Skip to content

Neuropsychobiological Correlates of Sex-steroid Hormone Manipulation in Healthy Women: a Risk Model for Depression

Neuropsychobiological Correlates of Sex-steroid Hormone Manipulation in Healthy Women: a Risk Model for Depression

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02661789
Acronym
GnRHa
Enrollment
63
Registered
2016-01-22
Start date
2011-01-31
Completion date
2012-12-31
Last updated
2016-01-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Major Depressive Disorder, Menopause, Neurodegeneration, Postpartum Depression, Postpartum Psychosis, Schizophrenia

Keywords

Mental health, Brain Imaging, Steroid hormones, Serotonin, PET, MRI, fMRI, human, gender, risk model

Brief summary

The project aimed at identifying neuropsychobiological signatures of pharmacological sex-steroid hormone manipulations in healthy women as a risk model for depression. The study is a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study. Investigators included 63 healthy female volunteers with regular menstrual cycles between 23 and 35 days. Participants were randomized to active Gonadotrophin-Releasing-Hormone agonist (GnRHa) (goserelin 3.6 mg implant) or placebo (saline injection) intervention, which was initiated in the mid follicular phase (i.e. cycle day 22.6 ±2.5). Sixty women completed follow-up and entered the analyses, except for a few drop outs on some domains. The following domains were addressed at baseline and at follow-up (16±3 days post intervention), (which corresponded to the early ovarian suppression phase of the biphasic hormone response to GnRHa): 1) serotonin transporter binding as imaged by 11CDASB Positron Emission Tomography (PET), 2) functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) emotional processing, 3) fMRI reward processing, 3) rating state fMRI (rsfMRI), 4) structural MRI, 5) Neuropsychology, 6) Psychophysiology, 7) Hypothalamus-Pituitary-Adrenal cortex (HPA)-axis dynamics, 8) Peripheral markers of immunoactive cell responses, 9) Epigenetic factors. Psychometrics in terms of self reported mental distress and interview based ratings were monitored across the intervention period to monitor potential symptoms of mental distress and psychopathology. Also ovarian hormone responses, peripheral blood markers, and side effects scores were collected across the intervention period.

Detailed description

Aims and hypotheses: Gender matters in normal brain function as well as in neuropsychiatric disorders. E.g. the vulnerability to mood and anxiety disorders is considerably greater in women. Among other factors, this possibly reflects gender differences in central serotonergic function since dysfunction of serotonergic neurotransmission is critically involved in the pathophysiology of mood and anxiety disorders, schizophrenia, and Alzheimer's disease. In particular, women going through phases in life where sex hormones decline rapidly from high levels or fluctuate, have a higher frequency of severe mood state changes and are more vulnerable to psychiatric disorders, e.g. across the pre to postpartum and menopausal transition. Interestingly, this risk is associated with increased variability of the plasma levels of the sex-hormone estradiol. Therefore, sex-hormone manipulation with a pharmacologically induced biphasic ovarian hormone response serve as a unique opportunity to study how sex-hormone fluctuations provoke mood state changes and increase vulnerability to neuropsychiatric disorders. In this project investigators aimed at investigating whether sex-hormone manipulation affects: 1. Molecular imaging markers of serotonergic neurotransmission in vivo, 2. Brain structure, architecture and functional connectivity, 3. Stress and inflammatory responses, and 4. Cognitive functions, emotional processing, and information filtering, of importance in the pathophysiology of neuropsychiatric disorders. Mentally healthy female volunteers were assessed at baseline (i.e cycle day 6.6 ±2.2) and at follow-up (i.e 16.2 ±2.6 days post intervention) in the early ovarian suppression phase af a Gonadotrophin-Releasing-Hormone agonist response in a placebo-controlled, double-blinded design (cohort size aim: N=30x2). Research in neurobiological correlates of vulnerability related to sex-hormone changes is pivotal to improve the etiological understanding of brain disorders with gender differences in their incidence and/or nature. Such research may contribute to ameliorate fertility treatment, to improve treatment of mood disorders and schizophrenia, and, ideally, shed light on possible preventive strategies in vulnerable phases of women's lives such as the pre- to post-partum and menopausal transition period. Hypotheses: Investigators hypothesised that sex-hormone manipulation is associated with the following: 1. Compromised serotonergic neurotransmission, 2. Changes in functional and structural connectivity and lower hippocampal brain volumes and/or markers of decreased neurogenesis, 3. Increased stress reactivity and inflammatory responses, and 4. Changes in neurocognitive functioning and negative bias in emotional processing and information filtering. Investigators further hypothesised that these changes occur in a manner dependent on the magnitude of the estradiol drop from baseline and dependent on symptoms of depressed and anxious mood. General study design: The study is a prospective, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, combined within-subject and between-group design of neuropsychobiological changes in response to hormonal down-regulation. The investigation program will be performed at baseline in the mid-follicular phase, at day 5-8 of the menstrual cycle, and in the down-regulated state, 14-19 days after GnRHa intervention. Participants. Investigators aimed at including 60 healthy female volunteers, in the age range 18-40 years. Group 1 (N=30) will receive sex-hormone manipulation with GnRHa, and group 2 (N=30) will receive placebo (saline injection). The inclusion will be stratified according to a polymorphism in the serotonin transporter promoter region (5-HTLPR). The investigation program includes functional brain imaging of the serotonin transporter with \[11C\]DASB PET (6) and fMRI, structural brain imaging, blood measurements of sex-hormone levels, inflammatory and epigenetic biomarkers, characterization of the cortisol awakening response, and psychophysiological measures of information processing, and monitoring of symptoms of mental distress and psychopathology across the intervention period. An initial screening program will secure inclusion of healthy controls only and determine trait parameters such as genotypes, IQ and personality measures. The study was registered at and approved by the Danish Ethical Committee before participant inclusion under the protocol identification number: H-2-2010-108. All participants gave written informed consent.

Interventions

DRUGGoserelin 3.6 mg implant

Pharmacologically induced biphasic sex-steroid hormone fluctuation

DRUGPlacebo

Injection of saline

Sponsors

Center for Integrated Molecular Brain Imaging, Copenhagen, Denmak
CollaboratorOTHER
Fertility Clinic Rigshospitalet
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
CNSR, Glostrup Psychiatric Center
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Danish Multiple Sclerosis Center Rigshospitalet
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Dept. of Clinical Immunology, Rigshospitalet
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Gitte Moos Knudsen
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 40 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Healthy women * Regular menstrual cycles (23 -35 days cycle length) * No systemic or intrauterine steroid hormone use

Exclusion criteria

* Psychiatric disorder (DSM IV Axis I or WHO ICD-10 diagnostic classification). * Prior or present neurological or other severe medical condition including substance abuse. * No drug intake suspected to influence results * Conditions that may increase risk by participating in the study program including ovarian cysts * Pregnancy during the last year * Delivery during the last 2 years * Presently wishing to obtain pregnancy * Breast feeding * Not fluent in Danish or severe visual or hearing impairments * Earlier or present learning disabilities * Claustrophobia (due to MRI scans) * Metal implants (excludes MRI)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Changes from baseline in hippocampal microstructureBaseline to follow-up 16±3 days after interventionHippocampal microstructure from MRI
Changes from baseline in reaction timeBaseline to follow-up 16±3 days after interventionChanges in reaction time
Serial mood fluctuations (SD of total mood disturbance (TMD) score of daily POMS across intervention period)Intervention start to follow-up 16±3 days after interventionMood fluctuations measured by serial collection of daily POMS
Changes from baseline in hippocampal volumeBaseline to follow-up 16±3 days after interventionHippocampal volumes from structural MRI
Changes in pre-pulse-inhibition (PPI) from baselineBaseline to follow-up 16±3 days after interventionChange in amplitude of the startle response to pulse after pre-pulse warning as measured by EMG in the orbicularis oculi muscle (subtraction of averages across a series of 10 repititions at baseline and at follow-up 16±3 days).
Changes in a set of markers of immunoactivity across study periodBaseline, intervention time, flare-up phase and follow-upCytokines, hsCRP and gene transcript profile markers of
Changes in epigenetic markers of estrogen sensitivityBaseline to follow-up 16±3 days after interventionEpigenetic (methylation) markers
Changes in HPA-axis dynamics (the cortisol awakening response)Baseline to follow-up 16±3 days after interventionThe cortical awakening response
Changes in sensorimotor gating (P50 suppression) from baselineBaseline to follow-up 16±3 days after interventionChanges in sensorimotor gating (P50 suppression) from baseline
Changes from baseline in symptoms of depressionBaseline to follow-up 16±3 days after interventionHamilton 17 item score
Changes from baseline in serotonin transporter binding in volumes of interest (VOIs)Baseline to follow-up 16±3 days after interventionPET scan assessed serotonin transporter binding changes
Changes from baseline in fMRI response to emotional facesBaseline to follow-up 16±3 days after interventionfMRI response changes to emotional faces in emotion processing network including amygdala reactivity
Changes from baseline in fMRI response to gambling paradigmBaseline to follow-up 16±3 days after interventionfMRI response changes to reward (monetary win) paradigm in reward processing network
Changes from baseline in rsfMRI changes in functional connectivityBaseline to follow-up 16±3 days after interventionrsfMRI changes in functional connectivity in response to intervention
Changes from baseline in affective cognition (VAMT-24 test)Baseline to follow-up 16±3 days after interventionNeuropsychological (VAMT-24 test) outcomes on affective cognition

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Changes from baseline in fMRI responses to emotional memory paradigmBaseline to follow-up 16±3 days after interventionChanges in brain activation to fMRI emotional memory paradigm - delayed recall forgetting of word prior to emotional disturbance
Changes from baseline in Cohens perceived stress scoreBaseline to follow-up 16±3 days after interventionChanges Cohens perceived stress score
Changes in Pittsburg Sleep Quality Inventory (PSQI)Baseline and 1 time per week until follow-up at 16 ±3 daysSleep quality self reported weekly across intervention period
Side effects scores (project specific 15 items questionnaire)7, 12 and 30 days post interventionTotal side effect score across and after intervention period
Changes in SCL-R (Symptom check-list revised)Baseline and 1 time per week from intervention to follow up at 16±3 days post interventionChanges in symptoms of psychopathology across intervention period
Major Depression Inventory (MDI)Baseline and 1 time per week from intervention to follow up at 16±3 days post interventionChanges in self-reported symptoms of depression across intervention period
Changes in profile of mood states (POMS TMD score)Baseline and 1 time per week from intervention to follow up at 16±3 days post interventionChanges in self-reported symptoms of mental distress across intervention period

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Ovarian hormone responses to interventionBaseline (i.e, cycle day 5-8), intervention time (i.e cycle day 21-23), flare-up phase (i.e, 3-4 days post intervention) and follow-up (i.e.,16±3 days post intervention)Ovarian hormone responses to intervention, i.e. concentrations of estradiol, progesterone and testosterone in peripheral blood)

Countries

Denmark

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 3, 2026