Skip to content

Families and Schools for Health

Intervening in Family and Peer Contexts to Decrease Child Overweight

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02659319
Acronym
FiSH
Enrollment
541
Registered
2016-01-20
Start date
2005-05-31
Completion date
2010-06-30
Last updated
2016-01-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Overweight, Pediatric Obesity

Keywords

Child overweight, Child obesity, Family dynamics, Peer relationships, Family intervention, School intervention, Parenting

Brief summary

The purpose of the study is to test the effectiveness of a child obesity intervention with multiple components targeting nutrition and/or psycho-social factors in children, their parents, and their classmates. The specific aims of the study are to (1) Determine the effectiveness of two family-level interventions for improving child outcomes (unhealthy eating, low activity, and overweight); (2) Determine the extent to which adding a family dynamics component enhances the effectiveness of a family lifestyle intervention and improves the child outcomes listed above; and (3) Determine the extent to which a peer-level intervention improves the effectiveness of two family-level interventions among overweight children.

Detailed description

The Families and Schools for Health (FiSH) Project evaluates a psychosocial intervention that targets the family and peer contexts of overweight children. 23 rural schools were identified for participation (schools within a 90-mile radius of the PI's campus were targeted) and each was assigned to one of five intervention conditions using stratified random sampling, with stratification based on proximity to each other (to avoid spill-over effects) and proportion of Native American Indian students. A community sample of 1186 1st grade children, their families, and their teachers were successfully recruited. Anthropometric assessments were conducted with the 1186 children. Those who were not at Control schools were invited to participate in the intervention. 541 children qualified for the intervention (i.e., had BMI% \> 75%), including 459 at Intervention schools and 82 at Control schools. Intervention conditions were (1) a 12-week Family Food & Lifestyle intervention (FL), aimed at improving family nutritional intake, activity levels, weight perception, and parental monitoring of child eating; (2) a 12-week Family Food & Lifestyle and Family Dynamics intervention (FL+FD) that additionally targets dysfunctional family patterns such as high conflict, poor parent-child communication, and parental over-control or permissiveness; and (3) a Peer Group (PG) intervention conducted throughout one semester of the school year that includes a guidance-type curriculum sensitizing children to the importance of social inclusion of all children. Thus, 5 treatment groups were evaluated in the intervention year and followed through 4th grade: FL, FL+FD, FL+PG, FL+FD+PG, and Control. Child psychosocial variables such as emotional eating, self-esteem, loneliness, and social withdrawal will be analyzed as mediators between family/peer contexts and child overweight.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALFamily Lifestyle (FL)

12-week Family Food & Lifestyle intervention, aimed at improving family nutritional intake, activity levels, weight perception, and parental monitoring of child eating. Material is delivered in psychoeducational groups in the children's schools.

BEHAVIORALFamily Dynamics (FD)

The Family Dynamics intervention focuses on positive parenting (i.e., emotion coaching, praise, limit setting) and on child emotion regulation and positive problem solving. Material is delivered in psychoeducational groups in the children's schools.

BEHAVIORALPeer Group (PG)

Peer Group intervention conducted throughout one semester of the school year that includes 12 sessions of a guidance-type curriculum during class time sensitizing children to the importance of social inclusion of all children

Sponsors

Amanda Harrist
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
FACTORIAL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Children with BMI% greater than or equal to 75% who were enrolled in first grade in participating schools.

Exclusion criteria

* Children with BMI% \< 75%.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Body Mass Change from Baseline to End of 1st gradeWave 2, Spring Year 1Height and weight measured at Wave 2 (Spring 1st grade), vs. Baseline at Fall 1st grade
Body Mass Change from Baseline to End of 2nd gradeWave 3, Spring Year 2Height and weight measured at Wave 3 (Spring 2nd grade), vs. Baseline at Wave 1, Fall 1st grade
Body Mass Change from Baseline to End of 3rd gradeWave 4, Spring Year 3Height and weight measured at Wave 4 (Spring 3rd grade), vs. Baseline at Wave 1, Fall 1st grade
Body Mass Change from Baseline to End of 4th gradeWave 5, Spring Year 4Height and weight measured at Wave 5 (Spring 4th grade) vs. Baseline at Wave 1, Fall 1st grade

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Parent perceived responsibility, weight, child weight, concerns about weight, feeding practices - parent reportWave 1 Fall year 1, Wave 2 Spring year 1, Wave 3 Spring year 2, Wave 4 Spring year 3, Wave 5 Spring year 4
Parent expectations about, parent modeling of, and parent perception of child beliefs regarding eating - parent reportWave 1 Fall year 1, Wave 2 Spring year 1, Wave 3 Spring year 2, Wave 4 Spring year 3, Wave 5 Spring year 4
Family problem solving, communication, affective responsiveness, affective involvement, & general family functioning - parent reportWave 1 Fall year 1, Wave 2 Spring year 1, Wave 3 Spring year 2, Wave 4 Spring year 3, Wave 5 Spring year 4
Parenting style (permissive, authoritative, authoritarian) - parent reportWave 1 Fall year 1, Wave 2 Spring year 1, Wave 3 Spring year 2, Wave 4 Spring year 3, Wave 5 Spring year 4
Parent response to child negative emotions - parent reportWave 1 Fall year 1, Wave 2 Spring year 1, Wave 3 Spring year 2, Wave 4 Spring year 3, Wave 5 Spring year 4
Child temperament - child and parent reportWave 2 Spring year 1, Wave 3 Spring year 2, Wave 4 Spring year 3, Wave 5 Spring year 4
Child emotion management - Parent and child reportWave 2 Spring year 1, Wave 3 Spring year 2, Wave 4 Spring year 3, Wave 5 Spring year 4
Child behavior problems - Parent and teacher report (externalizing, internalizing)Wave 1 Fall year 1, Wave 2 Spring year 1, Wave 3 Spring year 2, Wave 4 Spring year 3, Wave 5 Spring year 4
School climateWave 1 Fall year 1, Wave 2 Spring year 1, Wave 3 Spring year 2, Wave 4 Spring year 3, Wave 5 Spring year 4
Peer relations - child, peer, and teacher reportsWave 1 Fall year 1, Wave 2 Spring year 1, Wave 3 Spring year 2, Wave 4 Spring year 3, Wave 5 Spring year 4
Child emotional and external eating - child self reportWave 1 Fall year 1, Wave 2 Spring year 1, Wave 3 Spring year 2, Wave 4 Spring year 3, Wave 5 Spring year 4
Body esteem - child self reportWave 1 Fall year 1, Wave 2 Spring year 1, Wave 3 Spring year 2, Wave 4 Spring year 3, Wave 5 Spring year 4
Child self esteem - child self reportWave 1 Fall year 1, Wave 2 Spring year 1, Wave 3 Spring year 2, Wave 4 Spring year 3, Wave 5 Spring year 4
Child depressive symptoms - child self reportWave 1 Fall year 1, Wave 2 Spring year 1, Wave 3 Spring year 2, Wave 4 Spring year 3, Wave 5 Spring year 4

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026