Skip to content

Anesthetic Techniques in EP Patients

Anesthetic Techniques and the Effect on Cardiac Electrophysiology Procedures

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02664922
Enrollment
35
Registered
2016-01-27
Start date
2012-05-31
Completion date
2013-12-31
Last updated
2020-09-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cardiac Disease

Keywords

Electrophysiology, Anesthetics

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to compare different combinations of anesthetic drugs (cause loss of sensation) in terms of effectiveness, adverse effects, pain relief, and patient comfort for cardiac electrophysiology procedures. In addition, the investigators are studying the different anesthetic combinations to determine the best approach in terms of identification and treatment of arrhythmias.

Detailed description

Anesthetic management in patients coming for electrophysiology procedures is extremely important and hemodynamically challenging in order to minimize interference on the electrophysiology studies (EPS) and the ability to trigger arrhythmias while also maintaining patient comfort and limited movement. Various anesthetic combinations are administered to provide sedation, analgesia/sedation, or general anesthesia. The ideal agent should produce rapid loss of consciousness while ensuring cardiovascular stability and prompt recovery with few adverse effects. Our goal is to study anesthetic techniques and the effect on electrophysiology procedures to determine the best anesthetic combination in terms of effectiveness, adverse effects, pain relief, and patient comfort. Adult patients scheduled for electrophysiology procedures will be enrolled in the study and randomly assigned to an anesthetic group based on their schedule procedure. Sedation cases for supraventricular tachycardia (SVT), right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT)/premature ventricular contraction (PVC) ablation, and atrial flutter (aflutter) procedures will be randomly assigned to one of three groups: 1) monitored anesthesia (local anesthesia with sedation and analgesia/pain reliever) with propofol (induce sleep), 2) monitored anesthesia with ketamine (sedation) + propofol (induce sleep), or 3) monitored anesthesia with remifentanil infusion (pain reliever) + propofol (induce sleep). Sedation cases for ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablation and atrial fibrillation (afib) procedures will be randomly assigned to one of two groups: 1) monitored anesthesia (local anesthesia with sedation and analgesia/pain reliever) with propofol (induce sleep), or 2) monitored anesthesia with ketamine (sedation) + propofol (induce sleep). General anesthesia (GA) cases, including VT ablation and afib procedures will receive general anesthesia (state of unconsciousness) with sevoflurane (loss of consciousness) + O2. Anesthesia factors, such as hemodynamics and cerebral oxygen saturation will be continuously monitored and recorded throughout the study. In addition, we will be looking at standard echocardiogram and electrophysiology (EP) parameters. The patient's pain level, level of sedation, and satisfaction will also be measured using scales, assessments, and surveys.

Interventions

DRUGPropofol

1 of 3 sedation groups for SVT, RVOT/PVC ablation, and aflutter procedures. 1 of 2 sedation groups for VT ablation and afib procedures.

DRUGKetamine

1 of 3 sedation groups for SVT, RVOT/PVC ablation, and aflutter procedures. 1 of 2 sedation groups for VT ablation and afib procedures.

DRUGRemifentanil

1 of 3 sedation groups for SVT, RVOT/PVC ablation, and aflutter procedures.

DRUGSevoflurane

1 general anesthesia group for VT ablations and afib procedures.

Sponsors

University of California, Los Angeles
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
SINGLE (Caregiver)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients scheduled for cardiac electrophysiology procedures * Patients ≥18 years of age

Exclusion criteria

* Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), * pulmonary hypertension, * severe pulmonary disease, * obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) with continuous positive airway pressure therapy (CPAP)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Effectiveness of Anesthetic Drugs in Terms of Number of Participants With Adverse Events.Intraoperatively to postoperatively in the ICU, an expected average of 5-7 hours.Direct observation and medical record review will be used to analyze adverse effects. Reported as number of participants with one or more adverse events.
Effectiveness of Anesthetic Drugs in Terms of Pain Relief.Intraoperatively to postoperatively in the ICU, an expected average of 5-7 hours.A patient's pain level will be assessed using a numerical pain rating scale from 0 no pain to 10 worst possible pain.
Effectiveness of Anesthetic Drugs in Terms of Patient Comfort.Intraoperatively to postoperatively in the ICU, an expected average of 5-7 hours.A patient's level of sedation will be assessed using a scoring system on a scale from 1-5. The Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation (OAA/S) Score Responsiveness Component score from 1 - Does not respond to mild prodding or shaking to 5 - Responds readily to name spoken in normal tone.
Effectiveness of Anesthetic Drugs in Terms of Patient Satisfaction.Intraoperatively to postoperatively in the ICU, an expected average of 5-7 hours.Patients will also be asked to complete a written questionnaire prior to discharge from the hospital to measure patient satisfaction during their anesthesia care. A Likert Scale is used and ranges from 1 - Disagree very much to 6 - Agree very much.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Effectiveness of Anesthetic Drugs in Terms of Proceduralist Satisfaction.Intraoperatively to postoperatively in the ICU, an expected average of 5-7 hours.The proceduralist will complete a written questionnaire after the procedure to rate their satisfaction. A Likert Scale is used and ranges from 1 - Disagree very much to 6 - Agree very much.
Effectiveness of Anesthetic Drugs in Terms of Number of Participants With Clinical Success.1-3 months postoperativelyThe proceduralist will follow-up 1-3 months post-procedure to evaluate the number of participants with clinical success reported by number of recurrences. Clinical success is defined as 0 recurrences in participants at 1-3 months post-operatively.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Sedation - Group 1
Sedation - monitored anesthesia with propofol. Propofol: 1 of 3 sedation groups for SVT, RVOT/PVC ablation, and aflutter procedures. 1 of 2 sedation groups for VT ablation and afib procedures.
10
Sedation - Group 2
Sedation - monitored anesthesia with ketamine + propofol Propofol: 1 of 3 sedation groups for SVT, RVOT/PVC ablation, and aflutter procedures. 1 of 2 sedation groups for VT ablation and afib procedures. Ketamine: 1 of 3 sedation groups for SVT, RVOT/PVC ablation, and aflutter procedures. 1 of 2 sedation groups for VT ablation and afib procedures.
12
Sedation - Group 3
Sedation - monitored anesthesia with remifentanil + propofol Propofol: 1 of 3 sedation groups for SVT, RVOT/PVC ablation, and aflutter procedures. 1 of 2 sedation groups for VT ablation and afib procedures. Remifentanil: 1 of 3 sedation groups for SVT, RVOT/PVC ablation, and aflutter procedures.
7
General Anesthesia - Group 1
General anesthesia (GA) with Sevoflurane + O2 Sevoflurane: 1 general anesthesia group for VT ablations and afib procedures.
5
Total34

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicSedation - Group 1Sedation - Group 2Sedation - Group 3General Anesthesia - Group 1Total
Age, Continuous56 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16
56 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13
48 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18
43 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16
53 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16
Sex: Female, Male
Female
6 Participants4 Participants2 Participants1 Participants13 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
4 Participants8 Participants5 Participants4 Participants21 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 100 / 120 / 71 / 5
other
Total, other adverse events
1 / 102 / 120 / 70 / 5
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 102 / 120 / 71 / 5

Outcome results

Primary

Effectiveness of Anesthetic Drugs in Terms of Number of Participants With Adverse Events.

Direct observation and medical record review will be used to analyze adverse effects. Reported as number of participants with one or more adverse events.

Time frame: Intraoperatively to postoperatively in the ICU, an expected average of 5-7 hours.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Sedation - Group 1Effectiveness of Anesthetic Drugs in Terms of Number of Participants With Adverse Events.1 Participants
Sedation - Group 2Effectiveness of Anesthetic Drugs in Terms of Number of Participants With Adverse Events.2 Participants
Sedation - Group 3Effectiveness of Anesthetic Drugs in Terms of Number of Participants With Adverse Events.0 Participants
General Anesthesia - Group 1Effectiveness of Anesthetic Drugs in Terms of Number of Participants With Adverse Events.0 Participants
Primary

Effectiveness of Anesthetic Drugs in Terms of Pain Relief.

A patient's pain level will be assessed using a numerical pain rating scale from 0 no pain to 10 worst possible pain.

Time frame: Intraoperatively to postoperatively in the ICU, an expected average of 5-7 hours.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Sedation - Group 1Effectiveness of Anesthetic Drugs in Terms of Pain Relief.1.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.3
Sedation - Group 2Effectiveness of Anesthetic Drugs in Terms of Pain Relief.0.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.5
Sedation - Group 3Effectiveness of Anesthetic Drugs in Terms of Pain Relief.0.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.5
General Anesthesia - Group 1Effectiveness of Anesthetic Drugs in Terms of Pain Relief.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
Primary

Effectiveness of Anesthetic Drugs in Terms of Patient Comfort.

A patient's level of sedation will be assessed using a scoring system on a scale from 1-5. The Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation (OAA/S) Score Responsiveness Component score from 1 - Does not respond to mild prodding or shaking to 5 - Responds readily to name spoken in normal tone.

Time frame: Intraoperatively to postoperatively in the ICU, an expected average of 5-7 hours.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Sedation - Group 1Effectiveness of Anesthetic Drugs in Terms of Patient Comfort.2.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.2
Sedation - Group 2Effectiveness of Anesthetic Drugs in Terms of Patient Comfort.3.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.3
Sedation - Group 3Effectiveness of Anesthetic Drugs in Terms of Patient Comfort.3.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.3
General Anesthesia - Group 1Effectiveness of Anesthetic Drugs in Terms of Patient Comfort.1.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
Primary

Effectiveness of Anesthetic Drugs in Terms of Patient Satisfaction.

Patients will also be asked to complete a written questionnaire prior to discharge from the hospital to measure patient satisfaction during their anesthesia care. A Likert Scale is used and ranges from 1 - Disagree very much to 6 - Agree very much.

Time frame: Intraoperatively to postoperatively in the ICU, an expected average of 5-7 hours.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Sedation - Group 1Effectiveness of Anesthetic Drugs in Terms of Patient Satisfaction.3.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.4
Sedation - Group 2Effectiveness of Anesthetic Drugs in Terms of Patient Satisfaction.3.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
Sedation - Group 3Effectiveness of Anesthetic Drugs in Terms of Patient Satisfaction.3.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.5
General Anesthesia - Group 1Effectiveness of Anesthetic Drugs in Terms of Patient Satisfaction.3.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.1
Secondary

Effectiveness of Anesthetic Drugs in Terms of Number of Participants With Clinical Success.

The proceduralist will follow-up 1-3 months post-procedure to evaluate the number of participants with clinical success reported by number of recurrences. Clinical success is defined as 0 recurrences in participants at 1-3 months post-operatively.

Time frame: 1-3 months postoperatively

Population: Patients were excluded from analysis if there was no electrophysiology follow-up in the medical record 1-3 months postoperatively.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Sedation - Group 1Effectiveness of Anesthetic Drugs in Terms of Number of Participants With Clinical Success.0 Participants
Sedation - Group 2Effectiveness of Anesthetic Drugs in Terms of Number of Participants With Clinical Success.0 Participants
Sedation - Group 3Effectiveness of Anesthetic Drugs in Terms of Number of Participants With Clinical Success.1 Participants
General Anesthesia - Group 1Effectiveness of Anesthetic Drugs in Terms of Number of Participants With Clinical Success.1 Participants
Secondary

Effectiveness of Anesthetic Drugs in Terms of Proceduralist Satisfaction.

The proceduralist will complete a written questionnaire after the procedure to rate their satisfaction. A Likert Scale is used and ranges from 1 - Disagree very much to 6 - Agree very much.

Time frame: Intraoperatively to postoperatively in the ICU, an expected average of 5-7 hours.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Sedation - Group 1Effectiveness of Anesthetic Drugs in Terms of Proceduralist Satisfaction.5.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.4
Sedation - Group 2Effectiveness of Anesthetic Drugs in Terms of Proceduralist Satisfaction.5.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.5
Sedation - Group 3Effectiveness of Anesthetic Drugs in Terms of Proceduralist Satisfaction.5.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.3
General Anesthesia - Group 1Effectiveness of Anesthetic Drugs in Terms of Proceduralist Satisfaction.5.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.9

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026