Skip to content

A Policy Relevant US Trauma Care System Pragmatic Trial for PTSD and Comorbidity

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02655354
Acronym
TSOS6
Enrollment
635
Registered
2016-01-14
Start date
2015-10-31
Completion date
2019-11-30
Last updated
2021-07-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Posttraumatic Stress Disorder, Depression, Alcohol-Related Disorders, Suicidal Ideation, Substance-Related Disorders, Mild Cognitive Impairment, Quality of Life, Pain, Wounds and Injury, Brain Injuries, Chronic Disease

Brief summary

The overarching goal of this UH2-UH3 proposal is to work with the NIH Health Care Systems Research Collaboratory to develop and implement a large scale, cluster randomized pragmatic clinical trial demonstration project that directly informs national trauma care system policy targeting injured patients with presentations of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) and related comorbidity. Each year in the United States (US), over 30 million individuals present to trauma centers, emergency departments, and other acute care medical settings for the treatment of physical injuries. Multiple chronic conditions including enduring PTSD, alcohol and drug use problems, depression and associated suicidal ideation, pain and somatic symptom amplification, and chronic medical conditions (e.g., hypertension, coronary artery disease, diabetes, and pulmonary diseases) are endemic among physical trauma survivors with and without traumatic brain injuries (TBI). Evidence-based, collaborative care/care management treatment models for PTSD and related comorbidities exist. These care management models have the potential to be flexibly implemented in order to prevent the development of chronic PTSD and depressive symptoms, alcohol use problems, and enduring physical disability in survivors of both TBI and non-TBI injuries; care management models may also be effective in mitigating the impact of the acute injury event on symptom exacerbations in the large subpopulation of injury survivors who already carry a substantial pre-injury burden of multiple chronic medical conditions.

Detailed description

Primary Aims and Hypotheses The primary aim of the UH3 period is to conduct a pragmatic randomized effectiveness trial of a collaborative care intervention targeting PTSD and comorbid conditions after acute care injury hospitalization. The investigation aims to determine if injured patients receiving the collaborative care intervention demonstrate significant reductions in PTSD symptoms when compared to control patients receiving care as usual. The study also aims to determine if the intervention patients when compared to control patients will demonstrate significant reductions in depressive symptoms, suicidal ideation, and alcohol use problems, and improvements in physical function. The primary hypothesis is that the intervention group when compared to the control group will demonstrate significant reductions in PTSD symptoms over the course of the year after injury. Secondary hypotheses are that intervention patients when compared to control patients will demonstrate, significant reductions in depressive symptoms, significant reductions in alcohol use problems, and improved post-injury physical function. A Priori Secondary Analyses The study team hypothesizes that a subgroup of patients will have persistent PTSD symptoms that will not remit over the longitudinal course of the investigation, regardless of randomization to intervention or control group conditions. The study team also anticipates that readily identifiable baseline clinical, injury and demographic characteristics will be associated with persistent PTSD symptoms over time (e.g., higher PTSD symptom levels, greater pre-injury trauma exposure, intentional injury including firearm related injury mechanisms and other characteristics such as unemployment, as well as other baseline factors). Derived from previous randomized clinical trials, a cumulative burden index has been developed from these baseline characteristics and will be adapted for the current investigation. The study team proposes a series of secondary analyses that adjust for and stratify by baseline characteristics that put patients at risk for persistent symptoms. It is hypothesized that these secondary analyses will identify a subgroup of intervention patients who are not at risk for persistent symptoms and who will demonstrate clinically and statistically significant treatment responses when compared to patients with similar baseline characteristics in the control condition. The study team also hypothesizes that the treatment effects will be greatest at the 1-6 month post-injury time points that are temporally correlated with the period of active intervention.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALMotivational Interviewing
BEHAVIORALCare Management
DRUGFluoxetine

Anti-depressant

DRUGFluvoxamine

Anti-depressant

DRUGParoxetine

Anti-depressant

DRUGSertraline

Anti-depressant

DRUGCitalopram

Anti-depressant

DRUGVenlafaxine

Anti-depressant

DRUGDuloxetine

Anti-depressant

DRUGMirtazapine

Anti-depressant

DRUGDiphenhydramine

Sleep medication

DRUGTrazodone

Sleep medication

DRUGPrazosin

Sleep medication

Sponsors

National Institutes of Health (NIH)
CollaboratorNIH
National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
CollaboratorNIH
National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA)
CollaboratorNIH
University of Washington
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patient currently admitted to inpatient/emergency department for a traumatic injury

Exclusion criteria

* Non-English speaking * Self-inflicted injury * Actively psychotic * Incarcerated or in custody * Less than 35 on PTSD Checklist * Less than 3 items on PTSD medical record screen * Less than 2 pieces of contact information

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline PTSD Checklist- Civilian (PCL-C) Over the Course of the Year After InjuryBaseline, 3-month, 6-month, 12-monthThe investigators will use the PTSD Checklist - Civilian (PCL-C). The scoring of the scale ranges from a minimum of 17 to a maximum of 85, with higher scores indicating a worse outcome. The measure can also provide a rating of symptoms consistent with a diagnosis of PTSD.
Change From Baseline Patient Health Questionnaire 9 Item Depression Scale Over the Course of the Year After InjuryBaseline, 3-month, 6-month, 12-monthThe investigators will use the Patient Health Questionnaire 9-item Depression Scale (PHQ-9). The scoring of the scale ranges from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 27, with higher scores indicating a worse outcome.
Change From Baseline Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Over the Course of the Year After InjuryBaseline, 3-month, 6-month, 12-monthThe investigators will use the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) as a continuous measure. The 10-item scale score ranges from 0-40, with higher values indicating a worse outcome.
Change From Baseline Short Form (SF)-12/36 Physical Function Over the Course of the Year After InjuryBaseline, 3-month, 6-month, 12-monthThe investigators used the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form healthy survey (MOS SF-12/36) physical components summary to assess physical function. The minimum and maximum scores are 0-100 with higher scores representing a better outcome.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
SF-36 Quality of LifeBaseline, 3-month, 6-month, 12-monthThe SF-36 assess quality of life domains that span emotional health, overall health status, and role function; a score of 100 indicates perfect health and a score of 0 indicates extremely poor health.
TSOS Patient Satisfaction: Overall Health CareBaseline, 3-month, 6-month, 12-monthSatisfaction with health care was rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with 1 indicating very dissatisfied and 5 indicating very satisfied.
Number of Participants With Suicidal IdeationBaseline, 3-month, 6-month, 12-monthItem 9 of the Patient Health Questionnaire 9-item (PHQ-9) scale assesses suicidal ideation. It is scored from 0 to 3, with a score of 1 or greater indicating a patient has suicidal ideation. Participants with a PHQ-9 item 9 score of greater than or equal to 1 are reported for this outcome.
Number of Participants Endorsing a Single Item That Assesses Marijuana UseBaseline, 3-month, 6-month, 12-monthSingle items that assess marijuana use. Single item self-report dichotomized as none versus at least monthly use.
TSOS Patient Satisfaction: Mental Health CareBaseline, 3 Month, 6 Month, 12 MonthSatisfaction with mental health care was rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with 1 indicating very dissatisfied and 5 indicating very satisfied.
Number of Participants Endorsing a Single Item That Assesses Stimulant UseBaseline, 3-month, 6-month, 12-monthSingle items that assess non-prescribed stimulant use. Single item self-report dichotomized as none versus at least monthly use.
Number of Participants Endorsing a Single Item That Assesses Opioid UseBaseline, 3-month, 6-month, 12-monthSingle items that assess non-prescribed opioid use. Single item self-report dichotomized as none versus at least monthly use.
Cognitive Impairment ScaleBaseline, 3-month, 6-month, 12-monthThe investigators will use the National Study on the Costs and Outcomes of Trauma (NSCOT) Cognitive Screen, a 4 - Item Traumatic Brain Injury / Post-concussive Symptom Screen. The scoring of the scale ranges from a minimum of 4 to a maximum of 20, with lower scores indicating a worse outcome.
Brief Pain InventoryBaseline, 3-month, 6-month, 12-monthA brief measure scored on a 0 to 10 scale to assess a patient's pain, with a higher score indicating more severe pain; a score of 0 indicates no pain and a score of 10 indicates very severe pain.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Intervention
The intervention aims to prevent the development of chronic PTSD and depressive symptoms, alcohol use problems, and enduring physical disability in survivors of both traumatic brain injury(TBI) and non-TBI injuries. The intervention utilizes a computerized decision support tool to flexibly target these multiple conditions including and includes care management, motivational interviewing, cognitive behavioral therapy elements, psychotropic drugs, and psychotherapy elements. Motivational Interviewing Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Elements Care Management Fluoxetine: Anti-depressant Fluvoxamine: Anti-depressant Paroxetine: Anti-depressant Sertraline: Anti-depressant Citalopram: Anti-depressant Venlafaxine: Anti-depressant Duloxetine: Anti-depressant Mirtazapine: Anti-depressant Diphenhydramine: Sleep medication Trazodone: Sleep medication Prazosin: Sleep medication
265
Usual Care
Enhanced standard care practices will be administered to this arm. This enhancement is sharing distressing emotional symptoms at recruitment with the attending nursing staff to address with patient subject.
370
Total635

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicInterventionTotalUsual Care
Age, Continuous37.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.4
39.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.2
39.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.8
Baseline PCL-C total score54.0 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.6
52.1 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.9
50.7 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.2
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
50 Participants102 Participants52 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
214 Participants530 Participants316 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants3 Participants2 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
American Indian
6 Participants15 Participants9 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
Asian
2 Participants4 Participants2 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
Black
89 Participants218 Participants129 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
Mixed
11 Participants20 Participants9 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
Other
27 Participants59 Participants32 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
Pacific Islander
3 Participants4 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
White
127 Participants315 Participants188 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
147 Participants308 Participants161 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
118 Participants327 Participants209 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
6 / 2653 / 370
other
Total, other adverse events
134 / 265197 / 370
serious
Total, serious adverse events
15 / 26513 / 370

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Over the Course of the Year After Injury

The investigators will use the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) as a continuous measure. The 10-item scale score ranges from 0-40, with higher values indicating a worse outcome.

Time frame: Baseline, 3-month, 6-month, 12-month

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
InterventionChange From Baseline Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Over the Course of the Year After InjuryChange from Baseline at 3 Months-2.04 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.21
InterventionChange From Baseline Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Over the Course of the Year After InjuryChange from Baseline at 6 Months-1.69 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.22
InterventionChange From Baseline Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Over the Course of the Year After InjuryChange from Baseline at 12 Months-1.81 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.23
Usual CareChange From Baseline Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Over the Course of the Year After InjuryChange from Baseline at 3 Months-1.90 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.18
Usual CareChange From Baseline Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Over the Course of the Year After InjuryChange from Baseline at 6 Months-1.63 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.19
Usual CareChange From Baseline Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Over the Course of the Year After InjuryChange from Baseline at 12 Months-1.45 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.19
Primary

Change From Baseline Patient Health Questionnaire 9 Item Depression Scale Over the Course of the Year After Injury

The investigators will use the Patient Health Questionnaire 9-item Depression Scale (PHQ-9). The scoring of the scale ranges from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 27, with higher scores indicating a worse outcome.

Time frame: Baseline, 3-month, 6-month, 12-month

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
InterventionChange From Baseline Patient Health Questionnaire 9 Item Depression Scale Over the Course of the Year After InjuryChange from Baseline at 3 Months-0.79 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.4
InterventionChange From Baseline Patient Health Questionnaire 9 Item Depression Scale Over the Course of the Year After InjuryChange from Baseline at 6 Months-1.17 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.45
InterventionChange From Baseline Patient Health Questionnaire 9 Item Depression Scale Over the Course of the Year After InjuryChange from Baseline at 12 Months-1.84 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.52
Usual CareChange From Baseline Patient Health Questionnaire 9 Item Depression Scale Over the Course of the Year After InjuryChange from Baseline at 3 Months-0.50 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.35
Usual CareChange From Baseline Patient Health Questionnaire 9 Item Depression Scale Over the Course of the Year After InjuryChange from Baseline at 6 Months-0.90 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.38
Usual CareChange From Baseline Patient Health Questionnaire 9 Item Depression Scale Over the Course of the Year After InjuryChange from Baseline at 12 Months-2.16 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.43
Primary

Change From Baseline PTSD Checklist- Civilian (PCL-C) Over the Course of the Year After Injury

The investigators will use the PTSD Checklist - Civilian (PCL-C). The scoring of the scale ranges from a minimum of 17 to a maximum of 85, with higher scores indicating a worse outcome. The measure can also provide a rating of symptoms consistent with a diagnosis of PTSD.

Time frame: Baseline, 3-month, 6-month, 12-month

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
InterventionChange From Baseline PTSD Checklist- Civilian (PCL-C) Over the Course of the Year After InjuryChange from Baseline at 3 Months-1.65 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.86
InterventionChange From Baseline PTSD Checklist- Civilian (PCL-C) Over the Course of the Year After InjuryChange from Baseline at 6 Months-4.02 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.99
InterventionChange From Baseline PTSD Checklist- Civilian (PCL-C) Over the Course of the Year After InjuryChange from Baseline at 12 Months-5.51 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.18
Usual CareChange From Baseline PTSD Checklist- Civilian (PCL-C) Over the Course of the Year After InjuryChange from Baseline at 3 Months0.08 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.74
Usual CareChange From Baseline PTSD Checklist- Civilian (PCL-C) Over the Course of the Year After InjuryChange from Baseline at 6 Months-1.44 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.83
Usual CareChange From Baseline PTSD Checklist- Civilian (PCL-C) Over the Course of the Year After InjuryChange from Baseline at 12 Months-4.25 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.97
Primary

Change From Baseline Short Form (SF)-12/36 Physical Function Over the Course of the Year After Injury

The investigators used the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form healthy survey (MOS SF-12/36) physical components summary to assess physical function. The minimum and maximum scores are 0-100 with higher scores representing a better outcome.

Time frame: Baseline, 3-month, 6-month, 12-month

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
InterventionChange From Baseline Short Form (SF)-12/36 Physical Function Over the Course of the Year After InjuryChange from Baseline at 3 Months-16.78 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.69
InterventionChange From Baseline Short Form (SF)-12/36 Physical Function Over the Course of the Year After InjuryChange from Baseline at 6 Months-14.17 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.79
InterventionChange From Baseline Short Form (SF)-12/36 Physical Function Over the Course of the Year After InjuryChange from Baseline at 12 Months-13.23 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.94
Usual CareChange From Baseline Short Form (SF)-12/36 Physical Function Over the Course of the Year After InjuryChange from Baseline at 3 Months-15.90 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.59
Usual CareChange From Baseline Short Form (SF)-12/36 Physical Function Over the Course of the Year After InjuryChange from Baseline at 6 Months-13.83 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.66
Usual CareChange From Baseline Short Form (SF)-12/36 Physical Function Over the Course of the Year After InjuryChange from Baseline at 12 Months-11.68 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.77
Secondary

Brief Pain Inventory

A brief measure scored on a 0 to 10 scale to assess a patient's pain, with a higher score indicating more severe pain; a score of 0 indicates no pain and a score of 10 indicates very severe pain.

Time frame: Baseline, 3-month, 6-month, 12-month

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
InterventionBrief Pain InventoryBaseline6.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.4
InterventionBrief Pain Inventory6 Month4.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.1
InterventionBrief Pain Inventory3 Month4.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.9
InterventionBrief Pain Inventory12 Month3.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3
Usual CareBrief Pain Inventory12 Month3.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3
Usual CareBrief Pain InventoryBaseline6.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.7
Usual CareBrief Pain Inventory3 Month4.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.8
Usual CareBrief Pain Inventory6 Month4.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3
Secondary

Cognitive Impairment Scale

The investigators will use the National Study on the Costs and Outcomes of Trauma (NSCOT) Cognitive Screen, a 4 - Item Traumatic Brain Injury / Post-concussive Symptom Screen. The scoring of the scale ranges from a minimum of 4 to a maximum of 20, with lower scores indicating a worse outcome.

Time frame: Baseline, 3-month, 6-month, 12-month

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
InterventionCognitive Impairment ScaleBaseline13.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.6
InterventionCognitive Impairment Scale3 Month13.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.5
InterventionCognitive Impairment Scale6 Month13.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.7
InterventionCognitive Impairment Scale12 Month13.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.7
Usual CareCognitive Impairment Scale12 Month14.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.1
Usual CareCognitive Impairment ScaleBaseline13.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.5
Usual CareCognitive Impairment Scale6 Month13.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.1
Usual CareCognitive Impairment Scale3 Month13.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.5
Secondary

Number of Participants Endorsing a Single Item That Assesses Marijuana Use

Single items that assess marijuana use. Single item self-report dichotomized as none versus at least monthly use.

Time frame: Baseline, 3-month, 6-month, 12-month

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
InterventionNumber of Participants Endorsing a Single Item That Assesses Marijuana UseBaseline125 Participants
InterventionNumber of Participants Endorsing a Single Item That Assesses Marijuana Use3 Month60 Participants
InterventionNumber of Participants Endorsing a Single Item That Assesses Marijuana Use6 Month60 Participants
InterventionNumber of Participants Endorsing a Single Item That Assesses Marijuana Use12 Month51 Participants
Usual CareNumber of Participants Endorsing a Single Item That Assesses Marijuana Use12 Month79 Participants
Usual CareNumber of Participants Endorsing a Single Item That Assesses Marijuana UseBaseline177 Participants
Usual CareNumber of Participants Endorsing a Single Item That Assesses Marijuana Use6 Month82 Participants
Usual CareNumber of Participants Endorsing a Single Item That Assesses Marijuana Use3 Month72 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants Endorsing a Single Item That Assesses Opioid Use

Single items that assess non-prescribed opioid use. Single item self-report dichotomized as none versus at least monthly use.

Time frame: Baseline, 3-month, 6-month, 12-month

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
InterventionNumber of Participants Endorsing a Single Item That Assesses Opioid Use6 Month4 Participants
InterventionNumber of Participants Endorsing a Single Item That Assesses Opioid Use3 Month4 Participants
InterventionNumber of Participants Endorsing a Single Item That Assesses Opioid Use12 Month6 Participants
InterventionNumber of Participants Endorsing a Single Item That Assesses Opioid UseBaseline18 Participants
Usual CareNumber of Participants Endorsing a Single Item That Assesses Opioid Use12 Month6 Participants
Usual CareNumber of Participants Endorsing a Single Item That Assesses Opioid Use3 Month15 Participants
Usual CareNumber of Participants Endorsing a Single Item That Assesses Opioid Use6 Month20 Participants
Usual CareNumber of Participants Endorsing a Single Item That Assesses Opioid UseBaseline44 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants Endorsing a Single Item That Assesses Stimulant Use

Single items that assess non-prescribed stimulant use. Single item self-report dichotomized as none versus at least monthly use.

Time frame: Baseline, 3-month, 6-month, 12-month

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
InterventionNumber of Participants Endorsing a Single Item That Assesses Stimulant UseBaseline58 Participants
InterventionNumber of Participants Endorsing a Single Item That Assesses Stimulant Use3 Month9 Participants
InterventionNumber of Participants Endorsing a Single Item That Assesses Stimulant Use6 Month7 Participants
InterventionNumber of Participants Endorsing a Single Item That Assesses Stimulant Use12 Month8 Participants
Usual CareNumber of Participants Endorsing a Single Item That Assesses Stimulant Use12 Month16 Participants
Usual CareNumber of Participants Endorsing a Single Item That Assesses Stimulant UseBaseline77 Participants
Usual CareNumber of Participants Endorsing a Single Item That Assesses Stimulant Use6 Month22 Participants
Usual CareNumber of Participants Endorsing a Single Item That Assesses Stimulant Use3 Month17 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Suicidal Ideation

Item 9 of the Patient Health Questionnaire 9-item (PHQ-9) scale assesses suicidal ideation. It is scored from 0 to 3, with a score of 1 or greater indicating a patient has suicidal ideation. Participants with a PHQ-9 item 9 score of greater than or equal to 1 are reported for this outcome.

Time frame: Baseline, 3-month, 6-month, 12-month

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
InterventionNumber of Participants With Suicidal IdeationBaseline67 Participants
InterventionNumber of Participants With Suicidal Ideation3 Month69 Participants
InterventionNumber of Participants With Suicidal Ideation6 Month63 Participants
InterventionNumber of Participants With Suicidal Ideation12 Month51 Participants
Usual CareNumber of Participants With Suicidal Ideation12 Month92 Participants
Usual CareNumber of Participants With Suicidal IdeationBaseline90 Participants
Usual CareNumber of Participants With Suicidal Ideation6 Month106 Participants
Usual CareNumber of Participants With Suicidal Ideation3 Month99 Participants
Secondary

SF-36 Quality of Life

The SF-36 assess quality of life domains that span emotional health, overall health status, and role function; a score of 100 indicates perfect health and a score of 0 indicates extremely poor health.

Time frame: Baseline, 3-month, 6-month, 12-month

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
InterventionSF-36 Quality of LifeBaseline44.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.9
InterventionSF-36 Quality of Life3 Month38.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.4
InterventionSF-36 Quality of Life6 Month38.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14
InterventionSF-36 Quality of Life12 Month39.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.6
Usual CareSF-36 Quality of Life12 Month41.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.9
Usual CareSF-36 Quality of LifeBaseline45.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13
Usual CareSF-36 Quality of Life6 Month39.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.2
Usual CareSF-36 Quality of Life3 Month39.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13
Secondary

TSOS Patient Satisfaction: Mental Health Care

Satisfaction with mental health care was rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with 1 indicating very dissatisfied and 5 indicating very satisfied.

Time frame: Baseline, 3 Month, 6 Month, 12 Month

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
InterventionTSOS Patient Satisfaction: Mental Health CareBaseline4.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
InterventionTSOS Patient Satisfaction: Mental Health Care3 Month3.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.1
InterventionTSOS Patient Satisfaction: Mental Health Care6 Month3.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.1
InterventionTSOS Patient Satisfaction: Mental Health Care12 Month3.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.1
Usual CareTSOS Patient Satisfaction: Mental Health Care12 Month3.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.1
Usual CareTSOS Patient Satisfaction: Mental Health CareBaseline4.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.1
Usual CareTSOS Patient Satisfaction: Mental Health Care6 Month3.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.1
Usual CareTSOS Patient Satisfaction: Mental Health Care3 Month3.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.1
Secondary

TSOS Patient Satisfaction: Overall Health Care

Satisfaction with health care was rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with 1 indicating very dissatisfied and 5 indicating very satisfied.

Time frame: Baseline, 3-month, 6-month, 12-month

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
InterventionTSOS Patient Satisfaction: Overall Health CareBaseline4.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9
InterventionTSOS Patient Satisfaction: Overall Health Care3 Month3.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.1
InterventionTSOS Patient Satisfaction: Overall Health Care6 Month4.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.1
InterventionTSOS Patient Satisfaction: Overall Health Care12 Month3.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.1
Usual CareTSOS Patient Satisfaction: Overall Health Care12 Month3.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.2
Usual CareTSOS Patient Satisfaction: Overall Health CareBaseline4.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9
Usual CareTSOS Patient Satisfaction: Overall Health Care6 Month3.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.1
Usual CareTSOS Patient Satisfaction: Overall Health Care3 Month3.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.1

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 13, 2026