Skip to content

The Effect of Solving Jigsaw Puzzles on Visuospatial Cognition in Older Adults: Jigsaw Puzzles As Cognitive Enrichment

Jigsaw Puzzles As Cognitive Enrichment

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02667314
Acronym
PACE
Enrollment
100
Registered
2016-01-28
Start date
2016-02-29
Completion date
2018-02-28
Last updated
2018-11-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cognitive Impairment

Keywords

Cognition, Cognitive Aging, Dementia, Neurocognitive Disorders, Cognitive Therapy, Cognitive Reserve, Cognitive Enrichment, Jigsaw Puzzles

Brief summary

Meta-analyses indicate beneficial effects of cognitive training and cognitively challenging video games on cognition. However, cognitive effects of solving jigsaw puzzles - a popular, visuospatial cognitive leisure activity - have not been investigated, yet. Thus, the primary aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of solving jigsaw puzzles on visuospatial cognition. As secondary aims, effects on psychological outcomes (self-efficacy, perceived stress, well-being) and visuospatial everyday functioning (instrumental activities of daily living and self-reported cognitive failures in everyday life) are examined.

Detailed description

see References section below for the study protocol article

Interventions

BEHAVIORALJigsaw puzzles

Intervention period 1: Participants are asked to solve jigsaw puzzles at home 6 times per week for at least 1 hour over a period of 5 weeks. Intervention period 2 (voluntary): Participants receive the possibility to solve jigsaw puzzles free-of-charge at home for a period of at least 3 month before the 1.5-year follow-up.

BEHAVIORALCognitive health counseling

Cognitive health counseling regarding modifiable risk and protective factors of cognitive decline and dementia at baseline, and four telephone calls for expert monitoring (three calls during the 5-week period between pre- and posttest, and one call 12 month later)

Sponsors

Ravensburger Spieleverlag GmbH (RSV), Germany
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
University of Ulm
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
SINGLE (Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
50 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* No cognitive impairment (Mini-Mental State Examination ≥ 24) * Commitment to minimum jigsaw puzzle time (1 hour/day, 6 days/week, 5 weeks) * Interest in jigsaw puzzles * Low jigsaw puzzle experience (less than 5 completed puzzles within the last 5 years)

Exclusion criteria

* Cognitive impairment (Mini-Mental State Examination \< 24) * Participation in another interventional study * Self-reported psychiatric, neurologic or other disease, which could affect cognitive change over time * Self-reported, severe visual impairment or motoric impairment of the upper extremity which significantly affects ability to solve jigsaw puzzles

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in global visuospatial cognition from baseline to post intervention and to the 1.5-year follow-upBaseline and post intervention (after 5 weeks and 1.5 years)Averaged score of eight z-standardized visuospatial cognitive ability scores (see secondary outcomes 2 - 9)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in visuoconstruction from baseline to post intervention and to the 1.5-year follow-upBaseline and post intervention (after 5 weeks and 1.5 years)Copying in Complex Figure Tests; parallel versions for baseline and post-test
Change in mental rotation from baseline to post intervention and to the 1.5-year follow-upBaseline and post intervention (after 5 weeks and 1.5 years)Mental Rotations Test-Letters (2D) and Form A (3D)
Change in visuospatial processing speed from baseline to post intervention and to the 1.5-year follow-upBaseline and post intervention (after 5 weeks and 1.5 years)Trail Making Test A
Change in visuospatial flexibility from baseline to post intervention and to the 1.5-year follow-upBaseline and post intervention (after 5 weeks and 1.5 years)Trail Making Test B
Change in visuospatial working memory from baseline to post intervention and to the 1.5-year follow-upBaseline and post intervention (after 5 weeks and 1.5 years)Block span (Wechsler Memory Scale, German version)
Change in visuospatial reasoning from baseline to post intervention and to the 1.5-year follow-upBaseline and post intervention (after 5 weeks and 1.5 years)Block design (Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-III, German version)
Change in visuospatial episodic memory from baseline to post intervention and to the 1.5-year follow-upBaseline and post intervention (after 5 weeks and 1.5 years)Recall in Complex Figure Tests (sum score of immediate and delayed recall); parallel versions for baseline and post-test
Change in psychological health from baseline to post intervention and to the 1.5-year follow-upBaseline and post intervention (after 5 weeks and 1.5 years)Averaged score of three z-standardized psychological health sub-scores (see secondary outcomes 11 - 13)
Change in psychological well-being from baseline to post intervention and to the 1.5-year follow-upBaseline and post intervention (after 5 weeks and 1.5 years)WHO-Five Well-being Index (WHO-5), German version
Change in visual perception from baseline to post intervention and to the 1.5-year follow-upBaseline and post intervention (after 5 weeks and 1.5 years)Judgment of Line Orientation Test
Change in perceived stress from baseline to post intervention and to the 1.5-year follow-upBaseline and post intervention (after 5 weeks and 1.5 years)Perceived Stress Scale-14, German translation
Change in objective everyday functioning from baseline to post intervention and to the 1.5-year follow-upBaseline and post intervention (after 5 weeks and 1.5 years)TIADL (1-3): Timed instrumental activities of daily living (Task 1-3; sum-score)
Change in self-reported everyday functioning from baseline to post intervention and to the 1.5-year follow-upBaseline and post intervention (after 5 weeks and 1.5 years)CFQ (visuospatial items): Cognitive Failures Questionnaire, sum score of visuo-spatial items; German version
Change in jigsaw puzzle performance from baseline to post intervention and to the 1.5-year follow-upBaseline and post intervention (after 5 weeks and 1.5 years)40-pieces mini puzzle (completed pieces per minute)
Hair cortisol concentration at the 1.5-year follow-up1.5-year follow-upHair cortisol will be measured in 1cm segements
Hair dehydroepiandrosteron concentration at the 1.5-year follow-up1.5-year follow-upHair dehydroepiandrosteron will be measured in 1cm segements
Hair brain-derived neurotrophic factor concentration at the 1.5-year follow-up1.5-year follow-upHair brain-derived neurotrophic factor will be measured in 1cm segements
Neurocognitive disorder1.5-year follow-upNeurocognitive disorder is a categorical outcome and includes mild and major neurocognitive disorders. Mild neurocognitive disorder (mild cognitive impairment) is defined by subjective cognitive decline (self-report), and an objective cognitive impairments in at least one cognitive abilitiy score (below -1 SD of the norm group), without an essential impairment of daily functioning compared to the premorbid level (self-report). In major neurocognitive decline (dementia), in addition to cognitive decline and impairment, daily functioning is essentially impaired compared to the permorbid level (self-report).
Change in self-efficacy from baseline to post intervention and to the 1.5-year follow-upBaseline and post intervention (after 5 weeks and 1.5 years)General Self-Efficacy Scale, German version

Countries

Germany

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 9, 2026