Skip to content

Thinking Healthy Program Peer Delivered Plus

Thinking Healthy Program - Peer Delivered in Pakistan - Child-Focused

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02658994
Acronym
THPP+
Enrollment
1154
Registered
2016-01-20
Start date
2014-10-31
Completion date
2019-08-01
Last updated
2021-04-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Depression

Brief summary

Background The negative effects of perinatal depression on mother and child start early and persist throughout the life-course. Given that 10-35% of children worldwide are exposed to perinatal depression in their first year of life, 16 mitigating this intergenerational risk is a global public health priority. However, there is a dearth of studies on whether a maternal depression intervention can have long-term benefits for either the mother or her child. This is a study of the effectiveness of an extended 36-month peer-delivered depression intervention, the Thinking Healthy Programme PLUS (THPP+) for women and their children in rural Pakistan. Study Design The THPP+ study aims to evaluate the effects of an extended 36-month perinatal depression intervention on mother and child outcomes using a cluster randomized controlled trial (c-RCT) design. The trial will recruit 560 pregnant women who screened positive for perinatal depression (PHQ-9 \>=10) from 40 village clusters, of which 20 clusters will receive the THPP+ intervention delivered by trained peers. These women will have already been participating in the trial of the shorter, 6 month long, version of the intervention. Women in the THPP+ intervention arm will receive bimonthly group-based sessions. Primary outcomes are 3-year maternal depression and 3-year child socio-emotional and cognitive development. All primary analyses will be intention-to-treat and will account for the clustered study design. Discussion This trial has the potential to further significantly our understanding of whether intervening on women's perinatal depression can mitigate the negative effects of maternal depression on 36-month child development.

Detailed description

Every year millions of children begin a compromised developmental trajectory resulting from exposure to maternal depression. In recent years, compelling evidence that maternal depression leads to worse developmental outcomes in the child has prompted a dramatic increase in efforts to ameliorate it. However, empirical evidence linking depression treatment to improved developmental trajectories in offspring is far from robust. The evidence is lacking due to several methodological limitations of previous studies, namely, insufficient follow-up, lack of appropriate control group, and/or lack of attention to the psychological and behavioral mechanisms underlying the impact of interventions on both the mother and child. We propose an innovative, cost-effective extension to an NIMH-funded perinatal depression cluster randomized controlled intervention trial (RCT) in Pakistan (SHARE: U19MH095687). The SHARE RCT includes individual and community-wide components and follows mothers with prenatal depression until 6 months postpartum. Our proposal, SHARE CHILD, builds on this trial in several critical ways. We (1) focus on child outcomes, (2) extend follow-up to 36 months postpartum, (3) include mothers who did not screen positive for depression in the 3rd trimester, thus enabling additional comparisons, and (4) investigate factors that mediate and modify the effect of the intervention on child outcomes. A unique window of opportunity is made possible due to the anticipated spring 2014 enrollment start date of the SHARE trial. Our long-term goal is to identify key modifiable factors in the intergenerational transmission of risk from depressed mothers to their children. The overall objective of this proposal is to rigorously evaluate the impact of a community based perinatal depression intervention on child development by expanding the sample of an already funded RCT and extending the follow-up period to 36 months postpartum. Our central hypothesis is that the perinatal depression intervention will lead to improved child socio-emotional, cognitive, and physical outcomes. Including the non-depressed dyads in our analyses will enable us to further determine (a) how much of the excess risk due to maternal depression exposure the intervention can mitigate and (b) whether this community based intervention has an impact on all children living in the intervention clusters, even if their mothers were not depressed prenatally. Such insights would not otherwise be possible without this expanded sample given the dearth of information on child developmental norms in this setting. Together, the unique opportunity to extend the SHARE trial to the broader SHARE CHILD study and the approaches we propose will yield novel and definitive evidence of the impact of treating perinatal depression on child developmental outcomes.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALThinking Healthy Program Peer Delivered Plus
OTHEREnhanced Usual Care

Sponsors

Duke University
CollaboratorOTHER
Columbia University
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Liverpool
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Essex
CollaboratorOTHER
Human Development Research Foundation, Pakistan
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* currently enrolled in THPP trial * married * residing in study area for the long term

Exclusion criteria

* Requiring immediate medical attention * development of psychotic or manic episode * broken mother-child dyad

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Depression (PHQ-9 Instrument)36 months post-partumThe PHQ-9 is a 9-question instrument given to patients in a primary care setting to screen for the presence and severity of depression. The results may be used to make a depression diagnosis according to the DSM-IV criteria. The PHQ-9 asks about patients experience in the last two weeks. Questions are about the level of interest in doing things, feeling down or depressed, difficulty with sleeping, energy levels, eating habits, self-perception, ability to concentrate, speed of functioning and thoughts of suicide. Responses range from 0 (not at all) to 3 (nearly every day). Scores range from 0-27, a total of 10 or above is suggestive of the presence of depression. PHQ-9 score Depression severity 0-4 minimal depression 5-9 mild depression 10-14 moderate depression 15-19 moderately severe depression 20+ severe depression
Child Strength and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) Total Difficulties (TD) Score36 monthsThe SDQ is a parent-reported measure of 25 child attributes with five subscales of 5 items each; emotional symptoms, conduct problems, hyperactivity, peer problems, and prosocial behavior. The TD score is calculated on the basis of four subscales (omitting prosocial behavior) with a score range of 0-40 points. The SDQ is widely used in low and middle-income countries and has been translated into Urdu. High SDQ scores are associated with a substantial increase in psychiatric risk. The TD score of our child participants is listed as a mean in the values below. TD score of 0-13 is considered close to average, clinically significant problems in this area are unlikely, 14-16 is slightly raised, which may reflect clinically significant problems, and 17-40 is high, there is substantial risk of clinically significant problems in this area.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Disability (WHO Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0)36 months post-partumWHODAS 2.0 was used to assess disability in the women in the cohort, the 12-item questionnaire was used to assess level of functionality over the last 30 days. The cohort was asked questions 2-13, and simple scoring was used. Responses to questions were none (0 points), mild difficulty (1 point), severe difficulty (2 points), and extreme difficulty/cannot do (4 points). Responses to the items were summed and scaled to a 0-100 scale to compute a total score, where 0 indicated no disability and 100 indicated full disability.
Infant Cognitive Development (Bayley Scales of Infant Development)36 monthsBayley Scales of Infant Development-III (BSITD) is an individually administered assessment of the child's achievement of developmental milestones across five areas. For this study, we focus on receptive language and fine motor domains at 36 months. A higher score means higher functioning. The two subscales are not combined, but treated as separate variables. The subscales are scaled according to the procedure outlined in the Bayley reference manual, the scaled score minimum and maximums at 36 months are: Receptive- min: 5; max: 19, Fine Motor- min: 2; max: 19.
Number of Participants With Depression (SCID Major Depressive Episode)36 months post-partumSCID is a semi-structured interview for the diagnoses of psychiatric disorders. It has been cross-culturally adapted for assessing depression among women during pregnancy and in the postpartum period. The PHQ-9 inquires about frequency of depressive symptoms in the last 2 weeks. Given that the PHQ-9 is a screening tool, we use the SCID module for current major depressive episode as a diagnostic tool to assess the criterion-related validity of using the scores from the PHQ-9 to measure the number of symptoms endorsed by the woman over time. The diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM) IV diagnosis of current major depressive episode is generated through the SCID algorithm. If a woman was diagnosed with at least 1 MDE she was included in the outcome below.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Infant Physical Development [Z-scores (Based on WHO Criteria)]36 monthsChild growth was analyzed with the weight-for-age and length-for-age z scores.

Countries

Pakistan

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

1154 pregnant women were enrolled in the study. Enhanced usual care (EUC) group had 287, THPP had 283, no prenatal depression had 584. The study team attempted to interview all women at all follow up visits (baseline, 3 mo, 6 mo, 12 mo, 24 mo, 36 mo). If a woman missed a previous visit, (LTFU, temporarily absent, refused) she was not excluded from participating in further visits. Therefore, the number of participants at each follow up visit may increase and decrease but will not exceed 1154.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Enhanced Usual Care
Informing participants and LHWs about depression status and ways to seek help.
287
THPP and THPP+
Group based booster sessions which included peer support behavioral activation and problem solving.
283
No Prenatal Depression
No prenatal depression at baseline.
584
Total1,154

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicEnhanced Usual CareTHPP and THPP+No Prenatal DepressionTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
287 Participants283 Participants584 Participants1154 Participants
Duration of depression (chronicity)
<12 weeks
38 Participants35 Participants73 Participants
Duration of depression (chronicity)
>12 weeks
155 Participants171 Participants326 Participants
Duration of depression (chronicity)
Data missing
94 Participants77 Participants171 Participants
Mother's education
Middle or secondary (6-12)
134 Participants145 Participants338 Participants617 Participants
Mother's education
None
55 Participants52 Participants63 Participants170 Participants
Mother's education
Primary (1-5)
71 Participants68 Participants87 Participants226 Participants
Mother's education
Tertiary >13
27 Participants18 Participants96 Participants141 Participants
Nuclear family49 Participants50 Participants59 Participants158 Participants
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Pakistan
287 participants283 participants584 participants1154 participants
SES (assets)
Lower-middle quintile
67 Participants71 Participants93 Participants231 Participants
SES (assets)
Lowest quintile
74 Participants85 Participants71 Participants230 Participants
SES (assets)
Middle quintile
55 Participants50 Participants126 Participants231 Participants
SES (assets)
Upper-middle quintile
47 Participants39 Participants145 Participants231 Participants
SES (assets)
Upper quintile
44 Participants38 Participants149 Participants231 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
287 Participants283 Participants584 Participants1154 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Total number of children in the household
1-3
183 Participants180 Participants336 Participants699 Participants
Total number of children in the household
4 or more
32 Participants38 Participants36 Participants106 Participants
Total number of children in the household
First pregnancy
72 Participants65 Participants212 Participants349 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
30 / 28728 / 28347 / 584
other
Total, other adverse events
3 / 2875 / 2837 / 584
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 2870 / 2830 / 584

Outcome results

Primary

Child Strength and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) Total Difficulties (TD) Score

The SDQ is a parent-reported measure of 25 child attributes with five subscales of 5 items each; emotional symptoms, conduct problems, hyperactivity, peer problems, and prosocial behavior. The TD score is calculated on the basis of four subscales (omitting prosocial behavior) with a score range of 0-40 points. The SDQ is widely used in low and middle-income countries and has been translated into Urdu. High SDQ scores are associated with a substantial increase in psychiatric risk. The TD score of our child participants is listed as a mean in the values below. TD score of 0-13 is considered close to average, clinically significant problems in this area are unlikely, 14-16 is slightly raised, which may reflect clinically significant problems, and 17-40 is high, there is substantial risk of clinically significant problems in this area.

Time frame: 36 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Enhanced Usual CareChild Strength and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) Total Difficulties (TD) Score14.72 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.13
THPP and THPP+Child Strength and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) Total Difficulties (TD) Score14.73 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.04
No Prenatal DepressionChild Strength and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) Total Difficulties (TD) Score13.69 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.34
95% CI: [-1.39, 1.19]
Primary

Depression (PHQ-9 Instrument)

The PHQ-9 is a 9-question instrument given to patients in a primary care setting to screen for the presence and severity of depression. The results may be used to make a depression diagnosis according to the DSM-IV criteria. The PHQ-9 asks about patients experience in the last two weeks. Questions are about the level of interest in doing things, feeling down or depressed, difficulty with sleeping, energy levels, eating habits, self-perception, ability to concentrate, speed of functioning and thoughts of suicide. Responses range from 0 (not at all) to 3 (nearly every day). Scores range from 0-27, a total of 10 or above is suggestive of the presence of depression. PHQ-9 score Depression severity 0-4 minimal depression 5-9 mild depression 10-14 moderate depression 15-19 moderately severe depression 20+ severe depression

Time frame: 36 months post-partum

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Enhanced Usual CareDepression (PHQ-9 Instrument)6.48 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.25
THPP and THPP+Depression (PHQ-9 Instrument)5.84 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.8
No Prenatal DepressionDepression (PHQ-9 Instrument)3.44 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.53
95% CI: [-0.33, 0.07]
Secondary

Disability (WHO Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0)

WHODAS 2.0 was used to assess disability in the women in the cohort, the 12-item questionnaire was used to assess level of functionality over the last 30 days. The cohort was asked questions 2-13, and simple scoring was used. Responses to questions were none (0 points), mild difficulty (1 point), severe difficulty (2 points), and extreme difficulty/cannot do (4 points). Responses to the items were summed and scaled to a 0-100 scale to compute a total score, where 0 indicated no disability and 100 indicated full disability.

Time frame: 36 months post-partum

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Enhanced Usual CareDisability (WHO Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0)16.11 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.12
THPP and THPP+Disability (WHO Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0)16.71 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.52
No Prenatal DepressionDisability (WHO Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0)5.61 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.46
95% CI: [-0.33, 0.09]
Secondary

Infant Cognitive Development (Bayley Scales of Infant Development)

Bayley Scales of Infant Development-III (BSITD) is an individually administered assessment of the child's achievement of developmental milestones across five areas. For this study, we focus on receptive language and fine motor domains at 36 months. A higher score means higher functioning. The two subscales are not combined, but treated as separate variables. The subscales are scaled according to the procedure outlined in the Bayley reference manual, the scaled score minimum and maximums at 36 months are: Receptive- min: 5; max: 19, Fine Motor- min: 2; max: 19.

Time frame: 36 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Enhanced Usual CareInfant Cognitive Development (Bayley Scales of Infant Development)Child Bayley scaled receptive score9.98 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.6
Enhanced Usual CareInfant Cognitive Development (Bayley Scales of Infant Development)Child Bayley scaled fine motor score11.38 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.12
THPP and THPP+Infant Cognitive Development (Bayley Scales of Infant Development)Child Bayley scaled receptive score10.42 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.81
THPP and THPP+Infant Cognitive Development (Bayley Scales of Infant Development)Child Bayley scaled fine motor score11.42 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.05
No Prenatal DepressionInfant Cognitive Development (Bayley Scales of Infant Development)Child Bayley scaled receptive score10.41 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.79
No Prenatal DepressionInfant Cognitive Development (Bayley Scales of Infant Development)Child Bayley scaled fine motor score11.31 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.99
Comparison: Child Bayley scaled receptive score95% CI: [-0.19, 0.96]
Comparison: Child Bayley scaled fine motor score95% CI: [-0.83, 0.9]
Secondary

Number of Participants With Depression (SCID Major Depressive Episode)

SCID is a semi-structured interview for the diagnoses of psychiatric disorders. It has been cross-culturally adapted for assessing depression among women during pregnancy and in the postpartum period. The PHQ-9 inquires about frequency of depressive symptoms in the last 2 weeks. Given that the PHQ-9 is a screening tool, we use the SCID module for current major depressive episode as a diagnostic tool to assess the criterion-related validity of using the scores from the PHQ-9 to measure the number of symptoms endorsed by the woman over time. The diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM) IV diagnosis of current major depressive episode is generated through the SCID algorithm. If a woman was diagnosed with at least 1 MDE she was included in the outcome below.

Time frame: 36 months post-partum

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Enhanced Usual CareNumber of Participants With Depression (SCID Major Depressive Episode)48 Participants
THPP and THPP+Number of Participants With Depression (SCID Major Depressive Episode)34 Participants
No Prenatal DepressionNumber of Participants With Depression (SCID Major Depressive Episode)42 Participants
95% CI: [0.43, 1.05]
Other Pre-specified

Infant Physical Development [Z-scores (Based on WHO Criteria)]

Child growth was analyzed with the weight-for-age and length-for-age z scores.

Time frame: 36 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Enhanced Usual CareInfant Physical Development [Z-scores (Based on WHO Criteria)]length-for-age-1.03 z scoreStandard Deviation 1.01
Enhanced Usual CareInfant Physical Development [Z-scores (Based on WHO Criteria)]weight-for-age-0.95 z scoreStandard Deviation 1.03
THPP and THPP+Infant Physical Development [Z-scores (Based on WHO Criteria)]length-for-age-1.12 z scoreStandard Deviation 1.13
THPP and THPP+Infant Physical Development [Z-scores (Based on WHO Criteria)]weight-for-age-1.06 z scoreStandard Deviation 0.97
No Prenatal DepressionInfant Physical Development [Z-scores (Based on WHO Criteria)]length-for-age-0.96 z scoreStandard Deviation 1.11
No Prenatal DepressionInfant Physical Development [Z-scores (Based on WHO Criteria)]weight-for-age-0.94 z scoreStandard Deviation 0.98
Comparison: Length-for-age z-scores95% CI: [-0.32, 0.15]
Comparison: Weight-for-age z-scores95% CI: [-0.33, 0.1]

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 12, 2026