Skip to content

IDA+BUCY vs BUCY Conditioning Regimen for Intermediate-risk AML Undergoing Auto-HSCT

Idarubicin+Busulfan+Cyclophosphamide vs Busulfan+Cyclophosphamide Conditioning Regimen for Intermediate-risk Acute Myeloid Leukemia Undergoing Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02671708
Enrollment
153
Registered
2016-02-02
Start date
2016-01-31
Completion date
2020-02-28
Last updated
2020-03-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Conditioning

Brief summary

Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (Auto-HSCT) is an effective alternative to allogeneic HSCT for intermediate-risk acute myeloid leukemia (AML) without HLA-matched donors. At present, the best conditioning regimen for AML undergoing auto-HSCT remains in discussion. In this study, the safety and efficacy of IDA+BUCY and BUCY myeloablative conditioning regimens in intermediate-risk AML undergoing auto-HSCT are evaluated.

Detailed description

Auto-HSCT is an effective alternative to allogeneic HSCT for intermediate-risk AML without HLA-matched donors. BUCY conditioning regimen is the standard myeloablative regimen. However, auto-HSCT with BUCY conditioning regimen appears to have higher relapse rate. To reduce the relapse rate, IDA is added in the conditioning regimen. In this study, the safety and efficacy of IDA+BUCY and BUCY myeloablative conditioning regimens in intermediate-risk AML patients undergoing auto-HSCT are evaluated.

Interventions

Idarubicin was administered at 15mg/m2/day on days -12 and -10.

Busulfan was administered at 3.2 mg/kg/day on days -7 to -4.

Cyclophosphamide was administered at 60 mg/kg/day on days -3 to -2.

Sponsors

Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University
CollaboratorOTHER
Peking University People's Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Zhujiang Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Guangzhou First People's Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University
CollaboratorOTHER
Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
14 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Intermediate-risk AML * Achieving CR after one cycle induction,then receiving three cycles of consolidation therapy including moderate and high doses of Ara-c combined regimens * With negative MRD before mobilization and collect of peripheral blood stem cells * Without HLA-matched donors (related and unrelated) * Refusal of haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Exclusion criteria

* Any abnormality in a vital sign (e.g., heart rate, respiratory rate, or blood pressure) * Patients with any conditions not suitable for the trial (investigators' decision)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
leukemia relapse rate2 year

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
overall survival (OS)2 year
disease-free survival (DFS)2 year
transplant-related mortality (TRM)2 year

Countries

China

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 10, 2026