Skip to content

POLARSTEM Cementless Hip Stem

Multicenter Clinical Observation Using the Cementless Version of the POLARSTEM

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02648152
Acronym
POLARSTEM
Enrollment
218
Registered
2016-01-06
Start date
2009-03-01
Completion date
2020-11-01
Last updated
2026-01-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Osteoarthritis

Brief summary

Multicenter observational study to validate that the POLARSTEM™ is a state-of-the-art implant in terms of radiographic, clinical performance and long-term survivorship.

Detailed description

The goal of this multicenter clinical observation is to validate short-, mid-, and long-term outcome (efficacy and safety) of the POLARSTEM™. Efficacy evaluations: * Evaluation of function, range of motion (ROM) and pain as assessed by Harris Hip Score, Hip disability and osteoarthritis outcome score (HOOS) \[7, 8\], an extension of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC). * Radiographic changes as defined by radiolucent lines, osteolysis, hypo- and hypertrophy, implant loosening or migration Safety evaluations: * Intra- and perioperative device-related adverse events (AE) and complications up to discharge * Postoperative AE up to 10 years

Interventions

DEVICETotal Hip Arthroplasty

Total Hip Arthroplasty using Cementless version of the POLARSTEM

Sponsors

Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patient has no general medical contraindication to surgery * Informed consent to participate in the MCO signed by the patient * Routine radiographic assessment is possible * Patient is likely to comply with study follow-up requirements * Primary total hip replacement (THR) to the affected side, unilateral or bilateral

Exclusion criteria

* Previously failed endoprosthesis and /or THR components in relevant hip * History of infection in the affected joint; systemic infections * Grossly insufficient femoral or acetabular bone stock in the involved hip * Charcot joint disease or other severe neurosensory deficit * Severe spinal disorders * Age of patient at date of surgery \> 75 years * High comorbidity * Cemented acetabular cup

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Kaplan-Meier Estimate: Overall Survivorship of POLARSTEMPre-operatively, 3 months, 12 months, 36 months, 60 months, and 120 monthsOverall survivorship of the Cementless Version of the POLARSTEM pre-operatively, 3 months, 12 months, 12 months, 36 months, 60 months, and 120 months by Kaplan-Meier estimate with overall hip survivorship defined as the time between date of treatment and date of revision for any reason.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Harris Hip Score (HHS)Pre-operative, 3 Months, 12 Months, 36 Months, 60 Months, 120 monthsThe HHS measured function, range of motion (ROM), and pain sub-scores that are combined to indicate total dysfunction on a numerical scale from 0 to 100, with a higher score indicating less dysfunction (i.e., a better outcome). Reported scores for the HHS utilized the following grading: * \<70 = poor * 70 to 80 = fair * 80 to 90 = good * 90 to 100 = excellent
Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC): Pain SubscalePre-operative, 3 Months, 12 Months, 36 Months, 60 Months, 120 MonthsWOMAC Pain subscale is a subset of the Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS) with a range of 0 to 20. Higher WOMAC scores indicate worse pain (i.e., worse outcome) and lower scores indicate less pain (i.e., a better outcome).
Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC): Stiffness SubscalePre-operative, 3 Months, 12 Months, 36 Months, 60 Months, 120 MonthsWOMAC Stiffness subscale is a subset of the Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS) with a range from 0 to 8 with a higher score indicating a worse outcome and a low score indicating a better outcome.
Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC): Physical Function SubscalePre-operative, 3 Months, 12 Months, 36 Months, 60 Months, 120 MonthsWOMAC Physical Function subscale is a subset of the Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS) with a range from 0 to 68 with a higher score indicating a worse outcome and a low score indicating a better outcome.
Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC): Total ScorePre-operative, 3 Months, 12 Months, 36 Months, 60 Months, 120 MonthsWOMAC total score combines Stiffness, Pain, and Physical Function subscales of the Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS) into a range from 0 to 96 with a higher score indicating a worse outcome and a lower score indicating a better outcome.
Radiological: Radiolucent Lines3 months, 12 months, 36 months, 60 months, 120 monthsNumber of hips identified with radiographic findings of radiolucent lines present (Yes/No) in femoral zones 1 to 14. Radiolucent lines indicated seams of 0 millimeters to 2 millimeters or greater.
Radiological: Osteolysis3 months, 12 months, 36 months, 60 months, 120 monthsNumber of hips identified with radiographic findings of osteolysis present (Yes/No) in femoral zones 1 to 14.
Radiological: Atrophy3 months, 12 months, 36 months, 60 months, 120 monthsNumber of hips identified with radiographic findings for atrophy in femoral zones 1 to 14 indicated as: * None * Mild * Moderate * Severe * Missing
Radiological: Hypertrophy3 months, 12 months, 36 months, 60 months, 120 monthsNumber of hips identified with radiographic findings for hypertrophy in femoral zones 1 to 14 indicated as: * None * Mild * Moderate * Severe * Missing
Radiological: Loosening of the Implant or Migration3 months, 12 months, 36 months, 60 months, 120 monthsNumber of hips identified with radiographic findings associated with loosening of the implant or migration were indicated as: * Integration not assessable * Indifferent, bone unchanged * Osteointegration, integration * Bone loss * Signs of loosening * Revision indicated

Countries

Germany, Switzerland

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORTurgay Efe, Dr.med.

Philipps University Marburg

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants were enrolled at three centers in two countries in Europe (2 in Germany and 1 in Switzerland)

Baseline characteristics

Characteristic
Age, Continuous64.70 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.7
Age, Customized
Age Group
<= 60 years
62 Participants
Age, Customized
Age Group
> 60 years
156 Participants
Body Mass Index (BMI)28.30 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.72
Sex: Female, Male
Female
111 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
107 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
29 / 218
other
Total, other adverse events
115 / 218
serious
Total, serious adverse events
114 / 218

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 1, 2026