Skip to content

Interventional Study of Active Weight Management in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes and Obesity in Routine Clinical Practice During 12 Months.

Interventional Study of Active Weight Management in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes and Obesity in Routine Clinical Practice During 12 Months.

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02670928
Enrollment
130
Registered
2016-02-02
Start date
2015-07-20
Completion date
2017-04-06
Last updated
2019-04-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM)

Keywords

Diabetes, lifestyle change, weight management, control of glycemic in HbA1C and FPG

Brief summary

This study was aimed to achieve of long-term weight loss in T2DM patients by use of comprehensive lifestyle changes program, providing patients with structured diet, exercise plan, group behavioral support and group education. Additionally the study was designed to establish reduction of the body weight leads to the improvement of glycemic and lipid metabolism, and also reducing blood pressure level. The study was also directed to show that lifestyle changes program in T2DM patients can lead to decreasing of hospitalization rate and healthcare consumption. In order to demonstrate a change from standard of care, data were to be collected from a parallel cohort from the same centers.

Detailed description

Patients of active group were assigned to receive activities of the program for life style changes. Patients in control group were managed in frames of routine clinical practice. No any investigational drug therapy was used.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALLifestyle intervention

Patients of active group were assigned to receive activities of the program for life style changes. Patients in control group were managed in frames of routine clinical practice. No any investigational drug therapy was used.

Sponsors

Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Signed Informed Consent. Written informed consent must be obtained before any assessment is performed. •≥ 18 years * Type 2 diabetes * The Body Mass Index is from 28 to 40 kg/m\^2

Exclusion criteria

* Pregnant or nursing (lactating) women, where pregnancy is defined as the state of a female after conception and until the termination of gestation. * Type 1 diabetes * Proliferative retinopathy * Renal impairment: serum creatinine \>1.5 mg/dL, creatinine clearance \< 40 ml/min and/or proteinuria * The lack of ability to perform the physical exercises due to the orthopedic or cardiovascular disorders * Chronic alcoholism, acute alcoholic intoxication

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Patients With Clinically Significant Weight Reduction (>5%) Compared to Baseline at Month 12Baseline, Month 12Number (portion) of patients in the active group and control group in whom the body weight decreased by at least 5% compared to Baseline values at 12 months of follow-up

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage Change From Baseline in Triglycerides at Month 12Baseline, Month 12Analysis of percentage in lipid profile (triglycerides, mmol/l) compared to Baseline at 12 months of follow-up
Percentage of Patients Who Achieved a Decrease in Blood Pressure Values From Baseline at Month 12Baseline, Month 12Decrease in blood pressure value was defined as at least 5 millimeters mercury (mmHg) in systolic and diastolic values in comparison to Baseline
Percentage of Patients With Clinically Significant Weight Reduction (>5%) Compared to BaselineBaseline, Month 3, Month 6, Month 9, Month 12Number (portion) of patients achieved weight loss by at least 5% in comparison with Baseline at 3, 6, 9 months of follow-up
Percentage Change From Baseline in Lipid Protein of High and Low Density at Month 12Baseline, Month 12Analysis of percentage in lipid profile (LDL, mmol/l and HDL, mmol/l) compared to Baseline at 12 months of follow-up
Percentage Change From Baseline in Cholesterol at Month 12Baseline, Month 12Analysis of percentage changes in lipid profile (cholesterol, mmol/l) compared to Baseline at 12 months of follow-up
Percentage Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) at Month 12Baseline, Month 12Analysis of percentage changes in Glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c, %) levels compared to Baseline at 12 months follow-up
Percentage Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Month 12Basline, Month 12Analysis of percentage changes in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG, mmol/l) levels compared to Baseline at 12 months of follow-up
Percentage Hange From Baseline in Body Mass Index (BMI) at Month 12Month 12Changes of Baseline in Body Mass Index (BMI) levels expressed in percents compared to Baseline at 12 months of follow-up
Percentage of Participants With Change From Baseline in Quality of Life (QoL) at Month 12Baseline, Month 12Patients were asked 'When did blood sugar level decrease most recently?' and the responses were reported on a Change in Quality of Life (QoL) expressed in percents using the Novartis survey in hypoglycemia and scale of individual perception of PhA (Scale of Borg)

Countries

Russia

Participant flow

Recruitment details

This study was conducted in the following jurisdiction: Russia (2 centers).

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Active Group of Patients
Active group of patients underwent program of active lifestyle management (healthy nutrition, physical exercises, psychological counselling and classes on diabetes) in first 12 weeks of the study.
100
Control Group of Patients
Control group pf patients were being monitored for the same criteria as active group but did not take part in the lifestyle change management program.
30
Total130

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event31
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up10
Overall StudyMiss 3 classes in a row in first 12 wks20
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject40

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicControl Group of PatientsTotalActive Group of Patients
Age, Continuous60.6 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.9
56.0 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.2
54.6 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.2
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Caucasian
29 Participants128 Participants99 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Oriental
1 Participants2 Participants1 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
19 Participants88 Participants69 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
11 Participants42 Participants31 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 1001 / 30
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 1000 / 30
serious
Total, serious adverse events
6 / 1002 / 30

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Patients With Clinically Significant Weight Reduction (>5%) Compared to Baseline at Month 12

Number (portion) of patients in the active group and control group in whom the body weight decreased by at least 5% compared to Baseline values at 12 months of follow-up

Time frame: Baseline, Month 12

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS) using the Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) approach for imputing missing data. Only descriptive analysis done.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Active Group of PatientsNumber of Patients With Clinically Significant Weight Reduction (>5%) Compared to Baseline at Month 12Week 48 (Month 12) - Yes50 Participants
Active Group of PatientsNumber of Patients With Clinically Significant Weight Reduction (>5%) Compared to Baseline at Month 12Week 48 (Month 12) - No50 Participants
Control Group of PatientsNumber of Patients With Clinically Significant Weight Reduction (>5%) Compared to Baseline at Month 12Week 48 (Month 12) - Yes4 Participants
Control Group of PatientsNumber of Patients With Clinically Significant Weight Reduction (>5%) Compared to Baseline at Month 12Week 48 (Month 12) - No26 Participants
Secondary

Percentage Change From Baseline in Cholesterol at Month 12

Analysis of percentage changes in lipid profile (cholesterol, mmol/l) compared to Baseline at 12 months of follow-up

Time frame: Baseline, Month 12

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS) using the Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) approach for imputing missing data. Only descriptive analysis done.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Active Group of PatientsPercentage Change From Baseline in Cholesterol at Month 12-9.44 Percent changeStandard Error 2.792
Control Group of PatientsPercentage Change From Baseline in Cholesterol at Month 12-8.00 Percent changeStandard Error 3.339
Secondary

Percentage Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Month 12

Analysis of percentage changes in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG, mmol/l) levels compared to Baseline at 12 months of follow-up

Time frame: Basline, Month 12

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS) using the Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) approach for imputing missing data. Only descriptive analysis done.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Active Group of PatientsPercentage Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Month 121.55 Percent changeStandard Error 7.217
Control Group of PatientsPercentage Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Month 12-3.03 Percent changeStandard Error 5.079
Secondary

Percentage Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) at Month 12

Analysis of percentage changes in Glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c, %) levels compared to Baseline at 12 months follow-up

Time frame: Baseline, Month 12

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS) using the Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) approach for imputing missing data. Only descriptive analysis done.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Active Group of PatientsPercentage Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) at Month 126.640 Percent changeStandard Deviation 1.152
Control Group of PatientsPercentage Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) at Month 127.687 Percent changeStandard Deviation 1.558
Secondary

Percentage Change From Baseline in Lipid Protein of High and Low Density at Month 12

Analysis of percentage in lipid profile (LDL, mmol/l and HDL, mmol/l) compared to Baseline at 12 months of follow-up

Time frame: Baseline, Month 12

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS) using the Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) approach for imputing missing data. Only descriptive analysis done.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Active Group of PatientsPercentage Change From Baseline in Lipid Protein of High and Low Density at Month 12Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL)-6.76 Percent changeStandard Error 4.649
Active Group of PatientsPercentage Change From Baseline in Lipid Protein of High and Low Density at Month 12High Density Lipoprotein (HDL)17.46 Percent changeStandard Error 10.967
Control Group of PatientsPercentage Change From Baseline in Lipid Protein of High and Low Density at Month 12Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL)-11.54 Percent changeStandard Error 4.641
Control Group of PatientsPercentage Change From Baseline in Lipid Protein of High and Low Density at Month 12High Density Lipoprotein (HDL)12.68 Percent changeStandard Error 6.089
Secondary

Percentage Change From Baseline in Triglycerides at Month 12

Analysis of percentage in lipid profile (triglycerides, mmol/l) compared to Baseline at 12 months of follow-up

Time frame: Baseline, Month 12

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS) using the Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) approach for imputing missing data. Only descriptive analysis done.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Active Group of PatientsPercentage Change From Baseline in Triglycerides at Month 12-0.479 Percent changeStandard Error 0.1136
Control Group of PatientsPercentage Change From Baseline in Triglycerides at Month 120.481 Percent changeStandard Error 0.2468
Secondary

Percentage Hange From Baseline in Body Mass Index (BMI) at Month 12

Changes of Baseline in Body Mass Index (BMI) levels expressed in percents compared to Baseline at 12 months of follow-up

Time frame: Month 12

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS) using the Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) approach for imputing missing data. Only descriptive analysis done.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Active Group of PatientsPercentage Hange From Baseline in Body Mass Index (BMI) at Month 1232.417 Percent changeStandard Deviation 3.94
Control Group of PatientsPercentage Hange From Baseline in Body Mass Index (BMI) at Month 1233.190 Percent changeStandard Deviation 4.075
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Change From Baseline in Quality of Life (QoL) at Month 12

Patients were asked 'When did blood sugar level decrease most recently?' and the responses were reported on a Change in Quality of Life (QoL) expressed in percents using the Novartis survey in hypoglycemia and scale of individual perception of PhA (Scale of Borg)

Time frame: Baseline, Month 12

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS) using the Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) approach for imputing missing data. Only descriptive analysis done.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Active Group of PatientsPercentage of Participants With Change From Baseline in Quality of Life (QoL) at Month 12From 1 week to 1 month ago1.1 Percentage of participants
Active Group of PatientsPercentage of Participants With Change From Baseline in Quality of Life (QoL) at Month 12More than 12 months ago11.1 Percentage of participants
Active Group of PatientsPercentage of Participants With Change From Baseline in Quality of Life (QoL) at Month 12During last week5.6 Percentage of participants
Active Group of PatientsPercentage of Participants With Change From Baseline in Quality of Life (QoL) at Month 12From 1 to 6 month ago16.7 Percentage of participants
Active Group of PatientsPercentage of Participants With Change From Baseline in Quality of Life (QoL) at Month 12More than 6 months ago and within last 12 months11.1 Percentage of participants
Active Group of PatientsPercentage of Participants With Change From Baseline in Quality of Life (QoL) at Month 12No episode of blood sugar level decrease54.4 Percentage of participants
Control Group of PatientsPercentage of Participants With Change From Baseline in Quality of Life (QoL) at Month 12More than 12 months ago6.9 Percentage of participants
Control Group of PatientsPercentage of Participants With Change From Baseline in Quality of Life (QoL) at Month 12More than 6 months ago and within last 12 months6.9 Percentage of participants
Control Group of PatientsPercentage of Participants With Change From Baseline in Quality of Life (QoL) at Month 12From 1 to 6 month ago17.2 Percentage of participants
Control Group of PatientsPercentage of Participants With Change From Baseline in Quality of Life (QoL) at Month 12No episode of blood sugar level decrease62.1 Percentage of participants
Control Group of PatientsPercentage of Participants With Change From Baseline in Quality of Life (QoL) at Month 12During last week3.4 Percentage of participants
Control Group of PatientsPercentage of Participants With Change From Baseline in Quality of Life (QoL) at Month 12From 1 week to 1 month ago3.4 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Patients Who Achieved a Decrease in Blood Pressure Values From Baseline at Month 12

Decrease in blood pressure value was defined as at least 5 millimeters mercury (mmHg) in systolic and diastolic values in comparison to Baseline

Time frame: Baseline, Month 12

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS) using the Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) approach for imputing missing data. Only descriptive analysis done.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Active Group of PatientsPercentage of Patients Who Achieved a Decrease in Blood Pressure Values From Baseline at Month 1255 Percentage of Participants
Control Group of PatientsPercentage of Patients Who Achieved a Decrease in Blood Pressure Values From Baseline at Month 1240 Percentage of Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Patients With Clinically Significant Weight Reduction (>5%) Compared to Baseline

Number (portion) of patients achieved weight loss by at least 5% in comparison with Baseline at 3, 6, 9 months of follow-up

Time frame: Baseline, Month 3, Month 6, Month 9, Month 12

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS) using the Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) approach for imputing missing data. Only descriptive analysis done.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Active Group of PatientsPercentage of Patients With Clinically Significant Weight Reduction (>5%) Compared to BaselineWeek 12 (Month 3) - Yes40 Percentage of Participants
Active Group of PatientsPercentage of Patients With Clinically Significant Weight Reduction (>5%) Compared to BaselineWeek 12 (Month 3) - No60 Percentage of Participants
Active Group of PatientsPercentage of Patients With Clinically Significant Weight Reduction (>5%) Compared to BaselineWeek 24 (Month 6) - Yes34 Percentage of Participants
Active Group of PatientsPercentage of Patients With Clinically Significant Weight Reduction (>5%) Compared to BaselineWeek 24 (Month 6) - No66 Percentage of Participants
Active Group of PatientsPercentage of Patients With Clinically Significant Weight Reduction (>5%) Compared to BaselineWeek 36 (Month 9) - Yes39 Percentage of Participants
Active Group of PatientsPercentage of Patients With Clinically Significant Weight Reduction (>5%) Compared to BaselineWeek 36 (Month 9) - No61 Percentage of Participants
Active Group of PatientsPercentage of Patients With Clinically Significant Weight Reduction (>5%) Compared to BaselineWeek 48 (Month 12) - Yes50 Percentage of Participants
Active Group of PatientsPercentage of Patients With Clinically Significant Weight Reduction (>5%) Compared to BaselineWeek 48 (Month 12) - No50 Percentage of Participants
Control Group of PatientsPercentage of Patients With Clinically Significant Weight Reduction (>5%) Compared to BaselineWeek 48 (Month 12) - No86.7 Percentage of Participants
Control Group of PatientsPercentage of Patients With Clinically Significant Weight Reduction (>5%) Compared to BaselineWeek 12 (Month 3) - Yes13.3 Percentage of Participants
Control Group of PatientsPercentage of Patients With Clinically Significant Weight Reduction (>5%) Compared to BaselineWeek 36 (Month 9) - Yes16.7 Percentage of Participants
Control Group of PatientsPercentage of Patients With Clinically Significant Weight Reduction (>5%) Compared to BaselineWeek 12 (Month 3) - No86.7 Percentage of Participants
Control Group of PatientsPercentage of Patients With Clinically Significant Weight Reduction (>5%) Compared to BaselineWeek 48 (Month 12) - Yes13.3 Percentage of Participants
Control Group of PatientsPercentage of Patients With Clinically Significant Weight Reduction (>5%) Compared to BaselineWeek 24 (Month 6) - Yes26.7 Percentage of Participants
Control Group of PatientsPercentage of Patients With Clinically Significant Weight Reduction (>5%) Compared to BaselineWeek 36 (Month 9) - No83.3 Percentage of Participants
Control Group of PatientsPercentage of Patients With Clinically Significant Weight Reduction (>5%) Compared to BaselineWeek 24 (Month 6) - No73.3 Percentage of Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026