Skip to content

Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Veterans With TBI

Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia for Veterans With History of TBI

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02658669
Enrollment
73
Registered
2016-01-20
Start date
2016-04-01
Completion date
2022-09-30
Last updated
2024-09-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Insomnia, Traumatic Brain Injury

Keywords

Insomnia, Injury, Brain, Traumatic Mild

Brief summary

Many Operation Enduring Freedom/Operation Iraqi Freedom/Operation New Dawn era Veterans have suffered a mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI), and now cope with multiple post-injury symptoms, including sleep disturbances (especially insomnia). Chronic insomnia in mTBI patients has the potential to exacerbate other symptoms, delay recovery, and negatively affect many of the cognitive, psychological, and neuromuscular sequelae of mTBI, thereby decreasing quality of life. Although Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia (CBT-I) has been shown to be an effective evidence-based treatment for insomnia, there are no published randomized controlled trials evaluating the potential strengths and/or limitations of CBT-I in post-mTBI patients. Therefore, assessing CBT-I in the context of mTBI holds promise to provide substantial benefits in terms of improved rehabilitation outcomes in Veterans who have suffered mTBI.

Detailed description

This VA Rehabilitation Research and Development Career Development Award (CDA-2) proposal is designed to significantly advance the application of Behavioral Sleep Medicine practices in the treatment of Veterans seen in the VA Healthcare System, especially those recovering from traumatic brain injury (TBI). TBI has been deemed the signature wound of the Iraq and Afghanistan Wars, occurring in about 19.5% of Operation Enduring Freedom/Operation Iraqi Freedom/Operation New Dawn (OEF/OIF/OND) service members. For many Veterans, mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) can be associated with persistent post-concussive symptoms, especially sleep disturbances. Sleep disturbances are among the most frequent complaints following mTBI, with studies suggesting that over 93% of Veterans who experienced brain injuries develop chronic sleep problems. Of the sleep disturbances diagnosed in this patient population the most common is insomnia, observed in over 50% of patients. Chronic and untreated insomnia is known to be associated with and/or increase risk for psychiatric problems, suicidal ideation, and unhealthy lifestyles (e.g., alcohol/drug abuse), lead to poorer physical health, disruption in major social and occupational responsibilities, and decreased quality of life, and may generally contribute to the persistence of post-concussive symptoms beyond the expected period of recovery. As such, treatment of sleep disturbance represents an essential component of Veteran care, one which may be particularly beneficial for Veterans with history of mTBI who commonly present to the clinic with complex multi-symptom concerns. To address this important clinical issue, the proposed randomized clinical trial (RCT) will attempt to assess the efficacy of Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia (CBT-I) versus a Sleep Education control in Veterans with insomnia and a history of mTBI. CBT-I is recommended by the American Academy of Sleep Medicine for treatment of chronic insomnia and has also been adopted by the VA within an Evidence Based Practice roll-out program. Despite the acceptance of CBT-I as a first line treatment for sleep disturbance, there are no published RCTs evaluating CBT-I in mTBI patient populations. Therefore, this proposed investigation will address this gap in the literature by assessing the efficacy of CBT-I in Veterans with history of head injury.

Interventions

Intervention includes strategies designed to improve sleep such as: sleep restriction, stimulus-control techniques, sleep hygiene education, and relaxation training.

BEHAVIORALSleep Education

Intervention includes sleep hygiene education and education regarding the impact of TBI on sleep.

Sponsors

VA Office of Research and Development
Lead SponsorFED

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 55 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. OEF/OIF/OND Veteran ages 18-55. 2. Documented history of mild TBI (documented in the medical record and where possible from the VA TBI second-level evaluation) 1. Loss of consciousness 30 minutes 2. Post-traumatic amnesia 1 day 3. At least 3 months post-TBI. 4. A diagnosis of insomnia classified as: 1. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-5 (DSM 5) criteria that include: trouble falling asleep, staying asleep, waking too early, and/or non-restorative sleep with accompanied daytime impairment in functioning for \> 3 months, occurring at least 3 nights per week. 2. Subjective sleep disturbance defined by a Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index score \>5 and Insomnia Severity Index score \>7 at intake. 5. No prior exposure to and/or treatment with CBT-I within the past 2 years. 6. Must be stable on medication regimen for at least 1 month prior to enrollment in study.

Exclusion criteria

1. History of a neurological disorder (besides TBI), dementia, or premorbid IQ \<70. 2. Schizophrenia, psychotic disorder, and/or bipolar disorder. 3. Evidence of suicidality more than low risk as determined by the VA Comprehensive Suicide Risk Assessment (CSRA). 4. Sleep disturbances other than insomnia (e.g., untreated obstructive sleep apnea and/or periodic limb movements) 5. Alcohol and/or substance abuse within the past 30 days.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Insomnia SeverityPre-Treatment (0-weeks), Post-Treatment (8-weeks), Follow-Up (12-weeks)Change in insomnia severity. Scale used is Insomnia Severity Index (ISI). Minimum value= 0; maximum value = 28. Lower score equals better outcome.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Depressive SymptomatologyPre-Treatment (0-weeks), Post-Treatment (8-weeks), Follow-Up (12-weeks)Change in depressive symptoms assessed using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) a self-report measure of depression. Minimum value = 0; maximum value = 27. Lower scores indicate fewer depressive symptoms.
Change in PTSD Stressor Specific Checklist 5Pre- Treatment (0-weeks), Post-Treatment (8-weeks), Follow-Up (12-weeks)Change in PTSD symptoms assessed using the PTSD Stressor Specific Checklist 5 (PCL-5) a self-report measure of PTSD. Minimum score = 0, maximum score = 80. Lower scores indicate less PTSD symptomatology.
Change in World Health Organization Disability Assessment Scale-2Pre- Treatment (0-weeks), Post-Treatment (8-weeks), Follow-Up (12-weeks)Change in global functioning and disability will be assessed using the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Scale-2, a self-report measure. Minimum value = 0; maximum value = 100. Lower scores indicates less disability.
Change in Pittsburgh Sleep Quality IndexPre- Treatment (0-weeks), Post-Treatment (8-weeks), Follow-Up (12-weeks)Change in sleep quality will be assessed with the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). Minimum value = 0; maximum value= 21. Lower score indicates less general sleep disturbance.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) PainPre- Treatment (0-weeks), Post-Treatment (8-weeks), Follow-Up (12-weeks)Change in pain will be assessed using the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) pain assessment, as self-report measure of pain. Measures are scored on a T-score (mean=50, SD=10) Minimum score = \<20 ; maximum score = \>80. Lower scores indicate less pain interference in daily life.
Change in Neuropsychological Functioning: Attention/Processing SpeedPre- Treatment (0-weeks), Post-Treatment (8-weeks), Follow-Up (12-weeks)Change in cognitive functioning will be evaluated through standardized assessments of attention and processing speed. The tasks that will be administered include: the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale Fourth Edition (WAIS-IV) Digit Symbol and Symbol Search to measure attention and processing speed. WAIS-IV raw minimum value score=45; maximum score=155. Scaled score used: minimum score = 1; maximum score = 19. Higher score equals a better outcome.
Change In Neuropsychological Functioning: Verbal Learning and MemoryPre- Treatment (0-weeks), Post-Treatment (8-weeks), Follow-Up (12-weeks)Change in cognitive functioning will be evaluated through standardized assessments of verbal learning and memory. The Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised (HVLT-R) was used to measure learning and memory, and was measured by Total Recall score and Delayed Recall score. HVLT Total Recall raw scores minimum value=0; maximum value=36. Measures scored on a T-Score; minimum t-score score:0, maximum t-score \>80. Higher t-scores indicate better outcome. HVLT delayed recall minimum raw score value=0; maximum value=12. Measures scored on a T-Score; maximum t-score value: 60, minimum =0. Higher t-scores indicate better outcome. Population mean and standard deviation calculated based on age. Mean age of the population was 36 years = total recall population t score mean: 28.04, SD: 4.43. Delayed recall population t score mean: 9.92, SD: 2.04.
Change In Neuropsychological Functioning: Executive FunctioningPre- Treatment (0-weeks), Post-Treatment (8-weeks), Follow-Up (12-weeks)Change in cognitive functioning will be evaluated through standardized assessments of executive functioning. The Delis-Kaplan Executive Function Scale (D-KEFS) Trials and Color-Word Tasks was used to measure executive functioning, as measured by Color-Word Inhibition, Color-Word Switching Inhibition, and Trails. Scored using a scaled-score (minimum=1, maximum=19 for all measures). Higher scores indicate better outcome.
Change in Sleep Efficiency as Measured by PolysomnographyPre-Treatment (0-weeks),Post-Treatment (8-weeks), Follow-Up (12-weeks)Change in sleep efficiency will be assessed through overnight polysomnographic sleep studies.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Number of participants enrolled (73) differs from participants started due to lack of eligibility post consent/baseline or declining continued participation.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia
6-week manualized treatment designed to improve symptoms of chronic insomnia. Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia: Intervention includes strategies designed to improve sleep such as: sleep restriction, stimulus-control techniques, sleep hygiene education, and relaxation training.
27
Sleep Education
6-week manualized treatment designed to provide information regarding traumatic brain injury and its relationship to sleep disturbance, which incorporates training in sleep hygiene to help improve nighttime sleep and daytime functioning. Sleep Education: Intervention includes sleep hygiene education and education regarding the impact of TBI on sleep.
28
Total55

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up75

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicCognitive-Behavioral Therapy for InsomniaSleep EducationTotal
Age, Continuous37.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.7
34.75 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.1
36.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.97
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
7 Participants3 Participants10 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
20 Participants25 Participants45 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 270 / 28
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 270 / 28
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 270 / 28

Outcome results

Primary

Change in Insomnia Severity

Change in insomnia severity. Scale used is Insomnia Severity Index (ISI). Minimum value= 0; maximum value = 28. Lower score equals better outcome.

Time frame: Pre-Treatment (0-weeks), Post-Treatment (8-weeks), Follow-Up (12-weeks)

Population: Overall number of participants analyzed reflects patients assessed at week 0, and total number analyzed reflected patients who were assessed at later time points. Differences due to drop-out of patients in the study.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for InsomniaChange in Insomnia SeverityISI Pre to Post8.833 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.743
Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for InsomniaChange in Insomnia SeverityISI Pre to Follow-Up9.625 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.927
Sleep EducationChange in Insomnia SeverityISI Pre to Post7.810 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.366
Sleep EducationChange in Insomnia SeverityISI Pre to Follow-Up8.364 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.25
Secondary

Change in Depressive Symptomatology

Change in depressive symptoms assessed using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) a self-report measure of depression. Minimum value = 0; maximum value = 27. Lower scores indicate fewer depressive symptoms.

Time frame: Pre-Treatment (0-weeks), Post-Treatment (8-weeks), Follow-Up (12-weeks)

Population: Overall number of participants analyzed reflects patients assessed at week 0, and total number analyzed reflected patients who were assessed at later time points. Differences due to drop-out of patients in the study.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for InsomniaChange in Depressive SymptomatologyPHQ-9 Pre to Post3.789 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.534
Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for InsomniaChange in Depressive SymptomatologyPHQ-9 Pre to Follow-Up3.250 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.312
Sleep EducationChange in Depressive SymptomatologyPHQ-9 Pre to Post1.609 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.659
Sleep EducationChange in Depressive SymptomatologyPHQ-9 Pre to Follow-Up-2.250 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.907
Secondary

Change in Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index

Change in sleep quality will be assessed with the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). Minimum value = 0; maximum value= 21. Lower score indicates less general sleep disturbance.

Time frame: Pre- Treatment (0-weeks), Post-Treatment (8-weeks), Follow-Up (12-weeks)

Population: Overall number of participants analyzed reflects patients assessed at week 0, and total number analyzed reflected patients who were assessed at later time points. Differences due to drop-out of patients in the study.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for InsomniaChange in Pittsburgh Sleep Quality IndexPSQI Pre to Post5.412 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.183
Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for InsomniaChange in Pittsburgh Sleep Quality IndexPSQI Pre to Follow-Up5.125 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.748
Sleep EducationChange in Pittsburgh Sleep Quality IndexPSQI Pre to Post4.400 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.633
Sleep EducationChange in Pittsburgh Sleep Quality IndexPSQI Pre to Follow-Up4.833 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.821
Secondary

Change in PTSD Stressor Specific Checklist 5

Change in PTSD symptoms assessed using the PTSD Stressor Specific Checklist 5 (PCL-5) a self-report measure of PTSD. Minimum score = 0, maximum score = 80. Lower scores indicate less PTSD symptomatology.

Time frame: Pre- Treatment (0-weeks), Post-Treatment (8-weeks), Follow-Up (12-weeks)

Population: Difference in overall number of participants and number analyzed differs due to lack of completion of treatment. Overall number refers to those who were assessed at week-0 treatment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for InsomniaChange in PTSD Stressor Specific Checklist 5PCL-5 Pre to Post8.053 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.373
Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for InsomniaChange in PTSD Stressor Specific Checklist 5PCL-5 Pre to Follow-Up3.125 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.822
Sleep EducationChange in PTSD Stressor Specific Checklist 5PCL-5 Pre to Post6.227 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.497
Sleep EducationChange in PTSD Stressor Specific Checklist 5PCL-5 Pre to Follow-Up4.727 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.516
Secondary

Change in World Health Organization Disability Assessment Scale-2

Change in global functioning and disability will be assessed using the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Scale-2, a self-report measure. Minimum value = 0; maximum value = 100. Lower scores indicates less disability.

Time frame: Pre- Treatment (0-weeks), Post-Treatment (8-weeks), Follow-Up (12-weeks)

Population: Overall number of participants analyzed reflects patients assessed at week 0, and total number analyzed reflected patients who were assessed at later time points. Differences due to drop-out of patients in the study.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for InsomniaChange in World Health Organization Disability Assessment Scale-2WHODAS Pre to Post-0.316 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.478
Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for InsomniaChange in World Health Organization Disability Assessment Scale-2WHODAS Pre to Follow-Up17.200 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.754
Sleep EducationChange in World Health Organization Disability Assessment Scale-2WHODAS Pre to Post1.818 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.702
Sleep EducationChange in World Health Organization Disability Assessment Scale-2WHODAS Pre to Follow-Up8.273 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.032
Other Pre-specified

Change in Neuropsychological Functioning: Attention/Processing Speed

Change in cognitive functioning will be evaluated through standardized assessments of attention and processing speed. The tasks that will be administered include: the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale Fourth Edition (WAIS-IV) Digit Symbol and Symbol Search to measure attention and processing speed. WAIS-IV raw minimum value score=45; maximum score=155. Scaled score used: minimum score = 1; maximum score = 19. Higher score equals a better outcome.

Time frame: Pre- Treatment (0-weeks), Post-Treatment (8-weeks), Follow-Up (12-weeks)

Population: Overall number of participants analyzed reflects patients assessed at week 0, and total number analyzed reflected patients who were assessed at later time points. Differences due to drop-out of patients in the study.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for InsomniaChange in Neuropsychological Functioning: Attention/Processing SpeedSymbol Search WAIS Pre to Post-1.90 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.035
Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for InsomniaChange in Neuropsychological Functioning: Attention/Processing SpeedSymbol Search WAIS Pre to Follow-Up-3.400 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.302
Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for InsomniaChange in Neuropsychological Functioning: Attention/Processing SpeedCoding WAIS Pre to Post-0.667 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for InsomniaChange in Neuropsychological Functioning: Attention/Processing SpeedCoding WAIS Pre to Follow-Up-2.600 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.608
Sleep EducationChange in Neuropsychological Functioning: Attention/Processing SpeedCoding WAIS Pre to Follow-Up-1.100 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.784
Sleep EducationChange in Neuropsychological Functioning: Attention/Processing SpeedSymbol Search WAIS Pre to Post-0.882 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.395
Sleep EducationChange in Neuropsychological Functioning: Attention/Processing SpeedCoding WAIS Pre to Post-1.500 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.875
Sleep EducationChange in Neuropsychological Functioning: Attention/Processing SpeedSymbol Search WAIS Pre to Follow-Up-1.200 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.765
Other Pre-specified

Change In Neuropsychological Functioning: Executive Functioning

Change in cognitive functioning will be evaluated through standardized assessments of executive functioning. The Delis-Kaplan Executive Function Scale (D-KEFS) Trials and Color-Word Tasks was used to measure executive functioning, as measured by Color-Word Inhibition, Color-Word Switching Inhibition, and Trails. Scored using a scaled-score (minimum=1, maximum=19 for all measures). Higher scores indicate better outcome.

Time frame: Pre- Treatment (0-weeks), Post-Treatment (8-weeks), Follow-Up (12-weeks)

Population: Overall number of participants analyzed reflects patients assessed at week 0, and total number analyzed reflected patients who were assessed at later time points. Differences due to drop-out of patients in the study.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for InsomniaChange In Neuropsychological Functioning: Executive FunctioningDKEFS Color-Word Inhibition Pre to Post-1.333 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.803
Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for InsomniaChange In Neuropsychological Functioning: Executive FunctioningDKEFS Color-Word Inhibition Pre to Follow-Up-1.400 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.074
Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for InsomniaChange In Neuropsychological Functioning: Executive FunctioningDKEFS Color Word Inhibition Switching Pre to Post-1.667 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.581
Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for InsomniaChange In Neuropsychological Functioning: Executive FunctioningDKEFS Color Word Inhibition Switching Pre to Follow-Up-1.00 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.581
Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for InsomniaChange In Neuropsychological Functioning: Executive FunctioningDKEFS Trails Pre to Post-0.667 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.581
Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for InsomniaChange In Neuropsychological Functioning: Executive FunctioningDKEFS Trails Pre to Follow-Up-1.400 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.074
Sleep EducationChange In Neuropsychological Functioning: Executive FunctioningDKEFS Trails Pre to Post-0.353 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.169
Sleep EducationChange In Neuropsychological Functioning: Executive FunctioningDKEFS Color-Word Inhibition Pre to Post-0.850 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.412
Sleep EducationChange In Neuropsychological Functioning: Executive FunctioningDKEFS Color Word Inhibition Switching Pre to Follow-Up-2.200 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.53
Sleep EducationChange In Neuropsychological Functioning: Executive FunctioningDKEFS Color-Word Inhibition Pre to Follow-Up-0.700 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.494
Sleep EducationChange In Neuropsychological Functioning: Executive FunctioningDKEFS Trails Pre to Follow-Up-0.700 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.418
Sleep EducationChange In Neuropsychological Functioning: Executive FunctioningDKEFS Color Word Inhibition Switching Pre to Post-1.850 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.059
Other Pre-specified

Change In Neuropsychological Functioning: Verbal Learning and Memory

Change in cognitive functioning will be evaluated through standardized assessments of verbal learning and memory. The Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised (HVLT-R) was used to measure learning and memory, and was measured by Total Recall score and Delayed Recall score. HVLT Total Recall raw scores minimum value=0; maximum value=36. Measures scored on a T-Score; minimum t-score score:0, maximum t-score \>80. Higher t-scores indicate better outcome. HVLT delayed recall minimum raw score value=0; maximum value=12. Measures scored on a T-Score; maximum t-score value: 60, minimum =0. Higher t-scores indicate better outcome. Population mean and standard deviation calculated based on age. Mean age of the population was 36 years = total recall population t score mean: 28.04, SD: 4.43. Delayed recall population t score mean: 9.92, SD: 2.04.

Time frame: Pre- Treatment (0-weeks), Post-Treatment (8-weeks), Follow-Up (12-weeks)

Population: Overall number of participants analyzed reflects patients assessed at week 0, and total number analyzed reflected patients who were assessed at later time points. Differences due to drop-out of patients in the study.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for InsomniaChange In Neuropsychological Functioning: Verbal Learning and MemoryHVLT Total Pre to Post T-Score-0.111 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.937
Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for InsomniaChange In Neuropsychological Functioning: Verbal Learning and MemoryHVLT Total Pre to Follow-Up T-Score-4.200 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.426
Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for InsomniaChange In Neuropsychological Functioning: Verbal Learning and MemoryHVLT Delayed Pre to Post T-Score-4.556 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.485
Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for InsomniaChange In Neuropsychological Functioning: Verbal Learning and MemoryHVLT Delayed Pre to Follow-Up T-Score-3.200 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.985
Sleep EducationChange In Neuropsychological Functioning: Verbal Learning and MemoryHVLT Delayed Pre to Follow-Up T-Score-12.000 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.03
Sleep EducationChange In Neuropsychological Functioning: Verbal Learning and MemoryHVLT Total Pre to Post T-Score-1.099 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.228
Sleep EducationChange In Neuropsychological Functioning: Verbal Learning and MemoryHVLT Delayed Pre to Post T-Score-7.300 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.914
Sleep EducationChange In Neuropsychological Functioning: Verbal Learning and MemoryHVLT Total Pre to Follow-Up T-Score-8.200 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.613
Other Pre-specified

Change in Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pain

Change in pain will be assessed using the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) pain assessment, as self-report measure of pain. Measures are scored on a T-score (mean=50, SD=10) Minimum score = \<20 ; maximum score = \>80. Lower scores indicate less pain interference in daily life.

Time frame: Pre- Treatment (0-weeks), Post-Treatment (8-weeks), Follow-Up (12-weeks)

Population: Overall number of participants analyzed reflects patients assessed at week 0, and total number analyzed reflected patients who were assessed at later time points. Differences due to drop-out of patients in the study.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for InsomniaChange in Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) PainPROMIS Pre to Post-0.8333 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.4042
Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for InsomniaChange in Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) PainPROMIS Pre to Follow-Up-2.5714 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.1768
Sleep EducationChange in Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) PainPROMIS Pre to Post3.3778 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.4668
Sleep EducationChange in Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) PainPROMIS Pre to Follow-Up2.050 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.1581
Other Pre-specified

Change in Sleep Efficiency as Measured by Polysomnography

Change in sleep efficiency will be assessed through overnight polysomnographic sleep studies.

Time frame: Pre-Treatment (0-weeks),Post-Treatment (8-weeks), Follow-Up (12-weeks)

Population: Data not collected due to pandemic.

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026