Cancer-related Cognitive Impairment, Cancer-related Fatigue
Conditions
Brief summary
The main purpose of this interdisciplinary proposal is to conduct two randomized controlled trial (RCT) of the efficacy of self-administered systematic light exposure (Bright White Light (BWL)), an innovative, low cost, and low burden intervention to treat cancer-related fatigue. Another common and often overlapping treatment side-effect is cognitive impairment. A secondary outcome of the proposed RCT is, thus, cognitive functioning. Finally, possible underlying chronobiological (circadian activity rhythms, sleep), biological (pro inflammatory markers), and neurophysiological (brain morphology) mechanisms of BWL will be explored.
Detailed description
Two independent but similar RCTs with a total of 144 breast cancer patients (Group 1 = 72 high risk patients; Group 2 = 72 low risk breast cancer patients) post-treatment screened for fatigue will be randomized to BWL (36 in each of the two groups) or dim light(DL) (36 in each of the two groups) exposure for 30 minutes/morning for 4 weeks, and assessed before, during, immediately and 3 months after the intervention. Measures include questionnaires, cognitive assessment, actigraphy, blood samples, saliva samples, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). 1.1 Aims and hypotheses. Aim 1: To test the efficacy of BWL on fatigue (primary outcome) in breast cancer patients. Hypothesis 1: Compared with control participants exposed to DL, participants randomized to BWL will report less fatigue immediately and 3 months after the intervention. Aim 2: To test the efficacy of BWL on cognitive functioning (secondary outcome). Hypothesis 2: Compared with controls, BWL recipients will show improved cognitive functioning immediately and 3 months after the intervention. Aim 3: To explore the effects of BWL on chronobiological, biological, and neurophysiological markers. Hypothesis 3: BWL will be associated with normalized circadian activity rhythms (3a); improved sleep (3b); decreased inflammation (3c); increased cortical and subcortical grey matter density (3d); and increased cortical and subcortical white matter integrity (3e). If hypotheses 1 and/or 2 are confirmed, the mediating effects of the markers will be explored.
Interventions
DEVICELitebook
Sponsors
Aarhus University Hospital
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
- Group 1: * High-risk breast cancer patients as defined by the Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group (DBCG) having received treatment according to the DBCG guidelines * Minimum age of 18 years; completion of adjuvant whole breast radiation treatments * A score \<34 on the FACIT-Fatigue scale (see below) after radiotherapy * Availability for home-based 4-week BWL/DL-treatment.
Exclusion criteria
* History of chronic fatigue disorders * Pregnancy * Confounding underlying medical illnesses such as significant pre-existing anemia * Diagnosed or suspected psychiatric or medical condition that might contribute to fatigue (other than those caused by the cancer or its treatment) * History of bipolar disease or mania (which are contra-indications for light treatment) * Current clinical depression * History of seasonal affective disorder * Previous diagnosis of sleep apnea, restless legs or other sleep disorders (not including insomnia) known to affect fatigue * Employment in shift work * Chronic use of oral steroid medication * Prior use of light treatment * Use of photosensitising medications * Plans to travel across meridians * Insufficient Danish language proficiency Inclusion criteria - Group 2: * Low-risk postmenopausal patients as defined by the DBCG having received breast-conserving surgery for lymph node-negative breast cancer * Completion of adjuvant whole breast radiation treatments * A score \<34 on the FACIT Fatigue scale (see below) after radiotherapy * Availability for home-based 4-week BWL/DL-treatment.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Cancer-related fatigue (FACIT-fatigue) | Changes in fatigue from baseline to immediately after intervention (T1-T2) |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Connors Continous performance test (CPT-3) | Immediately after intervention |
| Hopkins Verbal Learning Test (HVLT-R) | Immediately after intervention |
| Health-related quality of life (SF-36) | Immediately after intervention and 3 months after intervention |
| Anxiety symptoms (HADS Anxiety) | Immediately after intervention and 3 months after intervention |
| Impact of events (IES-R) | Immediately after intervention and 3 months after intervention |
| Patients assessment of own functioning Inventory (POAFI) | Immediately after intervention and 3 months after intervention |
| Overall neuropsychological composite score | Immediately after intervention and 3 months after intervention |
| Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) | Immediately after intervention and 3 months after intervention |
| Beck's Depression Inventory - II (BDI-II) | Immediately after intervention and 3 months after intervention |
| Psychomotor vigilance test (PVT) | Immediately after intervention |
Other
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Mediators: Changes in circadian activity rhythms (actigraphy) | Changes from baseline to immediately after intervention |
| Mediators: Changes in diurnal Cortisol (saliva samples) | From baseline to immediately after intervention |
| Mediators: Changes in diurnal melatonin (as measured with saliva samples) | From baseline to immediately after intervention |
| Mediators: Changes in grey matter density as measured by T-1 weighted MR imaging (voxel-based morphometry) | Immediately after intervention |
| Mediators: Changes in brain white mater diffusion integrity as measured with diffusion-weighted MR imaging: Diffusion/kurtosis parameters. | Immediately after intervention |
| Mediators: Changes in Pro-inflammatory cytokines (Il-1, Il-6, Tnf-alpha) (blood draw) | Changes from baseline to immediately after intervention |
Countries
Denmark
Outcome results
None listed