Skip to content

Salud al Día: Engaging Latino Parents in Pediatric Primary Care

Salud al Día: Engaging Latino Parents in Pediatric Primary Care

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02647814
Enrollment
158
Registered
2016-01-06
Start date
2016-02-29
Completion date
2018-02-28
Last updated
2018-08-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Primary Health Care

Keywords

Parent activation, Text-messages, LEP, Latino populations, pediatrics

Brief summary

Objective: To conduct a pilot randomized controlled trial comparing the effectiveness of a parent support intervention consisting of periodic text messages and educational support (video, collateral materials),and usual care on the healthcare engagement of limited English proficient (LEP) Latino parents during participants' child's first year and to examine its impact on healthcare utilization and primary care quality.

Detailed description

Lessons learned in organizational engagement reveal a critical need to increase healthcare engagement among LEP Latino parents. LEP Latina mothers who were founding members of Latino Family Advisory Board (LFAB) at the Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center identified the health system knowledge that enabled participants to more effectively use the healthcare system as one of the key benefits of board membership. The gains in knowledge, skills, and confidence demonstrated in the LFAB evaluation mirror qualitative evaluation findings of other ambulatory care advisory boards, and reflect the concept of patient activation. Patient activation, a component of individual patient engagement, is defined as the patient's willingness to manage their health and healthcare based on understanding one's role in the care process and having the knowledge, skills, and confidence to do so. Interventions focused on increasing activation, using both in-person and mHealth support, have demonstrated efficacy and have led to improvement in health and healthcare quality. mHealth-based interventions have the ability to reach larger populations at lower cost, with the potential for increased tailoring and interactivity, especially as the use of cellular phones becomes nearly universal, even among low-income populations. For example, Text4baby, a perinatal health education program delivered through passive educational text messages, has demonstrated success at reaching low-income Spanish-speaking parents with positive user assessments. A recent study of parent healthcare activation among low-income parents (conducted by PI: DeCamp) demonstrated that parent activation among parents whose preferred healthcare language was Spanish was significantly lower than that of parents whose preferred healthcare language was English. These findings further support targeting increasing the healthcare engagement of LEP Latino parents. This novel intervention will integrate mobile health (mHealth) technology and culturally- and linguistically-tailored interpersonal support to increase healthcare engagement of LEP Latino parents and to enable participants to overcome barriers to effective healthcare access and use. Investigators hypothesize that this intervention will measurably increase parent healthcare engagement and that this will positively impact healthcare utilization, quality and the patient/family experience. Increasing healthcare engagement of LEP Latino families and demonstrating positive healthcare impact through a tailored, scalable intervention would create a foundation for larger-scale impact on healthcare disparities for Latino children and a model for increasing engagement of other vulnerable populations.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALSalud al Día

A pilot randomized controlled trial comparing the effectiveness of a parent support intervention consisting of periodic text messages and educational support (video, collateral materials),and usual care on the healthcare engagement of LEP Latino parents during their child's first year and to examine its impact on healthcare utilization and primary care quality.

Sponsors

Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation
CollaboratorOTHER
emocha Mobile Health, Inc.
CollaboratorOTHER
Maryland Institute College of Art
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Johns Hopkins University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Parent or legal guardian of a singleton US-born infant ≤ 2 months of age 2. Parent or legal guardian age 18 or older 3. Parent or legal guardian self-identified as Latino/a 4. Parent or legal guardian foreign-born 5. Parental report of Spanish as their preferred healthcare language 6. Plan to select Medicaid/Priority Partners insurance for their child with the Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center Children's Medical Practice as the primary care site 7. Have a working cellular phone with text message capability and parent reports prior use of text messaging

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Emergency/Urgent Care Utilization24 months\# of ED/Urgent care visits
Parent experience of care12 monthsUse of standard measure of healthcare experiences (Child-CAHPS)
Up to Date Well Child Care24 monthsComposite variable of % of AAP recommended well visits completed at intervals 12 and 24 months of age, up to date immunizations and screening at 12 and 24 months

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Food stamp enrollment12 months
Use of clinic support programs12 months
Continuous health insurance for the child each of the last 12 months12 months
Parent activation12 months
Proportion of visits in the the past 12 months with the primary provider12 months

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Intervention delivery12 monthsMeasurement of intervention activities delivered per participant in the intervention arm
Intervention satisfaction12 monthsQuantitative and qualitative measurement of intervention experience for participants in the intervention arm

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 20, 2026