Skip to content

A Home-based Training Program for Elderly Patients With Dementia

Establishment and Effectiveness of a Community-based Long-term Care Model for Elderly Persons With Dementia

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02667951
Enrollment
129
Registered
2016-01-29
Start date
2009-06-30
Completion date
2012-03-31
Last updated
2023-08-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Dementia

Keywords

Elderly, Dementia, Intervention program

Brief summary

The illness course and symptoms of dementia is usually very long and characterized with behavioral, psychological and physical changes. Family caregivers' stresses change during the illness trajectory as well. The purpose of this study is to compare the costs and effectiveness of two care models- home-based caregiver-training program model and routine care model for dementia elders in Taiwan.

Detailed description

The illness course and symptoms of dementia is usually very long and characterized with behavioral, psychological and physical changes. Family caregivers' stresses change during the illness trajectory as well. Thus, the needs of the elderly persons with dementia and their family caregivers differ in different stage of dementia, and the services they require are multidimensional. According to the researchers' previous 2-year study, behavioral problem management and service utilization were found to be the most difficult and least prepared caregiving activities and the family caregiver's needs for assistance of these two caregiving activities differed in different stage of dementia.The purpose of this study is to compare the costs and effectiveness of two care models- home-based caregiver-training program model and routine care model for dementia elders in Taiwan.

Interventions

OTHERA home-based caregiver-training program

A home-based caregiver-training program consisted of two weekly sessions, each lasting 2 to 3 hours. Following the training sessions, further assurance and consultation were provided in monthly telephone follow-ups, and progress in behavior management was evaluated.

Sponsors

National Science and Technology Council, Taiwan
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
65 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

(patients) * diagnosed with dementia by a psychiatrist or neurologist * Age 65 years or older * living in a community of northern Taiwan * living in a home setting * scored \>50 on the Chinese version Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory (CMAI).

Exclusion criteria

(patients) * diagnosed with critical illness. Inclusion Criteria:(caregivers) * Primary caregiving responsibility and be at least 20 years old.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Caregivers' Self-efficacy18 monthsThe Agitation Management Self-efficacy Scale was used to measure caregivers' self-efficacy for managing dementia patients' agitation. Caregivers were asked how confident they were about handling the problem for each identified behavioral problem and if they believed that they could manage the problem for behaviors that did not occur. Scores range from 42 to 210, with higher scores representing greater caregiver self-efficacy. In this study, Cronbach's alphas ranged from 0.98 to 0.99 at different time points.
Caregivers' Preparedness18 monthsPreparedness was measured by the 10-item Caregiver Preparedness Scale,asks caregivers to rate how well prepared they think they are for seven domains of caregiving. A final question asks for an overall rating of how well prepared caregivers think they are to care for the care receiver. Items are scored on a 5-point Likert scale from 1 (not prepared) to 5 (well prepared). Scores range from 10 to 50, with higher scores representing greater preparedness for caregiving tasks. Validity and reliability of the original Preparedness scale was supported.24 The content validity index for the Preparedness Scale Taiwanese version was 1.0 and Cronbach's alpha for this scale among Taiwanese caregivers was 0.87. Cronbach's alpha in this study was 0.92.
Caregivers' Competence18 monthsA 17-item Competence Scale was used to assess caregivers' knowledge and skills for managing behavioral problems of patients with dementia. Scores range from 17 to 85, with higher scores representing better competence. In this study, Cronbach's alpha ranged from 0.90 to 0.93 at different time points.
Dementia Patients' Behavioral Problems18 monthsPhysically aggressive behaviors of dementia patients were measured by the PAB subscale of the Chinese version CMAI, community form, which was shown to be valid and reliable for a Taiwanese sample. Each item (behavioral problem) is scored according to its frequency from 1 (never happens) to 7 (several times per hour). PAB subscale scores range from 7 to 49, with higher scores indicating more physically aggressive behaviors. In this study, the PAB subscale had Cronbach's alpha of 0.55.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Caregivers' Quality of Life18 monthsThe Taiwan version of the Medical Outcomes SF-36 was used to measure family caregivers' HRQoL. The SF-36 contains eight generic health concepts: physical functioning (PF), role disability due to physical health problems (RP); bodily pain (BP); vitality (energy/fatigue) (VT); general health perceptions (GH); role disability due to emotional problems (RE); social functioning (SF); and general mental health (MH). Taiwan-specific SF-36 algorithms were used to compute the Mental Component Summary (MCS) and Physical Component Summary (PCS) scores using norm-based (mean = 50, SD = 10) scoring methods. Scores for each scale range from 0 to 100, with higher scores representing better health outcomes. In this study, Cronbach's alphas for the eight scales ranged from 0.81 to 0.99.
Caregivers' Depressive Symptoms18 monthsA 17-item Competence Scale was used to assess caregivers' knowledge and skills for managing behavioral problems of patients with dementia. Scores range from 17 to 85, with higher scores representing better competence. In this study, Cronbach's alpha ranged from 0.90 to 0.93 at different time points.

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Control Group
Caregivers received general information on dementia care and follow-up phone calls simply to maintain contact, but without any training for developing a behavioral problem-management plan and strategies.
66
Intervention Group
Caregivers received solutions for managing behavioral problems, with referrals to community services and telephone consultation, further assurance and consultation were provided in monthly telephone follow-ups, and progress in behavior management was evaluated. A home-based caregiver-training program: A home-based caregiver-training program consisted of two weekly sessions, each lasting 2 to 3 hours. Following the training sessions, further assurance and consultation were provided in monthly telephone follow-ups, and progress in behavior management was evaluated.
63
Total129

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicControl GroupIntervention GroupTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
18 Participants16 Participants34 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
48 Participants47 Participants95 Participants
Age, Continuous56 year
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12
55 year
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15
55 year
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
48 Participants14 Participants62 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
18 Participants49 Participants67 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 660 / 63
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 660 / 63

Outcome results

Primary

Caregivers' Competence

A 17-item Competence Scale was used to assess caregivers' knowledge and skills for managing behavioral problems of patients with dementia. Scores range from 17 to 85, with higher scores representing better competence. In this study, Cronbach's alpha ranged from 0.90 to 0.93 at different time points.

Time frame: 18 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Control GroupCaregivers' Competence51 units on a scaleStandard Error 13
Intervention GroupCaregivers' Competence66 units on a scaleStandard Error 8
Primary

Caregivers' Preparedness

Preparedness was measured by the 10-item Caregiver Preparedness Scale,asks caregivers to rate how well prepared they think they are for seven domains of caregiving. A final question asks for an overall rating of how well prepared caregivers think they are to care for the care receiver. Items are scored on a 5-point Likert scale from 1 (not prepared) to 5 (well prepared). Scores range from 10 to 50, with higher scores representing greater preparedness for caregiving tasks. Validity and reliability of the original Preparedness scale was supported.24 The content validity index for the Preparedness Scale Taiwanese version was 1.0 and Cronbach's alpha for this scale among Taiwanese caregivers was 0.87. Cronbach's alpha in this study was 0.92.

Time frame: 18 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Control GroupCaregivers' Preparedness33 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8
Intervention GroupCaregivers' Preparedness38 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6
Primary

Caregivers' Self-efficacy

The Agitation Management Self-efficacy Scale was used to measure caregivers' self-efficacy for managing dementia patients' agitation. Caregivers were asked how confident they were about handling the problem for each identified behavioral problem and if they believed that they could manage the problem for behaviors that did not occur. Scores range from 42 to 210, with higher scores representing greater caregiver self-efficacy. In this study, Cronbach's alphas ranged from 0.98 to 0.99 at different time points.

Time frame: 18 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Control GroupCaregivers' Self-efficacy155 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 34
Intervention GroupCaregivers' Self-efficacy178 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 26
Primary

Dementia Patients' Behavioral Problems

Physically aggressive behaviors of dementia patients were measured by the PAB subscale of the Chinese version CMAI, community form, which was shown to be valid and reliable for a Taiwanese sample. Each item (behavioral problem) is scored according to its frequency from 1 (never happens) to 7 (several times per hour). PAB subscale scores range from 7 to 49, with higher scores indicating more physically aggressive behaviors. In this study, the PAB subscale had Cronbach's alpha of 0.55.

Time frame: 18 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Control GroupDementia Patients' Behavioral Problems7.89 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.66
Intervention GroupDementia Patients' Behavioral Problems7.88 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.91
Secondary

Caregivers' Depressive Symptoms

A 17-item Competence Scale was used to assess caregivers' knowledge and skills for managing behavioral problems of patients with dementia. Scores range from 17 to 85, with higher scores representing better competence. In this study, Cronbach's alpha ranged from 0.90 to 0.93 at different time points.

Time frame: 18 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Control GroupCaregivers' Depressive Symptoms13 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12
Intervention GroupCaregivers' Depressive Symptoms8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7
Secondary

Caregivers' Quality of Life

The Taiwan version of the Medical Outcomes SF-36 was used to measure family caregivers' HRQoL. The SF-36 contains eight generic health concepts: physical functioning (PF), role disability due to physical health problems (RP); bodily pain (BP); vitality (energy/fatigue) (VT); general health perceptions (GH); role disability due to emotional problems (RE); social functioning (SF); and general mental health (MH). Taiwan-specific SF-36 algorithms were used to compute the Mental Component Summary (MCS) and Physical Component Summary (PCS) scores using norm-based (mean = 50, SD = 10) scoring methods. Scores for each scale range from 0 to 100, with higher scores representing better health outcomes. In this study, Cronbach's alphas for the eight scales ranged from 0.81 to 0.99.

Time frame: 18 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Control GroupCaregivers' Quality of LifePF80.22 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.48
Control GroupCaregivers' Quality of LifeRP67.22 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 47.02
Control GroupCaregivers' Quality of LifeRE70.37 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 45.07
Control GroupCaregivers' Quality of LifeSF68.06 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 28.27
Control GroupCaregivers' Quality of LifeBP72.84 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.09
Control GroupCaregivers' Quality of LifeVT52.00 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.52
Control GroupCaregivers' Quality of LifeMH64.09 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.65
Control GroupCaregivers' Quality of LifeGH50.64 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 27.43
Control GroupCaregivers' Quality of LifePCS51.39 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.72
Control GroupCaregivers' Quality of LifeMCS50.10 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.92
Intervention GroupCaregivers' Quality of LifeGH63.75 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.22
Intervention GroupCaregivers' Quality of LifePF83.38 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 26
Intervention GroupCaregivers' Quality of LifeVT69.75 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.77
Intervention GroupCaregivers' Quality of LifeRP73.13 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 43.63
Intervention GroupCaregivers' Quality of LifeMCS57.85 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.11
Intervention GroupCaregivers' Quality of LifeRE88.33 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 29.77
Intervention GroupCaregivers' Quality of LifeMH72.50 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.07
Intervention GroupCaregivers' Quality of LifeSF87.50 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.68
Intervention GroupCaregivers' Quality of LifePCS52.96 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.64
Intervention GroupCaregivers' Quality of LifeBP82.25 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.75

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 12, 2026