Skip to content

Efficacy and Safety Study in Pancreatic or Midgut Neuroendocrine Tumours Having Progressed Radiologically While Previously Treated With Lanreotide Autogel® 120 mg

Efficacy and Safety of Lanreotide Autogel® 120 mg Administered Every 14 Days in Well Differentiated, Metastatic or Locally Advanced, Unresectable Pancreatic or Midgut Neuroendocrine Tumours Having Progressed Radiologically While Previously Treated With Lanreotide Autogel® 120 mg Administered Every 28 Days

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02651987
Acronym
CLARINET FORTE
Enrollment
99
Registered
2016-01-11
Start date
2015-12-15
Completion date
2019-10-24
Last updated
2022-10-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Midgut Neuroendocrine Tumours, Pancreatic Tumours

Brief summary

This study aims to explore the efficacy and safety of lanreotide Autogel® 120 mg administered every 14 days in subjects with grade 1 or 2, metastatic or locally advanced, unresectable pancreatic or intestinal neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) once they have progressed on the standard dose of lanreotide Autogel® 120 mg every 28 days.

Interventions

Sponsors

Ipsen
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Histopathologically confirmed, grade 1 or 2, metastatic or locally advanced, unresectable pNET (pNET cohort) or midgut NET (midgut cohort) with or without hormone related syndromes, with a proliferation index (Ki67) ≤20%. * Positive somatostatin receptors type 2 * Progression as assessed by an independent central reviewer according to RECIST v1.0 while receiving first line treatment with lanreotide Autogel® at a standard dose of 120 mg every 28 days for at least 24 weeks

Exclusion criteria

* Grade 3 or rapidly progressive (within 12 weeks) NET * Any NET other than pancreatic and midgut * Previous treatment with any antitumour agent for NET other than lanreotide Autogel® 120 mg every 28 days. Exception made of prior treatment with Octreotide at standard dose stopped for other reason than disease progression. * Symptomatic gallbladder lithiasis at screening echography or history of cholelithiasis with no cholecystectomy since then.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Median Progression Free Survival (PFS)From Day 1 up to Week 60 for the panNET cohort and Week 103 for the midgut NET cohortPFS was defined as the time from first injection of lanreotide Autogel® 120 mg every 14 days to progression or death. Disease progression was assessed by tumour response evaluation according to RECIST v1.0, every 12 weeks, measured by independent central review using the same imaging technique (computed tomography \[CT\] scan or magnetic resonance imaging \[MRI\]) for each subject throughout the study. The median PFS time was estimated using the Kaplan Meier method for each cohort.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Subjects Alive and Progression FreeWeeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60 (for both cohorts) and Weeks 72, 84 and 96 (for midgut NET cohort)The percentage of subjects alive and progression-free was assessed throughout the study up to Week 60 for the panNET cohort and Week 96 for the midgut cohort. Disease progression was assessed by tumour response evaluation according to RECIST v1.0, every 12 weeks measured by independent central review using the same imaging technique (CT scan or MRI) for each subject throughout the study. The percentage of subjects alive and progression free was estimated using the Kaplan Meier method for each cohort.
Overall SurvivalFrom Day 1 up to Week 60 for the panNET cohort and Week 103 for the midgut NET cohortOverall survival was defined as the time in months from the first injection of lanreotide Autogel® 120 mg every 14 days to death due to any cause. Median overall survival was estimated using the Kaplan Meier method for each cohort.
Objective Response Rate (ORR)Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60 (for both cohorts) and Weeks 72, 84, and 96 (for midgut cohort)The ORR was defined as the percentage of subjects who achieve either complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) according to RECIST v1.0 criteria. ORR was evaluated every 12 weeks and results are presented for each cohort.
Disease Control Rate (DCR)Weeks 24 and 48The DCR was defined as the percentage of subjects who achieved CR plus PR plus Stable Disease (SD), evaluated according to RECIST v1.0 criteria. The DCR at Weeks 24 and 48 is presented for each cohort.
Best Overall Response RateFrom Day 1 up to Week 60 for the panNET cohort and Week 103 for the midgut NET cohortBest overall response was defined as the best response recorded from the initiation of treatment until disease progression, according to RECIST v1.0 evaluation. The percentage of subjects in each response category and those who were non-evaluable (i.e. with no tumour assessment after the start of study treatment) throughout the study are presented for each cohort.
Median Duration of Stable DiseaseFrom Day 1 up to Week 60 for the panNET cohort and Week 103 for the midgut NET cohortMedian duration of SD was the time from first injection of lanreotide Autogel® 120 mg every 14 days until the first occurrence of PD by central assessment. Disease progression was assessed by tumour response evaluation according to RECIST v1.0, every 12 weeks, measured using the same imaging technique (CT scan or MRI) for each subject throughout the study. Median duration of stable disease was estimated using the Kaplan Meier method for each cohort.
Factors Associated With PFSScreening/Baseline (Day 1)A univariate cox proportional hazards model was used to assess whether the following factors were associated with PFS: * Hepatic tumour load: \>25% versus reference ≤25% * Tumour Grade: Grade 2 versus reference Grade 1, * Previous surgery of the primary tumour: No versus reference Yes, * Proliferation index Ki67: ≥10% versus reference \<10% * Duration of treatment with lanreotide Autogel® 120 mg every 28 days by category: ≥median value versus reference \<median value, * Age by category: ≥65 years versus reference \<65 years, * Time from diagnosis to study entry by category: ≥3 years versus reference \<3 years, * Time interval between the two CT scans (pre-screening/screening): ≥12 months versus reference \<12 months and * Symptoms (diarrhoea or flushing at baseline): No versus reference Yes. Each factor was assessed for its importance in the Cox model for PFS in a univariate fashion.
Median Time to ProgressionFrom Day 1 up to Week 60 for the panNET cohort and Week 103 for the midgut NET cohortTime to Progression was defined as time from first injection of lanreotide Autogel® 120 mg every 14 days to progression. Disease progression was assessed by tumour response evaluation according to RECIST v1.0, every 12 weeks, measured by independent central review using the same imaging technique (CT scan or MRI) for each subject throughout the study. Median time to progression was estimated using the Kaplan Meier method for each cohort.
Mean Change From Baseline in QoL Measured Using EORTC, QLQ-C30 v3.0 (Global Health Status Sub-score)Baseline (Day 1) and end of study (approximately 64 weeks for panNET cohort and 108 weeks for midgut NET (and overall) cohort)Subjects were instructed to complete the 30 questions in the EORTC-QLQ-C30 v3.0 questionnaire at baseline and every 12 weeks throughout the study. The global health status sub-score was assessed using the last 2 questions which represented subject's assessment of overall health & QoL. Each question was coded on a 7-point scale (1=very poor to 7=excellent). The sub-score was transformed to range from 0-100, with a high score for global health status representing a high QoL. The mean change from baseline in the transformed global health status are presented for the end of study/early withdrawal visit, with a positive change indicating an improvement in QoL.
Mean Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L v1.0 Questionnaire (Descriptive System)Baseline (Day 1) and end of study (approximately 64 weeks for panNET cohort and 108 weeks for midgut NET (and overall) cohort)Subjects were instructed to complete the EQ-5D-5L descriptive system at baseline and every 12 weeks throughout the study. The EQ-5D-5L descriptive system comprised the following 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension had 5 levels: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems, extreme problems. The EQ-5D-5L health states, defined by the EQ-5D-5L descriptive system, was converted into a single index value with scores ranging from 0 (no problems) to 1 (extreme problems). The mean change from baseline at the end of study/early withdrawal visit is presented with a positive change from baseline in the index values indicating a worsening of symptoms.
Mean Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L v1.0 Questionnaire (VAS)Baseline (Day 1) and end of study (approximately 64 weeks for panNET cohort and 108 weeks for midgut NET (and overall) cohort)Subjects were instructed to complete the EQ-5D-5L VAS at baseline and every 12 weeks throughout the study. The EQ-5D-5L VAS recorded the subject's self-rated health on a vertical VAS which is numbered from 0 (worst health state) to 100 (best health state). The mean change from baseline at the end of study/early withdrawal visit is presented with a positive change in the VAS indicating an improvement in symptoms.
Mean Change From Baseline in QoL Questionnaire Gastrointestinal Neuroendocrine Tumour 21 (QLQ-GI.NET21; 2006)Baseline (Day 1) and end of study (approximately 64 weeks for panNET cohort and 108 weeks for midgut NET (and overall) cohort)Subjects were asked to complete the EORTC QLQ-GI.NET21 module which comprised 21 questions that used a 4-point scale (1 = Not at all, 2 = A little, 3 = Quite a bit, 4 = Very much) to evaluate 3 defined multi-item symptom scales (endocrine, gastrointestinal and treatment related side effects), 2 single item symptoms (bone/muscle pain and concern about weight loss), 2 psychosocial scales (social function and disease-related worries) and 2 other single items (sexuality and communication). Answers were converted into grading scale, with values between 0 and 100. Each individual sub-score was transformed to range from 0 to 100. The mean change from baseline at the end of study/early withdrawal visit is presented with a higher score representing more or worse problems.
Mean Change From Baseline in Nonspecific Tumour BiomarkersBaseline (Day 1) and end of study (approximately 64 weeks for panNET cohort and 108 weeks for midgut NET cohort)Nonspecific tumour peptide biomarkers (chromogranin A \[CgA\], neuron specific enolase \[NSE\] and plasma/urinary 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid \[5-HIAA\]) were evaluated in both pancreas and midgut subjects at baseline and Week 12 and every 12 weeks thereafter. At all scheduled visits, except baseline, plasma/urinary 5-HIAA was only performed in subjects with symptoms of carcinoid syndrome (diarrhoea and/or flushing) or if urinary 5-HIAA was elevated (above upper limit of normal \[ULN\]) at baseline. Mean change from baseline values were normalised by the ULN (xULN) and are presented for each cohort.
Mean Change From Baseline in PanNet Specific Tumour Biomarkers: Pancreatic Polypeptide, GastrinBaseline (Day 1) and end of study (approximately 64 weeks)PanNET specific tumour peptide biomarkers were evaluated in pancreas subjects at baseline. Only the tumour biomarkers that were above normal range at baseline were evaluated every 12 weeks thereafter and at the end of study visit. The mean change from baseline values in picomole/liter (pmol/L) are presented for the end of study visit.
Mean Change From Baseline in PanNet Specific Tumour Biomarkers: GlucagonBaseline (Day 1) and end of study (approximately 64 weeks)PanNET specific tumour peptide biomarkers were evaluated in pancreas subjects at baseline. Only the tumour biomarkers that were above normal range at baseline were evaluated every 12 weeks thereafter and at the end of study visit. The mean change from baseline values in nanograms (ng)/L are presented for the end of study visit.
Mean Change From Baseline in Number of Stools and Flushing EpisodesBaseline (Day 1), Weeks 8,12, 48 and end of study (approximately 64 weeks for panNET cohort and 108 weeks for midgut NET cohort)Symptom control was measured by the total number of stools (diarrhoea) and flushing episodes during the 7 days prior to the visit, reported orally by the subject to the investigator. The mean change from baseline in number of stools and flushing episodes reported at each visit is presented for each cohort.

Countries

Belgium, Denmark, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, Netherlands, Poland, Spain, United Kingdom

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Subjects with well differentiated, metastatic or locally advanced, unresectable, pancreatic or midgut neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) and who had radiologically documented disease progression as per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST) v1.0 whilst receiving treatment with lanreotide Autogel® 120mg, every 28 days for at least 24 weeks were enrolled into this study in 25 centres across 10 countries.

Pre-assignment details

Subjects who had centrally reviewed, radiologically documented disease progression within 24 months prior to enrolment and whilst receiving treatment with lanreotide Autogel® 120 mg, administered every 28 days for at least 24 weeks, were recruited into one of two cohorts based on the primary location of NET (i.e. pancreatic NET \[panNET\] or midgut NET cohort).

Participants by arm

ArmCount
PanNET Cohort
Subjects were treated with lanreotide Autogel® 120 mg, administered as deep SC injections, every 14 days starting from Day 1 (at a reduced dosing interval) for up to 48 weeks or until disease progression, death or unacceptable toxicity or tolerability. Subjects who had not progressed at Week 48 could continue study treatment with lanreotide Autogel® 120 mg every 14 days until 25 events (PD or death) in the panNET cohort had been observed. Additional visits were performed every 12 weeks until disease progression or death, or unacceptable toxicity or tolerability.
48
Midgut NET Cohort
Subjects were treated with lanreotide Autogel® 120 mg, administered as deep SC injections, every 14 days starting from Day 1 (at a reduced dosing interval) for up to 96 weeks or until disease progression, death or unacceptable toxicity or tolerability. Subjects who had not progressed at Week 96 could continue study treatment with lanreotide Autogel® 120 mg every 14 days until 25 events (PD or death) in the midgut NET cohort had been observed. Additional visits were performed every 12 weeks until disease progression or death, or unacceptable toxicity or tolerability.
51
Total99

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event22
Overall StudyConsent Withdrawn20
Overall StudyInvestigator Decision11
Overall StudyLocal PD02

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPanNET CohortMidgut NET CohortTotal
Age, Continuous63.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.6
67.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.2
65.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.6
Categories of Proliferation index Ki67
<10%
41 participants46 participants87 participants
Categories of Proliferation index Ki67
≥10%
7 participants4 participants11 participants
Categories of Proliferation index Ki67
Missing
0 participants1 participants1 participants
EQ-5D-5L Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score75.02 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.93
70.45 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.93
72.81 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.62
EuroQoL 5 Dimensions, 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) v1.0 Questionnaire Descriptive System Score0.82 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.17
0.83 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.14
0.83 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.15
Hepatic tumour load
≤25%
41 participants42 participants83 participants
Hepatic tumour load
>25%
7 participants9 participants16 participants
QoL Questionnaire Gastrointestinal Neuroendocrine Tumour 21 (QLQ-GI.NET21) Score
Body Image
10.61 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 23.6
15.56 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 28.95
13.11 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 26.41
QoL Questionnaire Gastrointestinal Neuroendocrine Tumour 21 (QLQ-GI.NET21) Score
Disease Related Worries
44.44 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 29.96
44.22 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 25.83
44.33 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 27.74
QoL Questionnaire Gastrointestinal Neuroendocrine Tumour 21 (QLQ-GI.NET21) Score
Endocrine Symptoms
16.54 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 22.3
19.73 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 22.82
18.20 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 22.51
QoL Questionnaire Gastrointestinal Neuroendocrine Tumour 21 (QLQ-GI.NET21) Score
Gastrointestinal Symptoms
21.70 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 20.01
22.04 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.17
21.88 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.48
QoL Questionnaire Gastrointestinal Neuroendocrine Tumour 21 (QLQ-GI.NET21) Score
Information/Communication Function
3.70 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.76
4.17 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.14
3.94 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.89
QoL Questionnaire Gastrointestinal Neuroendocrine Tumour 21 (QLQ-GI.NET21) Score
Muscle/Bone Pain
26.52 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 30.99
25.69 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 30.16
26.09 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 30.39
QoL Questionnaire Gastrointestinal Neuroendocrine Tumour 21 (QLQ-GI.NET21) Score
Sexual Function
22.58 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 30.29
17.86 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 27.94
20.34 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 29.04
QoL Questionnaire Gastrointestinal Neuroendocrine Tumour 21 (QLQ-GI.NET21) Score
Social Function
32.84 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 24.18
35.03 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 24.33
33.98 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 24.15
QoL Questionnaire Gastrointestinal Neuroendocrine Tumour 21 (QLQ-GI.NET21) Score
Treatment Related Symptoms
11.63 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.11
11.46 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.75
11.55 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.33
Quality of Life (QoL) Questionnaire Core 30 (QLQ-C30) Score68.12 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.74
67.83 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 20.76
67.97 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 20.17
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
Asian
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
Other
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
White
35 Participants37 Participants72 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Belgium
3 participants2 participants5 participants
Region of Enrollment
Denmark
1 participants2 participants3 participants
Region of Enrollment
France
12 participants13 participants25 participants
Region of Enrollment
Germany
8 participants3 participants11 participants
Region of Enrollment
Ireland
2 participants0 participants2 participants
Region of Enrollment
Italy
2 participants6 participants8 participants
Region of Enrollment
Netherlands
1 participants3 participants4 participants
Region of Enrollment
Poland
12 participants10 participants22 participants
Region of Enrollment
Spain
1 participants3 participants4 participants
Region of Enrollment
United Kingdom
6 participants9 participants15 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
28 Participants22 Participants50 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
20 Participants29 Participants49 Participants
Tumour grading (according to WHO 2010 classification)
Grade 1
12 participants29 participants41 participants
Tumour grading (according to WHO 2010 classification)
Grade 2
36 participants22 participants58 participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
1 / 483 / 514 / 99
other
Total, other adverse events
41 / 4847 / 5188 / 99
serious
Total, serious adverse events
5 / 4813 / 5118 / 99

Outcome results

Primary

Median Progression Free Survival (PFS)

PFS was defined as the time from first injection of lanreotide Autogel® 120 mg every 14 days to progression or death. Disease progression was assessed by tumour response evaluation according to RECIST v1.0, every 12 weeks, measured by independent central review using the same imaging technique (computed tomography \[CT\] scan or magnetic resonance imaging \[MRI\]) for each subject throughout the study. The median PFS time was estimated using the Kaplan Meier method for each cohort.

Time frame: From Day 1 up to Week 60 for the panNET cohort and Week 103 for the midgut NET cohort

Population: The FAS included all subjects who received at least one dose of lanreotide Autogel® 120 mg every 14 days during the study.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
PanNET CohortMedian Progression Free Survival (PFS)5.6 months
Midgut NET CohortMedian Progression Free Survival (PFS)8.3 months
Secondary

Best Overall Response Rate

Best overall response was defined as the best response recorded from the initiation of treatment until disease progression, according to RECIST v1.0 evaluation. The percentage of subjects in each response category and those who were non-evaluable (i.e. with no tumour assessment after the start of study treatment) throughout the study are presented for each cohort.

Time frame: From Day 1 up to Week 60 for the panNET cohort and Week 103 for the midgut NET cohort

Population: The FAS included all subjects who received at least one dose of lanreotide Autogel® 120 mg every 14 days during the study.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PanNET CohortBest Overall Response RatePR0.0 percentage of subjects
PanNET CohortBest Overall Response RatePD31.3 percentage of subjects
PanNET CohortBest Overall Response RateSD66.7 percentage of subjects
PanNET CohortBest Overall Response RateNot evaluable0.0 percentage of subjects
PanNET CohortBest Overall Response RateCR0.0 percentage of subjects
Midgut NET CohortBest Overall Response RateNot evaluable2.0 percentage of subjects
Midgut NET CohortBest Overall Response RateCR0.0 percentage of subjects
Midgut NET CohortBest Overall Response RatePR3.9 percentage of subjects
Midgut NET CohortBest Overall Response RateSD68.6 percentage of subjects
Midgut NET CohortBest Overall Response RatePD23.5 percentage of subjects
Secondary

Disease Control Rate (DCR)

The DCR was defined as the percentage of subjects who achieved CR plus PR plus Stable Disease (SD), evaluated according to RECIST v1.0 criteria. The DCR at Weeks 24 and 48 is presented for each cohort.

Time frame: Weeks 24 and 48

Population: The FAS included all subjects who received at least one dose of lanreotide Autogel® 120 mg every 14 days during the study.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PanNET CohortDisease Control Rate (DCR)Week 2443.8 percentage of subjects
PanNET CohortDisease Control Rate (DCR)Week 4822.9 percentage of subjects
Midgut NET CohortDisease Control Rate (DCR)Week 2458.8 percentage of subjects
Midgut NET CohortDisease Control Rate (DCR)Week 4833.3 percentage of subjects
Secondary

Factors Associated With PFS

A univariate cox proportional hazards model was used to assess whether the following factors were associated with PFS: * Hepatic tumour load: \>25% versus reference ≤25% * Tumour Grade: Grade 2 versus reference Grade 1, * Previous surgery of the primary tumour: No versus reference Yes, * Proliferation index Ki67: ≥10% versus reference \<10% * Duration of treatment with lanreotide Autogel® 120 mg every 28 days by category: ≥median value versus reference \<median value, * Age by category: ≥65 years versus reference \<65 years, * Time from diagnosis to study entry by category: ≥3 years versus reference \<3 years, * Time interval between the two CT scans (pre-screening/screening): ≥12 months versus reference \<12 months and * Symptoms (diarrhoea or flushing at baseline): No versus reference Yes. Each factor was assessed for its importance in the Cox model for PFS in a univariate fashion.

Time frame: Screening/Baseline (Day 1)

Population: The FAS included all subjects who received at least one dose of lanreotide Autogel® 120 mg every 14 days during the study.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PanNET CohortFactors Associated With PFSHepatic tumour load: >25% Vs ≤25%0.96 Hazard Ratio
PanNET CohortFactors Associated With PFSTumour Grade: 2 Vs 10.68 Hazard Ratio
PanNET CohortFactors Associated With PFSPrevious surgery: No Vs Yes1.04 Hazard Ratio
PanNET CohortFactors Associated With PFSKi67: ≥10% Vs <10%3.60 Hazard Ratio
PanNET CohortFactors Associated With PFSSymptoms: No Vs Yes2.55 Hazard Ratio
PanNET CohortFactors Associated With PFSDuration of treatment with lanreotide Autogel® 120 mg every 28 days: ≥median Vs <median0.68 Hazard Ratio
PanNET CohortFactors Associated With PFSAge: ≥65 years Vs <65 years1.55 Hazard Ratio
PanNET CohortFactors Associated With PFSTime from diagnosis: ≥3 years Vs <3 years0.49 Hazard Ratio
PanNET CohortFactors Associated With PFSTime between CT scans: ≥12 months Vs <12 months0.47 Hazard Ratio
Midgut NET CohortFactors Associated With PFSTime from diagnosis: ≥3 years Vs <3 years0.94 Hazard Ratio
Midgut NET CohortFactors Associated With PFSHepatic tumour load: >25% Vs ≤25%1.54 Hazard Ratio
Midgut NET CohortFactors Associated With PFSDuration of treatment with lanreotide Autogel® 120 mg every 28 days: ≥median Vs <median0.76 Hazard Ratio
Midgut NET CohortFactors Associated With PFSSymptoms: No Vs Yes1.32 Hazard Ratio
Midgut NET CohortFactors Associated With PFSPrevious surgery: No Vs Yes2.14 Hazard Ratio
Midgut NET CohortFactors Associated With PFSAge: ≥65 years Vs <65 years1.15 Hazard Ratio
Midgut NET CohortFactors Associated With PFSKi67: ≥10% Vs <10%2.26 Hazard Ratio
Midgut NET CohortFactors Associated With PFSTime between CT scans: ≥12 months Vs <12 months0.72 Hazard Ratio
Midgut NET CohortFactors Associated With PFSTumour Grade: 2 Vs 10.90 Hazard Ratio
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L v1.0 Questionnaire (Descriptive System)

Subjects were instructed to complete the EQ-5D-5L descriptive system at baseline and every 12 weeks throughout the study. The EQ-5D-5L descriptive system comprised the following 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension had 5 levels: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems, extreme problems. The EQ-5D-5L health states, defined by the EQ-5D-5L descriptive system, was converted into a single index value with scores ranging from 0 (no problems) to 1 (extreme problems). The mean change from baseline at the end of study/early withdrawal visit is presented with a positive change from baseline in the index values indicating a worsening of symptoms.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and end of study (approximately 64 weeks for panNET cohort and 108 weeks for midgut NET (and overall) cohort)

Population: The FAS included all subjects who received at least one dose of lanreotide Autogel® 120 mg every 14 days during the study. Only subjects with data available for analysis are presented.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PanNET CohortMean Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L v1.0 Questionnaire (Descriptive System)-0.04 Index valueStandard Deviation 0.12
Midgut NET CohortMean Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L v1.0 Questionnaire (Descriptive System)0.00 Index valueStandard Deviation 0.11
OverallMean Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L v1.0 Questionnaire (Descriptive System)-0.02 Index valueStandard Deviation 0.12
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L v1.0 Questionnaire (VAS)

Subjects were instructed to complete the EQ-5D-5L VAS at baseline and every 12 weeks throughout the study. The EQ-5D-5L VAS recorded the subject's self-rated health on a vertical VAS which is numbered from 0 (worst health state) to 100 (best health state). The mean change from baseline at the end of study/early withdrawal visit is presented with a positive change in the VAS indicating an improvement in symptoms.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and end of study (approximately 64 weeks for panNET cohort and 108 weeks for midgut NET (and overall) cohort)

Population: The FAS included all subjects who received at least one dose of lanreotide Autogel® 120 mg every 14 days during the study. Only subjects with data available for analysis are presented.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PanNET CohortMean Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L v1.0 Questionnaire (VAS)-1.90 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.8
Midgut NET CohortMean Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L v1.0 Questionnaire (VAS)-1.76 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.34
OverallMean Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L v1.0 Questionnaire (VAS)-1.83 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.22
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in Nonspecific Tumour Biomarkers

Nonspecific tumour peptide biomarkers (chromogranin A \[CgA\], neuron specific enolase \[NSE\] and plasma/urinary 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid \[5-HIAA\]) were evaluated in both pancreas and midgut subjects at baseline and Week 12 and every 12 weeks thereafter. At all scheduled visits, except baseline, plasma/urinary 5-HIAA was only performed in subjects with symptoms of carcinoid syndrome (diarrhoea and/or flushing) or if urinary 5-HIAA was elevated (above upper limit of normal \[ULN\]) at baseline. Mean change from baseline values were normalised by the ULN (xULN) and are presented for each cohort.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and end of study (approximately 64 weeks for panNET cohort and 108 weeks for midgut NET cohort)

Population: The FAS included all subjects who received at least one dose of lanreotide Autogel® 120 mg every 14 days during the study. Only subjects with data available for analysis are presented.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PanNET CohortMean Change From Baseline in Nonspecific Tumour BiomarkersCgA0.205 xULNStandard Deviation 1.258
PanNET CohortMean Change From Baseline in Nonspecific Tumour BiomarkersNSE0.03 xULNStandard Deviation 1
PanNET CohortMean Change From Baseline in Nonspecific Tumour BiomarkersPlasma 5-HIAA-0.42 xULNStandard Deviation 1.44
Midgut NET CohortMean Change From Baseline in Nonspecific Tumour BiomarkersCgA0.370 xULNStandard Deviation 1.843
Midgut NET CohortMean Change From Baseline in Nonspecific Tumour BiomarkersNSE-0.49 xULNStandard Deviation 1.86
Midgut NET CohortMean Change From Baseline in Nonspecific Tumour BiomarkersPlasma 5-HIAA3.90 xULNStandard Deviation 7.39
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in Number of Stools and Flushing Episodes

Symptom control was measured by the total number of stools (diarrhoea) and flushing episodes during the 7 days prior to the visit, reported orally by the subject to the investigator. The mean change from baseline in number of stools and flushing episodes reported at each visit is presented for each cohort.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1), Weeks 8,12, 48 and end of study (approximately 64 weeks for panNET cohort and 108 weeks for midgut NET cohort)

Population: The FAS included all subjects who received at least one dose of lanreotide Autogel® 120 mg every 14 days during the study. Numbers analysed at each time point correspond to the number of subjects reporting episodes in the 7 days prior to the visit.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PanNET CohortMean Change From Baseline in Number of Stools and Flushing EpisodesStools - Week 48-1.0 episodesStandard Deviation 0
PanNET CohortMean Change From Baseline in Number of Stools and Flushing EpisodesStools - End of Study0.5 episodesStandard Deviation 5.4
PanNET CohortMean Change From Baseline in Number of Stools and Flushing EpisodesFlushing - Week 80.7 episodesStandard Deviation 2.1
PanNET CohortMean Change From Baseline in Number of Stools and Flushing EpisodesFlushing - Week 12-1.0 episodesStandard Deviation 0
PanNET CohortMean Change From Baseline in Number of Stools and Flushing EpisodesFlushing - Week 48-1.0 episodesStandard Deviation 0
PanNET CohortMean Change From Baseline in Number of Stools and Flushing EpisodesStools - Week 81.0 episodesStandard Deviation 5.5
PanNET CohortMean Change From Baseline in Number of Stools and Flushing EpisodesStools - Week 12-1.2 episodesStandard Deviation 7.9
PanNET CohortMean Change From Baseline in Number of Stools and Flushing EpisodesFlushing - End of Study0.0 episodesStandard Deviation 1.4
Midgut NET CohortMean Change From Baseline in Number of Stools and Flushing EpisodesStools - Week 8-1.0 episodesStandard Deviation 8.2
Midgut NET CohortMean Change From Baseline in Number of Stools and Flushing EpisodesStools - Week 483.4 episodesStandard Deviation 4.8
Midgut NET CohortMean Change From Baseline in Number of Stools and Flushing EpisodesFlushing - Week 48-1.5 episodesStandard Deviation 2.1
Midgut NET CohortMean Change From Baseline in Number of Stools and Flushing EpisodesStools - End of Study-1.2 episodesStandard Deviation 12.2
Midgut NET CohortMean Change From Baseline in Number of Stools and Flushing EpisodesFlushing - End of Study-0.5 episodesStandard Deviation 6.2
Midgut NET CohortMean Change From Baseline in Number of Stools and Flushing EpisodesFlushing - Week 8-3.3 episodesStandard Deviation 8.3
Midgut NET CohortMean Change From Baseline in Number of Stools and Flushing EpisodesStools - Week 120.7 episodesStandard Deviation 2.5
Midgut NET CohortMean Change From Baseline in Number of Stools and Flushing EpisodesFlushing - Week 121.5 episodesStandard Deviation 10
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in PanNet Specific Tumour Biomarkers: Glucagon

PanNET specific tumour peptide biomarkers were evaluated in pancreas subjects at baseline. Only the tumour biomarkers that were above normal range at baseline were evaluated every 12 weeks thereafter and at the end of study visit. The mean change from baseline values in nanograms (ng)/L are presented for the end of study visit.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and end of study (approximately 64 weeks)

Population: The FAS included all subjects who received at least one dose of lanreotide Autogel® 120 mg every 14 days during the study. Only subjects in panNET cohort with data available for analysis are presented.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PanNET CohortMean Change From Baseline in PanNet Specific Tumour Biomarkers: Glucagon5.5 ng/LStandard Deviation 36.4
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in PanNet Specific Tumour Biomarkers: Pancreatic Polypeptide, Gastrin

PanNET specific tumour peptide biomarkers were evaluated in pancreas subjects at baseline. Only the tumour biomarkers that were above normal range at baseline were evaluated every 12 weeks thereafter and at the end of study visit. The mean change from baseline values in picomole/liter (pmol/L) are presented for the end of study visit.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and end of study (approximately 64 weeks)

Population: The FAS included all subjects who received at least one dose of lanreotide Autogel® 120 mg every 14 days during the study. Only subjects in the panNET cohort with data available for analysis are presented.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PanNET CohortMean Change From Baseline in PanNet Specific Tumour Biomarkers: Pancreatic Polypeptide, GastrinPancreatic Polypeptide82.7 pmol/LStandard Deviation 146.7
PanNET CohortMean Change From Baseline in PanNet Specific Tumour Biomarkers: Pancreatic Polypeptide, GastrinGastrin-9.8 pmol/LStandard Deviation 70.7
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in QoL Measured Using EORTC, QLQ-C30 v3.0 (Global Health Status Sub-score)

Subjects were instructed to complete the 30 questions in the EORTC-QLQ-C30 v3.0 questionnaire at baseline and every 12 weeks throughout the study. The global health status sub-score was assessed using the last 2 questions which represented subject's assessment of overall health & QoL. Each question was coded on a 7-point scale (1=very poor to 7=excellent). The sub-score was transformed to range from 0-100, with a high score for global health status representing a high QoL. The mean change from baseline in the transformed global health status are presented for the end of study/early withdrawal visit, with a positive change indicating an improvement in QoL.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and end of study (approximately 64 weeks for panNET cohort and 108 weeks for midgut NET (and overall) cohort)

Population: The FAS included all subjects who received at least one dose of lanreotide Autogel® 120 mg every 14 days during the study. Only subjects with data available for analysis are presented.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PanNET CohortMean Change From Baseline in QoL Measured Using EORTC, QLQ-C30 v3.0 (Global Health Status Sub-score)-0.38 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.32
Midgut NET CohortMean Change From Baseline in QoL Measured Using EORTC, QLQ-C30 v3.0 (Global Health Status Sub-score)-1.33 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.13
OverallMean Change From Baseline in QoL Measured Using EORTC, QLQ-C30 v3.0 (Global Health Status Sub-score)-0.89 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.14
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in QoL Questionnaire Gastrointestinal Neuroendocrine Tumour 21 (QLQ-GI.NET21; 2006)

Subjects were asked to complete the EORTC QLQ-GI.NET21 module which comprised 21 questions that used a 4-point scale (1 = Not at all, 2 = A little, 3 = Quite a bit, 4 = Very much) to evaluate 3 defined multi-item symptom scales (endocrine, gastrointestinal and treatment related side effects), 2 single item symptoms (bone/muscle pain and concern about weight loss), 2 psychosocial scales (social function and disease-related worries) and 2 other single items (sexuality and communication). Answers were converted into grading scale, with values between 0 and 100. Each individual sub-score was transformed to range from 0 to 100. The mean change from baseline at the end of study/early withdrawal visit is presented with a higher score representing more or worse problems.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and end of study (approximately 64 weeks for panNET cohort and 108 weeks for midgut NET (and overall) cohort)

Population: The FAS included all subjects who received at least one dose of lanreotide Autogel® 120 mg every 14 days during the study. Only subjects with data available for analysis are presented.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PanNET CohortMean Change From Baseline in QoL Questionnaire Gastrointestinal Neuroendocrine Tumour 21 (QLQ-GI.NET21; 2006)Information/Communication Function7.94 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 29.64
PanNET CohortMean Change From Baseline in QoL Questionnaire Gastrointestinal Neuroendocrine Tumour 21 (QLQ-GI.NET21; 2006)Social Function-0.79 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.41
PanNET CohortMean Change From Baseline in QoL Questionnaire Gastrointestinal Neuroendocrine Tumour 21 (QLQ-GI.NET21; 2006)Endocrine Symptoms-0.53 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.37
PanNET CohortMean Change From Baseline in QoL Questionnaire Gastrointestinal Neuroendocrine Tumour 21 (QLQ-GI.NET21; 2006)Body Image0.00 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.29
PanNET CohortMean Change From Baseline in QoL Questionnaire Gastrointestinal Neuroendocrine Tumour 21 (QLQ-GI.NET21; 2006)Disease Related Worries3.17 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.47
PanNET CohortMean Change From Baseline in QoL Questionnaire Gastrointestinal Neuroendocrine Tumour 21 (QLQ-GI.NET21; 2006)Sexual Function2.38 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.82
PanNET CohortMean Change From Baseline in QoL Questionnaire Gastrointestinal Neuroendocrine Tumour 21 (QLQ-GI.NET21; 2006)Muscle/Bone Pain-1.67 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 33.29
PanNET CohortMean Change From Baseline in QoL Questionnaire Gastrointestinal Neuroendocrine Tumour 21 (QLQ-GI.NET21; 2006)Treatment Related Symptoms5.93 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.64
PanNET CohortMean Change From Baseline in QoL Questionnaire Gastrointestinal Neuroendocrine Tumour 21 (QLQ-GI.NET21; 2006)Gastrointestinal Symptoms-3.49 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.24
Midgut NET CohortMean Change From Baseline in QoL Questionnaire Gastrointestinal Neuroendocrine Tumour 21 (QLQ-GI.NET21; 2006)Body Image-7.58 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 28.97
Midgut NET CohortMean Change From Baseline in QoL Questionnaire Gastrointestinal Neuroendocrine Tumour 21 (QLQ-GI.NET21; 2006)Muscle/Bone Pain0.00 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 36.78
Midgut NET CohortMean Change From Baseline in QoL Questionnaire Gastrointestinal Neuroendocrine Tumour 21 (QLQ-GI.NET21; 2006)Sexual Function-2.78 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.43
Midgut NET CohortMean Change From Baseline in QoL Questionnaire Gastrointestinal Neuroendocrine Tumour 21 (QLQ-GI.NET21; 2006)Disease Related Worries-0.93 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 27.4
Midgut NET CohortMean Change From Baseline in QoL Questionnaire Gastrointestinal Neuroendocrine Tumour 21 (QLQ-GI.NET21; 2006)Information/Communication Function-2.90 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.6
Midgut NET CohortMean Change From Baseline in QoL Questionnaire Gastrointestinal Neuroendocrine Tumour 21 (QLQ-GI.NET21; 2006)Endocrine Symptoms-5.09 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.33
Midgut NET CohortMean Change From Baseline in QoL Questionnaire Gastrointestinal Neuroendocrine Tumour 21 (QLQ-GI.NET21; 2006)Gastrointestinal Symptoms-2.78 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.96
Midgut NET CohortMean Change From Baseline in QoL Questionnaire Gastrointestinal Neuroendocrine Tumour 21 (QLQ-GI.NET21; 2006)Treatment Related Symptoms-3.47 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.47
Midgut NET CohortMean Change From Baseline in QoL Questionnaire Gastrointestinal Neuroendocrine Tumour 21 (QLQ-GI.NET21; 2006)Social Function-9.49 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.2
OverallMean Change From Baseline in QoL Questionnaire Gastrointestinal Neuroendocrine Tumour 21 (QLQ-GI.NET21; 2006)Sexual Function0.00 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.08
OverallMean Change From Baseline in QoL Questionnaire Gastrointestinal Neuroendocrine Tumour 21 (QLQ-GI.NET21; 2006)Treatment Related Symptoms1.08 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.54
OverallMean Change From Baseline in QoL Questionnaire Gastrointestinal Neuroendocrine Tumour 21 (QLQ-GI.NET21; 2006)Gastrointestinal Symptoms-3.11 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.02
OverallMean Change From Baseline in QoL Questionnaire Gastrointestinal Neuroendocrine Tumour 21 (QLQ-GI.NET21; 2006)Muscle/Bone Pain-0.76 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 34.84
OverallMean Change From Baseline in QoL Questionnaire Gastrointestinal Neuroendocrine Tumour 21 (QLQ-GI.NET21; 2006)Disease Related Worries0.99 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.48
OverallMean Change From Baseline in QoL Questionnaire Gastrointestinal Neuroendocrine Tumour 21 (QLQ-GI.NET21; 2006)Body Image-3.97 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.52
OverallMean Change From Baseline in QoL Questionnaire Gastrointestinal Neuroendocrine Tumour 21 (QLQ-GI.NET21; 2006)Information/Communication Function2.27 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.04
OverallMean Change From Baseline in QoL Questionnaire Gastrointestinal Neuroendocrine Tumour 21 (QLQ-GI.NET21; 2006)Social Function-5.43 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.56
OverallMean Change From Baseline in QoL Questionnaire Gastrointestinal Neuroendocrine Tumour 21 (QLQ-GI.NET21; 2006)Endocrine Symptoms-2.96 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.87
Secondary

Median Duration of Stable Disease

Median duration of SD was the time from first injection of lanreotide Autogel® 120 mg every 14 days until the first occurrence of PD by central assessment. Disease progression was assessed by tumour response evaluation according to RECIST v1.0, every 12 weeks, measured using the same imaging technique (CT scan or MRI) for each subject throughout the study. Median duration of stable disease was estimated using the Kaplan Meier method for each cohort.

Time frame: From Day 1 up to Week 60 for the panNET cohort and Week 103 for the midgut NET cohort

Population: The FAS included all subjects who received at least one dose of lanreotide Autogel® 120 mg every 14 days during the study.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
PanNET CohortMedian Duration of Stable Disease8.3 months
Midgut NET CohortMedian Duration of Stable Disease13.8 months
Secondary

Median Time to Progression

Time to Progression was defined as time from first injection of lanreotide Autogel® 120 mg every 14 days to progression. Disease progression was assessed by tumour response evaluation according to RECIST v1.0, every 12 weeks, measured by independent central review using the same imaging technique (CT scan or MRI) for each subject throughout the study. Median time to progression was estimated using the Kaplan Meier method for each cohort.

Time frame: From Day 1 up to Week 60 for the panNET cohort and Week 103 for the midgut NET cohort

Population: The FAS included all subjects who received at least one dose of lanreotide Autogel® 120 mg every 14 days during the study.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
PanNET CohortMedian Time to Progression5.6 months
Midgut NET CohortMedian Time to Progression8.7 months
Secondary

Objective Response Rate (ORR)

The ORR was defined as the percentage of subjects who achieve either complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) according to RECIST v1.0 criteria. ORR was evaluated every 12 weeks and results are presented for each cohort.

Time frame: Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60 (for both cohorts) and Weeks 72, 84, and 96 (for midgut cohort)

Population: The FAS included all subjects who received at least one dose of lanreotide Autogel® 120 mg every 14 days during the study.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PanNET CohortObjective Response Rate (ORR)Week 120.0 percentage of subjects
PanNET CohortObjective Response Rate (ORR)Week 240.0 percentage of subjects
PanNET CohortObjective Response Rate (ORR)Week 360.0 percentage of subjects
PanNET CohortObjective Response Rate (ORR)Week 480.0 percentage of subjects
PanNET CohortObjective Response Rate (ORR)Week 600.0 percentage of subjects
Midgut NET CohortObjective Response Rate (ORR)Week 360.0 percentage of subjects
Midgut NET CohortObjective Response Rate (ORR)Week 842.0 percentage of subjects
Midgut NET CohortObjective Response Rate (ORR)Week 480.0 percentage of subjects
Midgut NET CohortObjective Response Rate (ORR)Week 962.0 percentage of subjects
Midgut NET CohortObjective Response Rate (ORR)Week 120.0 percentage of subjects
Midgut NET CohortObjective Response Rate (ORR)Week 602.0 percentage of subjects
Midgut NET CohortObjective Response Rate (ORR)Week 240.0 percentage of subjects
Midgut NET CohortObjective Response Rate (ORR)Week 723.9 percentage of subjects
Secondary

Overall Survival

Overall survival was defined as the time in months from the first injection of lanreotide Autogel® 120 mg every 14 days to death due to any cause. Median overall survival was estimated using the Kaplan Meier method for each cohort.

Time frame: From Day 1 up to Week 60 for the panNET cohort and Week 103 for the midgut NET cohort

Population: The FAS included all subjects who received at least one dose of lanreotide Autogel® 120 mg every 14 days during the study.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
PanNET CohortOverall SurvivalNA months
Midgut NET CohortOverall SurvivalNA months
Secondary

Percentage of Subjects Alive and Progression Free

The percentage of subjects alive and progression-free was assessed throughout the study up to Week 60 for the panNET cohort and Week 96 for the midgut cohort. Disease progression was assessed by tumour response evaluation according to RECIST v1.0, every 12 weeks measured by independent central review using the same imaging technique (CT scan or MRI) for each subject throughout the study. The percentage of subjects alive and progression free was estimated using the Kaplan Meier method for each cohort.

Time frame: Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60 (for both cohorts) and Weeks 72, 84 and 96 (for midgut NET cohort)

Population: The FAS included all subjects who received at least one dose of lanreotide Autogel® 120 mg every 14 days during the study.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PanNET CohortPercentage of Subjects Alive and Progression FreeWeek 1293.3 percentage of subjects
PanNET CohortPercentage of Subjects Alive and Progression FreeWeek 2464.4 percentage of subjects
PanNET CohortPercentage of Subjects Alive and Progression FreeWeek 3637.8 percentage of subjects
PanNET CohortPercentage of Subjects Alive and Progression FreeWeek 4828.5 percentage of subjects
PanNET CohortPercentage of Subjects Alive and Progression FreeWeek 6020.7 percentage of subjects
Midgut NET CohortPercentage of Subjects Alive and Progression FreeWeek 3659.2 percentage of subjects
Midgut NET CohortPercentage of Subjects Alive and Progression FreeWeek 8427.5 percentage of subjects
Midgut NET CohortPercentage of Subjects Alive and Progression FreeWeek 4838.3 percentage of subjects
Midgut NET CohortPercentage of Subjects Alive and Progression FreeWeek 9625.2 percentage of subjects
Midgut NET CohortPercentage of Subjects Alive and Progression FreeWeek 1291.8 percentage of subjects
Midgut NET CohortPercentage of Subjects Alive and Progression FreeWeek 6036.1 percentage of subjects
Midgut NET CohortPercentage of Subjects Alive and Progression FreeWeek 2465.3 percentage of subjects
Midgut NET CohortPercentage of Subjects Alive and Progression FreeWeek 7229.8 percentage of subjects

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026