Skip to content

Evaluation of the FilmArray BioThreat-E Test

Clinical Evaluation of the BioFire FilmArray® BioThreat-E Test for the Diagnosis of Ebola Virus Disease in West Africa

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02658331
Enrollment
156
Registered
2016-01-18
Start date
2015-03-31
Completion date
2015-07-31
Last updated
2016-01-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Ebola Virus Disease

Keywords

Ebola Virus Disease, Rapid Diagnosis, Point of care, Molecular platform

Brief summary

The aim of our study is to assess the analytical and clinical performance of the FilmArray (FA) BioThreat-E test (BioFire®) for the diagnosis of Ebola virus disease in the field in Guinea versus conventional molecular techniques.

Detailed description

The study will be conducted at the Laboratoire des Fièvres Hémorragiques Virales in Donka National Hospital (Conakry, Guinea), which is the Reference Laboratory for Hemorrhagic Fevers in Guinea. The reference based population includes the regions of Conakry and Coyah. No specific invasive intervention is required for this research protocol and the study does not interfere with the management of the patients according to the ongoing practices in Donka Ebola Treatment Center and in Coyah Ebola Treatment Center. Each participant will be verbally informed before signing an informed consent. Clinical data will be collected and recorded via a source document questionnaire - Clinical Report Form - based on the routine clinical data already provided to the laboratory according to the practices. Another questionnaire will be submitted to the biologist and technicians involved in the study to assess the practicability of the FilmArray technology, compared to conventional techniques, in terms of time to results, duration of test manipulation, sense of personnel safety for specimen handling, overall workload after each day, and preference of lab professionals. As the main objective, analytical performance (sensitivity and specificity) and clinical performance (positive and negative predictive values) of the FA BioThreat-E test in whole blood will be evaluated in comparison with the QuantiTect® Probe RT-PCR (Qiagen) and the RealStar® Filovirus Type RT-PCR Kit 1.0 (Altona) both tests performed on serum. The status for EVD will be defined for each patient based on the result of routine testing: * Positive patients: patients enrolled in the study showing positive results with the two routine PCR performed in the lab: QuantiTect Probe RT-PCR® and RealStar® Filovirus Type RT-PCR Kit 1.0. * Negative patients: patients enrolled in the study showing negative results with the two routine PCR performed in the lab: QuantiTect Probe RT-PCR® and RealStar® Filovirus Type RT-PCR Kit 1.0. * Equivocal patients: all other results showing a discrepancy between the two routine tests. As a secondary objective, the possibility of using the FilmArray (FA) BioThreat-E test on non-invasive specimens will also be assessed. Urine and saliva specimens will be analyzed by FA for confirmed positive cases only (based on routine testing), for patients able to provide saliva and/or urine specimens according to their health condition. This research protocol was approved by the Guinean Ethical Committee.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Fondation Mérieux
CollaboratorOTHER
Donka University Hospital, Conakry
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
BioMérieux
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
CASE_ONLY
Time perspective
CROSS_SECTIONAL

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* All patients, male and female, older than 18, sent to Conakry or Coyah Ebola Treatment Centers for a suspicion of EVD according to WHO criteria, and considered as eligible for Ebola routine diagnosis. * Ability to deliver a written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Age below 18. * Inability to provide a consent * Inability to provide the blood specimens required for Ebola virus disease diagnosis.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of positive/negative patients for the detection of Ebola virus RNA with the BioThreat-E test performed on whole blood.Through study completion, an average of 6 months.Number of positive/negative patients for the detection of Ebola virus RNA with the BioThreat-E test in comparision with their Ebola Virus Disease status as defined based on the result of routine testing.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Number of urine specimens positive/negative for the detection of Ebola virus RNA with the BioThreat-E test, in patients positive for Ebola Virus Disease based on routine testing, and able to provide a urine specimen.Through study completion, an average of 6 months.
Number of saliva specimens positive/negative for the detection of Ebola virus RNA with the BioThreat-E test, in patients positive for Ebola Virus Disease based on routine testing, and able to provide a saliva specimen.Through study completion, an average of 6 months.

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026