Skip to content

Posterior Fossa Decompression With or Without Duraplasty for Chiari Type I Malformation With Syringomyelia

Posterior Fossa Decompression With or Without Duraplasty for Chiari Type I Malformation With Syringomyelia

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02669836
Enrollment
162
Registered
2016-02-01
Start date
2016-04-30
Completion date
2020-07-31
Last updated
2024-10-31

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Arnold-Chiari Malformation, Type 1, Chiari Malformation Type I, Syringomyelia, Type I Arnold-Chiari Malformation

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether a posterior fossa decompression or a posterior fossa decompression with duraplasty results in better patient outcomes with fewer complications and improved quality of life in those who have Chiari malformation type I and syringomyelia.

Detailed description

Participants with Chiari Malformation type I and syringomyelia will be randomized to either have a posterior fossa decompression done with or without duraplasty. The participant will then return to the neurosurgeon's office at the following time points which are consistent with standard of care practice: \< 6 weeks, 3-6 months, and 12 months. At these visits, the clinician will complete a physical exam and the participant will report on the prognosis of symptoms and complete two quality of life questionnaires. A brain and cervical spine MRI will be performed 12 months after the decompression.

Interventions

Planned areas of bone removal from the suboccipital region of the skull and cervical l1 lamina. Then, the constricting epidural band at the level of the foramen magnum is resected.

PROCEDUREDural Augmentation

The dura is opened sharply, exposing the cerebellar tonsils, brainstem, and upper spinal cord. After microsurgical dissection, the dura is sewn closed with a dural graft.

Sponsors

Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute
CollaboratorOTHER
Johns Hopkins All Children's Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Arkansas Children's Hospital Research Institute
CollaboratorOTHER
Boston Children's Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Children's Healthcare of Atlanta
CollaboratorOTHER
Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center
CollaboratorOTHER
Children's Hospital Colorado
CollaboratorOTHER
Birmingham Children's Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Morgan Stanley Children's Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Phoenix Children's Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Children's Hospital and Health System Foundation, Wisconsin
CollaboratorOTHER
Children's National Research Institute
CollaboratorOTHER
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
CollaboratorOTHER
Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati
CollaboratorOTHER
Columbia University
CollaboratorOTHER
Gillette Children's Specialty Healthcare
CollaboratorOTHER
Levine Children's Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Children's Hospital Los Angeles
CollaboratorOTHER
Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago
CollaboratorOTHER
Mayo Clinic
CollaboratorOTHER
Nicklaus Children's Hospital f/k/a Miami Children's Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Medical University of South Carolina Shawn Jenkins Children's Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Oregon Health and Science University
CollaboratorOTHER
Penn State University
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Pittsburgh
CollaboratorOTHER
Primary Children's Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Seattle Children's Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Stanford University
CollaboratorOTHER
Baylor College of Medicine
CollaboratorOTHER
The Children's Hospital at OU Medical Center
CollaboratorOTHER
Nationwide Children's Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
University of California
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Iowa
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Michigan
CollaboratorOTHER
The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Minnesota
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Vermont
CollaboratorOTHER
UVA Children's Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Wisconsin, Madison
CollaboratorOTHER
Vanderbilt University
CollaboratorOTHER
Wake Forest University
CollaboratorOTHER
Yale University
CollaboratorOTHER
Washington University School of Medicine
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
No minimum to 21 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Age ≤21 years old 2. Chiari malformation type I ≥5 mm tonsillar ectopia 3. Syrinx between 3 mm and 6 mm 4. Chiari Severity Index (CSI) classification 1 5. MRI of the brain and cervical and thoracic spine are required prior to surgery and must be available to be shared with the Data Coordinating Center

Exclusion criteria

1. CSI-2 or CSI-3 classification 2. Syrinx \<3 mm and/or ≥6 mm 3. Neuro-imaging demonstrating basilar invagination 4. Clival canal angle \<120° (signs of severe craniovertebral junction disease) 5. Chiari Malformation I + syringomyelia secondary to other pathology (e.g. a tumor) 6. Unable to share pre-decompression MRI of the brain and cervical and thoracic spine 7. Patients who do not wish to participate

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The Number of Participants With Surgical Complicationsless then or equal to 6 months from decompressionThe number of participants with complications such as: Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF)-related complications ≤6 months (e.g. CSF leak, pseudomeningocele, aseptic meningitis, infection, hydrocephalus), and the requirement for additional surgery for wound revision or CSF diversion

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Aim 2: The Number of Patients With Clinical Improvement10-14 monthsNumber of patients who experienced improvement in clinical or neurological symptoms-such as; headaches, pain, numbness or tingling, nausea/ vomiting, itching, weakness, difficulty swallowing, difficulty sleeping and cranial nerve assessments.
Aim 2: The Mean Number of Syrinx Reduction in Millimeters Less Than 24 Months Post Surgery.10-14 monthsSyrinx regression comparison between posterior fossa decompression surgery and dural augmentation surgery cohorts based on ITT.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Aim 3 : Mean Change in Quality of Life Measurement After Surgery Relative to Baseline.10-14 Months from DecompressionQuality of Life (QOL) was assessed using the Chiari Health Index Pediatrics (CHIP), and the Health Utilities-3 (HUI-3). The CHIP is a 5-point response scale. Within the physical symptoms' domain, 5 questions regarding pain severity are alternatively scaled. The Health Utilities Index Mark 3 (HUI3) is a generic status classification system, generalizable in pediatric patients with illness. The HUI3 assesses domains including vision, hearing, speech, ambulation, dexterity, emotion, cognition, and pain. We used a non-inferiority approach in the analysis. The score is corrected for missing values and scaled to a range of scores between 0 and 1. An increasing score represents increasing HRQOL. Increase/decrease in the quality of life metric (on a scale from 0-1, with 0 representing no quality of life and 1 representing 100% quality of life).

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Posterior Fossa Decompression Surgery
The bone is surgically removed from the suboccipital region of the skull and Cervical 1 lamina so the constricting epidural band can be resected Posterior fossa decompression: Planned areas of bone removal from the suboccipital region of the skull and cervical l1 lamina. Then, the constricting epidural band at the level of the foramen magnum is resected.
84
Dural Augmentation Surgery
The bone is removed from the suboccipital region of the skull and Cervical 1 lamina so the constricting epidural band can be resected. Then, the dura is opened. Microsurgical dissection is performed and the dura is sewn closed. Dural Augmentation: The dura is opened sharply, exposing the cerebellar tonsils, brainstem, and upper spinal cord. After microsurgical dissection, the dura is sewn closed with a dural graft.
78
Total162

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPosterior Fossa Decompression SurgeryDural Augmentation SurgeryTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
80 Participants74 Participants154 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
4 Participants4 Participants8 Participants
Age, Continuous9.94 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.59
10.77 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.37
10.34 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.48
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
6 Participants9 Participants15 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
78 Participants69 Participants147 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
5 Participants10 Participants15 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
4 Participants4 Participants8 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
2 Participants4 Participants6 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
72 Participants59 Participants131 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
48 Participants39 Participants87 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
36 Participants39 Participants75 Participants
Size of Syringomyelia
Syrinx AP Diameter (mm) 3-6 mm
65 Participants37 Participants102 Participants
Size of Syringomyelia
Syrinx AP Diameter (mm) 7-9 mm
19 Participants41 Participants60 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 840 / 78
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 840 / 78
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 840 / 78

Outcome results

Primary

The Number of Participants With Surgical Complications

The number of participants with complications such as: Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF)-related complications ≤6 months (e.g. CSF leak, pseudomeningocele, aseptic meningitis, infection, hydrocephalus), and the requirement for additional surgery for wound revision or CSF diversion

Time frame: less then or equal to 6 months from decompression

Population: Note: values represent reporting by ITT, i.e. split by randomization, not necessarily treatment received.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Posterior Fossa Decompression SurgeryThe Number of Participants With Surgical Complications8 Participants
Dural Augmentation SurgeryThe Number of Participants With Surgical Complications10 Participants
Secondary

Aim 2: The Mean Number of Syrinx Reduction in Millimeters Less Than 24 Months Post Surgery.

Syrinx regression comparison between posterior fossa decompression surgery and dural augmentation surgery cohorts based on ITT.

Time frame: 10-14 months

Population: Values represent reporting by ITT not treatment received

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Posterior Fossa Decompression SurgeryAim 2: The Mean Number of Syrinx Reduction in Millimeters Less Than 24 Months Post Surgery.1.06 millimetersStandard Deviation 1.73
Dural Augmentation SurgeryAim 2: The Mean Number of Syrinx Reduction in Millimeters Less Than 24 Months Post Surgery.3.07 millimetersStandard Deviation 2.47
Secondary

Aim 2: The Number of Patients With Clinical Improvement

Number of patients who experienced improvement in clinical or neurological symptoms-such as; headaches, pain, numbness or tingling, nausea/ vomiting, itching, weakness, difficulty swallowing, difficulty sleeping and cranial nerve assessments.

Time frame: 10-14 months

Population: Note: values represent reporting by ITT, i.e. split by randomization, not necessarily treatment received

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Posterior Fossa Decompression SurgeryAim 2: The Number of Patients With Clinical Improvement43 Participants
Dural Augmentation SurgeryAim 2: The Number of Patients With Clinical Improvement43 Participants
Other Pre-specified

Aim 3 : Mean Change in Quality of Life Measurement After Surgery Relative to Baseline.

Quality of Life (QOL) was assessed using the Chiari Health Index Pediatrics (CHIP), and the Health Utilities-3 (HUI-3). The CHIP is a 5-point response scale. Within the physical symptoms' domain, 5 questions regarding pain severity are alternatively scaled. The Health Utilities Index Mark 3 (HUI3) is a generic status classification system, generalizable in pediatric patients with illness. The HUI3 assesses domains including vision, hearing, speech, ambulation, dexterity, emotion, cognition, and pain. We used a non-inferiority approach in the analysis. The score is corrected for missing values and scaled to a range of scores between 0 and 1. An increasing score represents increasing HRQOL. Increase/decrease in the quality of life metric (on a scale from 0-1, with 0 representing no quality of life and 1 representing 100% quality of life).

Time frame: 10-14 Months from Decompression

Population: Note: values represent reporting by ITT, i.e. split by randomization, not necessarily treatment received

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Posterior Fossa Decompression SurgeryAim 3 : Mean Change in Quality of Life Measurement After Surgery Relative to Baseline.0.02 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.16
Dural Augmentation SurgeryAim 3 : Mean Change in Quality of Life Measurement After Surgery Relative to Baseline.0.04 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.17

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 18, 2026