Skip to content

Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of RAD1901 in Postmenopausal Women With Moderate to Severe Vasomotor Symptoms

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Dose Ranging Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of RAD1901 in Postmenopausal Women With Moderate to Severe Vasomotor Symptoms

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02653417
Enrollment
139
Registered
2016-01-12
Start date
2015-12-31
Completion date
2018-05-01
Last updated
2019-03-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hot Flashes, Vasomotor Symptoms

Brief summary

The primary objective of this study was to determine the clinical safety of RAD1901 and to evaluate whether RAD1901 reduced the frequency and severity of moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms (VMS; hot flashes) in postmenopausal women.

Detailed description

This was a Phase 2b outpatient, prospective, multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study to determine whether elacestrant reduces the frequency and severity of vasomotor symptoms (VMS; hot flashes) in postmenopausal women with moderate to severe hot flashes. Postmenopausal women who met study criteria were followed for 12 weeks on double-blind study medication and two weeks off study medication. Treatment was randomized 1:1:1:1 to ensure that an approximately equal number of patients were exposed to each of three RAD1901 (elacestrant) doses (5, 10 and 20 mg/day) or placebo. The total period of placebo exposure was 14 weeks. Enrolling approximately 300 patients was expected to provide power for testing superiority of the primary efficacy endpoint outcomes.

Interventions

RAD1901

OTHERPlacebo

Placebo

Sponsors

Radius Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
40 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

To have participated in this study, a subject MUST: 1. be a postmenopausal woman between 40 and 65 years of age, inclusive 2. be seeking relief or treatment for moderate to severe VMS 3. be willing to discontinue and abstain from the following: vaginal hormonal products; transdermal or oral estrogen or estrogen/progestin combination; progestin implants; injectable estrogen; topical progesterone cream, selective estrogen receptor modulators and intrauterine devices (IUDs) 4. have no clinically significant abnormalities on pelvic exam except for vulvovaginal atrophy (VVA) 5. have a normal or clinically insignificant transvaginal ultrasound (TVU) with an endometrial thickness \<4 mm at screening 6. have a normal endometrial biopsy subsequent to the TVU without clinically relevant results 7. have a normal screening Papanicolaou (Pap) smear 8. have a mammogram within 9 months prior to randomization. Subjects must have had a Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) mammography result of 1 or 2 to enroll.

Exclusion criteria

Subjects with any of the following characteristics were not be eligible to participate in the study: 1. have a history of invasive breast cancer or ductal carcinoma in situ, melanoma or any gynecologic cancer. 2. using any of the following: * oral estrogen-, progestin-, androgen-, or selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM) containing drug products within 8 weeks before screening (visit 1) * transdermal hormone products within 4 weeks before screening (visit 1) * vaginal hormone products (rings, creams, gels) within 4 weeks before screening (visit 1) * progestin implants/injectables, IUDs or estrogen pellets/injectables within 6 months before screening (visit 1) * anabolic steroids 3. have been treated with a gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist within the last year 4. have been treated with anti-estrogens or aromatase inhibitors within 2 months prior to study entry 5. have been concurrently treated and will abstain from gabapentin and paroxetine or serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) for VMS or other indications for 3 months during the trial and have not taken within 4 weeks prior to screening 6. have unexplained vaginal bleeding within the 3 months prior to study entry 7. have an endometrial biopsy at baseline with a diagnosis by a gynecologic pathologist of proliferative, hyperplasia, polyp or cancer 8. have unresolved cervical cytological smear report of atypical glandular or squamous cells of undetermined significance. Cervical cytologic smear report of ASCUS, low grade squamous intraepithelial lesion or greater, or any reported dysplasia 9. have unresolved findings suspicious for malignancy on the breast examination

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in the Frequency of Moderate to Severe Hot FlashesBaseline and 12 weeksChange from baseline to week 12 in the average number of moderate and severe hot flashes per day, where change is calculated as week 12 minus baseline so that negative values indicate a reduction (improvement) of hot flash frequency. Severity of hot flashes was self-assessed and reported as follows: * Mild: sensation of heat without sweating * Moderate: sensation of heat with sweating, able to continue activity * Severe: sensation of heat with sweating, causing cessation of activity.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the Frequency of Moderate to Severe Hot FlashesBaseline and 4 weeksChange from baseline to week 4 in the average number of moderate and severe hot flashes per day, where change is calculated as week 4 minus baseline so that negative values indicate a reduction (improvement) of hot flash frequency.
Change From Baseline to Week 4 and Week 12 in the Severity of Hot FlashesBaseline, 4 weeks, and 12 weeksChange from baseline to week 4 and week 12 in the average daily severity of hot flashes, where change is calculated as week 4 or week 12 minus baseline so that negative values indicate a reduction (improvement) of hot flash severity. Subjects recorded the number of hot flashes per day using an electronic diary. Daily severity score for hot flashes for each subject was calculated as the sum of the number of mild hot flashes, plus 2 times the number of moderate hot flashes, plus 3 times the number of severe hot flashes, divided by the total number of mild, moderate, and severe hot flashes. That is, Daily Severity Score = (Fmild + 2•Fmod + 3•Fsev)/(Fmild + Fmod + Fsev) where Fmild= frequency of mild hot flashes, Fmod = frequency of moderate hot flashes, Fsev = frequency of severe hot flashes. The measure is a weighted average of the frequencies of Hot Flashes.
Change From Baseline to Week 4 and Week 12 in the Frequency of All Hot FlashesBaseline, 4 weeks, and 12 weeksChange from baseline to week 4 and week 12 in the average number of all hot flashes (mild, moderate, and severe) by eDiary, where change is calculated as week 4 or week 12 minus baseline so that negative values indicate a reduction (improvement) of hot flash frequency.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Regimen 1 RAD1901 5 mg
RAD1901 5 mg RAD1901: RAD1901
38
Regimen 2 RAD1901 10 mg
RAD1901 10 mg RAD1901: RAD1901
34
Regimen 3 RAD1901 20 mg
RAD1901 20 mg RAD1901: RAD1901
28
Regimen 4 Placebo
Placebo Placebo: Placebo
38
Total138

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicRegimen 1 RAD1901 5 mgTotalRegimen 4 PlaceboRegimen 3 RAD1901 20 mgRegimen 2 RAD1901 10 mg
Age, Continuous56.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.83
55.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.9
53.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.09
54.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.07
55.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.08
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
8 Participants29 Participants6 Participants7 Participants8 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
30 Participants109 Participants32 Participants21 Participants26 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
1 Participants3 Participants1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
6 Participants34 Participants10 Participants6 Participants12 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
30 Participants100 Participants27 Participants21 Participants22 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
38 participants138 participants38 participants28 participants34 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
38 Participants138 Participants38 Participants28 Participants34 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 380 / 340 / 290 / 38
other
Total, other adverse events
11 / 383 / 347 / 2913 / 38
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 380 / 340 / 290 / 38

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline to Week 12 in the Frequency of Moderate to Severe Hot Flashes

Change from baseline to week 12 in the average number of moderate and severe hot flashes per day, where change is calculated as week 12 minus baseline so that negative values indicate a reduction (improvement) of hot flash frequency. Severity of hot flashes was self-assessed and reported as follows: * Mild: sensation of heat without sweating * Moderate: sensation of heat with sweating, able to continue activity * Severe: sensation of heat with sweating, causing cessation of activity.

Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks

Population: The modified intent to treat (mITT) population was used. This included all patients in the safety population who had recorded hot flash data in their eDiaries for at least 5 days during baseline and for at least one day while on double-blind study medication, and was the primary analysis population for all efficacy analyses

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Regimen 1Change From Baseline to Week 12 in the Frequency of Moderate to Severe Hot Flashes-3.48 moderate to severe hot flashes per dayStandard Error 0.793
Regimen 2Change From Baseline to Week 12 in the Frequency of Moderate to Severe Hot Flashes-3.74 moderate to severe hot flashes per dayStandard Error 0.867
Regimen 3Change From Baseline to Week 12 in the Frequency of Moderate to Severe Hot Flashes-4.12 moderate to severe hot flashes per dayStandard Error 0.944
Regimen 4Change From Baseline to Week 12 in the Frequency of Moderate to Severe Hot Flashes-3.66 moderate to severe hot flashes per dayStandard Error 0.808
Comparison: Regimen 1 = 5 mg vs Regimen 4 = placebo
Comparison: Regimen 2 = 10 mg vs Regimen 4 = placebo
Comparison: Regimen 3 = 20 mg vs Regimen 4 = placebo
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 4 and Week 12 in the Frequency of All Hot Flashes

Change from baseline to week 4 and week 12 in the average number of all hot flashes (mild, moderate, and severe) by eDiary, where change is calculated as week 4 or week 12 minus baseline so that negative values indicate a reduction (improvement) of hot flash frequency.

Time frame: Baseline, 4 weeks, and 12 weeks

Population: mITT population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Regimen 1Change From Baseline to Week 4 and Week 12 in the Frequency of All Hot FlashesWeek 4 change from baseline-0.99 hot flashes per dayStandard Deviation 3.803
Regimen 1Change From Baseline to Week 4 and Week 12 in the Frequency of All Hot FlashesWeek 12 change from baseline-3.47 hot flashes per dayStandard Deviation 5.076
Regimen 2Change From Baseline to Week 4 and Week 12 in the Frequency of All Hot FlashesWeek 12 change from baseline-2.40 hot flashes per dayStandard Deviation 3.56
Regimen 2Change From Baseline to Week 4 and Week 12 in the Frequency of All Hot FlashesWeek 4 change from baseline-2.23 hot flashes per dayStandard Deviation 4.792
Regimen 3Change From Baseline to Week 4 and Week 12 in the Frequency of All Hot FlashesWeek 4 change from baseline-2.29 hot flashes per dayStandard Deviation 3.754
Regimen 3Change From Baseline to Week 4 and Week 12 in the Frequency of All Hot FlashesWeek 12 change from baseline-3.91 hot flashes per dayStandard Deviation 5.263
Regimen 4Change From Baseline to Week 4 and Week 12 in the Frequency of All Hot FlashesWeek 4 change from baseline-3.27 hot flashes per dayStandard Deviation 4.107
Regimen 4Change From Baseline to Week 4 and Week 12 in the Frequency of All Hot FlashesWeek 12 change from baseline-3.74 hot flashes per dayStandard Deviation 4.228
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 4 and Week 12 in the Severity of Hot Flashes

Change from baseline to week 4 and week 12 in the average daily severity of hot flashes, where change is calculated as week 4 or week 12 minus baseline so that negative values indicate a reduction (improvement) of hot flash severity. Subjects recorded the number of hot flashes per day using an electronic diary. Daily severity score for hot flashes for each subject was calculated as the sum of the number of mild hot flashes, plus 2 times the number of moderate hot flashes, plus 3 times the number of severe hot flashes, divided by the total number of mild, moderate, and severe hot flashes. That is, Daily Severity Score = (Fmild + 2•Fmod + 3•Fsev)/(Fmild + Fmod + Fsev) where Fmild= frequency of mild hot flashes, Fmod = frequency of moderate hot flashes, Fsev = frequency of severe hot flashes. The measure is a weighted average of the frequencies of Hot Flashes.

Time frame: Baseline, 4 weeks, and 12 weeks

Population: mITT population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Regimen 1Change From Baseline to Week 4 and Week 12 in the Severity of Hot FlashesWeek 4 change from baseline in severity-0.04 hot flash severity score per dayStandard Deviation 0.25
Regimen 1Change From Baseline to Week 4 and Week 12 in the Severity of Hot FlashesWeek 12 change from baseline in severity-0.09 hot flash severity score per dayStandard Deviation 0.337
Regimen 2Change From Baseline to Week 4 and Week 12 in the Severity of Hot FlashesWeek 12 change from baseline in severity-0.08 hot flash severity score per dayStandard Deviation 0.373
Regimen 2Change From Baseline to Week 4 and Week 12 in the Severity of Hot FlashesWeek 4 change from baseline in severity-0.07 hot flash severity score per dayStandard Deviation 0.26
Regimen 3Change From Baseline to Week 4 and Week 12 in the Severity of Hot FlashesWeek 4 change from baseline in severity-0.13 hot flash severity score per dayStandard Deviation 0.273
Regimen 3Change From Baseline to Week 4 and Week 12 in the Severity of Hot FlashesWeek 12 change from baseline in severity-0.13 hot flash severity score per dayStandard Deviation 0.313
Regimen 4Change From Baseline to Week 4 and Week 12 in the Severity of Hot FlashesWeek 4 change from baseline in severity-0.00 hot flash severity score per dayStandard Deviation 0.28
Regimen 4Change From Baseline to Week 4 and Week 12 in the Severity of Hot FlashesWeek 12 change from baseline in severity-0.01 hot flash severity score per dayStandard Deviation 0.409
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the Frequency of Moderate to Severe Hot Flashes

Change from baseline to week 4 in the average number of moderate and severe hot flashes per day, where change is calculated as week 4 minus baseline so that negative values indicate a reduction (improvement) of hot flash frequency.

Time frame: Baseline and 4 weeks

Population: mITT population

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Regimen 1Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the Frequency of Moderate to Severe Hot Flashes-1.15 moderate to severe hot flashes per dayStandard Deviation 3.644
Regimen 2Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the Frequency of Moderate to Severe Hot Flashes-2.22 moderate to severe hot flashes per dayStandard Deviation 4.872
Regimen 3Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the Frequency of Moderate to Severe Hot Flashes-2.70 moderate to severe hot flashes per dayStandard Deviation 3.764
Regimen 4Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the Frequency of Moderate to Severe Hot Flashes-3 moderate to severe hot flashes per dayStandard Deviation 4.075

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026