Skip to content

Influence of Diabetes Control on Treatment of Diabetic Macular Edema With Ranibizumab

Influence of Diabetes Control on Treatment of Diabetic Macular Edema With Ranibizumab

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02665689
Acronym
DORO
Enrollment
4
Registered
2016-01-28
Start date
2016-01-18
Completion date
2018-09-07
Last updated
2019-11-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Macular Edema, Cystoid, Visual Acuity Reduced Transiently

Keywords

Diabetic Macular Edema, Ranibizumab, Visual Acuity, Diabetic Control

Brief summary

The aim of the prospective randomized study is to investigate whether a intensified diabetic control program leads to better final visual acuity and less frequent diabetic ocular complications in patients with diabetic retinopathy when compared with a normal diabetic treatment.

Detailed description

Patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) will be treated with intravitreal ranibizumab injections and the effect of optimal control of internal factors (eg. glycemia, blood pressure etc) on final functional (best corrected visual acuity-CBVA) and morphological (central retinal thickness-CRT) will be investigated. Patients will be randomized into two groups: Group with intensified diabetic control will be follow and investigated monthly at department of diabetology, endocrinology and nutritional medicine (Campus Benjamin Franklin) in Berlin with aim to reach the optimal glycemic control defined as HbA1c \< 6,5%. Further, triglycerides values \< 140 mg/dl and blood pressure \< 140/90 mmHg will be pursued. Second group of patients will be followed by their general practitioner and in the study center only blood samples will be taken quarterly without active medical intervention. BCVA, CRT and the number of required ranibizumab injections will we evaluated and compared between both study groups.

Interventions

DRUGranibizumab

Ranibizumab injections will be given for diabetic macular edema. In the experimental arm insulin injections and antihypertensiva will be applied.

Sponsors

Charite University, Berlin, Germany
CollaboratorOTHER
Prof. Dr. Antonia M. Joussen
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Observer-masking (assessment of BCVA, macular thickness, capillary drop-out) is done to guard against detection bias.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

\- Patients with diabetic macular edema relevant to visual acuity * OCT central retinal thickness ≥ 250µm * HbA1c \> 6,5% at initial visit * BCVA ≤0.8 and ≥0.05 * Age ≥18 years * Written patient informed consent given

Exclusion criteria

* Previous treatment with intravitreal drugs in last 6 months * Vitreous hemorrhage as a consequence of proliferative retinopathy * Pregnancy * Blood pressure of ≥ 180/100 (or uncontrolled pressures under pharmacological therapy) * Chronic systemic or ocular inflammatory/autoimmune diseases (e.g. inflammatory bowel disease, Addison´s disease, Cushing Syndrome, Uveitis) * Systemic cortisone or anti-VEGF therapy * Acute systemic or ocular infectious diseases

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Difference of Best Corrected Visual Acuity Measured in ETDRS Letters Score Between Month 12 Baseline VisitBaseline to 12 monthsMeasured by the difference in ETDRS letters score between month 12 and baseline according to internal guideline of Charité department of ophthalmology.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Difference of Best Corrected Visual Acuity Measured in ETDRS Letters Score Between Month 6, 12, 24 and Baseline VisitBaseline to 12 monthsAs the time point 12 months for the evaluation of this secondary endpoint was reached only for patients of study arm B, a comparison of both study arms was not possible and thus analysis of the endpoint was waived completely. Time point 24 months was reached by none of the patients due to trial discontinuation. Results are only shown descriptively. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) score is shown as change in ETDRS letters score at the distinct time point compared to baseline. Higher scores mean a better outcome.
Macular Thickness Change at 6, 12, 18 and 24 Months Compared to BaselineBaseline to 12 monthsAs the time point 12 months for the evaluation of this secondary endpoint was reached only for patients of study arm B, a comparison of both study arms was not possible and thus analysis of the endpoint was waived completely. None of the patients reached time points beyond month 12 due to trial discontinuation. Results are only shown descriptively. Macular thickness (study eye) is shown as change in thickness \[µm\] compared to individual baseline value. A reduction in thickness means improvement.
Time to Reach Target HbA1c24 months
Number of Treatments With Ranibizumab up to 6, 12, 18 and 24 Months of TreatmentBaseline to 12 monthsFor the number of treatments at 6, 12, 18 and 24 months, an ANOVA without any covariates was planned to be applied at each endpoint 6, 12, 18 and 24 months. As the time point 12 months for the evaluation of this secondary endpoint was reached only for patients of study arm B, a comparison of both study arms was not possible and thus statistical analysis of the endpoint was waived completely. None of the patients reached time points beyond month 12. Results are only shown descriptively. Ranibizumab injections were summed up per study arm as well as cumulative at each time point.
Number of Participants With Retinal Detachment, Central Retinal Artery Occlusion, or Endophthalmitis and/or Ocular Adverse Events That Are Related to TreatmentBaseline to 12 monthsAll ocular adverse events presented from baseline to 24 months will be documented.
Number of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Values and/or Adverse Events That Are Related to TreatmentBaseline to 12 monthsAll adverse events were documented. Causal relationship to study treatment was assessed by the investigators. Intended time frame was baseline to 24 months. None of the patients reached time points beyond 12 months due to study discontinuation.
Number of Panretinal Laser Photocoagulation (PRP) Treatments Necessary for Neovascular ComplicationsBaseline to 12 monthsNeed for PRP is up to the investigator's decision. Assessment was done on every visit. Intended time frame was baseline to 24 months. None of the patients reached time points beyond month 12 due to study discontinuation. Unit of measure is any separate investigator's decision to perform panretinal laser photocoagulation (PRP) for neovascular complications. Each PRP is counted separately.

Countries

Germany

Participant flow

Recruitment details

The recruitment has been stopped prematurely in August 2018 by the sponsor after the enrolment of four patients because the enrollment pace was far below target.

Pre-assignment details

Screening period of seven days prior to randomization.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Regular Glycemic Control
Diabetic macular edema will be treated with 3 monthly ranibizumab (0,5mg) injections followed by PRN regimen. Patients randomized into this group will be controlled by their general practitioner or private diabetologist (usual care). The glycemic control (blood measurements of HbA1c) will be performed at trial site (Department of diabetology, endocrinology and nutritional medicine) every 3 months. The site will not influence or change the diabetes medication given by general physician and serves as an observer only to monitor the diabetic control. ranibizumab: Ranibizumab injections will be given for diabetic macular edema. In the experimental arm insulin injections and antihypertensiva will be applied.
2
Intensified Glycemic Control
Diabetic macular edema will be treated with 3 monthly ranibizumab (0,5mg) injections followed by PRN regimen. Patients randomized into this group will be controlled at the trial site (Department of diabetology, endocrinology and nutritional medicine) during first year monthly, in the second study year every 3 months. The individual HbA1c will be targeted according to the general status reflecting other risk factors for the vasculopathy (e.g. BMI, smoking, blood pressure, lipid status). All effort will be done to reach the target blood pressure ≤ 140/90 mmHg and blood triglyceride level \< 140 mg/dl: Further the patients will be educated to improve their eating habits in regard to reduce the carbohydrate intake. ranibizumab: Ranibizumab injections will be given for diabetic macular edema. In the experimental arm insulin injections and antihypertensiva will be applied.
2
Total4

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event10
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up01
Overall StudyTrial termination11

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicRegular Glycemic ControlIntensified Glycemic ControlTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
1 Participants2 Participants3 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Number of participants with history of ophthalmic disease2 Participants2 Participants4 Participants
Number of patients with medical history2 Participants2 Participants4 Participants
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
0 Participants2 Participants2 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
2 Participants0 Participants2 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 20 / 2
other
Total, other adverse events
2 / 22 / 2
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 21 / 2

Outcome results

Primary

Difference of Best Corrected Visual Acuity Measured in ETDRS Letters Score Between Month 12 Baseline Visit

Measured by the difference in ETDRS letters score between month 12 and baseline according to internal guideline of Charité department of ophthalmology.

Time frame: Baseline to 12 months

Population: Of the four enrolled patients, only the two patients had 12-month visit. Since the time point for the evaluation of the primary endpoint was reached only for patients of study arm B, a comparison of both study arms was not possible and thus analysis of the primary endpoint was waived.

Secondary

Difference of Best Corrected Visual Acuity Measured in ETDRS Letters Score Between Month 6, 12, 24 and Baseline Visit

As the time point 12 months for the evaluation of this secondary endpoint was reached only for patients of study arm B, a comparison of both study arms was not possible and thus analysis of the endpoint was waived completely. Time point 24 months was reached by none of the patients due to trial discontinuation. Results are only shown descriptively. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) score is shown as change in ETDRS letters score at the distinct time point compared to baseline. Higher scores mean a better outcome.

Time frame: Baseline to 12 months

Population: BCVA score compared to baseline.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Regular Glycemic ControlDifference of Best Corrected Visual Acuity Measured in ETDRS Letters Score Between Month 6, 12, 24 and Baseline VisitParticipant 1, month 67 Letters improved
Regular Glycemic ControlDifference of Best Corrected Visual Acuity Measured in ETDRS Letters Score Between Month 6, 12, 24 and Baseline VisitParticipant 2, month 65 Letters improved
Intensified Glycemic ControlDifference of Best Corrected Visual Acuity Measured in ETDRS Letters Score Between Month 6, 12, 24 and Baseline VisitParticipant 3, month 63 Letters improved
Intensified Glycemic ControlDifference of Best Corrected Visual Acuity Measured in ETDRS Letters Score Between Month 6, 12, 24 and Baseline VisitParticipant 4, month 68 Letters improved
Intensified Glycemic ControlDifference of Best Corrected Visual Acuity Measured in ETDRS Letters Score Between Month 6, 12, 24 and Baseline VisitParticipant 3, month 123 Letters improved
Intensified Glycemic ControlDifference of Best Corrected Visual Acuity Measured in ETDRS Letters Score Between Month 6, 12, 24 and Baseline VisitParticipant 4, month 1210 Letters improved
Secondary

Macular Thickness Change at 6, 12, 18 and 24 Months Compared to Baseline

As the time point 12 months for the evaluation of this secondary endpoint was reached only for patients of study arm B, a comparison of both study arms was not possible and thus analysis of the endpoint was waived completely. None of the patients reached time points beyond month 12 due to trial discontinuation. Results are only shown descriptively. Macular thickness (study eye) is shown as change in thickness \[µm\] compared to individual baseline value. A reduction in thickness means improvement.

Time frame: Baseline to 12 months

Population: For none of the patients in study arm A 12-month data was available. Time points beyond 6 months (18, 24 months) were reached by none of the patients due to trial discontinuation. Results are only shown descriptively.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Regular Glycemic ControlMacular Thickness Change at 6, 12, 18 and 24 Months Compared to BaselineParticipant 1, month 6-91 µm
Regular Glycemic ControlMacular Thickness Change at 6, 12, 18 and 24 Months Compared to BaselineParticipant 2, month 6-319 µm
Intensified Glycemic ControlMacular Thickness Change at 6, 12, 18 and 24 Months Compared to BaselineParticipant 3, month 610 µm
Intensified Glycemic ControlMacular Thickness Change at 6, 12, 18 and 24 Months Compared to BaselineParticipant 4, month 6-103 µm
Intensified Glycemic ControlMacular Thickness Change at 6, 12, 18 and 24 Months Compared to BaselineParticipant 3, month 1223 µm
Intensified Glycemic ControlMacular Thickness Change at 6, 12, 18 and 24 Months Compared to BaselineParticipant 4, month 12-101 µm
Secondary

Number of Panretinal Laser Photocoagulation (PRP) Treatments Necessary for Neovascular Complications

Need for PRP is up to the investigator's decision. Assessment was done on every visit. Intended time frame was baseline to 24 months. None of the patients reached time points beyond month 12 due to study discontinuation. Unit of measure is any separate investigator's decision to perform panretinal laser photocoagulation (PRP) for neovascular complications. Each PRP is counted separately.

Time frame: Baseline to 12 months

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Regular Glycemic ControlNumber of Panretinal Laser Photocoagulation (PRP) Treatments Necessary for Neovascular Complications1 number of PRPs across participants
Intensified Glycemic ControlNumber of Panretinal Laser Photocoagulation (PRP) Treatments Necessary for Neovascular Complications1 number of PRPs across participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Values and/or Adverse Events That Are Related to Treatment

All adverse events were documented. Causal relationship to study treatment was assessed by the investigators. Intended time frame was baseline to 24 months. None of the patients reached time points beyond 12 months due to study discontinuation.

Time frame: Baseline to 12 months

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Regular Glycemic ControlNumber of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Values and/or Adverse Events That Are Related to Treatment0 participants
Intensified Glycemic ControlNumber of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Values and/or Adverse Events That Are Related to Treatment0 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Retinal Detachment, Central Retinal Artery Occlusion, or Endophthalmitis and/or Ocular Adverse Events That Are Related to Treatment

All ocular adverse events presented from baseline to 24 months will be documented.

Time frame: Baseline to 12 months

Population: Patients in study arm A discontinued before month 12. None of the patients reached time points beyond month 12 due to trial discontinuation.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Regular Glycemic ControlNumber of Participants With Retinal Detachment, Central Retinal Artery Occlusion, or Endophthalmitis and/or Ocular Adverse Events That Are Related to TreatmentMonth 60 participants
Intensified Glycemic ControlNumber of Participants With Retinal Detachment, Central Retinal Artery Occlusion, or Endophthalmitis and/or Ocular Adverse Events That Are Related to TreatmentMonth 60 participants
Intensified Glycemic ControlNumber of Participants With Retinal Detachment, Central Retinal Artery Occlusion, or Endophthalmitis and/or Ocular Adverse Events That Are Related to TreatmentMonth 120 participants
Secondary

Number of Treatments With Ranibizumab up to 6, 12, 18 and 24 Months of Treatment

For the number of treatments at 6, 12, 18 and 24 months, an ANOVA without any covariates was planned to be applied at each endpoint 6, 12, 18 and 24 months. As the time point 12 months for the evaluation of this secondary endpoint was reached only for patients of study arm B, a comparison of both study arms was not possible and thus statistical analysis of the endpoint was waived completely. None of the patients reached time points beyond month 12. Results are only shown descriptively. Ranibizumab injections were summed up per study arm as well as cumulative at each time point.

Time frame: Baseline to 12 months

Population: At month 6, the two patients in study arm A had received six treatments each; the two patients in study arm B had received three and five treatments, respectively. At month 12, the two patients in study arm B had received three and six treatments, respectively. For none of the patients in study arm A, 12-month data was available.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Regular Glycemic ControlNumber of Treatments With Ranibizumab up to 6, 12, 18 and 24 Months of TreatmentMonth 612 Ranibizumab injections
Intensified Glycemic ControlNumber of Treatments With Ranibizumab up to 6, 12, 18 and 24 Months of TreatmentMonth 68 Ranibizumab injections
Intensified Glycemic ControlNumber of Treatments With Ranibizumab up to 6, 12, 18 and 24 Months of TreatmentMonth 129 Ranibizumab injections
Secondary

Time to Reach Target HbA1c

Time frame: 24 months

Population: Originally, target HbA1c should have been defined individually for each patient by the investigator acc. to the patient's general status by risk factors for vasculopathy (Body-Mass-Index, smoking, blood pressure, lipid Status). However, definition of target HbA1c values was waived and only HbA1c values were documented (not shown here).

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026