Newly Diagnosed Pediatric ITP
Conditions
Brief summary
To demonstrate the efficacy of new product IVIG prepared by minipool technology as assessed by Bleeding Score and platelet count at 3 days, 1 week, 2 weeks and 4 weeks. The platelet response rate is defined as the percentage of subjects responding to treatment with an increase of platelet count from ≤ 20 x 10\^9/L to ≥ 100 x 10\^9/L and absence of bleeding (complete response) or platelet count ≥ 50 x 10\^9/L and at least 2-fold increase the base line count with absence of bleeding (partial response), within the specified time frame.
Detailed description
To demonstrate the efficacy of new product IVIG prepared by minipool technology as assessed by Bleeding Score and platelet count at 3 days, 1 week, 2 weeks and 4 weeks. The platelet response rate is defined as the percentage of subjects responding to treatment with an increase of platelet count from ≤ 20 x 10\^9/L to ≥ 100 x 10\^9/L and absence of bleeding (complete response) or platelet count ≥ 50 x 10\^9/L and at least 2-fold increase the base line count with absence of bleeding (partial response), within the specified time frame. Secondary: 1. To assess safety of mini-pool IVIG in patients with newly diagnosed ITP by assessing frequency of adverse events related to mini-pool IgG administration 2. To compare data on efficacy and safety of mini-pool IVIG with data obtained from literature on standard IVIG. Study population: Patients with newly diagnosed ITP attending Hematology clinic Ain Shams Children hospital Sample size: Seventy- two patients will be enrolled. They will be divided into 3 groups: Group A; platelet non enhancing group Group B; group receiving standard IVIG Group C; group receiving IVIG New product 24 patients in each group in a ratio 1:1:1.
Interventions
DRUGIVIG prepared by minipool technology
Drug: To demonstrate the efficacy of new product IVIG prepared by minipool technology as assessed by Bleeding Score and platelet count at 3 days, 1 week, 2 weeks and 4 weeks.
DRUGstandard IVIG product
to compare efficacy and safety with the minipool IVIG
Sponsors
Ain Shams University
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
12 Months to 16 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
1. All newly diagnosed ITP patients (\< 2 weeks from onset of the disease), with no platelet enhancing therapy. 2. Age eligible for study: 1-16 years old 3. Gender eligible for study: both sexes 4. Informed consent signed by patient or his legal guardian.
Exclusion criteria
1. Patients started on steroid therapy. 2. Platelet count\<10,000/mm3. 3. Having a life threatening bleeding. 4. Patients with known or suspected hypersensitivity to immunoglobulins or previous severe side effects to immunoglobulin therapy. 5. Treatment with immunosuppressive or other immunomodulatory drugs within 3 weeks prior to screening. 6. Treatment with any other investigational drug within 7 days before study entry.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| bleeding score(SMOG) | 4 weeks | change of bleeding score(SMOG) at day 3,week1,week 2 and week 4 after presentation |
| complete blood count | 4 weeks | change of complete blood count for number of platelets,absolute neutrophil count,absolute lymphocyte count and hemoglobin at day 3,week 1,week 2 and week 4 after presentation |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Number of participants with treatment-related adverse events | 4 weeks | presence of side effects: anaphylaxis,fever,rash and any others |
Countries
Egypt
Contacts
Primary Contactmohsen elalfy, MD
Backup Contactmarwa deghedy, MD
Outcome results
None listed