Skip to content

Eustachian Tube Dysfunction Assessment

Investigation of Activities of Paratubal Muscles for Opening Eustachian Tube as Assessed by Simultaneous Electromyography and Tympanic Air Exchange Observations

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02667301
Acronym
ETDA
Enrollment
55
Registered
2016-01-28
Start date
2014-01-31
Completion date
2016-01-31
Last updated
2021-04-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Eustachian Tube Dysfunction

Brief summary

The purpose of the study is to understand the exact mechanism of the activity of paratubal muscles in opening eustachian tube in patients with the functional eustachian tube and those with the eustachian tube dysfunction problem.

Detailed description

In this study adult patients with normal and abnormal middle ears with documented tympanogram were tested to detect the Levator Veli Palatini (mLVP) and the tensor Veli Palatini (mTVP) electromyographic (EMG) activities corresponding to eustachian tube (ET) opening at rest. The subjects were mixed some with and some without ET dysfunction (ETD). Tests were conducted at an audiology unit at a tertiary care center located near at sea level, constant atmospheric pressure and temperature. Subjects are to be selected randomly with and without eustachian tube dysfunction (ETD) by using a questionnaire and evaluated with tympanometry and tympanic air exchange testing of the external ear canal for testing the ET openings. Monopolar and reference needle electrodes for each muscle were inserted transpalatally on the test side without topical anesthetics. Tympanic air exchange test is done by placing a pressure sensor into the external ear canal of the patient as well as a nasal pressure sensor for detecting ET openings during EMG recording. Information received from ear pressure and nasal pressure sensor of tympanic air exchange sensor (TAS) equipment was used for assessing the swallowing efficacy of the healthy subjects. Simultaneous correspondent recordings of the ET openings during the test as well as the electromyographic activity for the mLVP, mTVP were recorded.

Interventions

DEVICEEMG recording

1.3X0.4 mm, sterile subdermal monopolar needle electrodes along with the same type of reference needle electrodes were inserted mTVP and mLVP muscles submucosally through the soft palate trans orally. The point of insertion for mTVP was one mm inferior and lateral of the pterygoid hamulus which is palpable at the posterior-medial of the upper alveolus. The active electrode was fully inserted horizontally into the superior belly of mTVP on the tested side. The reference electrode for mTVP was inserted into the palatine aponeurosis at one centimeter apart from the active electrode. The point of insertion for the mLVP active electrode was one centimeter medial and five mm inferior to the hamulus pterygoideus. Reference electrode of mLVP was inserted into one cm apart of medial side of the passive electrode of the mTVP at palatine aponeurosis.

DEVICETympanic Cavity Air Exchange Test

Tympanic cavity air exchange test is done by placing a sensitive pressure sensor in the ear canal and another pressure sensor on one of the nostrils. Patient is asked to to obstruct the other nostril with his/her index finger while holding the probe in place securely and asked to swallow the water during the next ten seconds. Both ear canal and nasal pressure values were simultaneously recorded on tympanic cavity air exchange sensor computer for subsequent analyses. The swallowing action triggers the ET opening and causes a momentary increase of pressure in the nasal cavity. ET opening moves the tympanic membrane which is sensed by the sensors.

DEVICETympanometer test

Patient is subjected to tympanometry test on the specific ear and information is recorded.

Sponsors

Haseki Training and Research Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey
CollaboratorOTHER
Stratejik Yenilikci Girisimler Ltd.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Patients are selected from outpatients visiting Department of Otolaryngology of Haseki Hospital with a mixture of healthy Eustachian tube and with Eustachian Tube Dysfunction problem who agreed to participate in the study after being informed and signed the consent form. Questionnaire (ETDQ-7) is used for initial determination of those with and without ET dysfunction problem to include the sufficient number of patients with ETD problem in the batch.

Exclusion criteria

* All of the subjects had an examination of the tympanic membrane, middle ear, nasal cavity and nasopharynx. * Patients with severe septal deformities, nasal polyps and turbinate hypertrophy, adenoid and other nasopharyngeal masses were excluded. * Patients with upper respiratory tract infections, acute otitis media, tympanosclerosis, otosclerosis and those who had previous ear surgery were not included in the study group.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Latency Between mLVP and mTVP SignalsTest is conducted within 60 days after enrolling the patientThe time difference between mLVP and mTVP signals. This is an indication of synchronization of muscle activities.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Amplitude in mTVP and mLVP in MicrovoltsTest is conducted within 60 days after enrolling the patient

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Observations About the Phase Relationship Between the Signal Pattern of mLVP, mTVP and Eustachian Dysfunction ProblemWithin 1 yearAny observable relationship between the signal patterns and eustachian dysfunction problem which helps to our understanding of eustachian dysfunction problem and the electrical activity of ET muscles. Common characteristics of patients with healthy and unhealthy eustachian tube.

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Recruitment took place in Haseki Training and Research Hospital. An ETDQ7 questionnaire was filled out in patients who came to the Otorhinolaryngology clinic of Haseki hospital and had various ear complaints. Patients with a score of 14.5 points or greater in this quantitative test were accepted as potential chronic eustachian dysfunction patients

Pre-assignment details

39 enrolled participants were excluded from the study before assignment to the group because of unreliable EMG records generating wrong electrode placement for Tensor Veli Palatini and Levator Veli Palatini muscles in the soft palate.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
EMG, TAS and Tympanometry
All treatments were performed by the same group of professionals. EMG needle administration by an ENT specialist with 30+ year experience, EMG recording by a neurologist with 20+ year experience. Tympanic cavity Air exchange Sensor (TAS) recording is done by an experienced technician. The following are done to all patients: 1. The patient is subjected to tympanometry test on the specific ear, 2. The patient is subjected to TAS test on the specific ear while sipping water and signals from ear and nasal cavity recorded, 3. The patient is hooked up to EMG instrument and TAS test equipment simultaneously and signals are recorded by both instruments for a duration of 150-300 seconds while the patient is at rest without sipping water. The patient is allowed to swallow during the test. Tympanometer test: Patient is subjected to tympanometry test on the specific ear and information is recorded.
14
Total14

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyAdverse Event1
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy1

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicEMG, TAS and Tympanometry
Age, Continuous36.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.3
Sex: Female, Male
Female
10 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
4 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
1 / 16
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 16

Outcome results

Primary

Latency Between mLVP and mTVP Signals

The time difference between mLVP and mTVP signals. This is an indication of synchronization of muscle activities.

Time frame: Test is conducted within 60 days after enrolling the patient

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
EMG, TAS and TympanometryLatency Between mLVP and mTVP Signals127.26 Time in millisecondsStandard Deviation 61.028420946845
Secondary

Amplitude in mTVP and mLVP in Microvolts

Time frame: Test is conducted within 60 days after enrolling the patient

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
EMG, TAS and TympanometryAmplitude in mTVP and mLVP in Microvolts650 microvoltsStandard Deviation 211.3315816689
mTVPAmplitude in mTVP and mLVP in Microvolts1075 microvoltsStandard Deviation 247.71225993981
Other Pre-specified

Observations About the Phase Relationship Between the Signal Pattern of mLVP, mTVP and Eustachian Dysfunction Problem

Any observable relationship between the signal patterns and eustachian dysfunction problem which helps to our understanding of eustachian dysfunction problem and the electrical activity of ET muscles. Common characteristics of patients with healthy and unhealthy eustachian tube.

Time frame: Within 1 year

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026