Anaesthesia
Conditions
Keywords
Communication, Confusion, Intravenous Catheterization, Comfort
Brief summary
The purpose of this study is to compare three communications during peripheral intravenous catheterization and measure pain patient: one hypnotic, confusion (HYPNOSIS), an other with negative connotation (NOCEBO) and at least with neutral connotation (NEUTRAL).
Detailed description
Clinicians used to warn patients of pain or discomfort before potentially painful procedures like peripherical intravenous catheterization (PIVC). However, suggestions for negative perceptual experiences causes more pain and anxiety. During This does not improve at all the real-life experience of the act. On the contrary, the use of gentler words improves pain perception and subjective patient experience. Furthermore, hypnosis has been demonstrated as efficient and the pain perception seems to be modulate by hypnotic suggestions.
Interventions
hypnotic communication during peripheral intravenous catheterization
OTHERnegative connotation communication
negative connotation communication during peripheral intravenous catheterization
OTHERneutral connotation communication
neutral connotation communication during peripheral intravenous catheterization
peripheral intravenous catheterization
Sponsors
Rennes University Hospital
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* at least 18 years * peripheral intravenous catheterization of 20 G on the dorsal face of the hand before a planned surgery * written and informed patient consent Non inclusion Criteria: * patient unable to communicate in french * difficult vein access characteristics * premedication * pregnant, breast-feeding woman * patient subject of legal protection
Exclusion criteria
: * failed of the first attempt of peripheral intravenous catheterization
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| numerical rating scale for pain from 0 to 10 | data collected within 3 min after the end of peripheral intravenous catheterization procedure | self-evaluation of pain catheterization |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| evolution of numerical rating scale for comfort from 0 to 10 | data collected just before and within 3 min after peripheral intravenous catheterization procedure | self-evaluation of comfort catheterization |
| evolution of numerical rating scale for anxiety from 0 to 10 | data collected just before and within 3 min after peripheral intravenous catheterization procedure | self-evaluation of anxiety catheterization |
| presence of spontaneous patient arm withdrawal | data collected within 3 min after the end of peripheral intravenous catheterization procedure | — |
| presence of unprompted vocalization by word(s) or sound(s) | data collected within 3 min after the end of peripheral intravenous catheterization procedure | — |
Countries
Belgium, France
Outcome results
None listed