Skip to content

Comparative Effectiveness of Decision Aids for Stable Chest Discomfort

Randomized Trial Comparing Effectiveness of Two Patient Decision Aids for Stable Chest Discomfort

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02652208
Enrollment
34
Registered
2016-01-11
Start date
2016-01-31
Completion date
2016-11-30
Last updated
2017-08-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Coronary Artery Disease, Stable Angina

Keywords

decision making, decision aids, shared decision making, stable angina, cardiology

Brief summary

The purpose of the study is to compare two different types of decision support materials for patients considering treatment for chest pain or chest discomfort from heart disease.

Detailed description

The purpose of the project is to compare the effectiveness of a detailed, video patient decision aid and an online, interactive patient decision aid for treatment of Stable Chest Discomfort. The study will randomly assign eligible participants to receive either the online decision aid or the video decision aid. Participants will complete a survey after reviewing the decision aid that will examine decision quality, use of the intervention, and satisfaction with the intervention.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALOnline decision aid

The Healthwise online shared decision point for Stable Chest Discomfort

The Health Dialog DVD and booklet decision aid for Stable Chest Discomfort

Sponsors

Massachusetts General Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adults 18 and older * English speaking * Current diagnosis of stable angina * Ability to access online material and willing to provide an email address

Exclusion criteria

* Coronary bypass surgery and/or percutaneous coronary intervention within 6 months * Diagnosis of unstable angina, acute coronary syndrome, STEMI, non STEMI within 6 months * Scheduled for nonelective catheterization * Significant cognitive deficit such that participant is unable to consent for self * Serious comorbidities or other conditions that make revascularization inappropriate

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Total Knowledge ScoreWithin 1 week after reviewing the decision aidSix multiple choice knowledge items covered important facts patients should know about chest pain or discomfort and treatments. A total knowledge score (0-6) was created by summing the total number of correct responses. A missing knowledge response was marked as incorrect. Any survey with more than three missing knowledge responses did not get a total knowledge score. A higher score indicates higher knowledge on the topic. Both decision aids provided information for answering all knowledge items. Higher knowledge scores are better.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Treatment Leaning (Percentage of Patients Who Have a Clear Treatment Preference)Within 1 week after reviewing the decision aidTo determine the percentage of patients who have a clear treatment preference for their stable chest discomfort.
Satisfaction With the InterventionWithin 1 week after reviewing the decision aidNumber of respondents who rated the material as very good or excellent.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Online Decision Aid
This group will receive the access to an online decision aid that covers the main treatment options for stable chest discomfort. Online decision aid: The Healthwise online shared decision point for Stable Chest Discomfort
13
Video Decision Aid
This group will receive the DVD and booklet decision aid describing stable chest discomfort and the main treatment options including medical therapy and stents. Video decision aid: The Health Dialog DVD and booklet decision aid for Stable Chest Discomfort
15
Total28

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicOnline Decision AidVideo Decision AidTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
7 Participants12 Participants19 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
6 Participants3 Participants9 Participants
Age, Continuous67 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.2
73 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.6
70 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.1
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
13 Participants15 Participants28 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
12 Participants15 Participants27 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
13 participants15 participants28 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
3 Participants9 Participants12 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
10 Participants6 Participants16 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 00 / 0
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 00 / 0

Outcome results

Primary

Total Knowledge Score

Six multiple choice knowledge items covered important facts patients should know about chest pain or discomfort and treatments. A total knowledge score (0-6) was created by summing the total number of correct responses. A missing knowledge response was marked as incorrect. Any survey with more than three missing knowledge responses did not get a total knowledge score. A higher score indicates higher knowledge on the topic. Both decision aids provided information for answering all knowledge items. Higher knowledge scores are better.

Time frame: Within 1 week after reviewing the decision aid

Population: All participants who completed and returned a survey within the 6 month study period.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Online Decision AidTotal Knowledge Score2.83 knowledge scoreStandard Deviation 0.72
Video Decision AidTotal Knowledge Score4.0 knowledge scoreStandard Deviation 1.46
Secondary

Satisfaction With the Intervention

Number of respondents who rated the material as very good or excellent.

Time frame: Within 1 week after reviewing the decision aid

Population: All participants who completed and returned a survey within the 6 month study period.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Online Decision AidSatisfaction With the Intervention6 Participants
Video Decision AidSatisfaction With the Intervention10 Participants
Secondary

Treatment Leaning (Percentage of Patients Who Have a Clear Treatment Preference)

To determine the percentage of patients who have a clear treatment preference for their stable chest discomfort.

Time frame: Within 1 week after reviewing the decision aid

Population: Only participants who indicated they currently had symptoms were asked to complete the item

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Online Decision AidTreatment Leaning (Percentage of Patients Who Have a Clear Treatment Preference)4 Participants
Video Decision AidTreatment Leaning (Percentage of Patients Who Have a Clear Treatment Preference)5 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026