Carotid Artery Plaque
Conditions
Keywords
Carotid Stenosis, Carotid Artery Narrowing, Carotid Artery Plaque, Carotid Artery Stenosis, Carotid Artery Ulcerating Plaque, Carotid Ulcer, Common Carotid Artery Stenosis, External Carotid Artery Stenosis, Internal Carotid Artery Stenosis, Plaque, Ulcerating, Carotid Artery, Stenosis, Common Carotid Artery, Stenosis, External Carotid Artery, Ulcerating Plaque, Carotid Artery
Brief summary
This was a single-center, single-dose, study comprising a Proof of Concept (PoC) part and a subsequent Phase II part. The study was being done to assess the ability of the radiotracer 99mTc-rhAnnexin V-128 to image atherosclerotic plaque that might rupture and break off artery walls. This is caused by apoptosis or cell death in the plaque. These ruptured plaques can block blood circulation in the arteries causing a lack of oxygen to the tissues. Atherosclerotic plaques can build up on any artery in the body.
Detailed description
The sponsor decided to terminate the study earlier than planned due to strategic decisions to focus the AAA development portfolio on oncology theragnostics and not based on safety concerns. Novartis acquired Advanced Accelerator Applications SA.
Interventions
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
For all participants: 1. Males and females age 18 years or greater 2. Able and willing to comply with the study procedures 3. Negative pregnancy test for women of childbearing potential at screening and on the day of administration of 99mTc-rhAnnexin V-128. For participants with carotid artery disease: 4. Evidence of 50% or more carotid stenosis in one or more carotid arteries on carotid ultrasound within 2 years; 5. Evidence of 50% or more carotid stenosis in the most recent US imaging within 8 weeks prior to 99mTc-rhAnnexin V-128 administration For control participants: 6. No significant carotid artery disease on carotid ultrasound; 7. No clinically significant abnormalities in baseline laboratory values.
Exclusion criteria
1. Previous carotid stending, endarterectomy or stroke; 2. Diagnosis of vasculitis, dissection, or non-atherosclerotic carotid disease (Ehlers-Danlos, Marfans); 3. Pregnancy or lactation; 4. History of any disease or relevant physical or psychiatric condition or abnormal physical finding which may interfere with the study objectives at the investigator judgment; 5. Know hypersensitivity to the investigational product or any of its components; 6. Claustrophobia or inability to lie still in a supine position; 7. Participation in another clinical trial within 4 weeks before study inclusion, except for patients who have participated or who are currently participating in a study without any study drug administration; 8. Unwillingness to provide consent.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Participants Evaluated for Imaging Feasibility | Day 0 | The frequency and severity of abnormal carotid scans was determined in the CAD participants and control groups by review of the number, localization, length and uptake intensity grade of each plaque to define a positive or negative scan at each time point. The feasibility of imaging apoptotic activity in CAD using 99mTc-rhAnnexin V-128 was assessed by the data monitoring committee (visual image review and consensus). The three reviewers of the DMC did an independent visual assessment of the images using a 1 to 4 point grading system: each observer reviewed the images of each patient and scored either 1 or 2 (uptake was less than or equal to blood pool), these images were considered normal; 3 was equivocal and four equalled abnormal. Only descriptive analysis performed. |
| Percentage of Participants With Prevalence of Abnormal 99mTc-rhAnnexin V-128 SPECT/CT Imaging (Phase II Step) | At 60 and 120 minutes post injection on Day 0 | The prevalence of apoptotic activity was defined as the percentage of participants with abnormal Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT) imaging scans (also described as positive scans). The overall result of 99mTc-rhAnnexin V-128 imaging was unique: participants with at least one SPECT imaging as positive result (after 60 min or after 120 min from 99mTc-rhAnnexin V-128 injection) were considered as abnormal, participants with SPECT/CT images as negative were considered as normal. All images were acquired with a dual head SPECT/CT gamma camera with low-energy high-resolution collimators. Only descriptive analysis performed. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Ascending Aorta Uptake Imaging Assessment as Measured by Target to Background Ratio (TBR) | At 60 and 120 minutes post injection on Day 0 | Quantitative analysis of planar images was carried out by placing a region of interest in the carotid areas and over a background area placed in the subclavian regions representing venous and arterial activity (target-to-background). Carotid artery uptake measured as TBR data for right and left carotids at 1 and 2 hours was compared between normal control and carotid artery disease groups. Quantitative analysis of the SPECT 1 and 2 hour images was done with regions of interest placed over the arterial target (right carotid, left carotid, ascending aorta, arch and descending aorta) and adjacent vein (internal jugular, SVC or IVS) using transaxial slices. TBR was calculated as arterial max / venous mean (the average of 3 slices centered on the slice with the highest TBR value). |
| Descending Aorta Uptake Imaging Assessment as Measured by Target to Background Ratio (TBR) | At 60 and 120 minutes post injection on Day 0 | Quantitative analysis of planar images was carried out by placing a region of interest in the carotid areas and over a background area placed in the subclavian regions representing venous and arterial activity (target-to-background). Carotid artery uptake measured as TBR data for right and left carotids at 1 and 2 hours was compared between normal control and carotid artery disease groups. Quantitative analysis of the SPECT 1 and 2 hour images was done with regions of interest placed over the arterial target (right carotid, left carotid, ascending aorta, arch and descending aorta) and adjacent vein (internal jugular, SVC or IVS) using transaxial slices. TBR was calculated as arterial max / venous mean (the average of 3 slices centered on the slice with the highest TBR value). |
| Aortic Arch Uptake Correlation Imaging Assessment as Measured by Target to Background Ratio (TBR) | At 60 and 120 minutes post injection on Day 0 | Quantitative analysis of planar images was carried out by placing a region of interest in the carotid areas and over a background area placed in the subclavian regions representing venous and arterial activity (target-to-background). Carotid artery uptake measured as TBR data for right and left carotids at 1 and 2 hours was compared between normal control and carotid artery disease groups. Quantitative analysis of the SPECT 1 and 2 hour images was done with regions of interest placed over the arterial target (right carotid, left carotid, ascending aorta, arch and descending aorta) and adjacent vein (internal jugular, SVC or IVS) using transaxial slices. TBR was calculated as arterial max / venous mean (the average of 3 slices centered on the slice with the highest TBR value). |
| Left Carotid Uptake Imaging Assessment as Measured by Target to Background Ratio (TBR) | At 60 and 120 minutes post injection on Day 0 | Quantitative analysis of planar images was carried out by placing a region of interest in the carotid areas and over a background area placed in the subclavian regions representing venous and arterial activity (target-to-background). Carotid artery uptake measured as TBR data for right and left carotids at 1 and 2 hours was compared between normal control and carotid artery disease groups. Quantitative analysis of the SPECT 1 and 2 hour images was done with regions of interest placed over the arterial target (right carotid, left carotid, ascending aorta, arch and descending aorta) and adjacent vein (internal jugular, SVC or IVS) using transaxial slices. TBR was calculated as arterial max / venous mean (the average of 3 slices centered on the slice with the highest TBR value). |
| Right Carotid Uptake Imaging Assessment as Measure by Target to Background Ratio (TBR) by Ultrasound Grade of Plaque Echolucency/Echogenicity | At 60 and 120 minutes post injection on Day 0 | B-mode and color Doppler ultrasound studies were acquired of both carotid arteries and performed with an ultrasound scanner equipped with a 5- to 7-MHz transducer. Plaque morphology, as echogenicity, defined as reflectance of the emitted ultrasound signal, were assessed and graded from 1 to 4 as echolucent, predominantly echolucent, predominantly echogenic, or echogenic. The vessel lumen was used as the reference structure for defining echolucency, and the bright echo zone produced by the media-adventitia interface in the far wall was used as the reference structure for defining echogenicity. Uptake was reported as the ratio of the uptake in the region of interest (target) to the uptake in the blood pool (background). Only descriptive analysis performed. |
| Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious AEs and Death | From Day 0 post injection up to Day 30 | An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant and which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the investigational product. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease, temporally associated with the use of an investigational product, whether or not causally related to the investigational product. Treatment emergent adverse events that emerge after the 99mTc-rhAnnexin V-128 injection and up to 30 days after the injection that were absent before it or worsen relative to the pre-treatment state. A serious AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose results in death; is life-threatening; results in persistent or significant disability or incapacity; results in congenital anomaly or birth defect; or requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization. Only descriptive analysis performed. |
| Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Laboratory Values | From Day 0 post injection up to Day 30 | Laboratory data was analysed with respect to the normal ranges of values provided by the local laboratory and with respect to levels of change and significance in these values. The evaluation of the Clinically Significant Abnormal Laboratory Values was at the discretion of the Principal Investigator and noted as such in patient files, where necessary. Participants with abnormal laboratory values were analyzed based on clinical relevance. Only descriptive analysis performed. |
| Left Carotid Uptake Imaging Assessment as Measure by Target to Background Ratio (TBR) by Ultrasound Grade of Plaque Echolucency/Echogenicity | At 60 and 120 minutes post injection on Day 0 | B-mode and color Doppler ultrasound studies were acquired of both carotid arteries and performed with an ultrasound scanner equipped with a 5- to 7-MHz transducer. Plaque morphology, as echogenicity, defined as reflectance of the emitted ultrasound signal, were assessed and graded from 1 to 4 as echolucent, predominantly echolucent, predominantly echogenic, or echogenic. The vessel lumen was used as the reference structure for defining echolucency, and the bright echo zone produced by the media-adventitia interface in the far wall was used as the reference structure for defining echogenicity. Uptake was reported as the ratio of the uptake in the region of interest (target) to the uptake in the blood pool (background). Only descriptive analysis performed. |
| Right Carotid Uptake Imaging Assessment as Measured by Target to Background Ratio (TBR) | At 60 and 120 minutes post injection on Day 0 | Quantitative analysis of planar images was carried out by placing a region of interest in the carotid areas and over a background area placed in the subclavian regions representing venous and arterial activity (target-to-background). Carotid artery uptake measured as TBR data for right and left carotids at 1 and 2 hours was compared between normal control and carotid artery disease groups. Quantitative analysis of the SPECT 1 and 2 hour images was done with regions of interest placed over the arterial target (right carotid, left carotid, ascending aorta, arch and descending aorta) and adjacent vein (internal jugular, SVC or IVS) using transaxial slices. TBR was calculated as arterial max / venous mean (the average of 3 slices centered on the slice with the highest TBR value). |
Countries
Canada
Participant flow
Recruitment details
The study was conducted at single center in Canada.
Pre-assignment details
A total of 39 participants were screened and enrolled to the study, of which only 36 participants were administered with investigational imaging product. All 36 treated participants completed the study.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| CAD Participants Participants with asymptomatic or previously symptomatic with TIA only carotid atherosclerotic plaque with evidence of 50% or more carotid stenosis in one or more carotid arteries on carotid ultrasound within 2 years, received a single intravenous bolus of 350 MBq ± 10 % of 99mTc-rhAnnexin V-128 via an IV catheter in an antecubital vein, followed by a saline flush on Day 0. | 26 |
| Healthy Participants Healthy participants with no significant carotid artery disease on carotid ultrasound, received a single intravenous bolus of 350 MBq ± 10 % of 99mTc-rhAnnexin V-128 via an IV catheter in an antecubital vein, followed by a saline flush on Day 0. | 10 |
| Total | 36 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Other Reason | 0 | 2 |
| Overall Study | Withdrawal by Subject | 1 | 0 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Healthy Participants | Total | CAD Participants |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 58.4 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.1 | 67.4 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.1 | 70.9 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.6 |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Caucasian | 9 Participants | 35 Participants | 26 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Other | 1 Participants | 1 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 5 Participants | 10 Participants | 5 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 5 Participants | 26 Participants | 21 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 0 / 26 | 0 / 10 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 7 / 26 | 0 / 10 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 1 / 26 | 0 / 10 |
Outcome results
Number of Participants Evaluated for Imaging Feasibility
The frequency and severity of abnormal carotid scans was determined in the CAD participants and control groups by review of the number, localization, length and uptake intensity grade of each plaque to define a positive or negative scan at each time point. The feasibility of imaging apoptotic activity in CAD using 99mTc-rhAnnexin V-128 was assessed by the data monitoring committee (visual image review and consensus). The three reviewers of the DMC did an independent visual assessment of the images using a 1 to 4 point grading system: each observer reviewed the images of each patient and scored either 1 or 2 (uptake was less than or equal to blood pool), these images were considered normal; 3 was equivocal and four equalled abnormal. Only descriptive analysis performed.
Time frame: Day 0
Population: Full Analysis Set population (FAS)
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| CAD Participants | Number of Participants Evaluated for Imaging Feasibility | 15 Participants |
| Healthy Participants | Number of Participants Evaluated for Imaging Feasibility | 5 Participants |
Percentage of Participants With Prevalence of Abnormal 99mTc-rhAnnexin V-128 SPECT/CT Imaging (Phase II Step)
The prevalence of apoptotic activity was defined as the percentage of participants with abnormal Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT) imaging scans (also described as positive scans). The overall result of 99mTc-rhAnnexin V-128 imaging was unique: participants with at least one SPECT imaging as positive result (after 60 min or after 120 min from 99mTc-rhAnnexin V-128 injection) were considered as abnormal, participants with SPECT/CT images as negative were considered as normal. All images were acquired with a dual head SPECT/CT gamma camera with low-energy high-resolution collimators. Only descriptive analysis performed.
Time frame: At 60 and 120 minutes post injection on Day 0
Population: Full Analysis Set population (FAS)
| Arm | Measure | Group | Category | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CAD Participants | Percentage of Participants With Prevalence of Abnormal 99mTc-rhAnnexin V-128 SPECT/CT Imaging (Phase II Step) | 60 mins after injection | Positive (abnormal) | 8 Participants |
| CAD Participants | Percentage of Participants With Prevalence of Abnormal 99mTc-rhAnnexin V-128 SPECT/CT Imaging (Phase II Step) | 120 mins after injection | Missing | 0 Participants |
| CAD Participants | Percentage of Participants With Prevalence of Abnormal 99mTc-rhAnnexin V-128 SPECT/CT Imaging (Phase II Step) | 60 mins after injection | Negative (normal) | 16 Participants |
| CAD Participants | Percentage of Participants With Prevalence of Abnormal 99mTc-rhAnnexin V-128 SPECT/CT Imaging (Phase II Step) | 60 mins after injection | Missing | 1 Participants |
| CAD Participants | Percentage of Participants With Prevalence of Abnormal 99mTc-rhAnnexin V-128 SPECT/CT Imaging (Phase II Step) | 120 mins after injection | Positive (abnormal) | 8 Participants |
| CAD Participants | Percentage of Participants With Prevalence of Abnormal 99mTc-rhAnnexin V-128 SPECT/CT Imaging (Phase II Step) | 120 mins after injection | Negative (normal) | 17 Participants |
| Healthy Participants | Percentage of Participants With Prevalence of Abnormal 99mTc-rhAnnexin V-128 SPECT/CT Imaging (Phase II Step) | 120 mins after injection | Positive (abnormal) | 0 Participants |
| Healthy Participants | Percentage of Participants With Prevalence of Abnormal 99mTc-rhAnnexin V-128 SPECT/CT Imaging (Phase II Step) | 60 mins after injection | Missing | 0 Participants |
| Healthy Participants | Percentage of Participants With Prevalence of Abnormal 99mTc-rhAnnexin V-128 SPECT/CT Imaging (Phase II Step) | 120 mins after injection | Missing | 0 Participants |
| Healthy Participants | Percentage of Participants With Prevalence of Abnormal 99mTc-rhAnnexin V-128 SPECT/CT Imaging (Phase II Step) | 60 mins after injection | Positive (abnormal) | 0 Participants |
| Healthy Participants | Percentage of Participants With Prevalence of Abnormal 99mTc-rhAnnexin V-128 SPECT/CT Imaging (Phase II Step) | 120 mins after injection | Negative (normal) | 10 Participants |
| Healthy Participants | Percentage of Participants With Prevalence of Abnormal 99mTc-rhAnnexin V-128 SPECT/CT Imaging (Phase II Step) | 60 mins after injection | Negative (normal) | 10 Participants |
Aortic Arch Uptake Correlation Imaging Assessment as Measured by Target to Background Ratio (TBR)
Quantitative analysis of planar images was carried out by placing a region of interest in the carotid areas and over a background area placed in the subclavian regions representing venous and arterial activity (target-to-background). Carotid artery uptake measured as TBR data for right and left carotids at 1 and 2 hours was compared between normal control and carotid artery disease groups. Quantitative analysis of the SPECT 1 and 2 hour images was done with regions of interest placed over the arterial target (right carotid, left carotid, ascending aorta, arch and descending aorta) and adjacent vein (internal jugular, SVC or IVS) using transaxial slices. TBR was calculated as arterial max / venous mean (the average of 3 slices centered on the slice with the highest TBR value).
Time frame: At 60 and 120 minutes post injection on Day 0
Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS). Only participants with Aortic Arch Uptake Correlation Imaging Assessment included in the analysis.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CAD Participants | Aortic Arch Uptake Correlation Imaging Assessment as Measured by Target to Background Ratio (TBR) | 60 Minutes | 1.986 Target to Background Ratio (TBR) | Standard Deviation 0.679 |
| CAD Participants | Aortic Arch Uptake Correlation Imaging Assessment as Measured by Target to Background Ratio (TBR) | 120 Minutes | 1.628 Target to Background Ratio (TBR) | Standard Deviation 0.38 |
| Healthy Participants | Aortic Arch Uptake Correlation Imaging Assessment as Measured by Target to Background Ratio (TBR) | 60 Minutes | 1.606 Target to Background Ratio (TBR) | Standard Deviation 0.279 |
| Healthy Participants | Aortic Arch Uptake Correlation Imaging Assessment as Measured by Target to Background Ratio (TBR) | 120 Minutes | 1.294 Target to Background Ratio (TBR) | Standard Deviation 0.174 |
Ascending Aorta Uptake Imaging Assessment as Measured by Target to Background Ratio (TBR)
Quantitative analysis of planar images was carried out by placing a region of interest in the carotid areas and over a background area placed in the subclavian regions representing venous and arterial activity (target-to-background). Carotid artery uptake measured as TBR data for right and left carotids at 1 and 2 hours was compared between normal control and carotid artery disease groups. Quantitative analysis of the SPECT 1 and 2 hour images was done with regions of interest placed over the arterial target (right carotid, left carotid, ascending aorta, arch and descending aorta) and adjacent vein (internal jugular, SVC or IVS) using transaxial slices. TBR was calculated as arterial max / venous mean (the average of 3 slices centered on the slice with the highest TBR value).
Time frame: At 60 and 120 minutes post injection on Day 0
Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS). Only participants with Ascending Aorta Uptake Imaging Assessment included in the analysis.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CAD Participants | Ascending Aorta Uptake Imaging Assessment as Measured by Target to Background Ratio (TBR) | 60 Minutes | 2.054 Target to Background Ratio (TBR) | Standard Deviation 0.656 |
| CAD Participants | Ascending Aorta Uptake Imaging Assessment as Measured by Target to Background Ratio (TBR) | 120 Minutes | 1.616 Target to Background Ratio (TBR) | Standard Deviation 0.294 |
| Healthy Participants | Ascending Aorta Uptake Imaging Assessment as Measured by Target to Background Ratio (TBR) | 60 Minutes | 1.574 Target to Background Ratio (TBR) | Standard Deviation 0.252 |
| Healthy Participants | Ascending Aorta Uptake Imaging Assessment as Measured by Target to Background Ratio (TBR) | 120 Minutes | 1.381 Target to Background Ratio (TBR) | Standard Deviation 0.19 |
Descending Aorta Uptake Imaging Assessment as Measured by Target to Background Ratio (TBR)
Quantitative analysis of planar images was carried out by placing a region of interest in the carotid areas and over a background area placed in the subclavian regions representing venous and arterial activity (target-to-background). Carotid artery uptake measured as TBR data for right and left carotids at 1 and 2 hours was compared between normal control and carotid artery disease groups. Quantitative analysis of the SPECT 1 and 2 hour images was done with regions of interest placed over the arterial target (right carotid, left carotid, ascending aorta, arch and descending aorta) and adjacent vein (internal jugular, SVC or IVS) using transaxial slices. TBR was calculated as arterial max / venous mean (the average of 3 slices centered on the slice with the highest TBR value).
Time frame: At 60 and 120 minutes post injection on Day 0
Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS). Only participants with Descending Aorta Uptake Imaging Assessment included in the analysis.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CAD Participants | Descending Aorta Uptake Imaging Assessment as Measured by Target to Background Ratio (TBR) | 60 Minutes | 2.159 Target to Background Ratio (TBR) | Standard Deviation 0.865 |
| CAD Participants | Descending Aorta Uptake Imaging Assessment as Measured by Target to Background Ratio (TBR) | 120 Minutes | 1.520 Target to Background Ratio (TBR) | Standard Deviation 0.245 |
| Healthy Participants | Descending Aorta Uptake Imaging Assessment as Measured by Target to Background Ratio (TBR) | 60 Minutes | 1.590 Target to Background Ratio (TBR) | Standard Deviation 0.164 |
| Healthy Participants | Descending Aorta Uptake Imaging Assessment as Measured by Target to Background Ratio (TBR) | 120 Minutes | 1.341 Target to Background Ratio (TBR) | Standard Deviation 0.131 |
Left Carotid Uptake Imaging Assessment as Measure by Target to Background Ratio (TBR) by Ultrasound Grade of Plaque Echolucency/Echogenicity
B-mode and color Doppler ultrasound studies were acquired of both carotid arteries and performed with an ultrasound scanner equipped with a 5- to 7-MHz transducer. Plaque morphology, as echogenicity, defined as reflectance of the emitted ultrasound signal, were assessed and graded from 1 to 4 as echolucent, predominantly echolucent, predominantly echogenic, or echogenic. The vessel lumen was used as the reference structure for defining echolucency, and the bright echo zone produced by the media-adventitia interface in the far wall was used as the reference structure for defining echogenicity. Uptake was reported as the ratio of the uptake in the region of interest (target) to the uptake in the blood pool (background). Only descriptive analysis performed.
Time frame: At 60 and 120 minutes post injection on Day 0
Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS). Only participants with left carotid with stenosis \>=50% are taken into account.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CAD Participants | Left Carotid Uptake Imaging Assessment as Measure by Target to Background Ratio (TBR) by Ultrasound Grade of Plaque Echolucency/Echogenicity | Echogenic: 120 Minutes | 1.387 Ratio | Standard Deviation 0.496 |
| CAD Participants | Left Carotid Uptake Imaging Assessment as Measure by Target to Background Ratio (TBR) by Ultrasound Grade of Plaque Echolucency/Echogenicity | Predominantly echogenic: 120 Minutes | 1.096 Ratio | Standard Deviation 0.186 |
| CAD Participants | Left Carotid Uptake Imaging Assessment as Measure by Target to Background Ratio (TBR) by Ultrasound Grade of Plaque Echolucency/Echogenicity | Echogenic: 60 Minutes | 0.950 Ratio | Standard Deviation 0.245 |
| CAD Participants | Left Carotid Uptake Imaging Assessment as Measure by Target to Background Ratio (TBR) by Ultrasound Grade of Plaque Echolucency/Echogenicity | Predominantly echolucent: 60 Minutes | 1.490 Ratio | Standard Deviation 0.756 |
| CAD Participants | Left Carotid Uptake Imaging Assessment as Measure by Target to Background Ratio (TBR) by Ultrasound Grade of Plaque Echolucency/Echogenicity | Predominantly echolucent: 120 Minutes | 1.014 Ratio | Standard Deviation 0.309 |
| CAD Participants | Left Carotid Uptake Imaging Assessment as Measure by Target to Background Ratio (TBR) by Ultrasound Grade of Plaque Echolucency/Echogenicity | Predominantly echogenic: 60 Minutes | 0.945 Ratio | Standard Deviation 0.287 |
| Unknown | Left Carotid Uptake Imaging Assessment as Measure by Target to Background Ratio (TBR) by Ultrasound Grade of Plaque Echolucency/Echogenicity | Echolucent: 120 Minutes | — Ratio | — |
| Unknown | Left Carotid Uptake Imaging Assessment as Measure by Target to Background Ratio (TBR) by Ultrasound Grade of Plaque Echolucency/Echogenicity | Echolucent: 60 Minutes | — Ratio | — |
Left Carotid Uptake Imaging Assessment as Measured by Target to Background Ratio (TBR)
Quantitative analysis of planar images was carried out by placing a region of interest in the carotid areas and over a background area placed in the subclavian regions representing venous and arterial activity (target-to-background). Carotid artery uptake measured as TBR data for right and left carotids at 1 and 2 hours was compared between normal control and carotid artery disease groups. Quantitative analysis of the SPECT 1 and 2 hour images was done with regions of interest placed over the arterial target (right carotid, left carotid, ascending aorta, arch and descending aorta) and adjacent vein (internal jugular, SVC or IVS) using transaxial slices. TBR was calculated as arterial max / venous mean (the average of 3 slices centered on the slice with the highest TBR value).
Time frame: At 60 and 120 minutes post injection on Day 0
Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS). Only participants with Left Carotid Uptake Imaging Assessment included in the analysis.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CAD Participants | Left Carotid Uptake Imaging Assessment as Measured by Target to Background Ratio (TBR) | 60 Minutes | 1.171 Target to Background Ratio (TBR) | Standard Deviation 0.764 |
| CAD Participants | Left Carotid Uptake Imaging Assessment as Measured by Target to Background Ratio (TBR) | 120 Minutes | 1.208 Target to Background Ratio (TBR) | Standard Deviation 0.486 |
| Healthy Participants | Left Carotid Uptake Imaging Assessment as Measured by Target to Background Ratio (TBR) | 60 Minutes | 0.697 Target to Background Ratio (TBR) | Standard Deviation 0.222 |
| Healthy Participants | Left Carotid Uptake Imaging Assessment as Measured by Target to Background Ratio (TBR) | 120 Minutes | 0.827 Target to Background Ratio (TBR) | Standard Deviation 0.205 |
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Laboratory Values
Laboratory data was analysed with respect to the normal ranges of values provided by the local laboratory and with respect to levels of change and significance in these values. The evaluation of the Clinically Significant Abnormal Laboratory Values was at the discretion of the Principal Investigator and noted as such in patient files, where necessary. Participants with abnormal laboratory values were analyzed based on clinical relevance. Only descriptive analysis performed.
Time frame: From Day 0 post injection up to Day 30
Population: Safety Population Set. Only participants with abnormal laboratory values are taken into account.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Category | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CAD Participants | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Laboratory Values | Blood Chemistry | Abnormal non clinical relevant | 26 Participants |
| CAD Participants | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Laboratory Values | Urinalysis | Abnormal non clinical relevant | 10 Participants |
| CAD Participants | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Laboratory Values | Blood Chemistry | Abnormal clinically relevant | 0 Participants |
| CAD Participants | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Laboratory Values | Hematology | Abnormal non clinical relevant | 15 Participants |
| CAD Participants | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Laboratory Values | Hematology | Abnormal clinically relevant | 0 Participants |
| CAD Participants | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Laboratory Values | Urinalysis | Abnormal clinically relevant | 0 Participants |
| Healthy Participants | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Laboratory Values | Hematology | Abnormal clinically relevant | 0 Participants |
| Healthy Participants | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Laboratory Values | Blood Chemistry | Abnormal clinically relevant | 0 Participants |
| Healthy Participants | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Laboratory Values | Hematology | Abnormal non clinical relevant | 4 Participants |
| Healthy Participants | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Laboratory Values | Urinalysis | Abnormal non clinical relevant | 4 Participants |
| Healthy Participants | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Laboratory Values | Blood Chemistry | Abnormal non clinical relevant | 10 Participants |
| Healthy Participants | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Laboratory Values | Urinalysis | Abnormal clinically relevant | 0 Participants |
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious AEs and Death
An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant and which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the investigational product. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease, temporally associated with the use of an investigational product, whether or not causally related to the investigational product. Treatment emergent adverse events that emerge after the 99mTc-rhAnnexin V-128 injection and up to 30 days after the injection that were absent before it or worsen relative to the pre-treatment state. A serious AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose results in death; is life-threatening; results in persistent or significant disability or incapacity; results in congenital anomaly or birth defect; or requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization. Only descriptive analysis performed.
Time frame: From Day 0 post injection up to Day 30
Population: Safety Population Set
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| CAD Participants | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious AEs and Death | Treatment Emergent Serious Adverse Drug Reactions | 0 Participants |
| CAD Participants | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious AEs and Death | Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) | 7 Participants |
| CAD Participants | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious AEs and Death | TEAEs leading to Withdrawal | 0 Participants |
| CAD Participants | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious AEs and Death | Treatment Emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs) | 1 Participants |
| CAD Participants | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious AEs and Death | TEAEs leading to Deaths | 0 Participants |
| CAD Participants | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious AEs and Death | Treatment Emergent Adverse Drug Reactions | 2 Participants |
| Healthy Participants | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious AEs and Death | TEAEs leading to Deaths | 0 Participants |
| Healthy Participants | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious AEs and Death | Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) | 0 Participants |
| Healthy Participants | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious AEs and Death | Treatment Emergent Adverse Drug Reactions | 0 Participants |
| Healthy Participants | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious AEs and Death | Treatment Emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs) | 0 Participants |
| Healthy Participants | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious AEs and Death | Treatment Emergent Serious Adverse Drug Reactions | 0 Participants |
| Healthy Participants | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious AEs and Death | TEAEs leading to Withdrawal | 0 Participants |
Right Carotid Uptake Imaging Assessment as Measure by Target to Background Ratio (TBR) by Ultrasound Grade of Plaque Echolucency/Echogenicity
B-mode and color Doppler ultrasound studies were acquired of both carotid arteries and performed with an ultrasound scanner equipped with a 5- to 7-MHz transducer. Plaque morphology, as echogenicity, defined as reflectance of the emitted ultrasound signal, were assessed and graded from 1 to 4 as echolucent, predominantly echolucent, predominantly echogenic, or echogenic. The vessel lumen was used as the reference structure for defining echolucency, and the bright echo zone produced by the media-adventitia interface in the far wall was used as the reference structure for defining echogenicity. Uptake was reported as the ratio of the uptake in the region of interest (target) to the uptake in the blood pool (background). Only descriptive analysis performed.
Time frame: At 60 and 120 minutes post injection on Day 0
Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS). Only participants with right carotid with stenosis \>=50% are taken into account.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CAD Participants | Right Carotid Uptake Imaging Assessment as Measure by Target to Background Ratio (TBR) by Ultrasound Grade of Plaque Echolucency/Echogenicity | Echolucent: 60 Minutes | 0.619 Ratio | Standard Deviation 0 |
| CAD Participants | Right Carotid Uptake Imaging Assessment as Measure by Target to Background Ratio (TBR) by Ultrasound Grade of Plaque Echolucency/Echogenicity | Echolucent: 120 Minutes | 0.820 Ratio | Standard Deviation 0 |
| CAD Participants | Right Carotid Uptake Imaging Assessment as Measure by Target to Background Ratio (TBR) by Ultrasound Grade of Plaque Echolucency/Echogenicity | Predominantly echolucent: 60 Minutes | 0.955 Ratio | Standard Deviation 0.192 |
| CAD Participants | Right Carotid Uptake Imaging Assessment as Measure by Target to Background Ratio (TBR) by Ultrasound Grade of Plaque Echolucency/Echogenicity | Predominantly echogenic: 60 Minutes | 1.593 Ratio | Standard Deviation 1.174 |
| CAD Participants | Right Carotid Uptake Imaging Assessment as Measure by Target to Background Ratio (TBR) by Ultrasound Grade of Plaque Echolucency/Echogenicity | Predominantly echogenic: 120 Minutes | 1.294 Ratio | Standard Deviation 0.851 |
| CAD Participants | Right Carotid Uptake Imaging Assessment as Measure by Target to Background Ratio (TBR) by Ultrasound Grade of Plaque Echolucency/Echogenicity | Predominantly echolucent: 120 Minutes | 1.126 Ratio | Standard Deviation 0.311 |
| CAD Participants | Right Carotid Uptake Imaging Assessment as Measure by Target to Background Ratio (TBR) by Ultrasound Grade of Plaque Echolucency/Echogenicity | Echogenic: 60 Minutes | 1.180 Ratio | Standard Deviation 0.206 |
| CAD Participants | Right Carotid Uptake Imaging Assessment as Measure by Target to Background Ratio (TBR) by Ultrasound Grade of Plaque Echolucency/Echogenicity | Echogenic: 120 Minutes | 1.149 Ratio | Standard Deviation 0.438 |
Right Carotid Uptake Imaging Assessment as Measured by Target to Background Ratio (TBR)
Quantitative analysis of planar images was carried out by placing a region of interest in the carotid areas and over a background area placed in the subclavian regions representing venous and arterial activity (target-to-background). Carotid artery uptake measured as TBR data for right and left carotids at 1 and 2 hours was compared between normal control and carotid artery disease groups. Quantitative analysis of the SPECT 1 and 2 hour images was done with regions of interest placed over the arterial target (right carotid, left carotid, ascending aorta, arch and descending aorta) and adjacent vein (internal jugular, SVC or IVS) using transaxial slices. TBR was calculated as arterial max / venous mean (the average of 3 slices centered on the slice with the highest TBR value).
Time frame: At 60 and 120 minutes post injection on Day 0
Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS). Only participants with Right Carotid Uptake Imaging Assessment included in the analysis.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CAD Participants | Right Carotid Uptake Imaging Assessment as Measured by Target to Background Ratio (TBR) | 120 Minutes | 1.220 Target to Background Ratio (TBR) | Standard Deviation 0.55 |
| CAD Participants | Right Carotid Uptake Imaging Assessment as Measured by Target to Background Ratio (TBR) | 60 Minutes | 1.252 Target to Background Ratio (TBR) | Standard Deviation 0.745 |
| Healthy Participants | Right Carotid Uptake Imaging Assessment as Measured by Target to Background Ratio (TBR) | 60 Minutes | 0.768 Target to Background Ratio (TBR) | Standard Deviation 0.209 |
| Healthy Participants | Right Carotid Uptake Imaging Assessment as Measured by Target to Background Ratio (TBR) | 120 Minutes | 0.928 Target to Background Ratio (TBR) | Standard Deviation 0.217 |