Skip to content

Effect of Increased Positive End-expiratory Pressure on Intracranial Pressure in Different Respiratory Mechanic in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02670733
Enrollment
30
Registered
2016-02-02
Start date
2016-01-31
Completion date
2016-12-31
Last updated
2017-03-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Acute Brain Injuries

Keywords

mechanical ventilation, positive end-expiratory pressure

Brief summary

There are concerns that the use of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) for the treatment of pulmonary complications in patients with brain injury may potentially elevate intracranial pressure (ICP), and deteriorate neurological status. It is suggested that both respiratory system compliance and ventricular compliance would contribute to the elevation of ICP when PEEP increases. In theory, PEEP may cause elevation of ICP by increasing intrathoracic pressure and diminish venous return. However, the transmission of PEEP into thoracic cavity depends on the properties of the lung and chest wall. Experimental study showed that when chest wall compliance is low, PEEP can significantly increases intrathoracic pressure; whereas low lung compliance can minimize airway pressure transmission. It is generally recognized that the lung compliance decreases in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) patients due to extensive alveolar collapse. However, it has been report that the elastance ratio (the ratio between elastance of the chest wall and the respiratory system, where elastance is the reciprocal of compliance) may vary from 0.2 to 0.8. Therefore, it is important to distinguish the compliance of the chest wall and the lung when investigating the effect of PEEP on ICP. Because intrathoracic pressure (pleural pressure) is difficult to measure in clinical situations, esophageal pressure (Pes) is considered as a surrogate of intrathoracic pressure. In the present study, the investigators determine the effect of PEEP on intrathoracic pressure and ICP by Pes measurement.

Interventions

PROCEDUREPositive end-expiratory pressure

Positive end-expiratory pressure will be applied at 5 cmH2O and 15 cmH2O

Sponsors

Capital Medical University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Age 18 years and above; 2. Glasgow Coma Score ≤ 8; 3. Ventricular ICP monitor was placed for ICP monitoring and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) drainage; 4. Need for mechanical ventilation with PEEP; 5. ARDS was diagnosed according to Berlin Definition.

Exclusion criteria

1. Hemodynamic instability requiring more than 10 μg/kg/min dopamine or more than 0.5 μg/kg/min norepinephrine; 2. ICP \> 25 mmHg; 3. Esophageal varices; 4. History of esophageal or gastric surgery; 5. Evidence of active air leak from the lung, including bronchopleural fistula, pneumothorax, pneumomediastinum, or existing chest tube; 6. History of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Change in ICP level in different PEEP levelsBaseline ICP at PEEP of 5 cmH2O, and 15 minutes after increasing the PEEP level to 15 cmH2O

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 28, 2026