Midgut Neuroendocrine Tumours, Pancreatic Tumours
Conditions
Brief summary
This study aims to explore the efficacy and safety of lanreotide Autogel® 120 mg administered every 14 days in subjects with grade 1 or 2, metastatic or locally advanced, unresectable pancreatic or intestinal neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) once they have progressed on the standard dose of lanreotide Autogel® 120 mg every 28 days.
Interventions
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Histopathologically confirmed, grade 1 or 2, metastatic or locally advanced, unresectable pNET (pNET cohort) or midgut NET (midgut cohort) with or without hormone related syndromes, with a proliferation index (Ki67) ≤20%. * Positive somatostatin receptors type 2 * Progression as assessed by an independent central reviewer according to RECIST v1.0 while receiving first line treatment with lanreotide Autogel® at a standard dose of 120 mg every 28 days for at least 24 weeks
Exclusion criteria
* Grade 3 or rapidly progressive (within 12 weeks) NET * Any NET other than pancreatic and midgut * Previous treatment with any antitumour agent for NET other than lanreotide Autogel® 120 mg every 28 days. Exception made of prior treatment with Octreotide at standard dose stopped for other reason than disease progression. * Symptomatic gallbladder lithiasis at screening echography or history of cholelithiasis with no cholecystectomy since then.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Median Progression Free Survival (PFS) | From Day 1 up to Week 60 for the panNET cohort and Week 103 for the midgut NET cohort | PFS was defined as the time from first injection of lanreotide Autogel® 120 mg every 14 days to progression or death. Disease progression was assessed by tumour response evaluation according to RECIST v1.0, every 12 weeks, measured by independent central review using the same imaging technique (computed tomography \[CT\] scan or magnetic resonance imaging \[MRI\]) for each subject throughout the study. The median PFS time was estimated using the Kaplan Meier method for each cohort. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Subjects Alive and Progression Free | Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60 (for both cohorts) and Weeks 72, 84 and 96 (for midgut NET cohort) | The percentage of subjects alive and progression-free was assessed throughout the study up to Week 60 for the panNET cohort and Week 96 for the midgut cohort. Disease progression was assessed by tumour response evaluation according to RECIST v1.0, every 12 weeks measured by independent central review using the same imaging technique (CT scan or MRI) for each subject throughout the study. The percentage of subjects alive and progression free was estimated using the Kaplan Meier method for each cohort. |
| Overall Survival | From Day 1 up to Week 60 for the panNET cohort and Week 103 for the midgut NET cohort | Overall survival was defined as the time in months from the first injection of lanreotide Autogel® 120 mg every 14 days to death due to any cause. Median overall survival was estimated using the Kaplan Meier method for each cohort. |
| Objective Response Rate (ORR) | Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60 (for both cohorts) and Weeks 72, 84, and 96 (for midgut cohort) | The ORR was defined as the percentage of subjects who achieve either complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) according to RECIST v1.0 criteria. ORR was evaluated every 12 weeks and results are presented for each cohort. |
| Disease Control Rate (DCR) | Weeks 24 and 48 | The DCR was defined as the percentage of subjects who achieved CR plus PR plus Stable Disease (SD), evaluated according to RECIST v1.0 criteria. The DCR at Weeks 24 and 48 is presented for each cohort. |
| Best Overall Response Rate | From Day 1 up to Week 60 for the panNET cohort and Week 103 for the midgut NET cohort | Best overall response was defined as the best response recorded from the initiation of treatment until disease progression, according to RECIST v1.0 evaluation. The percentage of subjects in each response category and those who were non-evaluable (i.e. with no tumour assessment after the start of study treatment) throughout the study are presented for each cohort. |
| Median Duration of Stable Disease | From Day 1 up to Week 60 for the panNET cohort and Week 103 for the midgut NET cohort | Median duration of SD was the time from first injection of lanreotide Autogel® 120 mg every 14 days until the first occurrence of PD by central assessment. Disease progression was assessed by tumour response evaluation according to RECIST v1.0, every 12 weeks, measured using the same imaging technique (CT scan or MRI) for each subject throughout the study. Median duration of stable disease was estimated using the Kaplan Meier method for each cohort. |
| Factors Associated With PFS | Screening/Baseline (Day 1) | A univariate cox proportional hazards model was used to assess whether the following factors were associated with PFS: * Hepatic tumour load: \>25% versus reference ≤25% * Tumour Grade: Grade 2 versus reference Grade 1, * Previous surgery of the primary tumour: No versus reference Yes, * Proliferation index Ki67: ≥10% versus reference \<10% * Duration of treatment with lanreotide Autogel® 120 mg every 28 days by category: ≥median value versus reference \<median value, * Age by category: ≥65 years versus reference \<65 years, * Time from diagnosis to study entry by category: ≥3 years versus reference \<3 years, * Time interval between the two CT scans (pre-screening/screening): ≥12 months versus reference \<12 months and * Symptoms (diarrhoea or flushing at baseline): No versus reference Yes. Each factor was assessed for its importance in the Cox model for PFS in a univariate fashion. |
| Median Time to Progression | From Day 1 up to Week 60 for the panNET cohort and Week 103 for the midgut NET cohort | Time to Progression was defined as time from first injection of lanreotide Autogel® 120 mg every 14 days to progression. Disease progression was assessed by tumour response evaluation according to RECIST v1.0, every 12 weeks, measured by independent central review using the same imaging technique (CT scan or MRI) for each subject throughout the study. Median time to progression was estimated using the Kaplan Meier method for each cohort. |
| Mean Change From Baseline in QoL Measured Using EORTC, QLQ-C30 v3.0 (Global Health Status Sub-score) | Baseline (Day 1) and end of study (approximately 64 weeks for panNET cohort and 108 weeks for midgut NET (and overall) cohort) | Subjects were instructed to complete the 30 questions in the EORTC-QLQ-C30 v3.0 questionnaire at baseline and every 12 weeks throughout the study. The global health status sub-score was assessed using the last 2 questions which represented subject's assessment of overall health & QoL. Each question was coded on a 7-point scale (1=very poor to 7=excellent). The sub-score was transformed to range from 0-100, with a high score for global health status representing a high QoL. The mean change from baseline in the transformed global health status are presented for the end of study/early withdrawal visit, with a positive change indicating an improvement in QoL. |
| Mean Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L v1.0 Questionnaire (Descriptive System) | Baseline (Day 1) and end of study (approximately 64 weeks for panNET cohort and 108 weeks for midgut NET (and overall) cohort) | Subjects were instructed to complete the EQ-5D-5L descriptive system at baseline and every 12 weeks throughout the study. The EQ-5D-5L descriptive system comprised the following 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension had 5 levels: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems, extreme problems. The EQ-5D-5L health states, defined by the EQ-5D-5L descriptive system, was converted into a single index value with scores ranging from 0 (no problems) to 1 (extreme problems). The mean change from baseline at the end of study/early withdrawal visit is presented with a positive change from baseline in the index values indicating a worsening of symptoms. |
| Mean Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L v1.0 Questionnaire (VAS) | Baseline (Day 1) and end of study (approximately 64 weeks for panNET cohort and 108 weeks for midgut NET (and overall) cohort) | Subjects were instructed to complete the EQ-5D-5L VAS at baseline and every 12 weeks throughout the study. The EQ-5D-5L VAS recorded the subject's self-rated health on a vertical VAS which is numbered from 0 (worst health state) to 100 (best health state). The mean change from baseline at the end of study/early withdrawal visit is presented with a positive change in the VAS indicating an improvement in symptoms. |
| Mean Change From Baseline in QoL Questionnaire Gastrointestinal Neuroendocrine Tumour 21 (QLQ-GI.NET21; 2006) | Baseline (Day 1) and end of study (approximately 64 weeks for panNET cohort and 108 weeks for midgut NET (and overall) cohort) | Subjects were asked to complete the EORTC QLQ-GI.NET21 module which comprised 21 questions that used a 4-point scale (1 = Not at all, 2 = A little, 3 = Quite a bit, 4 = Very much) to evaluate 3 defined multi-item symptom scales (endocrine, gastrointestinal and treatment related side effects), 2 single item symptoms (bone/muscle pain and concern about weight loss), 2 psychosocial scales (social function and disease-related worries) and 2 other single items (sexuality and communication). Answers were converted into grading scale, with values between 0 and 100. Each individual sub-score was transformed to range from 0 to 100. The mean change from baseline at the end of study/early withdrawal visit is presented with a higher score representing more or worse problems. |
| Mean Change From Baseline in Nonspecific Tumour Biomarkers | Baseline (Day 1) and end of study (approximately 64 weeks for panNET cohort and 108 weeks for midgut NET cohort) | Nonspecific tumour peptide biomarkers (chromogranin A \[CgA\], neuron specific enolase \[NSE\] and plasma/urinary 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid \[5-HIAA\]) were evaluated in both pancreas and midgut subjects at baseline and Week 12 and every 12 weeks thereafter. At all scheduled visits, except baseline, plasma/urinary 5-HIAA was only performed in subjects with symptoms of carcinoid syndrome (diarrhoea and/or flushing) or if urinary 5-HIAA was elevated (above upper limit of normal \[ULN\]) at baseline. Mean change from baseline values were normalised by the ULN (xULN) and are presented for each cohort. |
| Mean Change From Baseline in PanNet Specific Tumour Biomarkers: Pancreatic Polypeptide, Gastrin | Baseline (Day 1) and end of study (approximately 64 weeks) | PanNET specific tumour peptide biomarkers were evaluated in pancreas subjects at baseline. Only the tumour biomarkers that were above normal range at baseline were evaluated every 12 weeks thereafter and at the end of study visit. The mean change from baseline values in picomole/liter (pmol/L) are presented for the end of study visit. |
| Mean Change From Baseline in PanNet Specific Tumour Biomarkers: Glucagon | Baseline (Day 1) and end of study (approximately 64 weeks) | PanNET specific tumour peptide biomarkers were evaluated in pancreas subjects at baseline. Only the tumour biomarkers that were above normal range at baseline were evaluated every 12 weeks thereafter and at the end of study visit. The mean change from baseline values in nanograms (ng)/L are presented for the end of study visit. |
| Mean Change From Baseline in Number of Stools and Flushing Episodes | Baseline (Day 1), Weeks 8,12, 48 and end of study (approximately 64 weeks for panNET cohort and 108 weeks for midgut NET cohort) | Symptom control was measured by the total number of stools (diarrhoea) and flushing episodes during the 7 days prior to the visit, reported orally by the subject to the investigator. The mean change from baseline in number of stools and flushing episodes reported at each visit is presented for each cohort. |
Countries
Belgium, Denmark, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, Netherlands, Poland, Spain, United Kingdom
Participant flow
Recruitment details
Subjects with well differentiated, metastatic or locally advanced, unresectable, pancreatic or midgut neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) and who had radiologically documented disease progression as per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST) v1.0 whilst receiving treatment with lanreotide Autogel® 120mg, every 28 days for at least 24 weeks were enrolled into this study in 25 centres across 10 countries.
Pre-assignment details
Subjects who had centrally reviewed, radiologically documented disease progression within 24 months prior to enrolment and whilst receiving treatment with lanreotide Autogel® 120 mg, administered every 28 days for at least 24 weeks, were recruited into one of two cohorts based on the primary location of NET (i.e. pancreatic NET \[panNET\] or midgut NET cohort).
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| PanNET Cohort Subjects were treated with lanreotide Autogel® 120 mg, administered as deep SC injections, every 14 days starting from Day 1 (at a reduced dosing interval) for up to 48 weeks or until disease progression, death or unacceptable toxicity or tolerability. Subjects who had not progressed at Week 48 could continue study treatment with lanreotide Autogel® 120 mg every 14 days until 25 events (PD or death) in the panNET cohort had been observed. Additional visits were performed every 12 weeks until disease progression or death, or unacceptable toxicity or tolerability. | 48 |
| Midgut NET Cohort Subjects were treated with lanreotide Autogel® 120 mg, administered as deep SC injections, every 14 days starting from Day 1 (at a reduced dosing interval) for up to 96 weeks or until disease progression, death or unacceptable toxicity or tolerability. Subjects who had not progressed at Week 96 could continue study treatment with lanreotide Autogel® 120 mg every 14 days until 25 events (PD or death) in the midgut NET cohort had been observed. Additional visits were performed every 12 weeks until disease progression or death, or unacceptable toxicity or tolerability. | 51 |
| Total | 99 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Adverse Event | 2 | 2 |
| Overall Study | Consent Withdrawn | 2 | 0 |
| Overall Study | Investigator Decision | 1 | 1 |
| Overall Study | Local PD | 0 | 2 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | PanNET Cohort | Midgut NET Cohort | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 63.3 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.6 | 67.1 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.2 | 65.2 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.6 |
| Categories of Proliferation index Ki67 <10% | 41 participants | 46 participants | 87 participants |
| Categories of Proliferation index Ki67 ≥10% | 7 participants | 4 participants | 11 participants |
| Categories of Proliferation index Ki67 Missing | 0 participants | 1 participants | 1 participants |
| EQ-5D-5L Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score | 75.02 score on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.93 | 70.45 score on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.93 | 72.81 score on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.62 |
| EuroQoL 5 Dimensions, 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) v1.0 Questionnaire Descriptive System Score | 0.82 score on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.17 | 0.83 score on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.14 | 0.83 score on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.15 |
| Hepatic tumour load ≤25% | 41 participants | 42 participants | 83 participants |
| Hepatic tumour load >25% | 7 participants | 9 participants | 16 participants |
| QoL Questionnaire Gastrointestinal Neuroendocrine Tumour 21 (QLQ-GI.NET21) Score Body Image | 10.61 score on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 23.6 | 15.56 score on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 28.95 | 13.11 score on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 26.41 |
| QoL Questionnaire Gastrointestinal Neuroendocrine Tumour 21 (QLQ-GI.NET21) Score Disease Related Worries | 44.44 score on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 29.96 | 44.22 score on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 25.83 | 44.33 score on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 27.74 |
| QoL Questionnaire Gastrointestinal Neuroendocrine Tumour 21 (QLQ-GI.NET21) Score Endocrine Symptoms | 16.54 score on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 22.3 | 19.73 score on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 22.82 | 18.20 score on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 22.51 |
| QoL Questionnaire Gastrointestinal Neuroendocrine Tumour 21 (QLQ-GI.NET21) Score Gastrointestinal Symptoms | 21.70 score on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 20.01 | 22.04 score on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.17 | 21.88 score on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.48 |
| QoL Questionnaire Gastrointestinal Neuroendocrine Tumour 21 (QLQ-GI.NET21) Score Information/Communication Function | 3.70 score on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.76 | 4.17 score on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.14 | 3.94 score on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.89 |
| QoL Questionnaire Gastrointestinal Neuroendocrine Tumour 21 (QLQ-GI.NET21) Score Muscle/Bone Pain | 26.52 score on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 30.99 | 25.69 score on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 30.16 | 26.09 score on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 30.39 |
| QoL Questionnaire Gastrointestinal Neuroendocrine Tumour 21 (QLQ-GI.NET21) Score Sexual Function | 22.58 score on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 30.29 | 17.86 score on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 27.94 | 20.34 score on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 29.04 |
| QoL Questionnaire Gastrointestinal Neuroendocrine Tumour 21 (QLQ-GI.NET21) Score Social Function | 32.84 score on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 24.18 | 35.03 score on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 24.33 | 33.98 score on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 24.15 |
| QoL Questionnaire Gastrointestinal Neuroendocrine Tumour 21 (QLQ-GI.NET21) Score Treatment Related Symptoms | 11.63 score on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.11 | 11.46 score on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.75 | 11.55 score on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.33 |
| Quality of Life (QoL) Questionnaire Core 30 (QLQ-C30) Score | 68.12 score on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.74 | 67.83 score on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 20.76 | 67.97 score on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 20.17 |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Race Asian | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Race Other | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Race White | 35 Participants | 37 Participants | 72 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Belgium | 3 participants | 2 participants | 5 participants |
| Region of Enrollment Denmark | 1 participants | 2 participants | 3 participants |
| Region of Enrollment France | 12 participants | 13 participants | 25 participants |
| Region of Enrollment Germany | 8 participants | 3 participants | 11 participants |
| Region of Enrollment Ireland | 2 participants | 0 participants | 2 participants |
| Region of Enrollment Italy | 2 participants | 6 participants | 8 participants |
| Region of Enrollment Netherlands | 1 participants | 3 participants | 4 participants |
| Region of Enrollment Poland | 12 participants | 10 participants | 22 participants |
| Region of Enrollment Spain | 1 participants | 3 participants | 4 participants |
| Region of Enrollment United Kingdom | 6 participants | 9 participants | 15 participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 28 Participants | 22 Participants | 50 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 20 Participants | 29 Participants | 49 Participants |
| Tumour grading (according to WHO 2010 classification) Grade 1 | 12 participants | 29 participants | 41 participants |
| Tumour grading (according to WHO 2010 classification) Grade 2 | 36 participants | 22 participants | 58 participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk | EG002 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 1 / 48 | 3 / 51 | 4 / 99 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 41 / 48 | 47 / 51 | 88 / 99 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 5 / 48 | 13 / 51 | 18 / 99 |
Outcome results
Median Progression Free Survival (PFS)
PFS was defined as the time from first injection of lanreotide Autogel® 120 mg every 14 days to progression or death. Disease progression was assessed by tumour response evaluation according to RECIST v1.0, every 12 weeks, measured by independent central review using the same imaging technique (computed tomography \[CT\] scan or magnetic resonance imaging \[MRI\]) for each subject throughout the study. The median PFS time was estimated using the Kaplan Meier method for each cohort.
Time frame: From Day 1 up to Week 60 for the panNET cohort and Week 103 for the midgut NET cohort
Population: The FAS included all subjects who received at least one dose of lanreotide Autogel® 120 mg every 14 days during the study.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| PanNET Cohort | Median Progression Free Survival (PFS) | 5.6 months |
| Midgut NET Cohort | Median Progression Free Survival (PFS) | 8.3 months |
Best Overall Response Rate
Best overall response was defined as the best response recorded from the initiation of treatment until disease progression, according to RECIST v1.0 evaluation. The percentage of subjects in each response category and those who were non-evaluable (i.e. with no tumour assessment after the start of study treatment) throughout the study are presented for each cohort.
Time frame: From Day 1 up to Week 60 for the panNET cohort and Week 103 for the midgut NET cohort
Population: The FAS included all subjects who received at least one dose of lanreotide Autogel® 120 mg every 14 days during the study.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| PanNET Cohort | Best Overall Response Rate | PR | 0.0 percentage of subjects |
| PanNET Cohort | Best Overall Response Rate | PD | 31.3 percentage of subjects |
| PanNET Cohort | Best Overall Response Rate | SD | 66.7 percentage of subjects |
| PanNET Cohort | Best Overall Response Rate | Not evaluable | 0.0 percentage of subjects |
| PanNET Cohort | Best Overall Response Rate | CR | 0.0 percentage of subjects |
| Midgut NET Cohort | Best Overall Response Rate | Not evaluable | 2.0 percentage of subjects |
| Midgut NET Cohort | Best Overall Response Rate | CR | 0.0 percentage of subjects |
| Midgut NET Cohort | Best Overall Response Rate | PR | 3.9 percentage of subjects |
| Midgut NET Cohort | Best Overall Response Rate | SD | 68.6 percentage of subjects |
| Midgut NET Cohort | Best Overall Response Rate | PD | 23.5 percentage of subjects |
Disease Control Rate (DCR)
The DCR was defined as the percentage of subjects who achieved CR plus PR plus Stable Disease (SD), evaluated according to RECIST v1.0 criteria. The DCR at Weeks 24 and 48 is presented for each cohort.
Time frame: Weeks 24 and 48
Population: The FAS included all subjects who received at least one dose of lanreotide Autogel® 120 mg every 14 days during the study.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| PanNET Cohort | Disease Control Rate (DCR) | Week 24 | 43.8 percentage of subjects |
| PanNET Cohort | Disease Control Rate (DCR) | Week 48 | 22.9 percentage of subjects |
| Midgut NET Cohort | Disease Control Rate (DCR) | Week 24 | 58.8 percentage of subjects |
| Midgut NET Cohort | Disease Control Rate (DCR) | Week 48 | 33.3 percentage of subjects |
Factors Associated With PFS
A univariate cox proportional hazards model was used to assess whether the following factors were associated with PFS: * Hepatic tumour load: \>25% versus reference ≤25% * Tumour Grade: Grade 2 versus reference Grade 1, * Previous surgery of the primary tumour: No versus reference Yes, * Proliferation index Ki67: ≥10% versus reference \<10% * Duration of treatment with lanreotide Autogel® 120 mg every 28 days by category: ≥median value versus reference \<median value, * Age by category: ≥65 years versus reference \<65 years, * Time from diagnosis to study entry by category: ≥3 years versus reference \<3 years, * Time interval between the two CT scans (pre-screening/screening): ≥12 months versus reference \<12 months and * Symptoms (diarrhoea or flushing at baseline): No versus reference Yes. Each factor was assessed for its importance in the Cox model for PFS in a univariate fashion.
Time frame: Screening/Baseline (Day 1)
Population: The FAS included all subjects who received at least one dose of lanreotide Autogel® 120 mg every 14 days during the study.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| PanNET Cohort | Factors Associated With PFS | Hepatic tumour load: >25% Vs ≤25% | 0.96 Hazard Ratio |
| PanNET Cohort | Factors Associated With PFS | Tumour Grade: 2 Vs 1 | 0.68 Hazard Ratio |
| PanNET Cohort | Factors Associated With PFS | Previous surgery: No Vs Yes | 1.04 Hazard Ratio |
| PanNET Cohort | Factors Associated With PFS | Ki67: ≥10% Vs <10% | 3.60 Hazard Ratio |
| PanNET Cohort | Factors Associated With PFS | Symptoms: No Vs Yes | 2.55 Hazard Ratio |
| PanNET Cohort | Factors Associated With PFS | Duration of treatment with lanreotide Autogel® 120 mg every 28 days: ≥median Vs <median | 0.68 Hazard Ratio |
| PanNET Cohort | Factors Associated With PFS | Age: ≥65 years Vs <65 years | 1.55 Hazard Ratio |
| PanNET Cohort | Factors Associated With PFS | Time from diagnosis: ≥3 years Vs <3 years | 0.49 Hazard Ratio |
| PanNET Cohort | Factors Associated With PFS | Time between CT scans: ≥12 months Vs <12 months | 0.47 Hazard Ratio |
| Midgut NET Cohort | Factors Associated With PFS | Time from diagnosis: ≥3 years Vs <3 years | 0.94 Hazard Ratio |
| Midgut NET Cohort | Factors Associated With PFS | Hepatic tumour load: >25% Vs ≤25% | 1.54 Hazard Ratio |
| Midgut NET Cohort | Factors Associated With PFS | Duration of treatment with lanreotide Autogel® 120 mg every 28 days: ≥median Vs <median | 0.76 Hazard Ratio |
| Midgut NET Cohort | Factors Associated With PFS | Symptoms: No Vs Yes | 1.32 Hazard Ratio |
| Midgut NET Cohort | Factors Associated With PFS | Previous surgery: No Vs Yes | 2.14 Hazard Ratio |
| Midgut NET Cohort | Factors Associated With PFS | Age: ≥65 years Vs <65 years | 1.15 Hazard Ratio |
| Midgut NET Cohort | Factors Associated With PFS | Ki67: ≥10% Vs <10% | 2.26 Hazard Ratio |
| Midgut NET Cohort | Factors Associated With PFS | Time between CT scans: ≥12 months Vs <12 months | 0.72 Hazard Ratio |
| Midgut NET Cohort | Factors Associated With PFS | Tumour Grade: 2 Vs 1 | 0.90 Hazard Ratio |
Mean Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L v1.0 Questionnaire (Descriptive System)
Subjects were instructed to complete the EQ-5D-5L descriptive system at baseline and every 12 weeks throughout the study. The EQ-5D-5L descriptive system comprised the following 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension had 5 levels: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems, extreme problems. The EQ-5D-5L health states, defined by the EQ-5D-5L descriptive system, was converted into a single index value with scores ranging from 0 (no problems) to 1 (extreme problems). The mean change from baseline at the end of study/early withdrawal visit is presented with a positive change from baseline in the index values indicating a worsening of symptoms.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and end of study (approximately 64 weeks for panNET cohort and 108 weeks for midgut NET (and overall) cohort)
Population: The FAS included all subjects who received at least one dose of lanreotide Autogel® 120 mg every 14 days during the study. Only subjects with data available for analysis are presented.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| PanNET Cohort | Mean Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L v1.0 Questionnaire (Descriptive System) | -0.04 Index value | Standard Deviation 0.12 |
| Midgut NET Cohort | Mean Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L v1.0 Questionnaire (Descriptive System) | 0.00 Index value | Standard Deviation 0.11 |
| Overall | Mean Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L v1.0 Questionnaire (Descriptive System) | -0.02 Index value | Standard Deviation 0.12 |
Mean Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L v1.0 Questionnaire (VAS)
Subjects were instructed to complete the EQ-5D-5L VAS at baseline and every 12 weeks throughout the study. The EQ-5D-5L VAS recorded the subject's self-rated health on a vertical VAS which is numbered from 0 (worst health state) to 100 (best health state). The mean change from baseline at the end of study/early withdrawal visit is presented with a positive change in the VAS indicating an improvement in symptoms.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and end of study (approximately 64 weeks for panNET cohort and 108 weeks for midgut NET (and overall) cohort)
Population: The FAS included all subjects who received at least one dose of lanreotide Autogel® 120 mg every 14 days during the study. Only subjects with data available for analysis are presented.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| PanNET Cohort | Mean Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L v1.0 Questionnaire (VAS) | -1.90 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 14.8 |
| Midgut NET Cohort | Mean Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L v1.0 Questionnaire (VAS) | -1.76 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 9.34 |
| Overall | Mean Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L v1.0 Questionnaire (VAS) | -1.83 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 12.22 |
Mean Change From Baseline in Nonspecific Tumour Biomarkers
Nonspecific tumour peptide biomarkers (chromogranin A \[CgA\], neuron specific enolase \[NSE\] and plasma/urinary 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid \[5-HIAA\]) were evaluated in both pancreas and midgut subjects at baseline and Week 12 and every 12 weeks thereafter. At all scheduled visits, except baseline, plasma/urinary 5-HIAA was only performed in subjects with symptoms of carcinoid syndrome (diarrhoea and/or flushing) or if urinary 5-HIAA was elevated (above upper limit of normal \[ULN\]) at baseline. Mean change from baseline values were normalised by the ULN (xULN) and are presented for each cohort.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and end of study (approximately 64 weeks for panNET cohort and 108 weeks for midgut NET cohort)
Population: The FAS included all subjects who received at least one dose of lanreotide Autogel® 120 mg every 14 days during the study. Only subjects with data available for analysis are presented.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PanNET Cohort | Mean Change From Baseline in Nonspecific Tumour Biomarkers | CgA | 0.205 xULN | Standard Deviation 1.258 |
| PanNET Cohort | Mean Change From Baseline in Nonspecific Tumour Biomarkers | NSE | 0.03 xULN | Standard Deviation 1 |
| PanNET Cohort | Mean Change From Baseline in Nonspecific Tumour Biomarkers | Plasma 5-HIAA | -0.42 xULN | Standard Deviation 1.44 |
| Midgut NET Cohort | Mean Change From Baseline in Nonspecific Tumour Biomarkers | CgA | 0.370 xULN | Standard Deviation 1.843 |
| Midgut NET Cohort | Mean Change From Baseline in Nonspecific Tumour Biomarkers | NSE | -0.49 xULN | Standard Deviation 1.86 |
| Midgut NET Cohort | Mean Change From Baseline in Nonspecific Tumour Biomarkers | Plasma 5-HIAA | 3.90 xULN | Standard Deviation 7.39 |
Mean Change From Baseline in Number of Stools and Flushing Episodes
Symptom control was measured by the total number of stools (diarrhoea) and flushing episodes during the 7 days prior to the visit, reported orally by the subject to the investigator. The mean change from baseline in number of stools and flushing episodes reported at each visit is presented for each cohort.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1), Weeks 8,12, 48 and end of study (approximately 64 weeks for panNET cohort and 108 weeks for midgut NET cohort)
Population: The FAS included all subjects who received at least one dose of lanreotide Autogel® 120 mg every 14 days during the study. Numbers analysed at each time point correspond to the number of subjects reporting episodes in the 7 days prior to the visit.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PanNET Cohort | Mean Change From Baseline in Number of Stools and Flushing Episodes | Stools - Week 48 | -1.0 episodes | Standard Deviation 0 |
| PanNET Cohort | Mean Change From Baseline in Number of Stools and Flushing Episodes | Stools - End of Study | 0.5 episodes | Standard Deviation 5.4 |
| PanNET Cohort | Mean Change From Baseline in Number of Stools and Flushing Episodes | Flushing - Week 8 | 0.7 episodes | Standard Deviation 2.1 |
| PanNET Cohort | Mean Change From Baseline in Number of Stools and Flushing Episodes | Flushing - Week 12 | -1.0 episodes | Standard Deviation 0 |
| PanNET Cohort | Mean Change From Baseline in Number of Stools and Flushing Episodes | Flushing - Week 48 | -1.0 episodes | Standard Deviation 0 |
| PanNET Cohort | Mean Change From Baseline in Number of Stools and Flushing Episodes | Stools - Week 8 | 1.0 episodes | Standard Deviation 5.5 |
| PanNET Cohort | Mean Change From Baseline in Number of Stools and Flushing Episodes | Stools - Week 12 | -1.2 episodes | Standard Deviation 7.9 |
| PanNET Cohort | Mean Change From Baseline in Number of Stools and Flushing Episodes | Flushing - End of Study | 0.0 episodes | Standard Deviation 1.4 |
| Midgut NET Cohort | Mean Change From Baseline in Number of Stools and Flushing Episodes | Stools - Week 8 | -1.0 episodes | Standard Deviation 8.2 |
| Midgut NET Cohort | Mean Change From Baseline in Number of Stools and Flushing Episodes | Stools - Week 48 | 3.4 episodes | Standard Deviation 4.8 |
| Midgut NET Cohort | Mean Change From Baseline in Number of Stools and Flushing Episodes | Flushing - Week 48 | -1.5 episodes | Standard Deviation 2.1 |
| Midgut NET Cohort | Mean Change From Baseline in Number of Stools and Flushing Episodes | Stools - End of Study | -1.2 episodes | Standard Deviation 12.2 |
| Midgut NET Cohort | Mean Change From Baseline in Number of Stools and Flushing Episodes | Flushing - End of Study | -0.5 episodes | Standard Deviation 6.2 |
| Midgut NET Cohort | Mean Change From Baseline in Number of Stools and Flushing Episodes | Flushing - Week 8 | -3.3 episodes | Standard Deviation 8.3 |
| Midgut NET Cohort | Mean Change From Baseline in Number of Stools and Flushing Episodes | Stools - Week 12 | 0.7 episodes | Standard Deviation 2.5 |
| Midgut NET Cohort | Mean Change From Baseline in Number of Stools and Flushing Episodes | Flushing - Week 12 | 1.5 episodes | Standard Deviation 10 |
Mean Change From Baseline in PanNet Specific Tumour Biomarkers: Glucagon
PanNET specific tumour peptide biomarkers were evaluated in pancreas subjects at baseline. Only the tumour biomarkers that were above normal range at baseline were evaluated every 12 weeks thereafter and at the end of study visit. The mean change from baseline values in nanograms (ng)/L are presented for the end of study visit.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and end of study (approximately 64 weeks)
Population: The FAS included all subjects who received at least one dose of lanreotide Autogel® 120 mg every 14 days during the study. Only subjects in panNET cohort with data available for analysis are presented.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| PanNET Cohort | Mean Change From Baseline in PanNet Specific Tumour Biomarkers: Glucagon | 5.5 ng/L | Standard Deviation 36.4 |
Mean Change From Baseline in PanNet Specific Tumour Biomarkers: Pancreatic Polypeptide, Gastrin
PanNET specific tumour peptide biomarkers were evaluated in pancreas subjects at baseline. Only the tumour biomarkers that were above normal range at baseline were evaluated every 12 weeks thereafter and at the end of study visit. The mean change from baseline values in picomole/liter (pmol/L) are presented for the end of study visit.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and end of study (approximately 64 weeks)
Population: The FAS included all subjects who received at least one dose of lanreotide Autogel® 120 mg every 14 days during the study. Only subjects in the panNET cohort with data available for analysis are presented.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PanNET Cohort | Mean Change From Baseline in PanNet Specific Tumour Biomarkers: Pancreatic Polypeptide, Gastrin | Pancreatic Polypeptide | 82.7 pmol/L | Standard Deviation 146.7 |
| PanNET Cohort | Mean Change From Baseline in PanNet Specific Tumour Biomarkers: Pancreatic Polypeptide, Gastrin | Gastrin | -9.8 pmol/L | Standard Deviation 70.7 |
Mean Change From Baseline in QoL Measured Using EORTC, QLQ-C30 v3.0 (Global Health Status Sub-score)
Subjects were instructed to complete the 30 questions in the EORTC-QLQ-C30 v3.0 questionnaire at baseline and every 12 weeks throughout the study. The global health status sub-score was assessed using the last 2 questions which represented subject's assessment of overall health & QoL. Each question was coded on a 7-point scale (1=very poor to 7=excellent). The sub-score was transformed to range from 0-100, with a high score for global health status representing a high QoL. The mean change from baseline in the transformed global health status are presented for the end of study/early withdrawal visit, with a positive change indicating an improvement in QoL.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and end of study (approximately 64 weeks for panNET cohort and 108 weeks for midgut NET (and overall) cohort)
Population: The FAS included all subjects who received at least one dose of lanreotide Autogel® 120 mg every 14 days during the study. Only subjects with data available for analysis are presented.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| PanNET Cohort | Mean Change From Baseline in QoL Measured Using EORTC, QLQ-C30 v3.0 (Global Health Status Sub-score) | -0.38 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 15.32 |
| Midgut NET Cohort | Mean Change From Baseline in QoL Measured Using EORTC, QLQ-C30 v3.0 (Global Health Status Sub-score) | -1.33 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 17.13 |
| Overall | Mean Change From Baseline in QoL Measured Using EORTC, QLQ-C30 v3.0 (Global Health Status Sub-score) | -0.89 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 16.14 |
Mean Change From Baseline in QoL Questionnaire Gastrointestinal Neuroendocrine Tumour 21 (QLQ-GI.NET21; 2006)
Subjects were asked to complete the EORTC QLQ-GI.NET21 module which comprised 21 questions that used a 4-point scale (1 = Not at all, 2 = A little, 3 = Quite a bit, 4 = Very much) to evaluate 3 defined multi-item symptom scales (endocrine, gastrointestinal and treatment related side effects), 2 single item symptoms (bone/muscle pain and concern about weight loss), 2 psychosocial scales (social function and disease-related worries) and 2 other single items (sexuality and communication). Answers were converted into grading scale, with values between 0 and 100. Each individual sub-score was transformed to range from 0 to 100. The mean change from baseline at the end of study/early withdrawal visit is presented with a higher score representing more or worse problems.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and end of study (approximately 64 weeks for panNET cohort and 108 weeks for midgut NET (and overall) cohort)
Population: The FAS included all subjects who received at least one dose of lanreotide Autogel® 120 mg every 14 days during the study. Only subjects with data available for analysis are presented.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PanNET Cohort | Mean Change From Baseline in QoL Questionnaire Gastrointestinal Neuroendocrine Tumour 21 (QLQ-GI.NET21; 2006) | Information/Communication Function | 7.94 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 29.64 |
| PanNET Cohort | Mean Change From Baseline in QoL Questionnaire Gastrointestinal Neuroendocrine Tumour 21 (QLQ-GI.NET21; 2006) | Social Function | -0.79 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 13.41 |
| PanNET Cohort | Mean Change From Baseline in QoL Questionnaire Gastrointestinal Neuroendocrine Tumour 21 (QLQ-GI.NET21; 2006) | Endocrine Symptoms | -0.53 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 11.37 |
| PanNET Cohort | Mean Change From Baseline in QoL Questionnaire Gastrointestinal Neuroendocrine Tumour 21 (QLQ-GI.NET21; 2006) | Body Image | 0.00 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 15.29 |
| PanNET Cohort | Mean Change From Baseline in QoL Questionnaire Gastrointestinal Neuroendocrine Tumour 21 (QLQ-GI.NET21; 2006) | Disease Related Worries | 3.17 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 15.47 |
| PanNET Cohort | Mean Change From Baseline in QoL Questionnaire Gastrointestinal Neuroendocrine Tumour 21 (QLQ-GI.NET21; 2006) | Sexual Function | 2.38 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 15.82 |
| PanNET Cohort | Mean Change From Baseline in QoL Questionnaire Gastrointestinal Neuroendocrine Tumour 21 (QLQ-GI.NET21; 2006) | Muscle/Bone Pain | -1.67 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 33.29 |
| PanNET Cohort | Mean Change From Baseline in QoL Questionnaire Gastrointestinal Neuroendocrine Tumour 21 (QLQ-GI.NET21; 2006) | Treatment Related Symptoms | 5.93 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 15.64 |
| PanNET Cohort | Mean Change From Baseline in QoL Questionnaire Gastrointestinal Neuroendocrine Tumour 21 (QLQ-GI.NET21; 2006) | Gastrointestinal Symptoms | -3.49 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 14.24 |
| Midgut NET Cohort | Mean Change From Baseline in QoL Questionnaire Gastrointestinal Neuroendocrine Tumour 21 (QLQ-GI.NET21; 2006) | Body Image | -7.58 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 28.97 |
| Midgut NET Cohort | Mean Change From Baseline in QoL Questionnaire Gastrointestinal Neuroendocrine Tumour 21 (QLQ-GI.NET21; 2006) | Muscle/Bone Pain | 0.00 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 36.78 |
| Midgut NET Cohort | Mean Change From Baseline in QoL Questionnaire Gastrointestinal Neuroendocrine Tumour 21 (QLQ-GI.NET21; 2006) | Sexual Function | -2.78 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 26.43 |
| Midgut NET Cohort | Mean Change From Baseline in QoL Questionnaire Gastrointestinal Neuroendocrine Tumour 21 (QLQ-GI.NET21; 2006) | Disease Related Worries | -0.93 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 27.4 |
| Midgut NET Cohort | Mean Change From Baseline in QoL Questionnaire Gastrointestinal Neuroendocrine Tumour 21 (QLQ-GI.NET21; 2006) | Information/Communication Function | -2.90 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 9.6 |
| Midgut NET Cohort | Mean Change From Baseline in QoL Questionnaire Gastrointestinal Neuroendocrine Tumour 21 (QLQ-GI.NET21; 2006) | Endocrine Symptoms | -5.09 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 17.33 |
| Midgut NET Cohort | Mean Change From Baseline in QoL Questionnaire Gastrointestinal Neuroendocrine Tumour 21 (QLQ-GI.NET21; 2006) | Gastrointestinal Symptoms | -2.78 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 15.96 |
| Midgut NET Cohort | Mean Change From Baseline in QoL Questionnaire Gastrointestinal Neuroendocrine Tumour 21 (QLQ-GI.NET21; 2006) | Treatment Related Symptoms | -3.47 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 14.47 |
| Midgut NET Cohort | Mean Change From Baseline in QoL Questionnaire Gastrointestinal Neuroendocrine Tumour 21 (QLQ-GI.NET21; 2006) | Social Function | -9.49 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 18.2 |
| Overall | Mean Change From Baseline in QoL Questionnaire Gastrointestinal Neuroendocrine Tumour 21 (QLQ-GI.NET21; 2006) | Sexual Function | 0.00 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 21.08 |
| Overall | Mean Change From Baseline in QoL Questionnaire Gastrointestinal Neuroendocrine Tumour 21 (QLQ-GI.NET21; 2006) | Treatment Related Symptoms | 1.08 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 15.54 |
| Overall | Mean Change From Baseline in QoL Questionnaire Gastrointestinal Neuroendocrine Tumour 21 (QLQ-GI.NET21; 2006) | Gastrointestinal Symptoms | -3.11 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 15.02 |
| Overall | Mean Change From Baseline in QoL Questionnaire Gastrointestinal Neuroendocrine Tumour 21 (QLQ-GI.NET21; 2006) | Muscle/Bone Pain | -0.76 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 34.84 |
| Overall | Mean Change From Baseline in QoL Questionnaire Gastrointestinal Neuroendocrine Tumour 21 (QLQ-GI.NET21; 2006) | Disease Related Worries | 0.99 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 22.48 |
| Overall | Mean Change From Baseline in QoL Questionnaire Gastrointestinal Neuroendocrine Tumour 21 (QLQ-GI.NET21; 2006) | Body Image | -3.97 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 23.52 |
| Overall | Mean Change From Baseline in QoL Questionnaire Gastrointestinal Neuroendocrine Tumour 21 (QLQ-GI.NET21; 2006) | Information/Communication Function | 2.27 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 22.04 |
| Overall | Mean Change From Baseline in QoL Questionnaire Gastrointestinal Neuroendocrine Tumour 21 (QLQ-GI.NET21; 2006) | Social Function | -5.43 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 16.56 |
| Overall | Mean Change From Baseline in QoL Questionnaire Gastrointestinal Neuroendocrine Tumour 21 (QLQ-GI.NET21; 2006) | Endocrine Symptoms | -2.96 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 14.87 |
Median Duration of Stable Disease
Median duration of SD was the time from first injection of lanreotide Autogel® 120 mg every 14 days until the first occurrence of PD by central assessment. Disease progression was assessed by tumour response evaluation according to RECIST v1.0, every 12 weeks, measured using the same imaging technique (CT scan or MRI) for each subject throughout the study. Median duration of stable disease was estimated using the Kaplan Meier method for each cohort.
Time frame: From Day 1 up to Week 60 for the panNET cohort and Week 103 for the midgut NET cohort
Population: The FAS included all subjects who received at least one dose of lanreotide Autogel® 120 mg every 14 days during the study.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| PanNET Cohort | Median Duration of Stable Disease | 8.3 months |
| Midgut NET Cohort | Median Duration of Stable Disease | 13.8 months |
Median Time to Progression
Time to Progression was defined as time from first injection of lanreotide Autogel® 120 mg every 14 days to progression. Disease progression was assessed by tumour response evaluation according to RECIST v1.0, every 12 weeks, measured by independent central review using the same imaging technique (CT scan or MRI) for each subject throughout the study. Median time to progression was estimated using the Kaplan Meier method for each cohort.
Time frame: From Day 1 up to Week 60 for the panNET cohort and Week 103 for the midgut NET cohort
Population: The FAS included all subjects who received at least one dose of lanreotide Autogel® 120 mg every 14 days during the study.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| PanNET Cohort | Median Time to Progression | 5.6 months |
| Midgut NET Cohort | Median Time to Progression | 8.7 months |
Objective Response Rate (ORR)
The ORR was defined as the percentage of subjects who achieve either complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) according to RECIST v1.0 criteria. ORR was evaluated every 12 weeks and results are presented for each cohort.
Time frame: Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60 (for both cohorts) and Weeks 72, 84, and 96 (for midgut cohort)
Population: The FAS included all subjects who received at least one dose of lanreotide Autogel® 120 mg every 14 days during the study.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| PanNET Cohort | Objective Response Rate (ORR) | Week 12 | 0.0 percentage of subjects |
| PanNET Cohort | Objective Response Rate (ORR) | Week 24 | 0.0 percentage of subjects |
| PanNET Cohort | Objective Response Rate (ORR) | Week 36 | 0.0 percentage of subjects |
| PanNET Cohort | Objective Response Rate (ORR) | Week 48 | 0.0 percentage of subjects |
| PanNET Cohort | Objective Response Rate (ORR) | Week 60 | 0.0 percentage of subjects |
| Midgut NET Cohort | Objective Response Rate (ORR) | Week 36 | 0.0 percentage of subjects |
| Midgut NET Cohort | Objective Response Rate (ORR) | Week 84 | 2.0 percentage of subjects |
| Midgut NET Cohort | Objective Response Rate (ORR) | Week 48 | 0.0 percentage of subjects |
| Midgut NET Cohort | Objective Response Rate (ORR) | Week 96 | 2.0 percentage of subjects |
| Midgut NET Cohort | Objective Response Rate (ORR) | Week 12 | 0.0 percentage of subjects |
| Midgut NET Cohort | Objective Response Rate (ORR) | Week 60 | 2.0 percentage of subjects |
| Midgut NET Cohort | Objective Response Rate (ORR) | Week 24 | 0.0 percentage of subjects |
| Midgut NET Cohort | Objective Response Rate (ORR) | Week 72 | 3.9 percentage of subjects |
Overall Survival
Overall survival was defined as the time in months from the first injection of lanreotide Autogel® 120 mg every 14 days to death due to any cause. Median overall survival was estimated using the Kaplan Meier method for each cohort.
Time frame: From Day 1 up to Week 60 for the panNET cohort and Week 103 for the midgut NET cohort
Population: The FAS included all subjects who received at least one dose of lanreotide Autogel® 120 mg every 14 days during the study.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| PanNET Cohort | Overall Survival | NA months |
| Midgut NET Cohort | Overall Survival | NA months |
Percentage of Subjects Alive and Progression Free
The percentage of subjects alive and progression-free was assessed throughout the study up to Week 60 for the panNET cohort and Week 96 for the midgut cohort. Disease progression was assessed by tumour response evaluation according to RECIST v1.0, every 12 weeks measured by independent central review using the same imaging technique (CT scan or MRI) for each subject throughout the study. The percentage of subjects alive and progression free was estimated using the Kaplan Meier method for each cohort.
Time frame: Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60 (for both cohorts) and Weeks 72, 84 and 96 (for midgut NET cohort)
Population: The FAS included all subjects who received at least one dose of lanreotide Autogel® 120 mg every 14 days during the study.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| PanNET Cohort | Percentage of Subjects Alive and Progression Free | Week 12 | 93.3 percentage of subjects |
| PanNET Cohort | Percentage of Subjects Alive and Progression Free | Week 24 | 64.4 percentage of subjects |
| PanNET Cohort | Percentage of Subjects Alive and Progression Free | Week 36 | 37.8 percentage of subjects |
| PanNET Cohort | Percentage of Subjects Alive and Progression Free | Week 48 | 28.5 percentage of subjects |
| PanNET Cohort | Percentage of Subjects Alive and Progression Free | Week 60 | 20.7 percentage of subjects |
| Midgut NET Cohort | Percentage of Subjects Alive and Progression Free | Week 36 | 59.2 percentage of subjects |
| Midgut NET Cohort | Percentage of Subjects Alive and Progression Free | Week 84 | 27.5 percentage of subjects |
| Midgut NET Cohort | Percentage of Subjects Alive and Progression Free | Week 48 | 38.3 percentage of subjects |
| Midgut NET Cohort | Percentage of Subjects Alive and Progression Free | Week 96 | 25.2 percentage of subjects |
| Midgut NET Cohort | Percentage of Subjects Alive and Progression Free | Week 12 | 91.8 percentage of subjects |
| Midgut NET Cohort | Percentage of Subjects Alive and Progression Free | Week 60 | 36.1 percentage of subjects |
| Midgut NET Cohort | Percentage of Subjects Alive and Progression Free | Week 24 | 65.3 percentage of subjects |
| Midgut NET Cohort | Percentage of Subjects Alive and Progression Free | Week 72 | 29.8 percentage of subjects |