Skip to content

A Study Investigating the Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy of Elamipretide Topical Ophthalmic Solution for the Treatment of Fuchs' Corneal Endothelial Dystrophy (FCED)

Part A: a Prospective, Randomized, Double-masked, Vehicle Controlled, Paired-eye Phase 1/2 Clinical Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability and Efficacy of Elamipretide Topical Ophthalmic Solution in Subjects With Fuchs' Corneal Endothelial Dystrophy (FCED) Presenting With Mild to Moderate Corneal Edema Part B: a Prospective, Randomized, Double-masked, Vehicle Controlled, Phase 1/2 Clinical Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy of Elamipretide Topical Ophthalmic Solution in Subjects With FCED Presenting With Mild to Moderate Corneal Edema.

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 1Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02653391
Acronym
SPIFD-101
Enrollment
22
Registered
2016-01-12
Start date
2016-02-29
Completion date
2018-12-31
Last updated
2021-09-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Fuchs' Corneal Endothelial Dystrophy (FCED)

Keywords

Fuchs' Corneal Endothelial Dystrophy, FCED, Ocuvia™, MTP-131

Brief summary

This is a Phase 1/2 prospective, randomized, double-masked, and vehicle-controlled trial in two parts to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of elamipretide topical ophthalmic solution in patients with Fuchs' Corneal Endothelial Dystrophy (FCED) presenting with mild to moderate corneal edema.

Detailed description

This is a Phase 1/2 trial in two parts. Part A is a prospective, randomized, double-masked, vehicle controlled, paired-eye study in approximately 16 subjects to evaluate safety, tolerability and efficacy of elamipretide 1.0% topical ophthalmic solution in patients with Fuchs' Corneal Endothelial Dystrophy (FCED) presenting with mild to moderate corneal edema. Part B is a prospective, randomized double-masked, vehicle controlled study in approximately 11 subjects to evaluate safety, tolerability, and efficacy of elamipretide 3.0% topical ophthalmic solution in patients with FCED presenting with mild to moderate corneal edema.

Interventions

DRUGPart A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic Solution

Part A Each subject will receive one drop of elamipretide 1.0% ophthalmic solution BID in the randomly selected study eye.

DRUGPart B Elamipretide 3.0% Ophthalmic Solution

Part B Each subject will receive one drop of elamipretide 3.0% ophthalmic solution BID in both eyes.

Part A Each subject will receive one drop of vehicle ophthalmic solution BID in the paired eye of the randomly selected study eye.

Part B: Each subject will receive one drop of vehicle ophthalmic solution BID in both eyes.

Sponsors

Stealth BioTherapeutics Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adults ≥18 years old at the time of Screening Visit * Diagnosis of FCED OU (both eyes) based on clinical and ophthalmic test findings * Clinical evidence of corneal edema OU diagnosed with FCED, including one or more of the following signs: corneal epithelial microcysts, corneal epithelial bullae, stromal folds, or stromal haze * Central corneal thickness of 550 μm to 700 μm (inclusive) in at least one eye diagnosed with FCED, as measured by ultrasonic pachymetry at the time of Screening Visit and Baseline Visit * Best-corrected distance visual acuity (BCVA) of 20/25 to 20/320 (inclusive) at the time of Screening Visit and Baseline Visit OU * Women of childbearing potential must agree to use birth control as specified in the protocol from the date they sign the informed consent form (ICF) until after the last study * Able to give informed consent and willing to comply with all study visits and examinations * Part B only: The presence of central endothelium, as determined by the investigator, with an area of contiguous endothelial cells within 1 mm of the central cornea as measured by confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) or specular microscopy at the time of Screening Visit

Exclusion criteria

* Corneal findings of any type (including, but not limited to, stromal haze or stromal scarring), in either eye, that, based on investigator's assessment, limit the probability of visual improvement after corneal deturgescence * Any ocular pathology requiring treatment with topical ophthalmic drops, with the exception of glaucoma or ocular hypertension * Use of topical hypertonic saline drops for 3 days prior to Screening and throughout the duration of the study * History of corneal disease (other than FCED) or corneal surgery in either eye * Current use or likely need for the use of contact lens at any time during the study * History of previous corneal or anterior segment surgery such as LASIK, photorefractive keratectomy, endothelial keratoplasty, penetrating keratoplasty cataract surgery or glaucoma surgery. * Any disease or medical condition that in the opinion of the investigator would prevent the subject from participating in the study or might confound study results * Participation in other investigational drug or device clinical trials within 30 days prior to enrollment, or planning to participate in any other investigational drug or device clinical trials within 30 days of study completion * Women who are pregnant or lactating * Part B only: Participation in Part A of SPIFD-101 Other protocol-defined inclusion/

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Incidence and Severity of Ocular TEAEs.Screening Visit, Baseline (Day 1), Week 1, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, and Week 16The incidence and severity of ocular treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs)
The Incidence and Severity of Systemic Adverse EventsScreening Visit, Baseline (Day 1), Week 1, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, and Week 16The incidence and severity of systemic treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs)
Change From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part ABaseline, Week 1, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, and Week 16Number of participants who had a change from baseline from normal or abnormal not clinically significant, to abnormal clinically significant (CS) findings for slit lamp examinations (SLE) for Part A. Part B is reported as separate outcome since unit of measure is number of eyes.
Change From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part BBaseline, Week 1, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, and Week 16Number of eyes with a change from baseline from normal or abnormal not clinically significant, to abnormal clinically significant (CS) findings for slit lamp examinations (SLE) for Part B. Part A is reported as separate outcome.
Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) for Part ABaseline, Week 1, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12Change from Baseline in intraocular pressure (IOP) using Goldmann applanation tonometry for Part A
Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) for Part BBaseline, Week 1, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 , and Week 16 or early discontinuation visitChange from Baseline in intraocular pressure (IOP) using Goldmann applanation tonometry for Part B. Part A is reported separately.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Endothelial Cell Density Over All 12 Weeks for Part ABaseline, Weeks 1, 4, 8, and 12Change From Baseline in Endothelial Cell Counts, or density (Counts/mm\^2) over all 12 weeks for Part A. Part B is entered as a separate outcome measure.
Corneal Endothelial Cell Density Part BBaseline, Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12, and 16.Corneal Endothelial Cell Density: Part B, By-subject data for all time points where images were readable. For all time points where there were Poor Quality Images or too few cells to register, there were no data available, and these were not listed below.
Change From Baseline in Endothelial Cell Coefficient of Variation Over All 12 Weeks for Part ABaseline, Week 12Change From Baseline in Endothelial Cell Coefficient of Variation Over All 12 Weeks. Coefficient of variation (CV) is Standard deviation (SD) of cell area divided by the mean cell area of endothelial cell analyzed. CV represents the coefficient, or degree, of variation in the sizes of the endothelial cells (polymegethism). By measuring the variation in size between endothelial cells, the system can measure how much cell loss is occurring. The more variation, the worse the outcome. Part B is is entered as a separate outcome measure.
Coefficient of Variation (CoV) Part BBaseline, Weeks 1, 4, 8,12, and 16Part B, By-subject data for all time points where images were readable. For all time points where there were Poor Quality Images or too few cells to register there were no data available. CoV represents the coefficient, or degree, of variation in the sizes of the endothelial cells. By measuring the variation in size between endothelial cells, the system can measure how much cell loss is occurring. A CoV less than 40 is normal.
Change From Baseline in Corneal Area Affected by Microcysts for Part ABaseline, Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12, and 16Change from Baseline in corneal area affected by microcysts by visit for Part A.
Corneal Area Affected by Microcysts: Part BBaseline, Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12, and 16, or early discontinuation visitCorneal area affected by microcysts: by-subject data for Part B. No microcysts were present for any timepoints.
Change From Baseline in Central Corneal Thickness by Visit Part A as Measured by Pachymetry for Part ABaseline, Week 1, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, and Week 16Change from Baseline in Central Corneal Thickness by Visit as measured by Pachymetry for Part A. Part B is reported as a separate outcome measure.
Corneal Bullae: Part BBaseline, Week 1, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16, or early discontinuation visitNumber, size and location of Corneal bullae: By-subject data: Part B.
Change From Baseline in Severity of Corneal Stromal Folds for Part ABaseline, Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12, and 16Change from baseline in severity of corneal stromal folds by visit. Descriptive assessment made by Investigator; severity is not assessed using a scale.
Severity of Corneal Stromal Folds:Part BBaseline, Week 1, 4, 8, 12, and 16, or early discontinuation visitSeverity of corneal stromal folds by-subject data by visit. Descriptive assessment made by Investigator in the following categories: Not present, trace, mild.
Change From Baseline in Contrast Sensitivity (Log Score) for Part ABaseline, Week 1, 4, 8, 12 weeksChange from Baseline in contrast sensitivity over all 12 weeks log score at 3, 6, 12, 18 cycles per degree (cpd) using Vector Vision's CSV-1000E. Standard tables for the VectorVision's CSV-1000E model were used to convert linear results to the log values. Lower log scores equals lower contrast sensitivity and worse outcome. Higher log scores mean higher contrast sensitivity and better outcome. For 3cpd, range is 0.7-2.08; 6 cpd: 0.91-2.29; 12 cpd: 0.61-1.99; 18cpd: 0.17-1.55, unless no gratings were visible. If no gratings were visible, .3 log was subtracted from the lowest score for 3, 6, and 12cpd. For 18cpd .01 log was used, or essentially 100% contrast.
Contrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject DataBaseline, Week 1, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16, or early discontinuation visitContrast Sensitivity log score at 3, 6, 12, 18 cycles per degree (cpd) using Vector Vision's CSV-1000E by-subject data, Part B. Part A is listed separately. Standard tables for the VectorVision's CSV-1000E model were used to convert linear results to the log values. Lower log scores equals lower contrast sensitivity and worse outcome. Higher log scores mean higher contrast sensitivity and better outcome. For 3cpd, range is 0.7-2.08; 6 cpd: 0.91-2.29; 12 cpd: 0.61-1.99; 18cpd: 0.17-1.55, unless no gratings were visible. If no gratings were visible, .3 log was subtracted from the lowest score for 3, 6, and 12cpd. For 18cpd .01 log was used, or essentially 100% contrast.
Change From Baseline in Corneal Bullae for Part A.Baseline, Week 1, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16Count of participants in number, size and location of bullae by treatment. Part B is listed separately.
Central Corneal Thickness Part BBaseline (Day 1), Week 1, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, and Week 16, or Early discontinuation visitCentral Corneal Thickness: by-subject data as measured by Pachymetry and Pentacam. Part A is reported as a separate outcome measure.
Change From Baseline Endothelial Cell Hexagonality in Percentage Over All 12 Weeks for Part ABaseline, Week 1, 4, 8, and 12Change From Baseline in Endothelial Cell Hexagonality in Percentage Over All 12 Weeks for Part A. Specular microscopy is a noninvasive photographic technique that allows visualization and analyzation the corneal endothelium. Using computer-assisted morphometry, specular microscopes analyzes the size, shape and population of the endothelial cells. Histologically, healthy corneal cells initially have a hexagonal shape. As endothelial cells die, neighboring cells enlarge to cover the empty space once occupied by the cell. This, in turn, causes the remaining cells to lose their hexagonal shape. Assessments were performed using the flex center and full auto methods for Part A and data from the flex center method was summarized. The flex center method was used for Part B. The percent of Part B is entered as a separate outcome measure. A decrease from baseline in % cell hexagonality means worse outcome, a increase from baseline means better outcome.
Corneal Endothelial Cell Hexagonality Part BBaseline, Week 1, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, and Week 16 or early discontinuation visitCorneal Endothelial Cell Hexagonality in Percentage by-subject data: Part B. Data was only listed in weeks where images were good enough quality to quantify. Specular microscopy is a noninvasive photographic technique that allows visualization and analyzation the corneal endothelium. Using computer-assisted morphometry, specular microscopes analyzes the size, shape and population of the endothelial cells. Histologically, healthy corneal cells initially have a hexagonal shape. As endothelial cells die, neighboring cells enlarge to cover the empty space once occupied by the cell. This, in turn, causes the remaining cells to lose their hexagonal shape. The flex center method was used for Part B. A decrease in percent of cell hexagonality from baseline means worse outcome, an increase from baseline means better outcome.
Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Using the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Scale for Part A.Baseline, Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12, and 16Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) using the using the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) scale by visit. ETDRS charts present a series of five letters of equal difficulty on each row, with standardized spacing between letters and rows; there is a total of 14 lines (70 letters), with letter size increasing further geometrically and equivalently in every line by a factor of 1.2589 (or 0.1 log unit), moving up the chart. Minimum score of zero, maximum score of 100. Change from baseline: a more negative score is worse outcome, a more positive score is better outcome. A lower score means less letters were read correctly (worse outcome) and a higher score means more letters were read correctly (better outcome). Part B was listed separately.
Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Score Using ETDRS Scale for Part BBaseline, Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12, and 16Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) using the using the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) scale by visit. ETDRS charts present a series of five letters of equal difficulty on each row, with standardized spacing between letters and rows; there is a total of 14 lines (70 letters), with letter size increasing further geometrically and equivalently in every line by a factor of 1.2589 (or 0.1 log unit), moving up the chart. Minimum score of zero, maximum score of 100. Change from baseline: a more negative score is worse outcome, a more positive score is better outcome. A lower score means less letters were read correctly (worse outcome) and a higher score means more letters were read correctly (better outcome).

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

Part A 18 participants were randomized. The treatment eye was chosen at random and the fellow eye was the control/placebo eye. Part B The participants received either treatment in both eyes or placebo in both eyes.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic Solution and Placebo
Part A participants includes those receiving Elamipretide and placebo
18
Part B Elamipretide 3.0% Ophthalmic Solution
Part B Participants includes those receiving Elamipretide.
3
Part B Placebo
Part B Participants include those receiving Placebo.
1
Total22

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicElamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic Solution and PlaceboPart B Elamipretide 3.0% Ophthalmic SolutionPart B PlaceboTotal
Age, Continuous67.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.64
NA yearsNA years67.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.64
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
18 Participants3 Participants1 Participants22 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
2 Participants0 Participants0 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
16 Participants3 Participants1 Participants20 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
8 Participants1 Participants1 Participants10 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
10 Participants2 Participants0 Participants12 Participants
Smoking
Current Smoker
1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Smoking
Former Smoker
10 Participants3 Participants0 Participants13 Participants
Smoking
Never Smoker
7 Participants0 Participants1 Participants8 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 180 / 180 / 180 / 10 / 3
other
Total, other adverse events
7 / 183 / 186 / 181 / 13 / 3
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 180 / 180 / 180 / 10 / 3

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part A

Number of participants who had a change from baseline from normal or abnormal not clinically significant, to abnormal clinically significant (CS) findings for slit lamp examinations (SLE) for Part A. Part B is reported as separate outcome since unit of measure is number of eyes.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 1, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, and Week 16

Population: All participants for whom slit lamp outcomes were measured.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Part A PlaceboChange From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part ACornea Week 81 participants
Part A PlaceboChange From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part ALids Week 40 participants
Part A PlaceboChange From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part ALids Week 160 participants
Part A PlaceboChange From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part AConjunctiva Week 10 participants
Part A PlaceboChange From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part AConjunctiva Week 40 participants
Part A PlaceboChange From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part AConjunctiva Week 120 participants
Part A PlaceboChange From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part ACornea Week 11 participants
Part A PlaceboChange From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part ACornea Week 40 participants
Part A PlaceboChange From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part ALids Week 10 participants
Part A PlaceboChange From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part ACornea Week 121 participants
Part A PlaceboChange From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part ACornea Week 161 participants
Part A PlaceboChange From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part APosterior Chamber Week 10 participants
Part A PlaceboChange From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part APosterior Chamber Week 160 participants
Part A PlaceboChange From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part AIris Week 120 participants
Part A PlaceboChange From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part AIris Week 160 participants
Part A PlaceboChange From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part ALens Week 40 participants
Part A PlaceboChange From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part ALens Week 80 participants
Part A PlaceboChange From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part AIris Week 40 participants
Part A PlaceboChange From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part AIris Week 10 participants
Part A PlaceboChange From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part ALids Week 80 participants
Part A PlaceboChange From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part ALids Week 120 participants
Part A PlaceboChange From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part AConjunctiva Week 80 participants
Part A PlaceboChange From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part AConjunctiva Week 160 participants
Part A PlaceboChange From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part AAnterior Chamber Week 10 participants
Part A PlaceboChange From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part AAnterior Chamber Week 40 participants
Part A PlaceboChange From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part AAnterior Chamber Week 80 participants
Part A PlaceboChange From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part AAnterior Chamber Week 120 participants
Part A PlaceboChange From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part AAnterior Chamber Week 160 participants
Part A PlaceboChange From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part APosterior Chamber Week 40 participants
Part A PlaceboChange From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part APosterior Chamber Week 80 participants
Part A PlaceboChange From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part APosterior Chamber Week 120 participants
Part A PlaceboChange From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part AIris Week 80 participants
Part A PlaceboChange From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part ALens Week 10 participants
Part A PlaceboChange From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part ALens Week 120 participants
Part A PlaceboChange From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part ALens Week 160 participants
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionChange From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part APosterior Chamber Week 160 participants
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionChange From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part ALids Week 10 participants
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionChange From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part ALens Week 120 participants
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionChange From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part ALids Week 80 participants
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionChange From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part AIris Week 10 participants
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionChange From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part ALids Week 160 participants
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionChange From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part ALids Week 40 participants
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionChange From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part AConjunctiva Week 10 participants
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionChange From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part AAnterior Chamber Week 120 participants
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionChange From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part AConjunctiva Week 80 participants
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionChange From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part AIris Week 40 participants
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionChange From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part AConjunctiva Week 120 participants
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionChange From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part ALids Week 120 participants
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionChange From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part ACornea Week 11 participants
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionChange From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part AConjunctiva Week 40 participants
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionChange From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part ACornea Week 40 participants
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionChange From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part AAnterior Chamber Week 160 participants
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionChange From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part ACornea Week 81 participants
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionChange From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part ALens Week 10 participants
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionChange From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part ACornea Week 121 participants
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionChange From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part AConjunctiva Week 160 participants
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionChange From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part ACornea Week 161 participants
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionChange From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part APosterior Chamber Week 10 participants
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionChange From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part APosterior Chamber Week 120 participants
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionChange From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part APosterior Chamber Week 40 participants
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionChange From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part AIris Week 80 participants
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionChange From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part AAnterior Chamber Week 10 participants
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionChange From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part AIris Week 120 participants
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionChange From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part AIris Week 160 participants
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionChange From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part AAnterior Chamber Week 40 participants
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionChange From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part ALens Week 40 participants
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionChange From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part APosterior Chamber Week 80 participants
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionChange From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part ALens Week 80 participants
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionChange From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part ALens Week 160 participants
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionChange From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part AAnterior Chamber Week 80 participants
Primary

Change From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part B

Number of eyes with a change from baseline from normal or abnormal not clinically significant, to abnormal clinically significant (CS) findings for slit lamp examinations (SLE) for Part B. Part A is reported as separate outcome.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 1, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, and Week 16

Population: All participants for whom slit lamp outcomes were measured with both baseline and post-baseline measurements.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Part A PlaceboChange From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part BPosterior Chamber Week 40 participants
Part A PlaceboChange From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part BLids Week 40 participants
Part A PlaceboChange From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part BConjunctiva Week 80 participants
Part A PlaceboChange From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part BConjunctiva Week 120 participants
Part A PlaceboChange From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part BConjunctiva Week 160 participants
Part A PlaceboChange From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part BCornea Week 10 participants
Part A PlaceboChange From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part BCornea Week 120 participants
Part A PlaceboChange From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part BCornea Week 160 participants
Part A PlaceboChange From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part BPosterior Chamber Week 10 participants
Part A PlaceboChange From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part BLids Week 10 participants
Part A PlaceboChange From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part BPosterior Chamber Week 160 participants
Part A PlaceboChange From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part BLens Week 120 participants
Part A PlaceboChange From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part BLens Week 80 participants
Part A PlaceboChange From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part BLens Week 160 participants
Part A PlaceboChange From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part BLids Week 80 participants
Part A PlaceboChange From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part BLids Week 120 participants
Part A PlaceboChange From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part BLids Week 160 participants
Part A PlaceboChange From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part BConjunctiva Week 10 participants
Part A PlaceboChange From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part BConjunctiva Week 40 participants
Part A PlaceboChange From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part BCornea Week 40 participants
Part A PlaceboChange From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part BCornea Week 80 participants
Part A PlaceboChange From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part BAnterior Chamber Week 10 participants
Part A PlaceboChange From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part BAnterior Chamber Week 40 participants
Part A PlaceboChange From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part BAnterior Chamber Week 80 participants
Part A PlaceboChange From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part BAnterior Chamber Week 120 participants
Part A PlaceboChange From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part BAnterior Chamber Week 160 participants
Part A PlaceboChange From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part BPosterior Chamber Week 80 participants
Part A PlaceboChange From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part BPosterior Chamber Week 120 participants
Part A PlaceboChange From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part BIris Week 10 participants
Part A PlaceboChange From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part BIris Week 40 participants
Part A PlaceboChange From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part BIris Week 80 participants
Part A PlaceboChange From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part BIris Week 120 participants
Part A PlaceboChange From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part BIris Week 160 participants
Part A PlaceboChange From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part BLens Week 10 participants
Part A PlaceboChange From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part BLens Week 40 participants
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionChange From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part BIris Week 80 participants
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionChange From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part BLids Week 10 participants
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionChange From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part BCornea Week 16 participants
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionChange From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part BConjunctiva Week 42 participants
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionChange From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part BPosterior Chamber Week 80 participants
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionChange From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part BConjunctiva Week 80 participants
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionChange From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part BCornea Week 40 participants
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionChange From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part BConjunctiva Week 120 participants
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionChange From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part BLens Week 40 participants
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionChange From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part BConjunctiva Week 160 participants
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionChange From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part BCornea Week 80 participants
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionChange From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part BCornea Week 160 participants
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionChange From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part BCornea Week 120 participants
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionChange From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part BPosterior Chamber Week 120 participants
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionChange From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part BLens Week 160 participants
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionChange From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part BPosterior Chamber Week 10 participants
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionChange From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part BAnterior Chamber Week 10 participants
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionChange From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part BPosterior Chamber Week 40 participants
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionChange From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part BIris Week 120 participants
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionChange From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part BPosterior Chamber Week 160 participants
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionChange From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part BIris Week 10 participants
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionChange From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part BAnterior Chamber Week 40 participants
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionChange From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part BLens Week 120 participants
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionChange From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part BLens Week 10 participants
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionChange From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part BLens Week 80 participants
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionChange From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part BAnterior Chamber Week 80 participants
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionChange From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part BLids Week 40 participants
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionChange From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part BIris Week 40 participants
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionChange From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part BLids Week 80 participants
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionChange From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part BAnterior Chamber Week 120 participants
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionChange From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part BLids Week 120 participants
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionChange From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part BIris Week 160 participants
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionChange From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part BLids Week 160 participants
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionChange From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part BAnterior Chamber Week 160 participants
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionChange From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part BConjunctiva Week 10 participants
Primary

Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) for Part A

Change from Baseline in intraocular pressure (IOP) using Goldmann applanation tonometry for Part A

Time frame: Baseline, Week 1, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12

Population: All participants for whom intraocular pressure was measured. Part B is reported as a separate Outcome Measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Part A PlaceboChange From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) for Part AWeek 4-0.3 mmHgStandard Error 0.47
Part A PlaceboChange From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) for Part AWeek 12-0.4 mmHgStandard Error 0.45
Part A PlaceboChange From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) for Part AWeek 8-1.1 mmHgStandard Error 0.47
Part A PlaceboChange From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) for Part AOver All 12 Weeks-0.6 mmHgStandard Error 0.22
Part A PlaceboChange From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) for Part AWeek 1-0.6 mmHgStandard Error 0.64
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionChange From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) for Part AOver All 12 Weeks-0.3 mmHgStandard Error 0.21
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionChange From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) for Part AWeek 1-0.4 mmHgStandard Error 0.49
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionChange From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) for Part AWeek 4-0.2 mmHgStandard Error 0.31
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionChange From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) for Part AWeek 8-0.2 mmHgStandard Error 0.64
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionChange From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) for Part AWeek 12-0.4 mmHgStandard Error 0.43
Primary

Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) for Part B

Change from Baseline in intraocular pressure (IOP) using Goldmann applanation tonometry for Part B. Part A is reported separately.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 1, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 , and Week 16 or early discontinuation visit

Population: All participants for whom intraocular pressures were measured.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Part A PlaceboChange From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) for Part BWeek 42.0 mmHgStandard Deviation 0
Part A PlaceboChange From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) for Part BWeek 120.0 mmHgStandard Deviation 0
Part A PlaceboChange From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) for Part BWeek 81.5 mmHgStandard Deviation 2.12
Part A PlaceboChange From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) for Part BWeek 163.5 mmHgStandard Deviation 2.12
Part A PlaceboChange From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) for Part BWeek 13.0 mmHgStandard Deviation 0
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionChange From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) for Part BWeek 161.0 mmHgStandard Deviation 1.41
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionChange From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) for Part BWeek 10.2 mmHgStandard Deviation 3.19
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionChange From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) for Part BWeek 4-0.8 mmHgStandard Deviation 1.33
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionChange From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) for Part BWeek 80.8 mmHgStandard Deviation 1.89
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionChange From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) for Part BWeek 123.5 mmHgStandard Deviation 2.12
Primary

Incidence and Severity of Ocular TEAEs.

The incidence and severity of ocular treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs)

Time frame: Screening Visit, Baseline (Day 1), Week 1, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, and Week 16

Population: All participants for whom ocular TEAEs were measured.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Part A PlaceboIncidence and Severity of Ocular TEAEs.Ocular mild TEAEs3 Participants
Part A PlaceboIncidence and Severity of Ocular TEAEs.Ocular severe TEAEs0 Participants
Part A PlaceboIncidence and Severity of Ocular TEAEs.Ocular moderate TEAEs0 Participants
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionIncidence and Severity of Ocular TEAEs.Ocular mild TEAEs6 Participants
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionIncidence and Severity of Ocular TEAEs.Ocular severe TEAEs0 Participants
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionIncidence and Severity of Ocular TEAEs.Ocular moderate TEAEs0 Participants
Part B PlaceboIncidence and Severity of Ocular TEAEs.Ocular moderate TEAEs0 Participants
Part B PlaceboIncidence and Severity of Ocular TEAEs.Ocular mild TEAEs1 Participants
Part B PlaceboIncidence and Severity of Ocular TEAEs.Ocular severe TEAEs0 Participants
Part B Elamipretide 3.0% Ophthalmic SolutionIncidence and Severity of Ocular TEAEs.Ocular mild TEAEs1 Participants
Part B Elamipretide 3.0% Ophthalmic SolutionIncidence and Severity of Ocular TEAEs.Ocular severe TEAEs0 Participants
Part B Elamipretide 3.0% Ophthalmic SolutionIncidence and Severity of Ocular TEAEs.Ocular moderate TEAEs2 Participants
Primary

The Incidence and Severity of Systemic Adverse Events

The incidence and severity of systemic treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs)

Time frame: Screening Visit, Baseline (Day 1), Week 1, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, and Week 16

Population: All participants for whom systemic TEAEs were measured. For Part A systemic events were not necessarily attributed to either intervention or placebo.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Part A PlaceboThe Incidence and Severity of Systemic Adverse EventsSystemic severe TEAEs2 Participants
Part A PlaceboThe Incidence and Severity of Systemic Adverse EventsSystemic moderate TEAEs2 Participants
Part A PlaceboThe Incidence and Severity of Systemic Adverse EventsSystemic mild TEAEs3 Participants
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionThe Incidence and Severity of Systemic Adverse EventsSystemic severe TEAEs0 Participants
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionThe Incidence and Severity of Systemic Adverse EventsSystemic mild TEAEs1 Participants
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionThe Incidence and Severity of Systemic Adverse EventsSystemic moderate TEAEs0 Participants
Part B PlaceboThe Incidence and Severity of Systemic Adverse EventsSystemic severe TEAEs0 Participants
Part B PlaceboThe Incidence and Severity of Systemic Adverse EventsSystemic moderate TEAEs0 Participants
Part B PlaceboThe Incidence and Severity of Systemic Adverse EventsSystemic mild TEAEs2 Participants
Secondary

Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Score Using ETDRS Scale for Part B

Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) using the using the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) scale by visit. ETDRS charts present a series of five letters of equal difficulty on each row, with standardized spacing between letters and rows; there is a total of 14 lines (70 letters), with letter size increasing further geometrically and equivalently in every line by a factor of 1.2589 (or 0.1 log unit), moving up the chart. Minimum score of zero, maximum score of 100. Change from baseline: a more negative score is worse outcome, a more positive score is better outcome. A lower score means less letters were read correctly (worse outcome) and a higher score means more letters were read correctly (better outcome).

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12, and 16

Population: All participants for whom BCVA score was measured.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Part A PlaceboBest Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Score Using ETDRS Scale for Part BParticipant 201 (Elamipretide) Week 162 letters
Part A PlaceboBest Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Score Using ETDRS Scale for Part BParticipant 203 (Elamipretide) Early Discontinuation60 letters
Part A PlaceboBest Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Score Using ETDRS Scale for Part BParticipant 204 (Vehicle) Week 178 letters
Part A PlaceboBest Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Score Using ETDRS Scale for Part BParticipant 201 (Elamipretide) Week 1268 letters
Part A PlaceboBest Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Score Using ETDRS Scale for Part BParticipant 204 (Vehicle) Week 479 letters
Part A PlaceboBest Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Score Using ETDRS Scale for Part BParticipant 201 (Elamipretide) Baseline66 letters
Part A PlaceboBest Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Score Using ETDRS Scale for Part BParticipant 204 (Vehicle) Week 876 letters
Part A PlaceboBest Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Score Using ETDRS Scale for Part BParticipant 201 (Elamipretide) Week 1662 letters
Part A PlaceboBest Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Score Using ETDRS Scale for Part BParticipant 204 (Vehicle) Week 1280 letters
Part A PlaceboBest Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Score Using ETDRS Scale for Part BParticipant 201 (Elamipretide) Week 464 letters
Part A PlaceboBest Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Score Using ETDRS Scale for Part BParticipant 204 (Vehicle) Week 1681 letters
Part A PlaceboBest Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Score Using ETDRS Scale for Part BParticipant 205 (Elamipretide) Baseline68 letters
Part A PlaceboBest Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Score Using ETDRS Scale for Part BParticipant 203 (Elamipretide) Baseline63 letters
Part A PlaceboBest Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Score Using ETDRS Scale for Part BParticipant 205 (Elamipretide) Week 169 letters
Part A PlaceboBest Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Score Using ETDRS Scale for Part BParticipant 204 (Vehicle) Baseline79 letters
Part A PlaceboBest Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Score Using ETDRS Scale for Part BParticipant 205 (Elamipretide) Week 463 letters
Part A PlaceboBest Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Score Using ETDRS Scale for Part BParticipant 203 (Elamipretide) Week 160 letters
Part A PlaceboBest Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Score Using ETDRS Scale for Part BParticipant 205 (Elamipretide) UnscheduledNA letters
Part A PlaceboBest Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Score Using ETDRS Scale for Part BParticipant 201 (Elamipretide) Week 867 letters
Part A PlaceboBest Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Score Using ETDRS Scale for Part BParticipant 205 (Elamipretide) Early Discontinuation70 letters
Part A PlaceboBest Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Score Using ETDRS Scale for Part BParticipant 203 (Elamipretide) Unscheduled Visit0 letters
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionBest Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Score Using ETDRS Scale for Part BParticipant 204 (Vehicle) Week 472 letters
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionBest Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Score Using ETDRS Scale for Part BParticipant 204 (Vehicle) Baseline71 letters
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionBest Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Score Using ETDRS Scale for Part BParticipant 204 (Vehicle) Week 1668 letters
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionBest Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Score Using ETDRS Scale for Part BParticipant 201 (Elamipretide) Baseline69 letters
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionBest Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Score Using ETDRS Scale for Part BParticipant 201 (Elamipretide) Week 168 letters
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionBest Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Score Using ETDRS Scale for Part BParticipant 201 (Elamipretide) Week 462 letters
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionBest Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Score Using ETDRS Scale for Part BParticipant 201 (Elamipretide) Week 870 letters
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionBest Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Score Using ETDRS Scale for Part BParticipant 201 (Elamipretide) Week 1273 letters
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionBest Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Score Using ETDRS Scale for Part BParticipant 201 (Elamipretide) Week 1663 letters
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionBest Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Score Using ETDRS Scale for Part BParticipant 203 (Elamipretide) Baseline59 letters
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionBest Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Score Using ETDRS Scale for Part BParticipant 203 (Elamipretide) Week 160 letters
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionBest Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Score Using ETDRS Scale for Part BParticipant 203 (Elamipretide) Unscheduled Visit0 letters
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionBest Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Score Using ETDRS Scale for Part BParticipant 204 (Vehicle) Week 171 letters
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionBest Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Score Using ETDRS Scale for Part BParticipant 203 (Elamipretide) Early Discontinuation57 letters
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionBest Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Score Using ETDRS Scale for Part BParticipant 204 (Vehicle) Week 870 letters
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionBest Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Score Using ETDRS Scale for Part BParticipant 204 (Vehicle) Week 1269 letters
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionBest Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Score Using ETDRS Scale for Part BParticipant 205 (Elamipretide) Baseline31 letters
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionBest Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Score Using ETDRS Scale for Part BParticipant 205 (Elamipretide) Week 130 letters
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionBest Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Score Using ETDRS Scale for Part BParticipant 205 (Elamipretide) Week 436 letters
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionBest Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Score Using ETDRS Scale for Part BParticipant 205 (Elamipretide) UnscheduledNA letters
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionBest Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Score Using ETDRS Scale for Part BParticipant 205 (Elamipretide) Early Discontinuation37 letters
Secondary

Central Corneal Thickness Part B

Central Corneal Thickness: by-subject data as measured by Pachymetry and Pentacam. Part A is reported as a separate outcome measure.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1), Week 1, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, and Week 16, or Early discontinuation visit

Population: All participants for whom Central Corneal Thickness was measured. Part A is reported as a separate Outcome Measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Part A PlaceboCentral Corneal Thickness Part BParticipant 204 (Vehicle) Week 12634 µm
Part A PlaceboCentral Corneal Thickness Part BParticipant 201 (Elamipretide) Week 1619 µm
Part A PlaceboCentral Corneal Thickness Part BParticipant 201 (Elamipretide) Baseline (Day 1)626 µm
Part A PlaceboCentral Corneal Thickness Part BParticipant 205 (Elamipretide) Week 1664 µm
Part A PlaceboCentral Corneal Thickness Part BParticipant 204 (Vehicle) Baseline (Day 1)656 µm
Part A PlaceboCentral Corneal Thickness Part BParticipant 201 (Elamipretide) Week 12617 µm
Part A PlaceboCentral Corneal Thickness Part BParticipant 205 (Elamipretide) Early Discontinuation663 µm
Part A PlaceboCentral Corneal Thickness Part BParticipant 205 (Elamipretide) Week 4650 µm
Part A PlaceboCentral Corneal Thickness Part BParticipant 203 (Elamipretide) Early discontinuation visit639 µm
Part A PlaceboCentral Corneal Thickness Part BParticipant 203 (Elamipretide) Week 1607 µm
Part A PlaceboCentral Corneal Thickness Part BParticipant 204 (Vehicle) Week 4645 µm
Part A PlaceboCentral Corneal Thickness Part BParticipant 204 (Vehicle) Week 1629 µm
Part A PlaceboCentral Corneal Thickness Part BParticipant 201 (Elamipretide) Week 16604 µm
Part A PlaceboCentral Corneal Thickness Part BParticipant 204 (Vehicle) Week 16646 µm
Part A PlaceboCentral Corneal Thickness Part BParticipant 204 (Vehicle) Week 8640 µm
Part A PlaceboCentral Corneal Thickness Part BParticipant 203 (Elamipretide) Baseline (Day 1)620 µm
Part A PlaceboCentral Corneal Thickness Part BParticipant 201 (Elamipretide) Week 8608 µm
Part A PlaceboCentral Corneal Thickness Part BParticipant 201(Elamipretide) Week 4623 µm
Part A PlaceboCentral Corneal Thickness Part BParticipant 205 (Elamipretide) Baseline (Day 1)655 µm
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionCentral Corneal Thickness Part BParticipant 201 (Elamipretide) Week 12608.6 µm
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionCentral Corneal Thickness Part BParticipant 204 (Vehicle) Week 12645.3 µm
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionCentral Corneal Thickness Part BParticipant 201 (Elamipretide) Week 1613 µm
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionCentral Corneal Thickness Part BParticipant 203 (Elamipretide) Baseline (Day 1)627 µm
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionCentral Corneal Thickness Part BParticipant 204 (Vehicle) Week 4631 µm
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionCentral Corneal Thickness Part BParticipant 204 (Vehicle) Week 8646.3 µm
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionCentral Corneal Thickness Part BParticipant 205 (Elamipretide) Baseline (Day 1)652.6 µm
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionCentral Corneal Thickness Part BParticipant 205 (Elamipretide) Week 1655.6 µm
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionCentral Corneal Thickness Part BParticipant 205 (Elamipretide) Week 4687.6 µm
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionCentral Corneal Thickness Part BParticipant 205 (Elamipretide) Early Discontinuation660.6 µm
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionCentral Corneal Thickness Part BParticipant 201 (Elamipretide) Baseline (Day 1)593 µm
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionCentral Corneal Thickness Part BParticipant 201(Elamipretide) Week 4599 µm
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionCentral Corneal Thickness Part BParticipant 201 (Elamipretide) Week 8624.3 µm
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionCentral Corneal Thickness Part BParticipant 201 (Elamipretide) Week 16598.6 µm
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionCentral Corneal Thickness Part BParticipant 203 (Elamipretide) Week 1618.3 µm
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionCentral Corneal Thickness Part BParticipant 203 (Elamipretide) Early discontinuation visit621 µm
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionCentral Corneal Thickness Part BParticipant 204 (Vehicle) Baseline (Day 1)618.3 µm
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionCentral Corneal Thickness Part BParticipant 204 (Vehicle) Week 1616.6 µm
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionCentral Corneal Thickness Part BParticipant 204 (Vehicle) Week 16638.3 µm
Part B PlaceboCentral Corneal Thickness Part BParticipant 205 (Elamipretide) Baseline (Day 1)632 µm
Part B PlaceboCentral Corneal Thickness Part BParticipant 205 (Elamipretide) Week 4656.3 µm
Part B PlaceboCentral Corneal Thickness Part BParticipant 201(Elamipretide) Week 4646 µm
Part B PlaceboCentral Corneal Thickness Part BParticipant 204 (Vehicle) Week 16627 µm
Part B PlaceboCentral Corneal Thickness Part BParticipant 201 (Elamipretide) Week 8607 µm
Part B PlaceboCentral Corneal Thickness Part BParticipant 201 (Elamipretide) Week 12623 µm
Part B PlaceboCentral Corneal Thickness Part BParticipant 204 (Vehicle) Week 4619 µm
Part B PlaceboCentral Corneal Thickness Part BParticipant 204 (Vehicle) Week 1623 µm
Part B PlaceboCentral Corneal Thickness Part BParticipant 201 (Elamipretide) Week 16620 µm
Part B PlaceboCentral Corneal Thickness Part BParticipant 204 (Vehicle) Week 8631 µm
Part B PlaceboCentral Corneal Thickness Part BParticipant 203 (Elamipretide) Week 1623 µm
Part B PlaceboCentral Corneal Thickness Part BParticipant 204 (Vehicle) Week 12621 µm
Part B PlaceboCentral Corneal Thickness Part BParticipant 203 (Elamipretide) Early discontinuation visit630 µm
Part B PlaceboCentral Corneal Thickness Part BParticipant 203 (Elamipretide) Baseline (Day 1)635 µm
Part B PlaceboCentral Corneal Thickness Part BParticipant 204 (Vehicle) Baseline (Day 1)624 µm
Part B PlaceboCentral Corneal Thickness Part BParticipant 205 (Elamipretide) Early Discontinuation645 µm
Part B PlaceboCentral Corneal Thickness Part BParticipant 205 (Elamipretide) Week 1643 µm
Part B PlaceboCentral Corneal Thickness Part BParticipant 201 (Elamipretide) Week 1633 µm
Part B PlaceboCentral Corneal Thickness Part BParticipant 201 (Elamipretide) Baseline (Day 1)604 µm
Part B Elamipretide 3.0% Ophthalmic SolutionCentral Corneal Thickness Part BParticipant 204 (Vehicle) Baseline (Day 1)604.6 µm
Part B Elamipretide 3.0% Ophthalmic SolutionCentral Corneal Thickness Part BParticipant 201 (Elamipretide) Week 1602.3 µm
Part B Elamipretide 3.0% Ophthalmic SolutionCentral Corneal Thickness Part BParticipant 204 (Vehicle) Week 16630 µm
Part B Elamipretide 3.0% Ophthalmic SolutionCentral Corneal Thickness Part BParticipant 203 (Elamipretide) Week 1617.3 µm
Part B Elamipretide 3.0% Ophthalmic SolutionCentral Corneal Thickness Part BParticipant 204 (Vehicle) Week 12637.6 µm
Part B Elamipretide 3.0% Ophthalmic SolutionCentral Corneal Thickness Part BParticipant 201(Elamipretide) Week 4600.3 µm
Part B Elamipretide 3.0% Ophthalmic SolutionCentral Corneal Thickness Part BParticipant 205 (Elamipretide) Baseline (Day 1)632 µm
Part B Elamipretide 3.0% Ophthalmic SolutionCentral Corneal Thickness Part BParticipant 204 (Vehicle) Week 8645 µm
Part B Elamipretide 3.0% Ophthalmic SolutionCentral Corneal Thickness Part BParticipant 205 (Elamipretide) Early Discontinuation642 µm
Part B Elamipretide 3.0% Ophthalmic SolutionCentral Corneal Thickness Part BParticipant 204 (Vehicle) Week 4626 µm
Part B Elamipretide 3.0% Ophthalmic SolutionCentral Corneal Thickness Part BParticipant 203 (Elamipretide) Early discontinuation visit622 µm
Part B Elamipretide 3.0% Ophthalmic SolutionCentral Corneal Thickness Part BParticipant 201 (Elamipretide) Week 12593.6 µm
Part B Elamipretide 3.0% Ophthalmic SolutionCentral Corneal Thickness Part BParticipant 201 (Elamipretide) Week 8608.6 µm
Part B Elamipretide 3.0% Ophthalmic SolutionCentral Corneal Thickness Part BParticipant 205 (Elamipretide) Week 4656.3 µm
Part B Elamipretide 3.0% Ophthalmic SolutionCentral Corneal Thickness Part BParticipant 201 (Elamipretide) Baseline (Day 1)591.3 µm
Part B Elamipretide 3.0% Ophthalmic SolutionCentral Corneal Thickness Part BParticipant 201 (Elamipretide) Week 16600.6 µm
Part B Elamipretide 3.0% Ophthalmic SolutionCentral Corneal Thickness Part BParticipant 203 (Elamipretide) Baseline (Day 1)622.6 µm
Part B Elamipretide 3.0% Ophthalmic SolutionCentral Corneal Thickness Part BParticipant 204 (Vehicle) Week 1608.3 µm
Part B Elamipretide 3.0% Ophthalmic SolutionCentral Corneal Thickness Part BParticipant 205 (Elamipretide) Week 1626.3 µm
Secondary

Change From Baseline Endothelial Cell Hexagonality in Percentage Over All 12 Weeks for Part A

Change From Baseline in Endothelial Cell Hexagonality in Percentage Over All 12 Weeks for Part A. Specular microscopy is a noninvasive photographic technique that allows visualization and analyzation the corneal endothelium. Using computer-assisted morphometry, specular microscopes analyzes the size, shape and population of the endothelial cells. Histologically, healthy corneal cells initially have a hexagonal shape. As endothelial cells die, neighboring cells enlarge to cover the empty space once occupied by the cell. This, in turn, causes the remaining cells to lose their hexagonal shape. Assessments were performed using the flex center and full auto methods for Part A and data from the flex center method was summarized. The flex center method was used for Part B. The percent of Part B is entered as a separate outcome measure. A decrease from baseline in % cell hexagonality means worse outcome, a increase from baseline means better outcome.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 1, 4, 8, and 12

Population: All participants had images taken; data was analyzed for those whose images were of sufficient quality.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Part A PlaceboChange From Baseline Endothelial Cell Hexagonality in Percentage Over All 12 Weeks for Part ACentral Cornea1.518 percentage of hexagonalityStandard Deviation 7.1703
Part A PlaceboChange From Baseline Endothelial Cell Hexagonality in Percentage Over All 12 Weeks for Part ANasal Cornea-6.812 percentage of hexagonalityStandard Deviation 4.3912
Part A PlaceboChange From Baseline Endothelial Cell Hexagonality in Percentage Over All 12 Weeks for Part ATemporal Cornea0.738 percentage of hexagonalityStandard Deviation 5.0322
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionChange From Baseline Endothelial Cell Hexagonality in Percentage Over All 12 Weeks for Part ACentral Cornea-3.155 percentage of hexagonalityStandard Deviation 7.2515
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionChange From Baseline Endothelial Cell Hexagonality in Percentage Over All 12 Weeks for Part ANasal Cornea-2.952 percentage of hexagonalityStandard Deviation 4.0223
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionChange From Baseline Endothelial Cell Hexagonality in Percentage Over All 12 Weeks for Part ATemporal Cornea-0.764 percentage of hexagonalityStandard Deviation 5.1291
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Using the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Scale for Part A.

Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) using the using the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) scale by visit. ETDRS charts present a series of five letters of equal difficulty on each row, with standardized spacing between letters and rows; there is a total of 14 lines (70 letters), with letter size increasing further geometrically and equivalently in every line by a factor of 1.2589 (or 0.1 log unit), moving up the chart. Minimum score of zero, maximum score of 100. Change from baseline: a more negative score is worse outcome, a more positive score is better outcome. A lower score means less letters were read correctly (worse outcome) and a higher score means more letters were read correctly (better outcome). Part B was listed separately.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12, and 16

Population: All participants for whom BCVA score was measured.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Part A PlaceboChange From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Using the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Scale for Part A.Week 40.8 lettersStandard Deviation 5.67
Part A PlaceboChange From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Using the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Scale for Part A.Week 122.6 lettersStandard Deviation 4.59
Part A PlaceboChange From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Using the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Scale for Part A.Week 82.5 lettersStandard Deviation 4.87
Part A PlaceboChange From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Using the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Scale for Part A.Week 163.8 lettersStandard Deviation 5.33
Part A PlaceboChange From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Using the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Scale for Part A.Week 11.8 lettersStandard Deviation 3.51
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionChange From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Using the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Scale for Part A.Week 162.6 lettersStandard Deviation 5.94
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionChange From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Using the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Scale for Part A.Week 12.3 lettersStandard Deviation 4.69
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionChange From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Using the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Scale for Part A.Week 4-0.1 lettersStandard Deviation 8.96
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionChange From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Using the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Scale for Part A.Week 81.3 lettersStandard Deviation 8.11
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionChange From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Using the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Scale for Part A.Week 120.8 lettersStandard Deviation 6.72
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Central Corneal Thickness by Visit Part A as Measured by Pachymetry for Part A

Change from Baseline in Central Corneal Thickness by Visit as measured by Pachymetry for Part A. Part B is reported as a separate outcome measure.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 1, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, and Week 16

Population: All participants for whom central corneal thickness was measured. Part B is reported as a separate Outcome Measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Part A PlaceboChange From Baseline in Central Corneal Thickness by Visit Part A as Measured by Pachymetry for Part AWeek 115.4 µmStandard Deviation 47.95
Part A PlaceboChange From Baseline in Central Corneal Thickness by Visit Part A as Measured by Pachymetry for Part AWeek 815.4 µmStandard Deviation 16.04
Part A PlaceboChange From Baseline in Central Corneal Thickness by Visit Part A as Measured by Pachymetry for Part AWeek 49.4 µmStandard Deviation 19.61
Part A PlaceboChange From Baseline in Central Corneal Thickness by Visit Part A as Measured by Pachymetry for Part AWeek 1613.7 µmStandard Deviation 19.5
Part A PlaceboChange From Baseline in Central Corneal Thickness by Visit Part A as Measured by Pachymetry for Part AWeek 1212.3 µmStandard Deviation 30.31
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionChange From Baseline in Central Corneal Thickness by Visit Part A as Measured by Pachymetry for Part AWeek 122.1 µmStandard Deviation 31.8
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionChange From Baseline in Central Corneal Thickness by Visit Part A as Measured by Pachymetry for Part AWeek 168.4 µmStandard Deviation 17.09
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionChange From Baseline in Central Corneal Thickness by Visit Part A as Measured by Pachymetry for Part AWeek 17.2 µmStandard Deviation 19.99
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionChange From Baseline in Central Corneal Thickness by Visit Part A as Measured by Pachymetry for Part AWeek 46.1 µmStandard Deviation 14.32
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionChange From Baseline in Central Corneal Thickness by Visit Part A as Measured by Pachymetry for Part AWeek 813.1 µmStandard Deviation 22.35
Part B PlaceboChange From Baseline in Central Corneal Thickness by Visit Part A as Measured by Pachymetry for Part AWeek 11.8 µmStandard Deviation 19.72
Part B PlaceboChange From Baseline in Central Corneal Thickness by Visit Part A as Measured by Pachymetry for Part AWeek 44.7 µmStandard Deviation 21.2
Part B PlaceboChange From Baseline in Central Corneal Thickness by Visit Part A as Measured by Pachymetry for Part AWeek 86.1 µmStandard Deviation 15.23
Part B PlaceboChange From Baseline in Central Corneal Thickness by Visit Part A as Measured by Pachymetry for Part AWeek 12-1.8 µmStandard Deviation 28.25
Part B PlaceboChange From Baseline in Central Corneal Thickness by Visit Part A as Measured by Pachymetry for Part AWeek 166.3 µmStandard Deviation 21.18
Part B Elamipretide 3.0% Ophthalmic SolutionChange From Baseline in Central Corneal Thickness by Visit Part A as Measured by Pachymetry for Part AWeek 12.0 µmStandard Deviation 25.51
Part B Elamipretide 3.0% Ophthalmic SolutionChange From Baseline in Central Corneal Thickness by Visit Part A as Measured by Pachymetry for Part AWeek 87.6 µmStandard Deviation 9.61
Part B Elamipretide 3.0% Ophthalmic SolutionChange From Baseline in Central Corneal Thickness by Visit Part A as Measured by Pachymetry for Part AWeek 44.8 µmStandard Deviation 26.52
Part B Elamipretide 3.0% Ophthalmic SolutionChange From Baseline in Central Corneal Thickness by Visit Part A as Measured by Pachymetry for Part AWeek 120.0 µmStandard Deviation 25.87
Part B Elamipretide 3.0% Ophthalmic SolutionChange From Baseline in Central Corneal Thickness by Visit Part A as Measured by Pachymetry for Part AWeek 168.7 µmStandard Deviation 27.75
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Contrast Sensitivity (Log Score) for Part A

Change from Baseline in contrast sensitivity over all 12 weeks log score at 3, 6, 12, 18 cycles per degree (cpd) using Vector Vision's CSV-1000E. Standard tables for the VectorVision's CSV-1000E model were used to convert linear results to the log values. Lower log scores equals lower contrast sensitivity and worse outcome. Higher log scores mean higher contrast sensitivity and better outcome. For 3cpd, range is 0.7-2.08; 6 cpd: 0.91-2.29; 12 cpd: 0.61-1.99; 18cpd: 0.17-1.55, unless no gratings were visible. If no gratings were visible, .3 log was subtracted from the lowest score for 3, 6, and 12cpd. For 18cpd .01 log was used, or essentially 100% contrast.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 1, 4, 8, 12 weeks

Population: All participants for whom contrast sensitivity was measured

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Part A PlaceboChange From Baseline in Contrast Sensitivity (Log Score) for Part A3 cycles per degree0.084 log scoreStandard Deviation 0.0554
Part A PlaceboChange From Baseline in Contrast Sensitivity (Log Score) for Part A18 cycles per degree0.122 log scoreStandard Deviation 0.0637
Part A PlaceboChange From Baseline in Contrast Sensitivity (Log Score) for Part A6 cycles per degree0.193 log scoreStandard Deviation 0.0745
Part A PlaceboChange From Baseline in Contrast Sensitivity (Log Score) for Part A12 cycles per degree0.050 log scoreStandard Deviation 0.0787
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionChange From Baseline in Contrast Sensitivity (Log Score) for Part A12 cycles per degree0.013 log scoreStandard Deviation 0.0503
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionChange From Baseline in Contrast Sensitivity (Log Score) for Part A6 cycles per degree0.111 log scoreStandard Deviation 0.0374
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionChange From Baseline in Contrast Sensitivity (Log Score) for Part A18 cycles per degree0.080 log scoreStandard Deviation 0.0564
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionChange From Baseline in Contrast Sensitivity (Log Score) for Part A3 cycles per degree-0.013 log scoreStandard Deviation 0.0499
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Corneal Area Affected by Microcysts for Part A

Change from Baseline in corneal area affected by microcysts by visit for Part A.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12, and 16

Population: All participants for whom corneal area affected by microcysts was measured.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Part A PlaceboChange From Baseline in Corneal Area Affected by Microcysts for Part AWeek 8 No Change16 Participants
Part A PlaceboChange From Baseline in Corneal Area Affected by Microcysts for Part AWeek 8 Improved0 Participants
Part A PlaceboChange From Baseline in Corneal Area Affected by Microcysts for Part AWeek 12 Worsened1 Participants
Part A PlaceboChange From Baseline in Corneal Area Affected by Microcysts for Part AWeek 12 No Change15 Participants
Part A PlaceboChange From Baseline in Corneal Area Affected by Microcysts for Part AWeek 16 No Change16 Participants
Part A PlaceboChange From Baseline in Corneal Area Affected by Microcysts for Part AWeek 16 Improved0 Participants
Part A PlaceboChange From Baseline in Corneal Area Affected by Microcysts for Part AWeek 1 Worsened0 Participants
Part A PlaceboChange From Baseline in Corneal Area Affected by Microcysts for Part AWeek 1 No Change18 Participants
Part A PlaceboChange From Baseline in Corneal Area Affected by Microcysts for Part AWeek 1 Improved0 Participants
Part A PlaceboChange From Baseline in Corneal Area Affected by Microcysts for Part AWeek 4 Worsened0 Participants
Part A PlaceboChange From Baseline in Corneal Area Affected by Microcysts for Part AWeek 4 No Change17 Participants
Part A PlaceboChange From Baseline in Corneal Area Affected by Microcysts for Part AWeek 4 Improved0 Participants
Part A PlaceboChange From Baseline in Corneal Area Affected by Microcysts for Part AWeek 8 Worsened1 Participants
Part A PlaceboChange From Baseline in Corneal Area Affected by Microcysts for Part AWeek 12 Improved0 Participants
Part A PlaceboChange From Baseline in Corneal Area Affected by Microcysts for Part AWeek 16 Worsened0 Participants
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionChange From Baseline in Corneal Area Affected by Microcysts for Part AWeek 16 Improved0 Participants
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionChange From Baseline in Corneal Area Affected by Microcysts for Part AWeek 8 No Change16 Participants
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionChange From Baseline in Corneal Area Affected by Microcysts for Part AWeek 1 Improved0 Participants
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionChange From Baseline in Corneal Area Affected by Microcysts for Part AWeek 8 Improved0 Participants
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionChange From Baseline in Corneal Area Affected by Microcysts for Part AWeek 8 Worsened1 Participants
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionChange From Baseline in Corneal Area Affected by Microcysts for Part AWeek 12 Worsened2 Participants
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionChange From Baseline in Corneal Area Affected by Microcysts for Part AWeek 4 Worsened0 Participants
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionChange From Baseline in Corneal Area Affected by Microcysts for Part AWeek 12 No Change14 Participants
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionChange From Baseline in Corneal Area Affected by Microcysts for Part AWeek 16 Worsened1 Participants
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionChange From Baseline in Corneal Area Affected by Microcysts for Part AWeek 16 No Change15 Participants
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionChange From Baseline in Corneal Area Affected by Microcysts for Part AWeek 4 No Change17 Participants
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionChange From Baseline in Corneal Area Affected by Microcysts for Part AWeek 12 Improved0 Participants
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionChange From Baseline in Corneal Area Affected by Microcysts for Part AWeek 1 Worsened1 Participants
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionChange From Baseline in Corneal Area Affected by Microcysts for Part AWeek 4 Improved0 Participants
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionChange From Baseline in Corneal Area Affected by Microcysts for Part AWeek 1 No Change17 Participants
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Corneal Bullae for Part A.

Count of participants in number, size and location of bullae by treatment. Part B is listed separately.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 1, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16

Population: All participants for whom corneal bullae were measured.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Part A PlaceboChange From Baseline in Corneal Bullae for Part A.Central Inferior 3 Bullae >1mm, 8 Bullae <0.5mm0 Participants
Part A PlaceboChange From Baseline in Corneal Bullae for Part A.Central (Superior) 3 Bullae >1mm, 8 Bullae <0.5mm0 Participants
Part A PlaceboChange From Baseline in Corneal Bullae for Part A.Central Nasal 3 bullae >1mm, 8 bullae <0.5mm0 Participants
Part A PlaceboChange From Baseline in Corneal Bullae for Part A.Central (Temporal) 3 Bullae >1mm, 8 Bullae <0.5mm0 Participants
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionChange From Baseline in Corneal Bullae for Part A.Central Nasal 3 bullae >1mm, 8 bullae <0.5mm1 Participants
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionChange From Baseline in Corneal Bullae for Part A.Central (Superior) 3 Bullae >1mm, 8 Bullae <0.5mm1 Participants
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionChange From Baseline in Corneal Bullae for Part A.Central Inferior 3 Bullae >1mm, 8 Bullae <0.5mm1 Participants
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionChange From Baseline in Corneal Bullae for Part A.Central (Temporal) 3 Bullae >1mm, 8 Bullae <0.5mm1 Participants
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Endothelial Cell Coefficient of Variation Over All 12 Weeks for Part A

Change From Baseline in Endothelial Cell Coefficient of Variation Over All 12 Weeks. Coefficient of variation (CV) is Standard deviation (SD) of cell area divided by the mean cell area of endothelial cell analyzed. CV represents the coefficient, or degree, of variation in the sizes of the endothelial cells (polymegethism). By measuring the variation in size between endothelial cells, the system can measure how much cell loss is occurring. The more variation, the worse the outcome. Part B is is entered as a separate outcome measure.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

Population: All participants had images taken; data was analyzed for those whose images were of sufficient quality.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Part A PlaceboChange From Baseline in Endothelial Cell Coefficient of Variation Over All 12 Weeks for Part ACentral Cornea-7.644 SD of cell area/Mean cell area, (μm^2)Standard Deviation 7.7617
Part A PlaceboChange From Baseline in Endothelial Cell Coefficient of Variation Over All 12 Weeks for Part ANasal Cornea-3.809 SD of cell area/Mean cell area, (μm^2)Standard Deviation 3.9095
Part A PlaceboChange From Baseline in Endothelial Cell Coefficient of Variation Over All 12 Weeks for Part ATemporal Cornea7.823 SD of cell area/Mean cell area, (μm^2)Standard Deviation 5.062
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionChange From Baseline in Endothelial Cell Coefficient of Variation Over All 12 Weeks for Part ACentral Cornea-7.941 SD of cell area/Mean cell area, (μm^2)Standard Deviation 8.0334
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionChange From Baseline in Endothelial Cell Coefficient of Variation Over All 12 Weeks for Part ANasal Cornea-4.293 SD of cell area/Mean cell area, (μm^2)Standard Deviation 3.6388
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionChange From Baseline in Endothelial Cell Coefficient of Variation Over All 12 Weeks for Part ATemporal Cornea0.737 SD of cell area/Mean cell area, (μm^2)Standard Deviation 5.0326
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Endothelial Cell Density Over All 12 Weeks for Part A

Change From Baseline in Endothelial Cell Counts, or density (Counts/mm\^2) over all 12 weeks for Part A. Part B is entered as a separate outcome measure.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 1, 4, 8, and 12

Population: All participants for whom endothelial cell counts were measured. All participants had images taken; data was analyzed for those whose images were of sufficient quality.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Part A PlaceboChange From Baseline in Endothelial Cell Density Over All 12 Weeks for Part ACentral Cornea11.0 counts/mm^2Standard Error 224.89
Part A PlaceboChange From Baseline in Endothelial Cell Density Over All 12 Weeks for Part ANasal Cornea-68.9 counts/mm^2Standard Error 114.22
Part A PlaceboChange From Baseline in Endothelial Cell Density Over All 12 Weeks for Part ATemporal Cornea-38.0 counts/mm^2Standard Error 162.07
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionChange From Baseline in Endothelial Cell Density Over All 12 Weeks for Part ACentral Cornea-166.9 counts/mm^2Standard Error 231.84
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionChange From Baseline in Endothelial Cell Density Over All 12 Weeks for Part ANasal Cornea-33.0 counts/mm^2Standard Error 105.18
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionChange From Baseline in Endothelial Cell Density Over All 12 Weeks for Part ATemporal Cornea-24.0 counts/mm^2Standard Error 178.93
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Severity of Corneal Stromal Folds for Part A

Change from baseline in severity of corneal stromal folds by visit. Descriptive assessment made by Investigator; severity is not assessed using a scale.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12, and 16

Population: All participants for whom corneal stromal folds was measured.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Part A PlaceboChange From Baseline in Severity of Corneal Stromal Folds for Part AWeek 4 Worsened1 Participants
Part A PlaceboChange From Baseline in Severity of Corneal Stromal Folds for Part AWeek 4 No Change14 Participants
Part A PlaceboChange From Baseline in Severity of Corneal Stromal Folds for Part AWeek 16 Improved3 Participants
Part A PlaceboChange From Baseline in Severity of Corneal Stromal Folds for Part AWeek 4 Improved2 Participants
Part A PlaceboChange From Baseline in Severity of Corneal Stromal Folds for Part AWeek 16 Worsened2 Participants
Part A PlaceboChange From Baseline in Severity of Corneal Stromal Folds for Part AWeek 8 Worsened2 Participants
Part A PlaceboChange From Baseline in Severity of Corneal Stromal Folds for Part AWeek 1 Worsened1 Participants
Part A PlaceboChange From Baseline in Severity of Corneal Stromal Folds for Part AWeek 8 No Change11 Participants
Part A PlaceboChange From Baseline in Severity of Corneal Stromal Folds for Part AWeek 12 Improved4 Participants
Part A PlaceboChange From Baseline in Severity of Corneal Stromal Folds for Part AWeek 8 Improved4 Participants
Part A PlaceboChange From Baseline in Severity of Corneal Stromal Folds for Part AWeek 1 No Change16 Participants
Part A PlaceboChange From Baseline in Severity of Corneal Stromal Folds for Part AWeek 12 Worsened2 Participants
Part A PlaceboChange From Baseline in Severity of Corneal Stromal Folds for Part AWeek 16 No Change11 Participants
Part A PlaceboChange From Baseline in Severity of Corneal Stromal Folds for Part AWeek 12 No Change10 Participants
Part A PlaceboChange From Baseline in Severity of Corneal Stromal Folds for Part AWeek 1 Improved1 Participants
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionChange From Baseline in Severity of Corneal Stromal Folds for Part AWeek 12 No Change12 Participants
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionChange From Baseline in Severity of Corneal Stromal Folds for Part AWeek 12 Improved2 Participants
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionChange From Baseline in Severity of Corneal Stromal Folds for Part AWeek 16 Worsened2 Participants
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionChange From Baseline in Severity of Corneal Stromal Folds for Part AWeek 16 No Change12 Participants
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionChange From Baseline in Severity of Corneal Stromal Folds for Part AWeek 16 Improved2 Participants
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionChange From Baseline in Severity of Corneal Stromal Folds for Part AWeek 1 Worsened1 Participants
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionChange From Baseline in Severity of Corneal Stromal Folds for Part AWeek 1 No Change15 Participants
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionChange From Baseline in Severity of Corneal Stromal Folds for Part AWeek 4 Worsened0 Participants
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionChange From Baseline in Severity of Corneal Stromal Folds for Part AWeek 4 No Change14 Participants
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionChange From Baseline in Severity of Corneal Stromal Folds for Part AWeek 4 Improved3 Participants
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionChange From Baseline in Severity of Corneal Stromal Folds for Part AWeek 8 Worsened2 Participants
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionChange From Baseline in Severity of Corneal Stromal Folds for Part AWeek 8 No Change11 Participants
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionChange From Baseline in Severity of Corneal Stromal Folds for Part AWeek 8 Improved4 Participants
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionChange From Baseline in Severity of Corneal Stromal Folds for Part AWeek 12 Worsened2 Participants
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionChange From Baseline in Severity of Corneal Stromal Folds for Part AWeek 1 Improved2 Participants
Secondary

Coefficient of Variation (CoV) Part B

Part B, By-subject data for all time points where images were readable. For all time points where there were Poor Quality Images or too few cells to register there were no data available. CoV represents the coefficient, or degree, of variation in the sizes of the endothelial cells. By measuring the variation in size between endothelial cells, the system can measure how much cell loss is occurring. A CoV less than 40 is normal.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 1, 4, 8,12, and 16

Population: All participants for whom Corneal Endothelial Cell Counts/Density was measured. Part A is reported as a separate Outcome Measure. All images from Participant 205 were poor quality images and hence, no data was available.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Part A PlaceboCoefficient of Variation (CoV) Part BParticipant 204 (Vehicle) Temporal Week 16NA SD of cell area/Mean cell area, (μm^2)
Part A PlaceboCoefficient of Variation (CoV) Part BParticipant 204 (Vehicle) Central Week 8NA SD of cell area/Mean cell area, (μm^2)
Part A PlaceboCoefficient of Variation (CoV) Part BParticipant 204 (Vehicle) Central Week 12NA SD of cell area/Mean cell area, (μm^2)
Part A PlaceboCoefficient of Variation (CoV) Part BParticipant 204 (Vehicle) Nasal Week 1NA SD of cell area/Mean cell area, (μm^2)
Part A PlaceboCoefficient of Variation (CoV) Part BParticipant 204 (Vehicle) Nasal Week 4NA SD of cell area/Mean cell area, (μm^2)
Part A PlaceboCoefficient of Variation (CoV) Part BParticipant 204 (Vehicle) Nasal Week 8NA SD of cell area/Mean cell area, (μm^2)
Part A PlaceboCoefficient of Variation (CoV) Part BParticipant 204 (Vehicle) Nasal Week 12NA SD of cell area/Mean cell area, (μm^2)
Part A PlaceboCoefficient of Variation (CoV) Part BParticipant 204 (Vehicle) Temporal Week 8NA SD of cell area/Mean cell area, (μm^2)
Part A PlaceboCoefficient of Variation (CoV) Part BParticipant 204 (Vehicle) Temporal Week 12NA SD of cell area/Mean cell area, (μm^2)
Part A PlaceboCoefficient of Variation (CoV) Part BParticipant 201 (Elamipretide) Central Week 1664.0 SD of cell area/Mean cell area, (μm^2)
Part A PlaceboCoefficient of Variation (CoV) Part BParticipant 201 (Elamipretide) Temporal Baseline (Day 1)51.0 SD of cell area/Mean cell area, (μm^2)
Part A PlaceboCoefficient of Variation (CoV) Part BParticipant 204 (Vehicle) Central Baseline (Day 1)NA SD of cell area/Mean cell area, (μm^2)
Part A PlaceboCoefficient of Variation (CoV) Part BParticipant 204 (Vehicle) Central Week 1NA SD of cell area/Mean cell area, (μm^2)
Part A PlaceboCoefficient of Variation (CoV) Part BParticipant 204 (Vehicle) Central Week 4NA SD of cell area/Mean cell area, (μm^2)
Part A PlaceboCoefficient of Variation (CoV) Part BParticipant 204 (Vehicle) Central Week 16NA SD of cell area/Mean cell area, (μm^2)
Part A PlaceboCoefficient of Variation (CoV) Part BParticipant 204 (Vehicle) Nasal Baseline (Day 1)NA SD of cell area/Mean cell area, (μm^2)
Part A PlaceboCoefficient of Variation (CoV) Part BParticipant 204 (Vehicle) Nasal Week 16NA SD of cell area/Mean cell area, (μm^2)
Part A PlaceboCoefficient of Variation (CoV) Part BParticipant 204 (Vehicle) Temporal Baseline (Day 1)NA SD of cell area/Mean cell area, (μm^2)
Part A PlaceboCoefficient of Variation (CoV) Part BParticipant 204 (Vehicle) Temporal Week 1NA SD of cell area/Mean cell area, (μm^2)
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionCoefficient of Variation (CoV) Part BParticipant 201 (Elamipretide) Central Week 16NA SD of cell area/Mean cell area, (μm^2)
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionCoefficient of Variation (CoV) Part BParticipant 201 (Elamipretide) Temporal Baseline (Day 1)NA SD of cell area/Mean cell area, (μm^2)
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionCoefficient of Variation (CoV) Part BParticipant 204 (Vehicle) Central Week 858.7 SD of cell area/Mean cell area, (μm^2)
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionCoefficient of Variation (CoV) Part BParticipant 204 (Vehicle) Nasal Week 1265.0 SD of cell area/Mean cell area, (μm^2)
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionCoefficient of Variation (CoV) Part BParticipant 204 (Vehicle) Central Week 1656.8 SD of cell area/Mean cell area, (μm^2)
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionCoefficient of Variation (CoV) Part BParticipant 204 (Vehicle) Nasal Baseline (Day 1)73.0 SD of cell area/Mean cell area, (μm^2)
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionCoefficient of Variation (CoV) Part BParticipant 204 (Vehicle) Central Baseline (Day 1)61.0 SD of cell area/Mean cell area, (μm^2)
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionCoefficient of Variation (CoV) Part BParticipant 204 (Vehicle) Nasal Week 158.7 SD of cell area/Mean cell area, (μm^2)
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionCoefficient of Variation (CoV) Part BParticipant 204 (Vehicle) Temporal Week 158.2 SD of cell area/Mean cell area, (μm^2)
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionCoefficient of Variation (CoV) Part BParticipant 204 (Vehicle) Nasal Week 459.5 SD of cell area/Mean cell area, (μm^2)
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionCoefficient of Variation (CoV) Part BParticipant 204 (Vehicle) Central Week 169.0 SD of cell area/Mean cell area, (μm^2)
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionCoefficient of Variation (CoV) Part BParticipant 204 (Vehicle) Nasal Week 851.5 SD of cell area/Mean cell area, (μm^2)
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionCoefficient of Variation (CoV) Part BParticipant 204 (Vehicle) Nasal Week 1650.0 SD of cell area/Mean cell area, (μm^2)
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionCoefficient of Variation (CoV) Part BParticipant 204 (Vehicle) Temporal Baseline (Day 1)62.3 SD of cell area/Mean cell area, (μm^2)
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionCoefficient of Variation (CoV) Part BParticipant 204 (Vehicle) Central Week 447.7 SD of cell area/Mean cell area, (μm^2)
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionCoefficient of Variation (CoV) Part BParticipant 204 (Vehicle) Temporal Week 863.0 SD of cell area/Mean cell area, (μm^2)
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionCoefficient of Variation (CoV) Part BParticipant 204 (Vehicle) Central Week 1260.2 SD of cell area/Mean cell area, (μm^2)
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionCoefficient of Variation (CoV) Part BParticipant 204 (Vehicle) Temporal Week 1663.0 SD of cell area/Mean cell area, (μm^2)
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionCoefficient of Variation (CoV) Part BParticipant 204 (Vehicle) Temporal Week 1232.3 SD of cell area/Mean cell area, (μm^2)
Secondary

Contrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject Data

Contrast Sensitivity log score at 3, 6, 12, 18 cycles per degree (cpd) using Vector Vision's CSV-1000E by-subject data, Part B. Part A is listed separately. Standard tables for the VectorVision's CSV-1000E model were used to convert linear results to the log values. Lower log scores equals lower contrast sensitivity and worse outcome. Higher log scores mean higher contrast sensitivity and better outcome. For 3cpd, range is 0.7-2.08; 6 cpd: 0.91-2.29; 12 cpd: 0.61-1.99; 18cpd: 0.17-1.55, unless no gratings were visible. If no gratings were visible, .3 log was subtracted from the lowest score for 3, 6, and 12cpd. For 18cpd .01 log was used, or essentially 100% contrast.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 1, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16, or early discontinuation visit

Population: All participants for whom contrast sensitivity was measured.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Part A PlaceboContrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject DataParticipant 203 (Elamipretide) 3 cpd Screening0.70 log score
Part A PlaceboContrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject DataParticipant 203 (Elamipretide) 6 cpd Screening0.61 log score
Part A PlaceboContrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject DataParticipant 203 (Elamipretide) 12cpd Baseline0.60 log score
Part A PlaceboContrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject DataParticipant 203 (Elamipretide) 12cpd Week 10.31 log score
Part A PlaceboContrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject DataParticipant 204 (Vehicle) 3cpd Week 11.63 log score
Part A PlaceboContrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject DataParticipant 204 (Vehicle) 6cpd Week 162.00 log score
Part A PlaceboContrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject DataParticipant 204 (Vehicle) 12cpd Week 11.08 log score
Part A PlaceboContrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject DataParticipant 204 (Vehicle) 18cpd Week 10.65 log score
Part A PlaceboContrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject DataParticipant 205 (Elamipretide) 3cpd Week 40.70 log score
Part A PlaceboContrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject DataParticipant 205 (Elamipretide) 6cpd Week 10.90 log score
Part A PlaceboContrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject DataParticipant 205 (Elamipretide) 6cpd Week 40.61 log score
Part A PlaceboContrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject DataParticipant 205 (Elamipretide) 12cpd Week 11.26 log score
Part A PlaceboContrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject DataParticipant 205 (Elamipretide) 12cpd Week 40.31 log score
Part A PlaceboContrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject DataParticipant 205 (Elamipretide) 18cpd Week 10.65 log score
Part A PlaceboContrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject DataParticipant 205 (Elamipretide) 18cpd Early Discontinuation0.01 log score
Part A PlaceboContrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject DataParticipant 203 (Elamipretide) 3 cpd Week 11.00 log score
Part A PlaceboContrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject DataParticipant 203 (Elamipretide) 3 cpd Early Discontinuation0.70 log score
Part A PlaceboContrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject DataParticipant 203 (Elamipretide) 6 cpd Week 10.90 log score
Part A PlaceboContrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject DataParticipant 203 (Elamipretide) 6 cpd Early Discontinuation0.61 log score
Part A PlaceboContrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject DataParticipant 203 (Elamipretide) 12cpd Early Discontinuation0.60 log score
Part A PlaceboContrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject DataParticipant 203 (Elamipretide) 18cpd Baseline0.01 log score
Part A PlaceboContrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject DataParticipant 203 (Elamipretide) 18cpd Week 10.01 log score
Part A PlaceboContrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject DataParticipant 203 (Elamipretide) 18 cpd Early Discontinuation0.01 log score
Part A PlaceboContrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject DataParticipant 204 (Vehicle) 3cpd Baseline1.18 log score
Part A PlaceboContrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject DataParticipant 204 (Vehicle) 3cpd Week 41.49 log score
Part A PlaceboContrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject DataParticipant 204 (Vehicle) 3cpd Week 81.49 log score
Part A PlaceboContrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject DataParticipant 204 (Vehicle) 3cpd Week 121.79 log score
Part A PlaceboContrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject DataParticipant 204 (Vehicle) 3cpd Week 161.79 log score
Part A PlaceboContrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject DataParticipant 204 (Vehicle) 6cpd Baseline1.38 log score
Part A PlaceboContrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject DataParticipant 204 (Vehicle) 6cpd Week 11.85 log score
Part A PlaceboContrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject DataParticipant 204 (Vehicle) 6cpd Week 41.38 log score
Part A PlaceboContrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject DataParticipant 204 (Vehicle) 6cpd Week 81.70 log score
Part A PlaceboContrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject DataParticipant 204 (Vehicle) 6cpd Week 121.70 log score
Part A PlaceboContrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject DataParticipant 204 (Vehicle) 12cpd Baseline0.60 log score
Part A PlaceboContrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject DataParticipant 204 (Vehicle) 12cpd Week 41.26 log score
Part A PlaceboContrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject DataParticipant 204 (Vehicle) 12cpd Week 80.60 log score
Part A PlaceboContrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject DataParticipant 204 (Vehicle) 12cpd Week 121.08 log score
Part A PlaceboContrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject DataParticipant 204 (Vehicle) 12cpd Week 161.26 log score
Part A PlaceboContrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject DataParticipant 204 (Vehicle) 18cpd Baseline0.65 log score
Part A PlaceboContrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject DataParticipant 204 (Vehicle) 18cpd Week 40.65 log score
Part A PlaceboContrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject DataParticipant 204 (Vehicle) 18cpd Week 80.18 log score
Part A PlaceboContrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject DataParticipant 204 (Vehicle) 18cpd Week 120.65 log score
Part A PlaceboContrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject DataParticipant 204 (Vehicle) 18cpd Week 160.65 log score
Part A PlaceboContrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject DataParticipant 205 (Elamipretide) 3cpd Baseline1.34 log score
Part A PlaceboContrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject DataParticipant 205 (Elamipretide) 3cpd Week 11.18 log score
Part A PlaceboContrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject DataParticipant 205 (Elamipretide) 12cpd Baseline0.31 log score
Part A PlaceboContrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject DataParticipant 205 (Elamipretide) 3cpd Early Discontinuation1.00 log score
Part A PlaceboContrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject DataParticipant 205 (Elamipretide) 6cpd Baseline0.90 log score
Part A PlaceboContrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject DataParticipant 205 (Elamipretide) 6cpd Early Discontinuation0.61 log score
Part A PlaceboContrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject DataParticipant 205 (Elamipretide) 12cpd Early Discontinuation0.31 log score
Part A PlaceboContrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject DataParticipant 205 (Elamipretide) 18cpd Baseline0.01 log score
Part A PlaceboContrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject DataParticipant 205 (Elamipretide) 18cpd Week 40.01 log score
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionContrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject DataParticipant 204 (Vehicle) 3cpd Week 161.34 log score
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionContrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject DataParticipant 204 (Vehicle) 18cpd Week 80.48 log score
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionContrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject DataParticipant 203 (Elamipretide) 6 cpd Early Discontinuation0.61 log score
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionContrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject DataParticipant 204 (Vehicle) 6cpd Baseline1.38 log score
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionContrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject DataParticipant 203 (Elamipretide) 12cpd Baseline0.31 log score
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionContrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject DataParticipant 205 (Elamipretide) 6cpd Baseline0.61 log score
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionContrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject DataParticipant 203 (Elamipretide) 12cpd Week 10.60 log score
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionContrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject DataParticipant 204 (Vehicle) 6cpd Week 11.20 log score
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionContrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject DataParticipant 204 (Vehicle) 3cpd Week 121.63 log score
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionContrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject DataParticipant 204 (Vehicle) 18cpd Week 120.01 log score
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionContrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject DataParticipant 204 (Vehicle) 6cpd Week 41.56 log score
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionContrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject DataParticipant 204 (Vehicle) 12cpd Week 120.60 log score
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionContrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject DataParticipant 205 (Elamipretide) 6cpd Week 10.61 log score
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionContrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject DataParticipant 204 (Vehicle) 6cpd Week 81.20 log score
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionContrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject DataParticipant 205 (Elamipretide) 3cpd Week 40.40 log score
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionContrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject DataParticipant 204 (Vehicle) 18cpd Week 160.65 log score
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionContrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject DataParticipant 204 (Vehicle) 6cpd Week 121.56 log score
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionContrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject DataParticipant 205 (Elamipretide) 6cpd Week 40.61 log score
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionContrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject DataParticipant 205 (Elamipretide) 12cpd Baseline0.31 log score
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionContrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject DataParticipant 204 (Vehicle) 6cpd Week 160.90 log score
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionContrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject DataParticipant 205 (Elamipretide) 12cpd Week 10.31 log score
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionContrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject DataParticipant 205 (Elamipretide) 18cpd Baseline0.01 log score
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionContrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject DataParticipant 205 (Elamipretide) 12cpd Early Discontinuation0.31 log score
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionContrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject DataParticipant 204 (Vehicle) 12cpd Baseline0.60 log score
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionContrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject DataParticipant 205 (Elamipretide) 18cpd Week 10.01 log score
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionContrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject DataParticipant 204 (Vehicle) 12cpd Week 10.90 log score
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionContrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject DataParticipant 203 (Elamipretide) 3 cpd Week 11.00 log score
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionContrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject DataParticipant 203 (Elamipretide) 3 cpd Screening0.70 log score
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionContrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject DataParticipant 205 (Elamipretide) 3cpd Baseline0.40 log score
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionContrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject DataParticipant 204 (Vehicle) 12cpd Week 41.08 log score
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionContrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject DataParticipant 203 (Elamipretide) 3 cpd Early Discontinuation0.70 log score
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionContrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject DataParticipant 203 (Elamipretide) 6 cpd Screening0.90 log score
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionContrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject DataParticipant 205 (Elamipretide) 6cpd Early Discontinuation0.61 log score
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionContrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject DataParticipant 203 (Elamipretide) 6 cpd Week 11.20 log score
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionContrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject DataParticipant 204 (Vehicle) 12cpd Week 80.90 log score
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionContrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject DataParticipant 205 (Elamipretide) 3cpd Week 10.40 log score
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionContrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject DataParticipant 203 (Elamipretide) 12cpd Early Discontinuation0.60 log score
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionContrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject DataParticipant 205 (Elamipretide) 12cpd Week 40.31 log score
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionContrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject DataParticipant 203 (Elamipretide) 18cpd Baseline0.18 log score
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionContrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject DataParticipant 204 (Vehicle) 12cpd Week 160.60 log score
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionContrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject DataParticipant 203 (Elamipretide) 18cpd Week 10.18 log score
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionContrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject DataParticipant 205 (Elamipretide) 18cpd Early Discontinuation0.01 log score
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionContrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject DataParticipant 203 (Elamipretide) 18 cpd Early Discontinuation0.18 log score
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionContrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject DataParticipant 204 (Vehicle) 18cpd Baseline0.01 log score
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionContrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject DataParticipant 204 (Vehicle) 3cpd Baseline1.18 log score
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionContrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject DataParticipant 204 (Vehicle) 3cpd Week 11.00 log score
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionContrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject DataParticipant 204 (Vehicle) 18cpd Week 10.18 log score
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionContrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject DataParticipant 204 (Vehicle) 3cpd Week 41.34 log score
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionContrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject DataParticipant 205 (Elamipretide) 3cpd Early Discontinuation0.40 log score
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionContrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject DataParticipant 204 (Vehicle) 3cpd Week 81.34 log score
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionContrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject DataParticipant 204 (Vehicle) 18cpd Week 40.65 log score
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionContrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject DataParticipant 205 (Elamipretide) 18cpd Week 40.01 log score
Secondary

Corneal Area Affected by Microcysts: Part B

Corneal area affected by microcysts: by-subject data for Part B. No microcysts were present for any timepoints.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12, and 16, or early discontinuation visit

Population: All participants for whom corneal area affected by microcysts was measured.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Part A PlaceboCorneal Area Affected by Microcysts: Part BParticipant 201 (Elamipretide) All visits0 eyes
Part A PlaceboCorneal Area Affected by Microcysts: Part BParticipant 203 (Elamipretide) All visits0 eyes
Part A PlaceboCorneal Area Affected by Microcysts: Part BParticipant 204 (Placebo) All visits0 eyes
Part A PlaceboCorneal Area Affected by Microcysts: Part BParticipant 205 (Elamipretide) All visits0 eyes
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionCorneal Area Affected by Microcysts: Part BParticipant 205 (Elamipretide) All visits0 eyes
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionCorneal Area Affected by Microcysts: Part BParticipant 201 (Elamipretide) All visits0 eyes
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionCorneal Area Affected by Microcysts: Part BParticipant 204 (Placebo) All visits0 eyes
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionCorneal Area Affected by Microcysts: Part BParticipant 203 (Elamipretide) All visits0 eyes
Secondary

Corneal Bullae: Part B

Number, size and location of Corneal bullae: By-subject data: Part B.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 1, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16, or early discontinuation visit

Population: All participants for whom corneal bullae were measured.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Part A PlaceboCorneal Bullae: Part BParticipant 201 (Elamipretide ) All weeks0 number of corneal bullae
Part A PlaceboCorneal Bullae: Part BParticipant 203 (Elamipretide) All weeks0 number of corneal bullae
Part A PlaceboCorneal Bullae: Part BParticipant 204 (Vehicle) All weeks0 number of corneal bullae
Part A PlaceboCorneal Bullae: Part BParticipant 205 (Elamipretide) All weeks0 number of corneal bullae
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionCorneal Bullae: Part BParticipant 205 (Elamipretide) All weeks0 number of corneal bullae
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionCorneal Bullae: Part BParticipant 201 (Elamipretide ) All weeks0 number of corneal bullae
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionCorneal Bullae: Part BParticipant 204 (Vehicle) All weeks0 number of corneal bullae
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionCorneal Bullae: Part BParticipant 203 (Elamipretide) All weeks0 number of corneal bullae
Secondary

Corneal Endothelial Cell Density Part B

Corneal Endothelial Cell Density: Part B, By-subject data for all time points where images were readable. For all time points where there were Poor Quality Images or too few cells to register, there were no data available, and these were not listed below.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12, and 16.

Population: All participants for whom Corneal Endothelial Cell Counts/Density was measured. Part A is reported as a separate Outcome Measure. All images from Participant 205 were poor quality images and hence, no data was available.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Part A PlaceboCorneal Endothelial Cell Density Part BParticipant 204 (Vehicle) Central Week 8NA counts/mm^2
Part A PlaceboCorneal Endothelial Cell Density Part BParticipant 204 (Vehicle) Nasal Week 4NA counts/mm^2
Part A PlaceboCorneal Endothelial Cell Density Part BParticipant 204 (Vehicle) Central Week 1NA counts/mm^2
Part A PlaceboCorneal Endothelial Cell Density Part BParticipant 204 (Vehicle) Nasal Week 8NA counts/mm^2
Part A PlaceboCorneal Endothelial Cell Density Part BParticipant 204 (Vehicle) Central Week 12NA counts/mm^2
Part A PlaceboCorneal Endothelial Cell Density Part BParticipant 204 (Vehicle) Nasal Week 12NA counts/mm^2
Part A PlaceboCorneal Endothelial Cell Density Part BParticipant 204 (Vehicle) Central Baseline (Day 1)NA counts/mm^2
Part A PlaceboCorneal Endothelial Cell Density Part BParticipant 204 (Vehicle) Nasal Week 16NA counts/mm^2
Part A PlaceboCorneal Endothelial Cell Density Part BParticipant 204 (Vehicle) Central Week 16NA counts/mm^2
Part A PlaceboCorneal Endothelial Cell Density Part BParticipant 204 (Vehicle) Temporal Baseline (Day 1)NA counts/mm^2
Part A PlaceboCorneal Endothelial Cell Density Part BParticipant 204 (Vehicle) Central Week 4NA counts/mm^2
Part A PlaceboCorneal Endothelial Cell Density Part BParticipant 204 (Vehicle) Temporal Week 1NA counts/mm^2
Part A PlaceboCorneal Endothelial Cell Density Part BParticipant 204 (Vehicle) Nasal Baseline (Day 1)NA counts/mm^2
Part A PlaceboCorneal Endothelial Cell Density Part BParticipant 204 (Vehicle) Temporal Week 8NA counts/mm^2
Part A PlaceboCorneal Endothelial Cell Density Part BParticipant 201 (Elamipretide) Temporal Baseline (Day 1)1449.0 counts/mm^2
Part A PlaceboCorneal Endothelial Cell Density Part BParticipant 204 (Vehicle) Temporal Week 12NA counts/mm^2
Part A PlaceboCorneal Endothelial Cell Density Part BParticipant 204 (Vehicle) Nasal Week 1NA counts/mm^2
Part A PlaceboCorneal Endothelial Cell Density Part BParticipant 204 (Vehicle) Temporal Week 16NA counts/mm^2
Part A PlaceboCorneal Endothelial Cell Density Part BParticipant 201 (Elamipretide) Central Week 16934.0 counts/mm^2
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionCorneal Endothelial Cell Density Part BParticipant 204 (Vehicle) Temporal Week 161032.5 counts/mm^2
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionCorneal Endothelial Cell Density Part BParticipant 201 (Elamipretide) Central Week 16NA counts/mm^2
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionCorneal Endothelial Cell Density Part BParticipant 201 (Elamipretide) Temporal Baseline (Day 1)NA counts/mm^2
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionCorneal Endothelial Cell Density Part BParticipant 204 (Vehicle) Central Baseline (Day 1)1241.7 counts/mm^2
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionCorneal Endothelial Cell Density Part BParticipant 204 (Vehicle) Central Week 11069.2 counts/mm^2
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionCorneal Endothelial Cell Density Part BParticipant 204 (Vehicle) Central Week 41087.7 counts/mm^2
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionCorneal Endothelial Cell Density Part BParticipant 204 (Vehicle) Central Week 81149.5 counts/mm^2
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionCorneal Endothelial Cell Density Part BParticipant 204 (Vehicle) Central Week 12773.2 counts/mm^2
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionCorneal Endothelial Cell Density Part BParticipant 204 (Vehicle) Central Week 161094.5 counts/mm^2
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionCorneal Endothelial Cell Density Part BParticipant 204 (Vehicle) Nasal Baseline (Day 1)897.3 counts/mm^2
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionCorneal Endothelial Cell Density Part BParticipant 204 (Vehicle) Nasal Week 11361.2 counts/mm^2
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionCorneal Endothelial Cell Density Part BParticipant 204 (Vehicle) Nasal Week 4971.5 counts/mm^2
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionCorneal Endothelial Cell Density Part BParticipant 204 (Vehicle) Nasal Week 8995.2 counts/mm^2
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionCorneal Endothelial Cell Density Part BParticipant 204 (Vehicle) Nasal Week 12961.3 counts/mm^2
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionCorneal Endothelial Cell Density Part BParticipant 204 (Vehicle) Nasal Week 161046.7 counts/mm^2
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionCorneal Endothelial Cell Density Part BParticipant 204 (Vehicle) Temporal Baseline (Day 1)826.0 counts/mm^2
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionCorneal Endothelial Cell Density Part BParticipant 204 (Vehicle) Temporal Week 11195.2 counts/mm^2
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionCorneal Endothelial Cell Density Part BParticipant 204 (Vehicle) Temporal Week 81068.3 counts/mm^2
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionCorneal Endothelial Cell Density Part BParticipant 204 (Vehicle) Temporal Week 121213.3 counts/mm^2
Secondary

Corneal Endothelial Cell Hexagonality Part B

Corneal Endothelial Cell Hexagonality in Percentage by-subject data: Part B. Data was only listed in weeks where images were good enough quality to quantify. Specular microscopy is a noninvasive photographic technique that allows visualization and analyzation the corneal endothelium. Using computer-assisted morphometry, specular microscopes analyzes the size, shape and population of the endothelial cells. Histologically, healthy corneal cells initially have a hexagonal shape. As endothelial cells die, neighboring cells enlarge to cover the empty space once occupied by the cell. This, in turn, causes the remaining cells to lose their hexagonal shape. The flex center method was used for Part B. A decrease in percent of cell hexagonality from baseline means worse outcome, an increase from baseline means better outcome.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 1, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, and Week 16 or early discontinuation visit

Population: All participants for whom Corneal Endothelial Cell Hexagonality was measured. Part A is reported as a separate Outcome Measure. For images with poor quality or too few cells to register, there was no data available.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Part A PlaceboCorneal Endothelial Cell Hexagonality Part BParticipant 201 (Elamipretide) Central Week 1627.75 µm
Part A PlaceboCorneal Endothelial Cell Hexagonality Part BParticipant 204 (Vehicle) Nasal Week 4NA µm
Part A PlaceboCorneal Endothelial Cell Hexagonality Part BParticipant 204 (Vehicle) Nasal Baseline (Day 1)NA µm
Part A PlaceboCorneal Endothelial Cell Hexagonality Part BParticipant 204 (Vehicle) Nasal Week 8NA µm
Part A PlaceboCorneal Endothelial Cell Hexagonality Part BParticipant 201 (Elamipretide) Temporal Baseline (Day 1)39.50 µm
Part A PlaceboCorneal Endothelial Cell Hexagonality Part BParticipant 204 (Vehicle) Nasal Week 12NA µm
Part A PlaceboCorneal Endothelial Cell Hexagonality Part BParticipant 204 (Vehicle) Central Week 8NA µm
Part A PlaceboCorneal Endothelial Cell Hexagonality Part BParticipant 204 (Vehicle) Nasal Week 16NA µm
Part A PlaceboCorneal Endothelial Cell Hexagonality Part BParticipant 204 (Vehicle) Central Baseline (Day 1)NA µm
Part A PlaceboCorneal Endothelial Cell Hexagonality Part BParticipant 204 (Vehicle) Temporal Baseline (Day 1)NA µm
Part A PlaceboCorneal Endothelial Cell Hexagonality Part BParticipant 204 (Vehicle) Central Week 4NA µm
Part A PlaceboCorneal Endothelial Cell Hexagonality Part BParticipant 204 (Vehicle) Temporal Week 1NA µm
Part A PlaceboCorneal Endothelial Cell Hexagonality Part BParticipant 204 (Vehicle) Central Week 1NA µm
Part A PlaceboCorneal Endothelial Cell Hexagonality Part BParticipant 204 (Vehicle) Temporal Week 8NA µm
Part A PlaceboCorneal Endothelial Cell Hexagonality Part BParticipant 204 (Vehicle) Central Week 12NA µm
Part A PlaceboCorneal Endothelial Cell Hexagonality Part BParticipant 204 (Vehicle) Temporal Week 12NA µm
Part A PlaceboCorneal Endothelial Cell Hexagonality Part BParticipant 204 (Vehicle) Central Week 16NA µm
Part A PlaceboCorneal Endothelial Cell Hexagonality Part BParticipant 204 (Vehicle) Temporal Week 16NA µm
Part A PlaceboCorneal Endothelial Cell Hexagonality Part BParticipant 204 (Vehicle) Nasal Week 1NA µm
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionCorneal Endothelial Cell Hexagonality Part BParticipant 204 (Vehicle) Temporal Week 1645.00 µm
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionCorneal Endothelial Cell Hexagonality Part BParticipant 204 (Vehicle) Central Week 1649.50 µm
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionCorneal Endothelial Cell Hexagonality Part BParticipant 204 (Vehicle) Central Week 430.00 µm
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionCorneal Endothelial Cell Hexagonality Part BParticipant 204 (Vehicle) Central Week 846.17 µm
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionCorneal Endothelial Cell Hexagonality Part BParticipant 201 (Elamipretide) Central Week 16NA µm
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionCorneal Endothelial Cell Hexagonality Part BParticipant 201 (Elamipretide) Temporal Baseline (Day 1)NA µm
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionCorneal Endothelial Cell Hexagonality Part BParticipant 204 (Vehicle) Central Baseline (Day 1)42.00 µm
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionCorneal Endothelial Cell Hexagonality Part BParticipant 204 (Vehicle) Central Week 131.67 µm
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionCorneal Endothelial Cell Hexagonality Part BParticipant 204 (Vehicle) Nasal Baseline (Day 1)41.50 µm
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionCorneal Endothelial Cell Hexagonality Part BParticipant 204 (Vehicle) Nasal Week 148.34 µm
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionCorneal Endothelial Cell Hexagonality Part BParticipant 204 (Vehicle) Nasal Week 441.34 µm
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionCorneal Endothelial Cell Hexagonality Part BParticipant 204 (Vehicle) Nasal Week 835.84 µm
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionCorneal Endothelial Cell Hexagonality Part BParticipant 204 (Vehicle) Nasal Week 1214.50 µm
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionCorneal Endothelial Cell Hexagonality Part BParticipant 204 (Vehicle) Nasal Week 1635.43 µm
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionCorneal Endothelial Cell Hexagonality Part BParticipant 204 (Vehicle) Temporal Baseline (Day 1)54.50 µm
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionCorneal Endothelial Cell Hexagonality Part BParticipant 204 (Vehicle) Temporal Week 130.50 µm
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionCorneal Endothelial Cell Hexagonality Part BParticipant 204 (Vehicle) Temporal Week 834.00 µm
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionCorneal Endothelial Cell Hexagonality Part BParticipant 204 (Vehicle) Temporal Week 1250.00 µm
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionCorneal Endothelial Cell Hexagonality Part BParticipant 204 (Vehicle) Central Week 1233.00 µm
Secondary

Severity of Corneal Stromal Folds:Part B

Severity of corneal stromal folds by-subject data by visit. Descriptive assessment made by Investigator in the following categories: Not present, trace, mild.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 1, 4, 8, 12, and 16, or early discontinuation visit

Population: All participants for whom corneal stromal folds was measured.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Part A PlaceboSeverity of Corneal Stromal Folds:Part BParticipant 201 (Elamipretide) Week 8- no folds0 eyes
Part A PlaceboSeverity of Corneal Stromal Folds:Part BParticipant 201 (Elamipretide) Week 12- no folds0 eyes
Part A PlaceboSeverity of Corneal Stromal Folds:Part BParticipant 201 (Elamipretide) Week 12-Trace1 eyes
Part A PlaceboSeverity of Corneal Stromal Folds:Part BParticipant 205 (Elamipretide) Week 1: Mild1 eyes
Part A PlaceboSeverity of Corneal Stromal Folds:Part BParticipant 201 (Elamipretide) Week 16 - no folds present0 eyes
Part A PlaceboSeverity of Corneal Stromal Folds:Part BParticipant 201 (Elamipretide) Week 1 -Mild0 eyes
Part A PlaceboSeverity of Corneal Stromal Folds:Part BParticipant 203 (Elamipretide) Baseline-no folds present1 eyes
Part A PlaceboSeverity of Corneal Stromal Folds:Part BParticipant 205 (Elamipretide) Week 4: no folds present1 eyes
Part A PlaceboSeverity of Corneal Stromal Folds:Part BParticipant 203 (Elamipretide) Week 1: no folds present1 eyes
Part A PlaceboSeverity of Corneal Stromal Folds:Part BParticipant 204 (Vehicle) Week 4: no folds present1 eyes
Part A PlaceboSeverity of Corneal Stromal Folds:Part BParticipant 203 (Elamipretide) Unscheduled visit: no folds present1 eyes
Part A PlaceboSeverity of Corneal Stromal Folds:Part BParticipant 205 (Elamipretide) Week 4: trace0 eyes
Part A PlaceboSeverity of Corneal Stromal Folds:Part BParticipant 203 (Elamipretide) Early discontinuation: no folds present1 eyes
Part A PlaceboSeverity of Corneal Stromal Folds:Part BParticipant 201 (Elamipretide) Week 1 - Trace1 eyes
Part A PlaceboSeverity of Corneal Stromal Folds:Part BParticipant 204 (Vehicle) Baseline- Trace1 eyes
Part A PlaceboSeverity of Corneal Stromal Folds:Part BParticipant 205 (Elamipretide) Unscheduled visit: trace0 eyes
Part A PlaceboSeverity of Corneal Stromal Folds:Part BParticipant 204 (Vehicle) Week 1: no folds present1 eyes
Part A PlaceboSeverity of Corneal Stromal Folds:Part BParticipant 204 (Vehicle) Week 16: no folds present1 eyes
Part A PlaceboSeverity of Corneal Stromal Folds:Part BParticipant 204 (Vehicle) Week 8: no folds present1 eyes
Part A PlaceboSeverity of Corneal Stromal Folds:Part BParticipant 205 (Elamipretide) Baseline: Mild1 eyes
Part A PlaceboSeverity of Corneal Stromal Folds:Part BParticipant 201 (Elamipretide) Week 4 -Trace1 eyes
Part A PlaceboSeverity of Corneal Stromal Folds:Part BParticipant 205 (Elamipretide) Unscheduled visit: No folds present1 eyes
Part A PlaceboSeverity of Corneal Stromal Folds:Part BParticipant 201 (Elamipretide) Week 16 -Trace1 eyes
Part A PlaceboSeverity of Corneal Stromal Folds:Part BParticipant 201 (Elamipretide) Week 8-Mild1 eyes
Part A PlaceboSeverity of Corneal Stromal Folds:Part BParticipant 205 (Elamipretide) Early discontinuation visit: no folds present1 eyes
Part A PlaceboSeverity of Corneal Stromal Folds:Part BParticipant 204 (Vehicle) Week 12: no folds present1 eyes
Part A PlaceboSeverity of Corneal Stromal Folds:Part BParticipant 205 (Elamipretide) Early discontinuation: trace0 eyes
Part A PlaceboSeverity of Corneal Stromal Folds:Part BParticipant 201 (Elamipretide) Baseline-Mild1 eyes
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionSeverity of Corneal Stromal Folds:Part BParticipant 205 (Elamipretide) Early discontinuation: trace1 eyes
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionSeverity of Corneal Stromal Folds:Part BParticipant 201 (Elamipretide) Baseline-Mild1 eyes
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionSeverity of Corneal Stromal Folds:Part BParticipant 201 (Elamipretide) Week 1 - Trace0 eyes
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionSeverity of Corneal Stromal Folds:Part BParticipant 201 (Elamipretide) Week 12- no folds1 eyes
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionSeverity of Corneal Stromal Folds:Part BParticipant 201 (Elamipretide) Week 16 -Trace0 eyes
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionSeverity of Corneal Stromal Folds:Part BParticipant 204 (Vehicle) Week 1: no folds present1 eyes
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionSeverity of Corneal Stromal Folds:Part BParticipant 204 (Vehicle) Week 4: no folds present1 eyes
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionSeverity of Corneal Stromal Folds:Part BParticipant 204 (Vehicle) Week 8: no folds present1 eyes
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionSeverity of Corneal Stromal Folds:Part BParticipant 204 (Vehicle) Week 12: no folds present1 eyes
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionSeverity of Corneal Stromal Folds:Part BParticipant 205 (Elamipretide) Week 1: Mild1 eyes
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionSeverity of Corneal Stromal Folds:Part BParticipant 205 (Elamipretide) Week 4: no folds present0 eyes
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionSeverity of Corneal Stromal Folds:Part BParticipant 205 (Elamipretide) Week 4: trace1 eyes
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionSeverity of Corneal Stromal Folds:Part BParticipant 201 (Elamipretide) Week 1 -Mild1 eyes
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionSeverity of Corneal Stromal Folds:Part BParticipant 201 (Elamipretide) Week 4 -Trace1 eyes
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionSeverity of Corneal Stromal Folds:Part BParticipant 201 (Elamipretide) Week 8-Mild0 eyes
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionSeverity of Corneal Stromal Folds:Part BParticipant 201 (Elamipretide) Week 8- no folds1 eyes
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionSeverity of Corneal Stromal Folds:Part BParticipant 201 (Elamipretide) Week 12-Trace0 eyes
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionSeverity of Corneal Stromal Folds:Part BParticipant 201 (Elamipretide) Week 16 - no folds present1 eyes
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionSeverity of Corneal Stromal Folds:Part BParticipant 203 (Elamipretide) Baseline-no folds present1 eyes
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionSeverity of Corneal Stromal Folds:Part BParticipant 203 (Elamipretide) Week 1: no folds present1 eyes
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionSeverity of Corneal Stromal Folds:Part BParticipant 203 (Elamipretide) Unscheduled visit: no folds present1 eyes
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionSeverity of Corneal Stromal Folds:Part BParticipant 203 (Elamipretide) Early discontinuation: no folds present1 eyes
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionSeverity of Corneal Stromal Folds:Part BParticipant 204 (Vehicle) Baseline- Trace1 eyes
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionSeverity of Corneal Stromal Folds:Part BParticipant 204 (Vehicle) Week 16: no folds present1 eyes
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionSeverity of Corneal Stromal Folds:Part BParticipant 205 (Elamipretide) Baseline: Mild1 eyes
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionSeverity of Corneal Stromal Folds:Part BParticipant 205 (Elamipretide) Unscheduled visit: No folds present0 eyes
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionSeverity of Corneal Stromal Folds:Part BParticipant 205 (Elamipretide) Unscheduled visit: trace1 eyes
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionSeverity of Corneal Stromal Folds:Part BParticipant 205 (Elamipretide) Early discontinuation visit: no folds present0 eyes

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026