Skip to content

Telementoring for Identifying the Appendix Using Telesonography

A Feasibility Study of Telementoring for Identifying the Appendix Using Smartphone-based Telesonography

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02665767
Acronym
TIAT
Enrollment
30
Registered
2016-01-28
Start date
2015-03-31
Completion date
2015-10-31
Last updated
2016-01-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Appendix, Ultrasonography

Keywords

Telesonography, Appendix

Brief summary

The investigators investigated the feasibility of the clinical application of novice-practitioner-performed/offsite-mentor-guided ultrasonography for identifying the appendix.

Detailed description

A randomized cross-over study was conducted using a telesonography system that can transmit the ultrasound images displayed on the ultrasound monitor(ultrasound sequence video) and images showing the practitioner's operations(background video) to a smartphone without any interruption in motion over a Long Term Evolution (LTE) network. Thirty novice practitioners were randomly assigned to two groups. The subjects in group A (n=15) performed ultrasonography for the identification of the appendix under mentoring by an onsite expert, whereas those in group B (n=15) performed the same procedure under mentoring by an offsite expert. Each subject performed the procedure on three simulated patients. After a four-week interval, they performed the procedure again under the other type of mentoring. A total of 90 ultrasound examinations were performed in each scenario. The primary outcomes were the success rate for identifying the appendix and the time required to identify the appendix.

Interventions

DEVICESmartphone-based Telesonography

The 30 participating examiners were randomly divided into two groups. In phase one, group A performed ultrasonography under onsite mentoring and group B performed the same procedure under remote mentoring. Each examiner was randomly assigned one expert and three SPs for phase one. Four weeks later, they were partnered with the same expert and SPs to whom they had been assigned in phase one and performed the procedure under the other type of mentoring (phase two). The examination order of the SPs was randomly assigned by choosing a number between one and six (1: A-B-C, 2: A-C-B, 3: B-A-C, 4: B-C-A, 5: C-A-B, 6: C-B-A) in each phase.

Sponsors

Hanyang University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
25 Years to 35 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Without any experience in ultrasonography

Exclusion criteria

* Subjects who do not want to participate * Subjects who has eye pain or any eye problem * Subjects who has wrist pain

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Success rate8 monthsSuccess is meaning of identifying appendix in 10 minutes.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Time to identifying appendix8 months

Countries

South Korea

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026