Skip to content

Evaluation of a Subcutaneous Progestogen Implants in the Medical Management of Painful Endometriosis

Evaluation of a Subcutaneous Progestogen Implants in the Medical Management of Painful Endometriosis

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 2Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02669238
Acronym
END-IMPACT
Enrollment
2
Registered
2016-02-01
Start date
2018-05-25
Completion date
2019-10-10
Last updated
2020-03-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Endometriosis

Brief summary

Endometriosis is a chronic relapsing disease characterized by the presence and proliferation of endometrial glands and stroma outside the uterus. This is a serious disease, widespread, difficult to live with for the patients, but also difficult to treat for practitioners who take care of these patients. It affects 1.6% of the general population, but its incidence is 10 times higher (up 40%) in patients with infertility. It occurs mainly by complex chronic pelvic pain and a negative influence on fertility. It is a disease whose complexity can be explained to four levels. Firstly, through its extremely polymorphic character with intraperitoneal superficial forms, ovarian forms and deep sub-peritoneal forms. Secondly by the plurality of the main symptoms which are individually non-specific and the frequency and / or intensity is not correlated with the severity of the disease. This non-specificity of symptoms partially explains the long lead misdiagnosis, which vary by 5 to 11 years. Thirdly, by its prevalence which seems very high and largely underestimated. If its precise estimate in the general population is so complicated, it seems very high in many studies of patients supported surgically for gynecological reasons. These very large prevalence figures are observed when some consultations support the hypothesis of a widespread and probably insufficiently evaluated disease. Lately by its management, insufficiently amended, for which there is currently only a few scientifically supported recommendations. Chronic pain caused by the disease associated with altered sexuality to a loss of fertility significantly impacts the quality of life of patients.

Detailed description

Investigators propose a randomized trial comparing two medical alternatives: a continuous monophasic type of estrogen-progestin oral treatment of second generation versus the establishment of an etonogestrel contraceptive implant type. Are excluded from this study certain absolute surgical indications. Patients, by consenting to participate in the study, choose a medical care, which means not to be operated immediately. They are clearly informed about the various possible treatment alternatives. The benefits and risks of surgery and medical treatment they are explicitly presented. At any time during the study, patients who wish may discuss again a surgical treatment with their physician and stop the study drug if the decision of an intervention is taken.

Interventions

DEVICENexplanon®

Subcutaneous implant (Nexplanon®) containing etonogestrel 68 mg

DRUGMinidril®/Leeloo®

continuous per os administration of oestroprogestative treatment. 1 pill a day First line: Minidril® (Levonogestrel 0.15 mg / Ethinylestradiol 0.03 mg) Second line: Leeloo® (Levonogestrel 0.1 mg / Ethinylestradiol 0.02 mg)

Sponsors

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de la Réunion
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 45 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Between 18 and 45 years old * with a painful symptomatic endometriosis * with symptoms evolve for more than 6 months * diagnosis based on clinical and radiological criteria : pain in the examination and/or palpation of endometriosis lesion(s) and lesion(s) objectified by MRI performed and interpreted by a radiologist referent dating less than three months at the time of inclusion * no history presenting therapeutic surgery for endometriosis * Accepting medical management * without hormonal treatment (oestroprogestative, progestative or Luteinizing Hormone-Releasing Hormone (LHRH) analog) since at least 15 days * No family history of deep venous thromboembolic disorders * No abnormalities of hemostasis known * Not pregnant at inclusion visit

Exclusion criteria

* Patient with a strict indication for surgery (ureteral disease with renal impact, digestive disease with occlusion, infertility with desire for immediate pregnancy, ovarian cyst ≥ 4cm) * reproductive upper tract infections * with one or more varicose veins * with one or more breast abnormalities (ACR 3 or more) * with contraindication for one of two treatments * with contraindication for RMI * taking drug treatment that could alter the concentration of the study treatments

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Global satisfaction6th month of treatmentGlobal satisfaction evaluated by the SATMED-Q® satisfaction score at 6th month.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Daily life impact6th and 12th monthEvaluation of daily life impact of endometriosis with Endometriosis Health Profile - 30 (EHP-30)
Sex life impact6th and 12th monthEvaluation of sexual life impact of endometriosis with Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI)
Evaluation of dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia and pelvic pain6th and 12th monthEvaluation of frequency and intensity of dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia and pelvic pain with Biberoglu scale
Quality of life score6th and 12th monthEvaluation of quality of life impact of endometriosis with SF36 scale
Pain evaluation6th and 12th monthPain evaluation from analogical visual scale
size of lesionsDay 1 and 12th monthSize of the lesions (mm) is evaluated by Resonance Magnetic Image
Localisation of lesionsDay 1 and 12th monthLocalisations of the lesions is evaluated by Resonance Magnetic Image
Incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (safety and tolerability)3rd, 6th, 9th and 12th monthpercentage of clinical and biological adverse effects
Number of lesionsDay 1 and 12th monthThe number, size, localisation and activity of the lesions is evaluated by Resonance Magnetic Image

Countries

Reunion

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026