Skip to content

Efficacy of a Smart Management Strategy for Health (SMASH) Program for Overcoming Cancer Crisis and Growing Positively

A Randomized Controlled Trial of Smart Management Strategy for Health (SMASH) Program for Overcoming Cancer Crisis and Growing Positively in Cancer Survivors

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02650661
Enrollment
394
Registered
2016-01-08
Start date
2015-11-23
Completion date
2018-01-31
Last updated
2018-10-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Breast Neoplasms, Lung Neoplasms, Colorectal Neoplasms, Stomach Neoplasms

Keywords

Cancer survivors

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of the Smart Management Strategy for Health (SMASH) program, which is designed to help cancer patients overcome their cancer crisis proactively and grow positively.

Detailed description

\<Hypothesis\> This study hypothesizes that the intervention being provided (SMASH program) will demonstrate improvements in cancer survivors' health management in the fields of (i) physical activity, body mass index, and positive growth, (ii) self-management strategies of health (SMASH Assessment Tool; SAT), (iii) overall physical, mental, social, spiritual health conditions and Quality of Life (QoL), and (iv) the execution and maintenance of health habits (10 Rules for Highly Effective Health Behavior). \<Patient registry\> Cancer survivors, who have just completed their cancer treatments (surgery, radiation, chemotherapy), will be recruited from five medical centers in Korea and randomly allocated to one of following three groups: 2 experiment groups and 1 attention control group. This recruitment process would start after the approval of protocol by the Institutional Review Board (IRB), and proceed through following steps: (i) the physician in charge confirms that the patient has finished his or her treatment and determines whether the patient is eligible to participate in the study by checking the recent (less than one year) results of the patient's basic medical exams (blood pressure, body temperature, heart rate, respiratory rate, weight, and height) and basic lab tests (blood chemistry, electrocardiogram, chest PA, complete blood count, liver function test, BUN/Cr), (ii) A nurse explains the purpose and method of the study to the patient, and asks to complete informed consent form, (iii) the patient who agrees for participation will complete a brief screening questionnaire (Godin's Leisure Time Exercise, weight/height, and PostTraumatic Growth Inventory(PTGI)), (iv) the patient meeting the criteria as determined by the screening questionnaire is asked to complete the baseline assessment questionnaire at home, (v) cases who finish the baseline assessment questionnaire and meet all criteria are considered study participants and are randomly assigned to one of the three study arms. \<Quality control (patient data)\> This study assumes that patients who are directly referred to the study by collaborating physicians are valid cancer cases. Data collected from study participants on screening forms will be reviewed by researchers at the central institution for missing responses and inconsistencies. \<Sample size\> The sample size of 477 participants was based upon the following assumptions: * a two-sided Type I error of 0.05 * drop-out rate of 10% * an attainment of goal behavior of 5% in the active comparator arm and 20% in the experiment arm, and a power of 90% to detect a between-arm difference \<Statistical analysis plan \> The primary endpoint was based on three-outcome composite achievement of PA, weight and PTGI score at 12 months. All analyses will be conducted on the basis of intention-to-treat. Arm differences at 3, 6, and 12 months in behavior change (physical activity, body mass index, posttraumatic growth) will be tested with logistic regression, controlling for the respective baseline values. Arm differences in levels of Mini Dietary Assessment Index (MDI), execution of health habits, SMASH Assessment Tool (SAT), Quality of Life (QoL), health condition, incurred medical expenses, incurred Complementary and Alternative Medicine (CAM) expenses will be explored using a mixed model that estimates the effect of SMASH program over time, which will correlate repeated observations on particular participants after adjustment for baseline scores.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALOnline health management program

Web-based health management program designed according to SMASH strategy, which includes (i) Assessment, (ii) Acceptance, (iii) Preparation for change, (iv) Commitment, (v) Planning, (vi) Promoting environment, (vii) Execution, (viii) Feedback and Maintenance, and (ix) Core perspectives, for 6 months. The program consists of four areas: self-assessment, self-planning, self-learning, and self-monitoring. The learning session includes SMASH strategies and 10 Rules for Highly Effective Health Behavior.

BEHAVIORALHealth coaching

Personalized tele-coaching for 6 months by health coaches who were trained by the Smart Management and Coaching for Health (SMACH) program

BEHAVIORALWorkshop

Total three sessions are to be held at 3-, 5-, and 7-month after the initiation of the enrollment. Each session includes 30-minute health education, 1-hour health management strategy workshop, and 30-minute team coaching.

BEHAVIORALStandard health educational booklet

Standard health educational booklets about 10 Rules for Highly Effective Health Behavior that are organized according to the Trans-theoretical Model (TTM). Booklets are provided at 0-, 2-, and 4-month after the enrollment.

Sponsors

Samsung Medical Center
CollaboratorOTHER
Asan Medical Center
CollaboratorOTHER
Ewha Womans University Mokdong Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
National Cancer Center, Korea
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
Seoul National University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
19 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Aware of one's diagnosis of breast, lung, colorectal or gastric cancer * less than 2 months has passed since one's completion of primary cancer treatment (including surgery, radiation, or chemotherapy) * Performs poorly at baseline on at least one goal behavior, which includes the followings: (i) moderate exercise ≥150 min/week or strenuous exercise ≥75 min/week (\*exception: ≥12.5 MET-hr/week for lung cancer patients) (ii) BMI within normal range (18.5-22.9) (\*exception: ≥18.5 for lung cancer patients) (iii) Posttraumatic Growth Inventory (PTGI) score ≥72

Exclusion criteria

* Inability to speak or write Korean * Medical conditions that would limit adherence to an unsupervised health management program (as confirmed by their referring physician; e.g. major depression, dyspnea) * Currently pregnant or planning to be within the next year

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in percentage of patients meeting the exercise goalbaseline, 3, 6, and 12 months]moderate exercise for ≥150 min/week or strenuous exercise for ≥75 min/week (\* ≥12.5 MET-hr/week for lung cancer patients; no limit on exercise strength)
Change in percentage of patients meeting the body mass index (BMI) goalbaseline, 3, 6, and 12 monthsBMI in kg/m\^2 goal 18.5-22.9 (≥18.5 for lung cancer patients)
Change in percentage of patients meeting the posttraumatic growth inventory (PTGI) goal3, 6, and 12 monthsGeneral is a quality of life measure with higher scores indicating better quality of life (range 0-105)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in level of fatiguebaseline, 3, 6, and 12 monthsThe Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) scale, which consists of 9 items that rate fatigue severity and interference on a 0-to-10 scale,
Change in level of self-management strategybaseline, 3, 6, and 12 monthsWe assessed the SM strategies of health with the SMASH Assessment Tool (SAT), which is a three-set, 16-factor, 91-item tool (i.e., the core strategies with 28 items, preparation strategies with 30 items, and implementation strategies with 33 items) that assesses the patients' ability to overcome their health-related crisis.
Change in percentage of patients meeting diet goalbaseline, 3, 6, and 12 monthsMini Dietary assessment Index (MDI) score ≥ 80
Cost effectiveness analysisbaseline, 3, 6, and 12 monthsCost effectiveness analysis
Change in level of social support and spiritual well-beingbaseline, 3, 6, and 12 monthsThe social support (2 items) and spiritual (6 items) scales of the McGill Quality of Life (McGill QOL)
Change in execution level of health habitsbaseline, 3, 6, and 12 months10 Rules for Highly Effective Health Behavior
Change in level of anxiety and depressionbaseline, 3, 6, and 12 monthsWe measured psychologic distress with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), which consists of 14 items (7 for anxiety and 7 for depression).

Countries

South Korea

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026