Skip to content

BARD® The VENOVO™ Venous Stent Study for Treatment of Iliofemoral Occlusive Disease

The BARD® VENOVO™ Venous Stent Study - A Prospective, Non-Randomized, Multi-Center, Single-Arm Study of the Treatment of Iliofemoral Occlusive Disease - an Assessment for Effectiveness and Safety (VERNACULAR)

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02655887
Acronym
VERNACULAR
Enrollment
170
Registered
2016-01-14
Start date
2016-06-15
Completion date
2020-10-30
Last updated
2021-02-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Iliofemoral Occlusive Disease, May-Thurner Syndrome, Peripheral Vascular Disease, Venous Disease

Keywords

Vernacular, Iliofemoral Occlusive Disease

Brief summary

The BARD® Venovo™ Venous Stent Study is a non-randomized clinical study intended to collect confirmatory evidence of the safety and effectiveness of the Venous Stent for the treatment of iliofemoral occlusive disease.

Detailed description

This is a prospective, multi-center, non-randomized, single-arm clinical study of the VENOVO ™ Venous Stent for the treatment of iliofemoral occlusive disease. The study will be conducted at a maximum of 35 investigational sites (sites) in the United States, and Europe and Australia/New Zealand. Enrollment will continue until a maximum of one hundred seventy (170) subjects are treated with the VENOVO™ Venous Stent, which is an estimated three-hundred forty (340) consecutive subjects in a non-randomized fashion. It is assumed that approximately 50% of the treated subjects will be U.S. subjects. Clinical follow-up for all treated subjects will be performed at hospital discharge, 30-days, and 6-, 12-, 24-, and 36-months post-index procedure.

Interventions

DEVICEVENOVO™ Venous Stent

VENOVO™ Venous stent placement

Sponsors

C. R. Bard
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. The subject provides written informed consent using an Informed Consent Form approved by Ethics Committee/ Institutional Review Board for the site. 2. Subject agrees to comply with the protocol-mandated follow-up procedures and visits. 3. The subject is a male or non-pregnant female ≥ 18 years old with an expected lifespan sufficient to allow for completion of all study procedures. 4. The subject has symptomatic (non-malignant) venous outflow obstruction in iliofemoral venous segments. 5. The subject has symptomatic venous outflow obstruction (non-malignant) in iliofemoral venous segments(Clinical-Etiology-Anatomic-Pathophysiologic (CEAP) C ≥ 3 or VCSS pain score of ≥ 2). 6. The subject is able and willing to comply with any required medication regimen. 7. The reference vessel diameters are between 7mm and 19 mm.

Exclusion criteria

1. Subject is unable or unwilling to provide written informed consent, or is unable or unwilling to conform to the study protocol follow-up procedures and visits. 2. Subject is or plans to become pregnant during the study. 3. Subject has contralateral disease of the common femoral vein, external iliac vein, common iliac vein, or any combination thereof and does not meet the venous outflow obstruction requirement or has a malignant obstruction. 4. The subject is asymptomatic, has a CEAP C \<3, or a VCSS pain score of \<2. 5. The subject has a venous obstruction that extends into the inferior vena cava (IVC) or below the level of the lesser trochanter. 6. The subject has a known uncorrectable bleeding diathesis or active coagulopathy. 7. The subject has a known allergy or sensitivity to Nickel or Titanium or intolerance to antiplatelet, anticoagulant or thrombolytic medications medications required per the protocol 8. The subject has a known allergy or sensitivity to contrast media, which cannot be adequately pre-medicated. 9. The subject has any planned surgical interventions within 30 days prior to, or within 30 days after the planned study procedure. 10. The subject has a lesion or occlusion which cannot be traversed with a guidewire. 11. The subject has had prior stenting in the target vessel. 12. The subject has iliofemoral venous segments unsuitable for treatment with available sizes of study devices. 13. The subject has another medical condition, which may cause him/her to be non-compliant with the protocol, confound the data interpretation, or is associated with a life expectancy insufficient to allow completion of study procedures and follow ups. 14. The subject is currently participating in an investigational drug, biologic, or another device study. 15. The subject is currently on dialysis or has a serum creatinine ≥2.5mg/dl.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Primary Patency of the Venous Stent at 12 Months Post-Index Procedure12 months post-index procedurePrimary patency rate at 12 months post-index procedure evaluated against a literature-derived Performance Goal (PG) of 74%. Primary patency defined as: freedom from Target Vessel Revascularization (TVR); freedom from thrombus occlusion and stenosis \> 50% as measured by Duplex Ultrasound (DUS). Please note that both the primary effectiveness and the primary safety endpoint are considered co-primary endpoints. That is, both endpoints need to be significant to claim the study as successful.
Number of Participants With Freedom From Major Adverse Events (MAEs)30 days post-index procedureFreedom from major adverse events (MAEs) defined as: Target Vessel Revascularization; Device and/or procedure related death; Major amputation of target limb; Pulmonary Embolism which is clinically important; Vascular injury requiring surgical/endovascular intervention; Embolization /migration of stent; Device or procedure related acute DVT involving the treated limb. Please note that both the primary effectiveness and the primary safety endpoint are considered co-primary endpoints. That is, both endpoints need to be significant to claim the study as successful.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Endpoint Without Hypothesis Testing: Index of CEAP at 30 Days, 6 Months, and 12 Months Post ProcedureEvaluation through 30 day, 6 months and 12 months post index procedureClinical-Etiologic-Anatomic-Pathophysiologic (CEAP) Classification is a system that describes a doctor's physical exam findings for vein problem(s), the cause of the problem(s), the location in the leg, and the mechanism responsible for the manifestation of the vein problem. For Clinical classification, the clinical components indicates disease severity, ranging from none (0 points) to active ulcers (6 points).For each category of Etiology, Anatomy, and Pathophysiology classifications, at each time point, frequency of each category is reported. Subsequent clinical study reports will present CEAP at 24 and 36-months follow-up. Changes from baseline measures to given time points are presented. Lower mean scores represent an improvement from baseline measure.
Endpoint Without Hypothesis Testing: Number of Participants With Acute Technical SuccessAt time of Index ProcedureAcute technical success is defined as successful deployment of stent(s) to intended target with adequate lesion coverage as assessed by the Investigator.
Endpoint Without Hypothesis Testing: Number of Participants With Acute Procedure Success (ITT Subjects)Less than 30 days post index procedureTechnical success is defined as no major adverse events experienced between index procedure and discharge
Endpoint With Hypothesis Testing: Index of Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS) From Baseline to 12 MonthsEvaluation at 12 months post-index procedureThe Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS) system includes 10 clinical descriptions (pain, varicose veins, venous edema, skin pigmentation, inflammation, induration, number of active ulcers, duration of active ulceration, size of active ulceration. and level of compliance with medical compression therapy), scored from 0 to 3 (total possible score, 30) with 0 means absent, 1 means mild, 2 means moderate and 3 means severe. Total VCSS is the sum of all VCSS assessment scores from categories for a given time point. Twelve-month data is the change between baseline score and 12-month follow-up score. Results calculated for Intent-to-Treat (ITT) subjects. Lower values represent a better outcome, that is, a level of pain less than that experienced at baseline.
Endpoint Without Hypothesis Testing: Number of Participants With Freedom From Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR) (ITT Subjects)Evaluation throrugh 30 day, 6 months and 12 months post index procedureFreedom from Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR) through 30 days is specific to the first revascularization procedure of the target lesion.
Endpoint Without Hypothesis Testing: Number of Participants With Freedom From Target Vessel Revascularization (TVR) (ITT Subjects)Evaluation through 30 days, 6 months and 12 months post index procedureFreedom from Target Vessel Revascularization (TVR) is defined as the first revascularization procedure of the target vessel, as determined by an Independent Core Lab. Freedom from Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR) and Freedom from TVR results are the same through the 12 month analysis as all TLRs were also TVRs in this case.
Endpoint Without Hypothesis Testing: Number of Participants Without Device Stent Fracture at 12 Months Follow-UpEvaluation at 12 months post-index procedureStents were evaluated at the 12 month follow-up for fracture analysis. Evaluable ITT subjects are included in this analysis.
Endpoint Without Hypothesis Testing: Number of Participants With Lesion Success (ITT Subjects)At the conclusion of index procedureLesion Success is defined as the attainment of less or equal to 50% residual stenosis at the conclusion of the index procedure.
Endpoint With Hypothesis Testing: Index of Quality of Life (QoL) From Baseline to 12 MonthsEvaluation at 12 months post-index procedureThe Quality of Life (QoL) assessment of Chronic Venous Insufficiency Questionnaire (CIVIC-20) is a 20-item questionnaire which provides a global index and an outline of 4 QoL dimensions - pain (4 items), physical (4 items), psychological (9 items) and social (4 items). Items are scored on a scale from 1 to 5. A low score corresponds to greater patient comfort. Total CIVIQ-20 score is the sum of all 20-item scores The score of each dimension was obtained by adding up the scores of each constituent item within that dimension. Twelve-month data is the change between baseline score and 12-month follow-up score. Results calculated for evaluable ITT subjects. Lower values represent a better outcome, that is, a better QoL than that experienced at baseline.

Countries

Australia, Germany, Ireland, Netherlands, Spain, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

The study was activated at 25 investigational sites in the U.S., Europe and Australia. First subject was enrolled June 15, 2016, and the last subject on May 1, 2017. Approximately 60% of subjects are in the U.S.

Pre-assignment details

Three U.S. sites were activated, but did not consent subjects. A fourth site enrolled 1 subject who was lost to follow-up after discharge (site closed). Fifty-eight (58) screen failures reported and three (3) eligible subjects were not treated with the device. In total, 170 subjects were treated with VENOVO.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
VENOVO™ Venous Stent.
Implant of the VENOVO™ Venous Stent VENOVO™ Venous Stent: VENOVO™ Venous stent placement
170
Total170

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyDeath4
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up3
Overall StudyMissed 12-month follow-up visit4
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject3

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicVENOVO™ Venous Stent.
Age, Customized
< 65 years
125 Participants
Age, Customized
≥ 65 years
45 Participants
Cardiovascular Disease
Angina
5 Participants
Cardiovascular Disease
Arrhythmia (other than A-FIB)
8 Participants
Cardiovascular Disease
Atrial Fibrillation (A-FIB)
6 Participants
Cardiovascular Disease
Cardiomyopathy
3 Participants
Cardiovascular Disease
Coronary Artery Disease (CAD)
15 Participants
Cardiovascular Disease
Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT)
92 Participants
Cardiovascular Disease
Dyslipidemia
47 Participants
Cardiovascular Disease
Hypertension
55 Participants
Cardiovascular Disease
May-Thurner Syndrome
102 Participants
Cardiovascular Disease
Myocardial Infarction (MI)
6 Participants
Cardiovascular Disease
Peripheral Arterial Disease (PAD)
18 Participants
Cardiovascular Disease
Stroke
4 Participants
Cardiovascular Disease
Transient Ischemic Attack (TIA)
3 Participants
Cardiovascular Disease
Varicosis
133 Participants
Cardiovascular Disease
Vascular Heart Disease
2 Participants
Cardiovascular Disease
Venous Valve Disease
12 Participants
Disease Category
Non-Thrombotic Iliac Vein Lesions (NIVL)
77 Participants
Disease Category
Post-Thrombotic Syndrome (PTS)
93 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
12 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
158 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Number of Study Devices Used
1 Study Device
122 Participants
Number of Study Devices Used
2 Study Devices
47 Participants
Number of Study Devices Used
3 Study Devices
1 Participants
Number of Target Lesions
1
154 Participants
Number of Target Lesions
2
16 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
9 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
156 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Australia
5 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Germany
34 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Ireland
4 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Netherlands
8 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Spain
11 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United Kingdom
8 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
100 Participants
Renal Disease
Acute Renal Insufficiency
1 Participants
Renal Disease
Chronic Kidney Disease
4 Participants
Renal Disease
Uremia
1 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
107 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
63 Participants
Target Limb
Left Leg
142 Participants
Target Limb
Right Leg
28 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
4 / 170
other
Total, other adverse events
63 / 170
serious
Total, serious adverse events
44 / 170

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants With Freedom From Major Adverse Events (MAEs)

Freedom from major adverse events (MAEs) defined as: Target Vessel Revascularization; Device and/or procedure related death; Major amputation of target limb; Pulmonary Embolism which is clinically important; Vascular injury requiring surgical/endovascular intervention; Embolization /migration of stent; Device or procedure related acute DVT involving the treated limb. Please note that both the primary effectiveness and the primary safety endpoint are considered co-primary endpoints. That is, both endpoints need to be significant to claim the study as successful.

Time frame: 30 days post-index procedure

Population: ITT subjects. Results adjudicated by CEC. MAEs that occurred prior to day 30 of each subject's follow-up were counted as failures toward primary safety (n= 11). Those subjects were considered not evaluable and not included in the denominator for the primary safety endpoint (total evaluable = 170 subjects).

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
VENOVO™ Venous Stent.Number of Participants With Freedom From Major Adverse Events (MAEs)159 Participants
Comparison: Hypothesis: H0: The primary safety endpoint absence from event rate in the VENOVO Venous Stent (BVS) through 30 day at most as large as that of the PG.~Ha: The primary safety endpoint absence from event rate in the VENOVO Venous Stent (BVS) through 30 day is better than that of the PG.p-value: 0.0322Exact binomial test
Primary

Number of Participants With Primary Patency of the Venous Stent at 12 Months Post-Index Procedure

Primary patency rate at 12 months post-index procedure evaluated against a literature-derived Performance Goal (PG) of 74%. Primary patency defined as: freedom from Target Vessel Revascularization (TVR); freedom from thrombus occlusion and stenosis \> 50% as measured by Duplex Ultrasound (DUS). Please note that both the primary effectiveness and the primary safety endpoint are considered co-primary endpoints. That is, both endpoints need to be significant to claim the study as successful.

Time frame: 12 months post-index procedure

Population: ITT subjects. 25 subjects were excluded from the denominator due to discontinuation or other reasons prior to 12 month follow-up visit.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
VENOVO™ Venous Stent.Number of Participants With Primary Patency of the Venous Stent at 12 Months Post-Index Procedure128 Participants
Comparison: Hypothesis: H0 :Primary patency rate at 12 months post-index procedure from the overall VENOVO Venous Stent (BVS) patients (PTS and NIVL combined) is at most as good as that of the PG.~Ha: Primary patency rate at 12 months post-index procedure from the overall VENOVO Venous Stent (BVS) patients (PTS and NIVL combined) is better than that of PG.p-value: 0.0001Weighted Z-statistics
Secondary

Endpoint With Hypothesis Testing: Index of Quality of Life (QoL) From Baseline to 12 Months

The Quality of Life (QoL) assessment of Chronic Venous Insufficiency Questionnaire (CIVIC-20) is a 20-item questionnaire which provides a global index and an outline of 4 QoL dimensions - pain (4 items), physical (4 items), psychological (9 items) and social (4 items). Items are scored on a scale from 1 to 5. A low score corresponds to greater patient comfort. Total CIVIQ-20 score is the sum of all 20-item scores The score of each dimension was obtained by adding up the scores of each constituent item within that dimension. Twelve-month data is the change between baseline score and 12-month follow-up score. Results calculated for evaluable ITT subjects. Lower values represent a better outcome, that is, a better QoL than that experienced at baseline.

Time frame: Evaluation at 12 months post-index procedure

Population: Evaluable ITT subjects were included in this analysis. (n) varies in relation to the number of evaluable subjects. Accordingly, the (n) for each period may be different from the overall (N) reported in the Participant Flow section.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
VENOVO™ Venous Stent.Endpoint With Hypothesis Testing: Index of Quality of Life (QoL) From Baseline to 12 Months-15.7 Scores on a scale
p-value: 0.001t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Endpoint With Hypothesis Testing: Index of Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS) From Baseline to 12 Months

The Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS) system includes 10 clinical descriptions (pain, varicose veins, venous edema, skin pigmentation, inflammation, induration, number of active ulcers, duration of active ulceration, size of active ulceration. and level of compliance with medical compression therapy), scored from 0 to 3 (total possible score, 30) with 0 means absent, 1 means mild, 2 means moderate and 3 means severe. Total VCSS is the sum of all VCSS assessment scores from categories for a given time point. Twelve-month data is the change between baseline score and 12-month follow-up score. Results calculated for Intent-to-Treat (ITT) subjects. Lower values represent a better outcome, that is, a level of pain less than that experienced at baseline.

Time frame: Evaluation at 12 months post-index procedure

Population: Evaluable ITT subjects are included in this analysis.(n) varies in relation to the number of evaluable subjects. Accordingly, the (n) for each period may be different from the overall (N) reported in the Participant Flow section.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
VENOVO™ Venous Stent.Endpoint With Hypothesis Testing: Index of Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS) From Baseline to 12 Months-1.7 Scores on a scale
Comparison: H0: The distribution at the 12-month follow-up remains unimproved compared to baseline.~Ha: The distribution shifts toward lower (less pain) classes.p-value: 0.001t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Endpoint Without Hypothesis Testing: Index of CEAP at 30 Days, 6 Months, and 12 Months Post Procedure

Clinical-Etiologic-Anatomic-Pathophysiologic (CEAP) Classification is a system that describes a doctor's physical exam findings for vein problem(s), the cause of the problem(s), the location in the leg, and the mechanism responsible for the manifestation of the vein problem. For Clinical classification, the clinical components indicates disease severity, ranging from none (0 points) to active ulcers (6 points).For each category of Etiology, Anatomy, and Pathophysiology classifications, at each time point, frequency of each category is reported. Subsequent clinical study reports will present CEAP at 24 and 36-months follow-up. Changes from baseline measures to given time points are presented. Lower mean scores represent an improvement from baseline measure.

Time frame: Evaluation through 30 day, 6 months and 12 months post index procedure

Population: Evaluable ITT subjects are included in this analysis. (n) varies in relation to the number of evaluable subjects at 30 days, 6 months and 12 months. Accordingly, the (n) for each period may be different from the overall (N) reported in the Participant Flow section.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
VENOVO™ Venous Stent.Endpoint Without Hypothesis Testing: Index of CEAP at 30 Days, 6 Months, and 12 Months Post Procedure6 months post procedure-1.3 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.34
VENOVO™ Venous Stent.Endpoint Without Hypothesis Testing: Index of CEAP at 30 Days, 6 Months, and 12 Months Post Procedure12 months post procedure-1.5 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.33
VENOVO™ Venous Stent.Endpoint Without Hypothesis Testing: Index of CEAP at 30 Days, 6 Months, and 12 Months Post Procedure30 day post procedure-1.1 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.26
Secondary

Endpoint Without Hypothesis Testing: Number of Participants With Acute Procedure Success (ITT Subjects)

Technical success is defined as no major adverse events experienced between index procedure and discharge

Time frame: Less than 30 days post index procedure

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
VENOVO™ Venous Stent.Endpoint Without Hypothesis Testing: Number of Participants With Acute Procedure Success (ITT Subjects)168 Participants
Secondary

Endpoint Without Hypothesis Testing: Number of Participants With Acute Technical Success

Acute technical success is defined as successful deployment of stent(s) to intended target with adequate lesion coverage as assessed by the Investigator.

Time frame: At time of Index Procedure

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
VENOVO™ Venous Stent.Endpoint Without Hypothesis Testing: Number of Participants With Acute Technical Success170 Participants
Secondary

Endpoint Without Hypothesis Testing: Number of Participants With Freedom From Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR) (ITT Subjects)

Freedom from Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR) through 30 days is specific to the first revascularization procedure of the target lesion.

Time frame: Evaluation throrugh 30 day, 6 months and 12 months post index procedure

Population: (n) varies in relation to the number of evaluable subjects at 30 days, 6 months and 12 months. Accordingly, the (n) for each period may be different from the overall (N) reported in the Participant Flow section.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
VENOVO™ Venous Stent.Endpoint Without Hypothesis Testing: Number of Participants With Freedom From Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR) (ITT Subjects)30 day post procedure164 Participants
VENOVO™ Venous Stent.Endpoint Without Hypothesis Testing: Number of Participants With Freedom From Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR) (ITT Subjects)6 months post procedure161 Participants
VENOVO™ Venous Stent.Endpoint Without Hypothesis Testing: Number of Participants With Freedom From Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR) (ITT Subjects)12 months post procedure151 Participants
Secondary

Endpoint Without Hypothesis Testing: Number of Participants With Freedom From Target Vessel Revascularization (TVR) (ITT Subjects)

Freedom from Target Vessel Revascularization (TVR) is defined as the first revascularization procedure of the target vessel, as determined by an Independent Core Lab. Freedom from Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR) and Freedom from TVR results are the same through the 12 month analysis as all TLRs were also TVRs in this case.

Time frame: Evaluation through 30 days, 6 months and 12 months post index procedure

Population: (n) varies in relation to the number of evaluable subjects at 30 days, 6 months and 12 months. Accordingly, the (n) for each period may be different from the overall (N) reported in the Participant Flow section.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
VENOVO™ Venous Stent.Endpoint Without Hypothesis Testing: Number of Participants With Freedom From Target Vessel Revascularization (TVR) (ITT Subjects)30 days post procedure164 Participants
VENOVO™ Venous Stent.Endpoint Without Hypothesis Testing: Number of Participants With Freedom From Target Vessel Revascularization (TVR) (ITT Subjects)6 months post procedure161 Participants
VENOVO™ Venous Stent.Endpoint Without Hypothesis Testing: Number of Participants With Freedom From Target Vessel Revascularization (TVR) (ITT Subjects)12 months post procedure151 Participants
Secondary

Endpoint Without Hypothesis Testing: Number of Participants With Lesion Success (ITT Subjects)

Lesion Success is defined as the attainment of less or equal to 50% residual stenosis at the conclusion of the index procedure.

Time frame: At the conclusion of index procedure

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
VENOVO™ Venous Stent.Endpoint Without Hypothesis Testing: Number of Participants With Lesion Success (ITT Subjects)170 Participants
Secondary

Endpoint Without Hypothesis Testing: Number of Participants Without Device Stent Fracture at 12 Months Follow-Up

Stents were evaluated at the 12 month follow-up for fracture analysis. Evaluable ITT subjects are included in this analysis.

Time frame: Evaluation at 12 months post-index procedure

Population: Evaluable ITT subjects are included in this analysis. (n) varies in relation to the number of evaluable subjects. Accordingly, the (n) for each period may be different from the overall (N) reported in the Participant Flow section.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
VENOVO™ Venous Stent.Endpoint Without Hypothesis Testing: Number of Participants Without Device Stent Fracture at 12 Months Follow-UpDevice Stent Fracture at 12 months0 Participants
VENOVO™ Venous Stent.Endpoint Without Hypothesis Testing: Number of Participants Without Device Stent Fracture at 12 Months Follow-UpNo Device Stent Fracture at 12 months137 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 14, 2026