Comparison of Different Umbilical Port Entry Techniques in Terms of Cosmetic Results

Status

Completed

Phases

Study type

Interventional

Source

ClinicalTrials.gov

Registry ID

NCT02672956

Enrollment

105

Registered

2016-02-03

Start date

2015-09-30

Completion date

2017-12-31

Last updated

2022-03-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cicatrix

Brief summary

Investigators selected participants who operated by laparoscopic technique due to any gynecologic indication according to random number table. The ten mm trocar was inserted supraumbilical, infraumbilical and intraumbilical. The verres needle was not used in all of patients. One month after we evaluated umbilical scar by used vancouver scar scale and compared results of vancouver scar scale.

Interventions

PROCEDURETen mm trocar

Study design

Allocation

RANDOMIZED

Intervention model

PARALLEL

Primary purpose

PREVENTION

Masking

NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

FEMALE

Age

20 Years to 60 Years

Healthy volunteers

Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Participant with eligible for laparoscopic surgery

Exclusion criteria

* Participant with umbilical scar due to previous surgery, burn eg.

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
The results of vancouver scar scale	One month

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026