Macular Edema, Cystoid, Visual Acuity Reduced Transiently
Conditions
Keywords
Diabetic Macular Edema, Ranibizumab, Visual Acuity, Diabetic Control
Brief summary
The aim of the prospective randomized study is to investigate whether a intensified diabetic control program leads to better final visual acuity and less frequent diabetic ocular complications in patients with diabetic retinopathy when compared with a normal diabetic treatment.
Detailed description
Patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) will be treated with intravitreal ranibizumab injections and the effect of optimal control of internal factors (eg. glycemia, blood pressure etc) on final functional (best corrected visual acuity-CBVA) and morphological (central retinal thickness-CRT) will be investigated. Patients will be randomized into two groups: Group with intensified diabetic control will be follow and investigated monthly at department of diabetology, endocrinology and nutritional medicine (Campus Benjamin Franklin) in Berlin with aim to reach the optimal glycemic control defined as HbA1c \< 6,5%. Further, triglycerides values \< 140 mg/dl and blood pressure \< 140/90 mmHg will be pursued. Second group of patients will be followed by their general practitioner and in the study center only blood samples will be taken quarterly without active medical intervention. BCVA, CRT and the number of required ranibizumab injections will we evaluated and compared between both study groups.
Interventions
Ranibizumab injections will be given for diabetic macular edema. In the experimental arm insulin injections and antihypertensiva will be applied.
Sponsors
Study design
Masking description
Observer-masking (assessment of BCVA, macular thickness, capillary drop-out) is done to guard against detection bias.
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
\- Patients with diabetic macular edema relevant to visual acuity * OCT central retinal thickness ≥ 250µm * HbA1c \> 6,5% at initial visit * BCVA ≤0.8 and ≥0.05 * Age ≥18 years * Written patient informed consent given
Exclusion criteria
* Previous treatment with intravitreal drugs in last 6 months * Vitreous hemorrhage as a consequence of proliferative retinopathy * Pregnancy * Blood pressure of ≥ 180/100 (or uncontrolled pressures under pharmacological therapy) * Chronic systemic or ocular inflammatory/autoimmune diseases (e.g. inflammatory bowel disease, Addison´s disease, Cushing Syndrome, Uveitis) * Systemic cortisone or anti-VEGF therapy * Acute systemic or ocular infectious diseases
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Difference of Best Corrected Visual Acuity Measured in ETDRS Letters Score Between Month 12 Baseline Visit | Baseline to 12 months | Measured by the difference in ETDRS letters score between month 12 and baseline according to internal guideline of Charité department of ophthalmology. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Difference of Best Corrected Visual Acuity Measured in ETDRS Letters Score Between Month 6, 12, 24 and Baseline Visit | Baseline to 12 months | As the time point 12 months for the evaluation of this secondary endpoint was reached only for patients of study arm B, a comparison of both study arms was not possible and thus analysis of the endpoint was waived completely. Time point 24 months was reached by none of the patients due to trial discontinuation. Results are only shown descriptively. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) score is shown as change in ETDRS letters score at the distinct time point compared to baseline. Higher scores mean a better outcome. |
| Macular Thickness Change at 6, 12, 18 and 24 Months Compared to Baseline | Baseline to 12 months | As the time point 12 months for the evaluation of this secondary endpoint was reached only for patients of study arm B, a comparison of both study arms was not possible and thus analysis of the endpoint was waived completely. None of the patients reached time points beyond month 12 due to trial discontinuation. Results are only shown descriptively. Macular thickness (study eye) is shown as change in thickness \[µm\] compared to individual baseline value. A reduction in thickness means improvement. |
| Time to Reach Target HbA1c | 24 months | — |
| Number of Treatments With Ranibizumab up to 6, 12, 18 and 24 Months of Treatment | Baseline to 12 months | For the number of treatments at 6, 12, 18 and 24 months, an ANOVA without any covariates was planned to be applied at each endpoint 6, 12, 18 and 24 months. As the time point 12 months for the evaluation of this secondary endpoint was reached only for patients of study arm B, a comparison of both study arms was not possible and thus statistical analysis of the endpoint was waived completely. None of the patients reached time points beyond month 12. Results are only shown descriptively. Ranibizumab injections were summed up per study arm as well as cumulative at each time point. |
| Number of Participants With Retinal Detachment, Central Retinal Artery Occlusion, or Endophthalmitis and/or Ocular Adverse Events That Are Related to Treatment | Baseline to 12 months | All ocular adverse events presented from baseline to 24 months will be documented. |
| Number of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Values and/or Adverse Events That Are Related to Treatment | Baseline to 12 months | All adverse events were documented. Causal relationship to study treatment was assessed by the investigators. Intended time frame was baseline to 24 months. None of the patients reached time points beyond 12 months due to study discontinuation. |
| Number of Panretinal Laser Photocoagulation (PRP) Treatments Necessary for Neovascular Complications | Baseline to 12 months | Need for PRP is up to the investigator's decision. Assessment was done on every visit. Intended time frame was baseline to 24 months. None of the patients reached time points beyond month 12 due to study discontinuation. Unit of measure is any separate investigator's decision to perform panretinal laser photocoagulation (PRP) for neovascular complications. Each PRP is counted separately. |
Countries
Germany
Participant flow
Recruitment details
The recruitment has been stopped prematurely in August 2018 by the sponsor after the enrolment of four patients because the enrollment pace was far below target.
Pre-assignment details
Screening period of seven days prior to randomization.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Regular Glycemic Control Diabetic macular edema will be treated with 3 monthly ranibizumab (0,5mg) injections followed by PRN regimen. Patients randomized into this group will be controlled by their general practitioner or private diabetologist (usual care). The glycemic control (blood measurements of HbA1c) will be performed at trial site (Department of diabetology, endocrinology and nutritional medicine) every 3 months. The site will not influence or change the diabetes medication given by general physician and serves as an observer only to monitor the diabetic control.
ranibizumab: Ranibizumab injections will be given for diabetic macular edema. In the experimental arm insulin injections and antihypertensiva will be applied. | 2 |
| Intensified Glycemic Control Diabetic macular edema will be treated with 3 monthly ranibizumab (0,5mg) injections followed by PRN regimen. Patients randomized into this group will be controlled at the trial site (Department of diabetology, endocrinology and nutritional medicine) during first year monthly, in the second study year every 3 months. The individual HbA1c will be targeted according to the general status reflecting other risk factors for the vasculopathy (e.g. BMI, smoking, blood pressure, lipid status). All effort will be done to reach the target blood pressure ≤ 140/90 mmHg and blood triglyceride level \< 140 mg/dl: Further the patients will be educated to improve their eating habits in regard to reduce the carbohydrate intake.
ranibizumab: Ranibizumab injections will be given for diabetic macular edema. In the experimental arm insulin injections and antihypertensiva will be applied. | 2 |
| Total | 4 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Adverse Event | 1 | 0 |
| Overall Study | Lost to Follow-up | 0 | 1 |
| Overall Study | Trial termination | 1 | 1 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Regular Glycemic Control | Intensified Glycemic Control | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical <=18 years | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Age, Categorical >=65 years | 1 Participants | 2 Participants | 3 Participants |
| Age, Categorical Between 18 and 65 years | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Number of participants with history of ophthalmic disease | 2 Participants | 2 Participants | 4 Participants |
| Number of patients with medical history | 2 Participants | 2 Participants | 4 Participants |
| Race and Ethnicity Not Collected | — | — | 0 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 0 Participants | 2 Participants | 2 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 2 Participants | 0 Participants | 2 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 0 / 2 | 0 / 2 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 2 / 2 | 2 / 2 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 1 / 2 | 1 / 2 |
Outcome results
Difference of Best Corrected Visual Acuity Measured in ETDRS Letters Score Between Month 12 Baseline Visit
Measured by the difference in ETDRS letters score between month 12 and baseline according to internal guideline of Charité department of ophthalmology.
Time frame: Baseline to 12 months
Population: Of the four enrolled patients, only the two patients had 12-month visit. Since the time point for the evaluation of the primary endpoint was reached only for patients of study arm B, a comparison of both study arms was not possible and thus analysis of the primary endpoint was waived.
Difference of Best Corrected Visual Acuity Measured in ETDRS Letters Score Between Month 6, 12, 24 and Baseline Visit
As the time point 12 months for the evaluation of this secondary endpoint was reached only for patients of study arm B, a comparison of both study arms was not possible and thus analysis of the endpoint was waived completely. Time point 24 months was reached by none of the patients due to trial discontinuation. Results are only shown descriptively. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) score is shown as change in ETDRS letters score at the distinct time point compared to baseline. Higher scores mean a better outcome.
Time frame: Baseline to 12 months
Population: BCVA score compared to baseline.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Regular Glycemic Control | Difference of Best Corrected Visual Acuity Measured in ETDRS Letters Score Between Month 6, 12, 24 and Baseline Visit | Participant 1, month 6 | 7 Letters improved |
| Regular Glycemic Control | Difference of Best Corrected Visual Acuity Measured in ETDRS Letters Score Between Month 6, 12, 24 and Baseline Visit | Participant 2, month 6 | 5 Letters improved |
| Intensified Glycemic Control | Difference of Best Corrected Visual Acuity Measured in ETDRS Letters Score Between Month 6, 12, 24 and Baseline Visit | Participant 3, month 6 | 3 Letters improved |
| Intensified Glycemic Control | Difference of Best Corrected Visual Acuity Measured in ETDRS Letters Score Between Month 6, 12, 24 and Baseline Visit | Participant 4, month 6 | 8 Letters improved |
| Intensified Glycemic Control | Difference of Best Corrected Visual Acuity Measured in ETDRS Letters Score Between Month 6, 12, 24 and Baseline Visit | Participant 3, month 12 | 3 Letters improved |
| Intensified Glycemic Control | Difference of Best Corrected Visual Acuity Measured in ETDRS Letters Score Between Month 6, 12, 24 and Baseline Visit | Participant 4, month 12 | 10 Letters improved |
Macular Thickness Change at 6, 12, 18 and 24 Months Compared to Baseline
As the time point 12 months for the evaluation of this secondary endpoint was reached only for patients of study arm B, a comparison of both study arms was not possible and thus analysis of the endpoint was waived completely. None of the patients reached time points beyond month 12 due to trial discontinuation. Results are only shown descriptively. Macular thickness (study eye) is shown as change in thickness \[µm\] compared to individual baseline value. A reduction in thickness means improvement.
Time frame: Baseline to 12 months
Population: For none of the patients in study arm A 12-month data was available. Time points beyond 6 months (18, 24 months) were reached by none of the patients due to trial discontinuation. Results are only shown descriptively.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Regular Glycemic Control | Macular Thickness Change at 6, 12, 18 and 24 Months Compared to Baseline | Participant 1, month 6 | -91 µm |
| Regular Glycemic Control | Macular Thickness Change at 6, 12, 18 and 24 Months Compared to Baseline | Participant 2, month 6 | -319 µm |
| Intensified Glycemic Control | Macular Thickness Change at 6, 12, 18 and 24 Months Compared to Baseline | Participant 3, month 6 | 10 µm |
| Intensified Glycemic Control | Macular Thickness Change at 6, 12, 18 and 24 Months Compared to Baseline | Participant 4, month 6 | -103 µm |
| Intensified Glycemic Control | Macular Thickness Change at 6, 12, 18 and 24 Months Compared to Baseline | Participant 3, month 12 | 23 µm |
| Intensified Glycemic Control | Macular Thickness Change at 6, 12, 18 and 24 Months Compared to Baseline | Participant 4, month 12 | -101 µm |
Number of Panretinal Laser Photocoagulation (PRP) Treatments Necessary for Neovascular Complications
Need for PRP is up to the investigator's decision. Assessment was done on every visit. Intended time frame was baseline to 24 months. None of the patients reached time points beyond month 12 due to study discontinuation. Unit of measure is any separate investigator's decision to perform panretinal laser photocoagulation (PRP) for neovascular complications. Each PRP is counted separately.
Time frame: Baseline to 12 months
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Regular Glycemic Control | Number of Panretinal Laser Photocoagulation (PRP) Treatments Necessary for Neovascular Complications | 1 number of PRPs across participants |
| Intensified Glycemic Control | Number of Panretinal Laser Photocoagulation (PRP) Treatments Necessary for Neovascular Complications | 1 number of PRPs across participants |
Number of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Values and/or Adverse Events That Are Related to Treatment
All adverse events were documented. Causal relationship to study treatment was assessed by the investigators. Intended time frame was baseline to 24 months. None of the patients reached time points beyond 12 months due to study discontinuation.
Time frame: Baseline to 12 months
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Regular Glycemic Control | Number of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Values and/or Adverse Events That Are Related to Treatment | 0 participants |
| Intensified Glycemic Control | Number of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Values and/or Adverse Events That Are Related to Treatment | 0 participants |
Number of Participants With Retinal Detachment, Central Retinal Artery Occlusion, or Endophthalmitis and/or Ocular Adverse Events That Are Related to Treatment
All ocular adverse events presented from baseline to 24 months will be documented.
Time frame: Baseline to 12 months
Population: Patients in study arm A discontinued before month 12. None of the patients reached time points beyond month 12 due to trial discontinuation.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Regular Glycemic Control | Number of Participants With Retinal Detachment, Central Retinal Artery Occlusion, or Endophthalmitis and/or Ocular Adverse Events That Are Related to Treatment | Month 6 | 0 participants |
| Intensified Glycemic Control | Number of Participants With Retinal Detachment, Central Retinal Artery Occlusion, or Endophthalmitis and/or Ocular Adverse Events That Are Related to Treatment | Month 6 | 0 participants |
| Intensified Glycemic Control | Number of Participants With Retinal Detachment, Central Retinal Artery Occlusion, or Endophthalmitis and/or Ocular Adverse Events That Are Related to Treatment | Month 12 | 0 participants |
Number of Treatments With Ranibizumab up to 6, 12, 18 and 24 Months of Treatment
For the number of treatments at 6, 12, 18 and 24 months, an ANOVA without any covariates was planned to be applied at each endpoint 6, 12, 18 and 24 months. As the time point 12 months for the evaluation of this secondary endpoint was reached only for patients of study arm B, a comparison of both study arms was not possible and thus statistical analysis of the endpoint was waived completely. None of the patients reached time points beyond month 12. Results are only shown descriptively. Ranibizumab injections were summed up per study arm as well as cumulative at each time point.
Time frame: Baseline to 12 months
Population: At month 6, the two patients in study arm A had received six treatments each; the two patients in study arm B had received three and five treatments, respectively. At month 12, the two patients in study arm B had received three and six treatments, respectively. For none of the patients in study arm A, 12-month data was available.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Regular Glycemic Control | Number of Treatments With Ranibizumab up to 6, 12, 18 and 24 Months of Treatment | Month 6 | 12 Ranibizumab injections |
| Intensified Glycemic Control | Number of Treatments With Ranibizumab up to 6, 12, 18 and 24 Months of Treatment | Month 6 | 8 Ranibizumab injections |
| Intensified Glycemic Control | Number of Treatments With Ranibizumab up to 6, 12, 18 and 24 Months of Treatment | Month 12 | 9 Ranibizumab injections |
Time to Reach Target HbA1c
Time frame: 24 months
Population: Originally, target HbA1c should have been defined individually for each patient by the investigator acc. to the patient's general status by risk factors for vasculopathy (Body-Mass-Index, smoking, blood pressure, lipid Status). However, definition of target HbA1c values was waived and only HbA1c values were documented (not shown here).