Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM)
Conditions
Keywords
Diabetes, lifestyle change, weight management, control of glycemic in HbA1C and FPG
Brief summary
This study was aimed to achieve of long-term weight loss in T2DM patients by use of comprehensive lifestyle changes program, providing patients with structured diet, exercise plan, group behavioral support and group education. Additionally the study was designed to establish reduction of the body weight leads to the improvement of glycemic and lipid metabolism, and also reducing blood pressure level. The study was also directed to show that lifestyle changes program in T2DM patients can lead to decreasing of hospitalization rate and healthcare consumption. In order to demonstrate a change from standard of care, data were to be collected from a parallel cohort from the same centers.
Detailed description
Patients of active group were assigned to receive activities of the program for life style changes. Patients in control group were managed in frames of routine clinical practice. No any investigational drug therapy was used.
Interventions
Patients of active group were assigned to receive activities of the program for life style changes. Patients in control group were managed in frames of routine clinical practice. No any investigational drug therapy was used.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Signed Informed Consent. Written informed consent must be obtained before any assessment is performed. •≥ 18 years * Type 2 diabetes * The Body Mass Index is from 28 to 40 kg/m\^2
Exclusion criteria
* Pregnant or nursing (lactating) women, where pregnancy is defined as the state of a female after conception and until the termination of gestation. * Type 1 diabetes * Proliferative retinopathy * Renal impairment: serum creatinine \>1.5 mg/dL, creatinine clearance \< 40 ml/min and/or proteinuria * The lack of ability to perform the physical exercises due to the orthopedic or cardiovascular disorders * Chronic alcoholism, acute alcoholic intoxication
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Patients With Clinically Significant Weight Reduction (>5%) Compared to Baseline at Month 12 | Baseline, Month 12 | Number (portion) of patients in the active group and control group in whom the body weight decreased by at least 5% compared to Baseline values at 12 months of follow-up |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage Change From Baseline in Triglycerides at Month 12 | Baseline, Month 12 | Analysis of percentage in lipid profile (triglycerides, mmol/l) compared to Baseline at 12 months of follow-up |
| Percentage of Patients Who Achieved a Decrease in Blood Pressure Values From Baseline at Month 12 | Baseline, Month 12 | Decrease in blood pressure value was defined as at least 5 millimeters mercury (mmHg) in systolic and diastolic values in comparison to Baseline |
| Percentage of Patients With Clinically Significant Weight Reduction (>5%) Compared to Baseline | Baseline, Month 3, Month 6, Month 9, Month 12 | Number (portion) of patients achieved weight loss by at least 5% in comparison with Baseline at 3, 6, 9 months of follow-up |
| Percentage Change From Baseline in Lipid Protein of High and Low Density at Month 12 | Baseline, Month 12 | Analysis of percentage in lipid profile (LDL, mmol/l and HDL, mmol/l) compared to Baseline at 12 months of follow-up |
| Percentage Change From Baseline in Cholesterol at Month 12 | Baseline, Month 12 | Analysis of percentage changes in lipid profile (cholesterol, mmol/l) compared to Baseline at 12 months of follow-up |
| Percentage Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) at Month 12 | Baseline, Month 12 | Analysis of percentage changes in Glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c, %) levels compared to Baseline at 12 months follow-up |
| Percentage Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Month 12 | Basline, Month 12 | Analysis of percentage changes in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG, mmol/l) levels compared to Baseline at 12 months of follow-up |
| Percentage Hange From Baseline in Body Mass Index (BMI) at Month 12 | Month 12 | Changes of Baseline in Body Mass Index (BMI) levels expressed in percents compared to Baseline at 12 months of follow-up |
| Percentage of Participants With Change From Baseline in Quality of Life (QoL) at Month 12 | Baseline, Month 12 | Patients were asked 'When did blood sugar level decrease most recently?' and the responses were reported on a Change in Quality of Life (QoL) expressed in percents using the Novartis survey in hypoglycemia and scale of individual perception of PhA (Scale of Borg) |
Countries
Russia
Participant flow
Recruitment details
This study was conducted in the following jurisdiction: Russia (2 centers).
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Active Group of Patients Active group of patients underwent program of active lifestyle management (healthy nutrition, physical exercises, psychological counselling and classes on diabetes) in first 12 weeks of the study. | 100 |
| Control Group of Patients Control group pf patients were being monitored for the same criteria as active group but did not take part in the lifestyle change management program. | 30 |
| Total | 130 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Adverse Event | 3 | 1 |
| Overall Study | Lost to Follow-up | 1 | 0 |
| Overall Study | Miss 3 classes in a row in first 12 wks | 2 | 0 |
| Overall Study | Withdrawal by Subject | 4 | 0 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Control Group of Patients | Total | Active Group of Patients |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 60.6 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.9 | 56.0 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.2 | 54.6 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.2 |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Caucasian | 29 Participants | 128 Participants | 99 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Oriental | 1 Participants | 2 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 19 Participants | 88 Participants | 69 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 11 Participants | 42 Participants | 31 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 0 / 100 | 1 / 30 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 0 / 100 | 0 / 30 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 6 / 100 | 2 / 30 |
Outcome results
Number of Patients With Clinically Significant Weight Reduction (>5%) Compared to Baseline at Month 12
Number (portion) of patients in the active group and control group in whom the body weight decreased by at least 5% compared to Baseline values at 12 months of follow-up
Time frame: Baseline, Month 12
Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS) using the Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) approach for imputing missing data. Only descriptive analysis done.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Active Group of Patients | Number of Patients With Clinically Significant Weight Reduction (>5%) Compared to Baseline at Month 12 | Week 48 (Month 12) - Yes | 50 Participants |
| Active Group of Patients | Number of Patients With Clinically Significant Weight Reduction (>5%) Compared to Baseline at Month 12 | Week 48 (Month 12) - No | 50 Participants |
| Control Group of Patients | Number of Patients With Clinically Significant Weight Reduction (>5%) Compared to Baseline at Month 12 | Week 48 (Month 12) - Yes | 4 Participants |
| Control Group of Patients | Number of Patients With Clinically Significant Weight Reduction (>5%) Compared to Baseline at Month 12 | Week 48 (Month 12) - No | 26 Participants |
Percentage Change From Baseline in Cholesterol at Month 12
Analysis of percentage changes in lipid profile (cholesterol, mmol/l) compared to Baseline at 12 months of follow-up
Time frame: Baseline, Month 12
Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS) using the Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) approach for imputing missing data. Only descriptive analysis done.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Active Group of Patients | Percentage Change From Baseline in Cholesterol at Month 12 | -9.44 Percent change | Standard Error 2.792 |
| Control Group of Patients | Percentage Change From Baseline in Cholesterol at Month 12 | -8.00 Percent change | Standard Error 3.339 |
Percentage Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Month 12
Analysis of percentage changes in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG, mmol/l) levels compared to Baseline at 12 months of follow-up
Time frame: Basline, Month 12
Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS) using the Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) approach for imputing missing data. Only descriptive analysis done.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Active Group of Patients | Percentage Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Month 12 | 1.55 Percent change | Standard Error 7.217 |
| Control Group of Patients | Percentage Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Month 12 | -3.03 Percent change | Standard Error 5.079 |
Percentage Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) at Month 12
Analysis of percentage changes in Glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c, %) levels compared to Baseline at 12 months follow-up
Time frame: Baseline, Month 12
Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS) using the Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) approach for imputing missing data. Only descriptive analysis done.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Active Group of Patients | Percentage Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) at Month 12 | 6.640 Percent change | Standard Deviation 1.152 |
| Control Group of Patients | Percentage Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) at Month 12 | 7.687 Percent change | Standard Deviation 1.558 |
Percentage Change From Baseline in Lipid Protein of High and Low Density at Month 12
Analysis of percentage in lipid profile (LDL, mmol/l and HDL, mmol/l) compared to Baseline at 12 months of follow-up
Time frame: Baseline, Month 12
Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS) using the Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) approach for imputing missing data. Only descriptive analysis done.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Active Group of Patients | Percentage Change From Baseline in Lipid Protein of High and Low Density at Month 12 | Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL) | -6.76 Percent change | Standard Error 4.649 |
| Active Group of Patients | Percentage Change From Baseline in Lipid Protein of High and Low Density at Month 12 | High Density Lipoprotein (HDL) | 17.46 Percent change | Standard Error 10.967 |
| Control Group of Patients | Percentage Change From Baseline in Lipid Protein of High and Low Density at Month 12 | Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL) | -11.54 Percent change | Standard Error 4.641 |
| Control Group of Patients | Percentage Change From Baseline in Lipid Protein of High and Low Density at Month 12 | High Density Lipoprotein (HDL) | 12.68 Percent change | Standard Error 6.089 |
Percentage Change From Baseline in Triglycerides at Month 12
Analysis of percentage in lipid profile (triglycerides, mmol/l) compared to Baseline at 12 months of follow-up
Time frame: Baseline, Month 12
Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS) using the Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) approach for imputing missing data. Only descriptive analysis done.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Active Group of Patients | Percentage Change From Baseline in Triglycerides at Month 12 | -0.479 Percent change | Standard Error 0.1136 |
| Control Group of Patients | Percentage Change From Baseline in Triglycerides at Month 12 | 0.481 Percent change | Standard Error 0.2468 |
Percentage Hange From Baseline in Body Mass Index (BMI) at Month 12
Changes of Baseline in Body Mass Index (BMI) levels expressed in percents compared to Baseline at 12 months of follow-up
Time frame: Month 12
Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS) using the Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) approach for imputing missing data. Only descriptive analysis done.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Active Group of Patients | Percentage Hange From Baseline in Body Mass Index (BMI) at Month 12 | 32.417 Percent change | Standard Deviation 3.94 |
| Control Group of Patients | Percentage Hange From Baseline in Body Mass Index (BMI) at Month 12 | 33.190 Percent change | Standard Deviation 4.075 |
Percentage of Participants With Change From Baseline in Quality of Life (QoL) at Month 12
Patients were asked 'When did blood sugar level decrease most recently?' and the responses were reported on a Change in Quality of Life (QoL) expressed in percents using the Novartis survey in hypoglycemia and scale of individual perception of PhA (Scale of Borg)
Time frame: Baseline, Month 12
Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS) using the Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) approach for imputing missing data. Only descriptive analysis done.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Active Group of Patients | Percentage of Participants With Change From Baseline in Quality of Life (QoL) at Month 12 | From 1 week to 1 month ago | 1.1 Percentage of participants |
| Active Group of Patients | Percentage of Participants With Change From Baseline in Quality of Life (QoL) at Month 12 | More than 12 months ago | 11.1 Percentage of participants |
| Active Group of Patients | Percentage of Participants With Change From Baseline in Quality of Life (QoL) at Month 12 | During last week | 5.6 Percentage of participants |
| Active Group of Patients | Percentage of Participants With Change From Baseline in Quality of Life (QoL) at Month 12 | From 1 to 6 month ago | 16.7 Percentage of participants |
| Active Group of Patients | Percentage of Participants With Change From Baseline in Quality of Life (QoL) at Month 12 | More than 6 months ago and within last 12 months | 11.1 Percentage of participants |
| Active Group of Patients | Percentage of Participants With Change From Baseline in Quality of Life (QoL) at Month 12 | No episode of blood sugar level decrease | 54.4 Percentage of participants |
| Control Group of Patients | Percentage of Participants With Change From Baseline in Quality of Life (QoL) at Month 12 | More than 12 months ago | 6.9 Percentage of participants |
| Control Group of Patients | Percentage of Participants With Change From Baseline in Quality of Life (QoL) at Month 12 | More than 6 months ago and within last 12 months | 6.9 Percentage of participants |
| Control Group of Patients | Percentage of Participants With Change From Baseline in Quality of Life (QoL) at Month 12 | From 1 to 6 month ago | 17.2 Percentage of participants |
| Control Group of Patients | Percentage of Participants With Change From Baseline in Quality of Life (QoL) at Month 12 | No episode of blood sugar level decrease | 62.1 Percentage of participants |
| Control Group of Patients | Percentage of Participants With Change From Baseline in Quality of Life (QoL) at Month 12 | During last week | 3.4 Percentage of participants |
| Control Group of Patients | Percentage of Participants With Change From Baseline in Quality of Life (QoL) at Month 12 | From 1 week to 1 month ago | 3.4 Percentage of participants |
Percentage of Patients Who Achieved a Decrease in Blood Pressure Values From Baseline at Month 12
Decrease in blood pressure value was defined as at least 5 millimeters mercury (mmHg) in systolic and diastolic values in comparison to Baseline
Time frame: Baseline, Month 12
Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS) using the Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) approach for imputing missing data. Only descriptive analysis done.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Active Group of Patients | Percentage of Patients Who Achieved a Decrease in Blood Pressure Values From Baseline at Month 12 | 55 Percentage of Participants |
| Control Group of Patients | Percentage of Patients Who Achieved a Decrease in Blood Pressure Values From Baseline at Month 12 | 40 Percentage of Participants |
Percentage of Patients With Clinically Significant Weight Reduction (>5%) Compared to Baseline
Number (portion) of patients achieved weight loss by at least 5% in comparison with Baseline at 3, 6, 9 months of follow-up
Time frame: Baseline, Month 3, Month 6, Month 9, Month 12
Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS) using the Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) approach for imputing missing data. Only descriptive analysis done.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Active Group of Patients | Percentage of Patients With Clinically Significant Weight Reduction (>5%) Compared to Baseline | Week 12 (Month 3) - Yes | 40 Percentage of Participants |
| Active Group of Patients | Percentage of Patients With Clinically Significant Weight Reduction (>5%) Compared to Baseline | Week 12 (Month 3) - No | 60 Percentage of Participants |
| Active Group of Patients | Percentage of Patients With Clinically Significant Weight Reduction (>5%) Compared to Baseline | Week 24 (Month 6) - Yes | 34 Percentage of Participants |
| Active Group of Patients | Percentage of Patients With Clinically Significant Weight Reduction (>5%) Compared to Baseline | Week 24 (Month 6) - No | 66 Percentage of Participants |
| Active Group of Patients | Percentage of Patients With Clinically Significant Weight Reduction (>5%) Compared to Baseline | Week 36 (Month 9) - Yes | 39 Percentage of Participants |
| Active Group of Patients | Percentage of Patients With Clinically Significant Weight Reduction (>5%) Compared to Baseline | Week 36 (Month 9) - No | 61 Percentage of Participants |
| Active Group of Patients | Percentage of Patients With Clinically Significant Weight Reduction (>5%) Compared to Baseline | Week 48 (Month 12) - Yes | 50 Percentage of Participants |
| Active Group of Patients | Percentage of Patients With Clinically Significant Weight Reduction (>5%) Compared to Baseline | Week 48 (Month 12) - No | 50 Percentage of Participants |
| Control Group of Patients | Percentage of Patients With Clinically Significant Weight Reduction (>5%) Compared to Baseline | Week 48 (Month 12) - No | 86.7 Percentage of Participants |
| Control Group of Patients | Percentage of Patients With Clinically Significant Weight Reduction (>5%) Compared to Baseline | Week 12 (Month 3) - Yes | 13.3 Percentage of Participants |
| Control Group of Patients | Percentage of Patients With Clinically Significant Weight Reduction (>5%) Compared to Baseline | Week 36 (Month 9) - Yes | 16.7 Percentage of Participants |
| Control Group of Patients | Percentage of Patients With Clinically Significant Weight Reduction (>5%) Compared to Baseline | Week 12 (Month 3) - No | 86.7 Percentage of Participants |
| Control Group of Patients | Percentage of Patients With Clinically Significant Weight Reduction (>5%) Compared to Baseline | Week 48 (Month 12) - Yes | 13.3 Percentage of Participants |
| Control Group of Patients | Percentage of Patients With Clinically Significant Weight Reduction (>5%) Compared to Baseline | Week 24 (Month 6) - Yes | 26.7 Percentage of Participants |
| Control Group of Patients | Percentage of Patients With Clinically Significant Weight Reduction (>5%) Compared to Baseline | Week 36 (Month 9) - No | 83.3 Percentage of Participants |
| Control Group of Patients | Percentage of Patients With Clinically Significant Weight Reduction (>5%) Compared to Baseline | Week 24 (Month 6) - No | 73.3 Percentage of Participants |