Skip to content

Hemodynamic and Inflammatory Responses in Thoracic Surgery

Hemodynamic and Inflammatory Responses in Thoracic Surgery: Hemodynamic and Inflammatory Responses Following Video-assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02647775
Enrollment
63
Registered
2016-01-06
Start date
2016-01-31
Completion date
2018-12-31
Last updated
2020-01-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery

Keywords

Thoracoscopic surgery

Brief summary

Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) for thoracic surgery is practical, has been shown to reduce postoperative discomfort, and has improved cosmetic results when compare to open thoracotomy. The specific aims of this project are: to clarify the physiologic and immunologic effects of different approaches for minimally invasive thoracic surgery: (1) multiple-port VATS; (2) single-port VATS

Detailed description

Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) was first reported in the early 1990s. Since then, the safety and efficacy of thoracoscopy for diagnosing and treating pleural, pulmonary, and mediastinal disease has been demonstrated with similar oncological results, which were confirmed by multiple clinical studies. Although VATS for thoracic surgery is practical, has been shown to reduce postoperative discomfort, and has improved cosmetic results when compare to open thoracotomy, unfortunately chronic thoracic wound discomfort and postoperative neuralgia were found in a significant portion of patients . Recently, a minimally invasive approach that is different from the conventional multiport thoracoscopic technique is gradually becoming of great interest in the diagnosis and treatment of thoracic surgical disease. Single-port VATS is one of the most promising emerging surgical techniques which allows the surgeon to perform a majority of thoracic surgeries and with similar perioperative outcomes that are comparable with the conventional multiport technique. However, a very limited number of clinical studies have demonstrated the advantages of single port VATS in postoperative pain reduction, when comparing to the traditional multiport thoracoscopic approach. To clarify the physiologic and immunologic effects of different approaches for minimally invasive thoracic surgery, investigators aim to compare the perioperative physiological changes, immunological responses, and postoperative pain between standard (multi-port) transthoracic thoracoscopic and single-port transthoracic thoracoscopic surgery for thoracic disease.

Interventions

PROCEDUREmulti-port VATS

Patients with thoracic surgical diseases who underwent VATS will be recruited into this study to investigate the postoperative pain , physiologic and immunologic impacts of two different approaches for minimally invasive thoracic surgery.

PROCEDUREsingle-port VATS

Patients with thoracic surgical diseases who underwent VATS will be recruited into this study to investigate the postoperative pain , physiologic and immunologic impacts of two different approaches for minimally invasive thoracic surgery.

Sponsors

Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
15 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patient with thoracic surgical diseases(lung cancer. mediastinal tumor. solitary pulmonary lesion. pneumothorax) who will be underwent video-assisted thoracic surgery

Exclusion criteria

* Unresectable mediastinal tumor * Previous history of ipsilateral pulmonary resection * Patients with complex cardiopulmonary dysfunction * Unresectable pulmonary hilar tumor

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pain scorebeginning at 3 hours after surgery until 5 daysNumerical Rating Scale (NRS) or Wong-Baker Face Pain Rating Scale

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean arterial pressurebeginning 20 min before the start of surgery until 20 min after the surgery.MAP; mmHg
Heart ratebeginning 20 min before the start of surgery until 20 min after the surgery.HR; beats per min \[bpm\]
Cardiac indexbeginning 20 min before the start of surgery until 20 min after the surgery.CI; L/\[min·m2\]
Systemic vascular resistance indexbeginning 20 min before the start of surgery until 20 min after the surgery.SVRI; \[dyn·s\]/\[cm-5·m2\]
Global end-diastolic volume indexbeginning 20 min before the start of surgery until 20 min after the surgery.GEDVI; mL/m2
Complicationbeginning at 3 hours after surgery until 30 daysYes/No
Intracellular oxidative activity of neutrophilspreoperation till 5 days after surgeryratio compared with preoperation
Inducible nitric oxide synthase expression in monocytespreoperation till 5 days after surgeryArbitrary intensity
Interleukin-6preoperation till 5 days after surgerypg/ml
C-reactive proteinpreoperation till 5 days after surgeryng/ml
Leukocyte subset analysispreoperation till 5 days after surgery10\^3/ul

Countries

Taiwan

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026