Skip to content

Effects of Teriflunomide (Aubagio) on Cognitive and Vocational Outcomes in Multiple Sclerosis

Teriflunomide (Aubagio) Effects on Cognitive and Vocational Outcomes, as Related to Neurodegeneration in Multiple Sclerosis: A Prospective, Observational, Single-blinded Study.

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02651545
Enrollment
60
Registered
2016-01-11
Start date
2014-02-28
Completion date
2020-11-30
Last updated
2021-09-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Multiple Sclerosis

Brief summary

Cognitive impairment is common in MS and has devastating impact on functional activities. There is a great demand for medications that will enhance cognitive capacity in MS patients. The effect of teriflunomide on cognition and vocational capacity is unknown. The investigators will address these questions in a sample of 30 relapsing MS patients treated with teriflunomide. Cognitive impairment will be measured by calculating an information processing speed index and a memory composite index from conventional, validated neuropsychological tests as recommended by consensus opinion publications. Vocational performance will be monitored using a newly developed online survey called the Multiple Sclerosis Vocational Monitoring Survey (MSVMS). This study will elucidate the effect of teriflunomide on these important outcomes.

Detailed description

Summary: Objectives: The primary aim of this study is to define the effect of teriflunomide (Aubagio®) on cognitive abilities in patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis (MS). There are two secondary objectives, to \[a\] relate changes in cognition to vocational problems, and \[b\] determine MRI correlates of change in cognition, more specifically gray-matter (GM) volume metrics which the investigators believe reflect neurodegeneration. Design: This is a prospective, observational, single-blinded, longitudinal study of teriflunomide effects on cognitive performance in MS patients over 24 months. Neuropsychological status and 3T (3 Tesla) MRI will be assessed at baseline, 12 months and 24 months. Vocational status will be assessed every three months via the internet. Statistical analysis will emphasize within-subjects changes in all metrics to maximize statistical power. Study Population: Thirty (30) relapsing MS patients and 30 healthy controls (HC) will be enrolled in the study. Outcomes: An information processing speed index and a memory composite index will be calculated from conventional, validated neuropsychological tests as recommended by consensus opinion publications. Conventional clinical metrics for overall neurological disability will also be assessed. Vocational performance will be monitored using a newly developed online survey called the Multiple Sclerosis Vocational Monitoring Survey (MSVMS). Regional GM atrophy, as defined by measurement of thalamic and cortical atrophy, will serve as neurodegeneration outcomes. Significance of the research: The effect of teriflunomide on the development of cognitive impairment and vocational capacity is unknown. This study will elucidate the effect of teriflunomide on these important outcomes.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

State University of New York at Buffalo
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_CONTROL
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Patient diagnosed with MS according to McDonald criteria * Age 18-60 * Have a relapsing disease course * Have Expanded Disability Status Scale scores of 0-6.5 * Have a disease duration \<20 years * Treatment naïve to teriflunomide * Be willing and able to comply with the study procedures for the duration of the trial * Have given written informed consent and signed Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) Authorization before any study-related activities are carried out * Normal kidney functioning (creatinine clearance \>59) * None of the

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Nine-hole Peg Test0, 12, and 24 monthsThe Nine-Hole Peg test is a measure of manual dexterity, where the time in seconds that it takes for patient to fill pegboard holes with pegs and remove them is recorded. Longer times indicate slower motor ability. The range in seconds to complete the nine-hole peg test ranges from 0-seconds to the ceiling value of 300 seconds.
Expanded Disability Status Scale Score (EDSS)0, 12, and 24 monthsThe Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS). 0-10 scale with higher scores indicating more severe disability.
Timed 25-foot Walk.0, 12, and 24 monthsTime it takes in seconds for patient to walk 25 feet. Higher times indicate slower ambulation.
Symbol Digit Modalities Test Total Correct0, 12, and 24 monthsA measure of cognitive processing speed. Patient is shown a key with symbol-digit pairings and several rows of symbols with empty boxes beneath them. Patient is asked to respond with the numbers that are paired with each of the symbols as quickly and accurately as they can. Score 0-120 with higher scores indicating better performance.
California Verbal Learning Test 2nd Edition Total Learning Score0, 12, and 24 monthsA measure of verbal learning and memory. Patient is read a list of 16 words 5 times and asked to recall the list each time. Score 0-80 with higher scores indicating better performance.
Brief Visuospatial Memory Test Revised Total Learning Score0, 12, and 24 monthsA measure of visual-spatial learning and memory. Patient is shown a display 3 times and asked to recall figures from the display. Score 0-36 with higher scores indicating better performance.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Vocational Status0, 12, and 24 monthsVocational Status assessed by the Buffalo Vocational Monitoring Survey (BVMS). BVMS includes four sections: \[a\] demographics and disease characteristics, \[b\] self-reported symptom inventories, \[c\] general employment information, and \[d\] work-related problems/accommodations. Vocational status (employed vs. unemployed) will be taken from this survey.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
MS Group
Multiple Sclerosis Patients Prescribed Aubagio
30
Healthy Control Group
Healthy controls matched to the MS group
30
Total60

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalMS GroupHealthy Control Group
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
60 Participants30 Participants30 Participants
Age, Continuous48.65 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.14
49.53 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.97
47.77 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.27
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
African American
8 Participants7 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Caucasian
50 Participants23 Participants27 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
2 Participants0 Participants2 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
60 participants30 participants30 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
51 Participants25 Participants26 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
9 Participants5 Participants4 Participants
Symbol Digit Modalities Test Total correct54.3 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.6
49.7 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.6
58.9 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.5

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 300 / 30
other
Total, other adverse events
10 / 300 / 30
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 300 / 30

Outcome results

Primary

Brief Visuospatial Memory Test Revised Total Learning Score

A measure of visual-spatial learning and memory. Patient is shown a display 3 times and asked to recall figures from the display. Score 0-36 with higher scores indicating better performance.

Time frame: 0, 12, and 24 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Relapsing MS PatientsBrief Visuospatial Memory Test Revised Total Learning ScoreMonth 020.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.5
Relapsing MS PatientsBrief Visuospatial Memory Test Revised Total Learning ScoreMonth 1219.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.1
Relapsing MS PatientsBrief Visuospatial Memory Test Revised Total Learning ScoreMonth 2420.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.3
Healthy ControlsBrief Visuospatial Memory Test Revised Total Learning ScoreMonth 2424.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.9
Healthy ControlsBrief Visuospatial Memory Test Revised Total Learning ScoreMonth 024.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.3
Healthy ControlsBrief Visuospatial Memory Test Revised Total Learning ScoreMonth 1223.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.6
Primary

California Verbal Learning Test 2nd Edition Total Learning Score

A measure of verbal learning and memory. Patient is read a list of 16 words 5 times and asked to recall the list each time. Score 0-80 with higher scores indicating better performance.

Time frame: 0, 12, and 24 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Relapsing MS PatientsCalifornia Verbal Learning Test 2nd Edition Total Learning ScoreMonth 050.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.5
Relapsing MS PatientsCalifornia Verbal Learning Test 2nd Edition Total Learning ScoreMonth 1247.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.5
Relapsing MS PatientsCalifornia Verbal Learning Test 2nd Edition Total Learning ScoreMonth 2449.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.6
Healthy ControlsCalifornia Verbal Learning Test 2nd Edition Total Learning ScoreMonth 055.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.7
Healthy ControlsCalifornia Verbal Learning Test 2nd Edition Total Learning ScoreMonth 1254.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.5
Healthy ControlsCalifornia Verbal Learning Test 2nd Edition Total Learning ScoreMonth 2453.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.7
Primary

Expanded Disability Status Scale Score (EDSS)

The Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS). 0-10 scale with higher scores indicating more severe disability.

Time frame: 0, 12, and 24 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Relapsing MS PatientsExpanded Disability Status Scale Score (EDSS)EDSS Score Month 03.0 EDSS Score
Relapsing MS PatientsExpanded Disability Status Scale Score (EDSS)EDSS Score Month 123.0 EDSS Score
Relapsing MS PatientsExpanded Disability Status Scale Score (EDSS)EDSS Score Month 242.5 EDSS Score
Primary

Nine-hole Peg Test

The Nine-Hole Peg test is a measure of manual dexterity, where the time in seconds that it takes for patient to fill pegboard holes with pegs and remove them is recorded. Longer times indicate slower motor ability. The range in seconds to complete the nine-hole peg test ranges from 0-seconds to the ceiling value of 300 seconds.

Time frame: 0, 12, and 24 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Relapsing MS PatientsNine-hole Peg TestMonth 2426.8 SecondsStandard Deviation 6.9
Relapsing MS PatientsNine-hole Peg TestMonth 025.1 SecondsStandard Deviation 6.6
Relapsing MS PatientsNine-hole Peg TestMonth 1226.7 SecondsStandard Deviation 7.5
Healthy ControlsNine-hole Peg TestMonth 020.0 SecondsStandard Deviation 2.2
Healthy ControlsNine-hole Peg TestMonth 1219.3 SecondsStandard Deviation 2.3
Healthy ControlsNine-hole Peg TestMonth 2420.1 SecondsStandard Deviation 2.7
Primary

Symbol Digit Modalities Test Total Correct

A measure of cognitive processing speed. Patient is shown a key with symbol-digit pairings and several rows of symbols with empty boxes beneath them. Patient is asked to respond with the numbers that are paired with each of the symbols as quickly and accurately as they can. Score 0-120 with higher scores indicating better performance.

Time frame: 0, 12, and 24 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Relapsing MS PatientsSymbol Digit Modalities Test Total CorrectMonth 049.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.6
Relapsing MS PatientsSymbol Digit Modalities Test Total CorrectMonth 1247.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.8
Relapsing MS PatientsSymbol Digit Modalities Test Total CorrectMonth 2448.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.1
Healthy ControlsSymbol Digit Modalities Test Total CorrectMonth 058.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.5
Healthy ControlsSymbol Digit Modalities Test Total CorrectMonth 1257.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.6
Healthy ControlsSymbol Digit Modalities Test Total CorrectMonth 2459.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11
Primary

Timed 25-foot Walk.

Time it takes in seconds for patient to walk 25 feet. Higher times indicate slower ambulation.

Time frame: 0, 12, and 24 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Relapsing MS PatientsTimed 25-foot Walk.Month 07.3 SecondsStandard Deviation 3.7
Relapsing MS PatientsTimed 25-foot Walk.Month 127.4 SecondsStandard Deviation 3.1
Relapsing MS PatientsTimed 25-foot Walk.Month 246.9 SecondsStandard Deviation 2.6
Healthy ControlsTimed 25-foot Walk.Month 04.6 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.8
Healthy ControlsTimed 25-foot Walk.Month 124.9 SecondsStandard Deviation 1.2
Healthy ControlsTimed 25-foot Walk.Month 245.3 SecondsStandard Deviation 1
Secondary

Change in Vocational Status

Vocational Status assessed by the Buffalo Vocational Monitoring Survey (BVMS). BVMS includes four sections: \[a\] demographics and disease characteristics, \[b\] self-reported symptom inventories, \[c\] general employment information, and \[d\] work-related problems/accommodations. Vocational status (employed vs. unemployed) will be taken from this survey.

Time frame: 0, 12, and 24 months

Population: Patient discontinuations, withdrawals, and loss-to-follow-ups account for declining numbers in each group as study progressed.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Relapsing MS PatientsChange in Vocational StatusMonth 12Employed7 Participants
Relapsing MS PatientsChange in Vocational StatusMonth 24Unemployed5 Participants
Relapsing MS PatientsChange in Vocational StatusMonth 12Unemployed9 Participants
Relapsing MS PatientsChange in Vocational StatusMonth 0Unemployed16 Participants
Relapsing MS PatientsChange in Vocational StatusMonth 24Employed3 Participants
Relapsing MS PatientsChange in Vocational StatusMonth 0Employed14 Participants
Healthy ControlsChange in Vocational StatusMonth 24Unemployed1 Participants
Healthy ControlsChange in Vocational StatusMonth 0Employed30 Participants
Healthy ControlsChange in Vocational StatusMonth 0Unemployed0 Participants
Healthy ControlsChange in Vocational StatusMonth 12Employed21 Participants
Healthy ControlsChange in Vocational StatusMonth 12Unemployed2 Participants
Healthy ControlsChange in Vocational StatusMonth 24Employed16 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026