Skip to content

Knowledge Translation for Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes

Knowledge Translation to Promote Evidence-based Medical Therapy in Acute Coronary Syndromes

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02672137
Acronym
AMI-OPTIMA
Enrollment
4604
Registered
2016-02-03
Start date
2010-01-31
Completion date
2016-01-31
Last updated
2016-02-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Acute Coronary Syndromes

Keywords

myocardial infarction, knowledge transfer, acute coronary syndromes

Brief summary

Cluster randomized open-label experimental study multi-center of 24 hospitals to either knowledge translation vs usual care to improve care of patents hospitalized for acute coronary syndromes.

Detailed description

The AMI-OPTIMA study was a cluster randomized controlled trial of 24 hospitals to one-year knowledge translation (KT) vs usual care. Prior to randomization, we reviewed charts of 100 consecutive acute coronary syndromes (ACS) patients at each participating hospital in 2009. During one year, hospitals randomized to KT completed: 1) revision of the most recent American Heart Association Guidelines of ACS management, 2) focus groups to identify and solve local care gaps, and 3)local champion team to promote evidence-based medical therapy (EBMT). At the end of 12-month of KT/usual care, we reviewed discharge prescriptions of 100 consecutive ACS patients at each participating hospital (year 2012). EBMT was pre-defined as in-hospital anticoagulation and discharge prescription of dual anti-platelets, beta-blockers, statins, and angiotensin pathway modulating agents (for patients with impaired left ventricular systolic function). Refusal, impaired cognitive function, allergy or intolerance of patients to any of EBMT were considered valid reasons for withholding EBMT.

Interventions

knowledge translation that include: Community of practice, local gap analysis, opinion leaders, targeted interventions, performance feedback, reminders and local formation of ACS teams.

Sponsors

Sanofi
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
Fonds de la Recherche en Santé du Québec
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
Montreal General Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Had a final discharge diagnosis of one of the following categories: 1. Myocardial infarction with ST-segment elevation 2. Myocardial infarction without ST-segment elevation 3. Unstable angina 4. Acute coronary syndromes -

Exclusion criteria

1. Non-atherosclerotic coronary artery disease (as confirmed by coronary angiograms or other non-invasive tests such as stress test, coronary CT-scan, nuclear scans) 2. Hospital stay of less than 48 hours -

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Proportion of patients who received evidence-based medical therapy at hospital discharge (mean of 4 days)at hospital discharge (average of 4 days)Evidence-based medical therapy is defined as aspirin,dual-antiplaquelets, beta-blockers, statins.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Discharge prescription of individual evidence-based medical therapy: aspirin, dual antiplatelets, beta-blockersat hospital discharge (average of 4 days)For each of the following medication: aspirin, dual anti-platelet, beta-blocker and statin, we calculated the proportion of patients who were prescribed the specific medication at discharge (as recorded on the discharge prescription).
Safety endpoints (mortality, reinfarction, strokes and bleeding outcomes (TIMI major and minor bleeds))in-hospital (average of 4 days)mortality, reinfarction, strokes and bleeding outcomes (TIMI major and minor bleeds)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026