Skip to content

interACTION: A Portable Joint Function Monitoring and Training System for Remote Rehabilitation Following TKA

interACTION: A Portable Joint Function Monitoring and Training System for Remote Rehabilitation Following Total Knee Arthroplasty

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02646761
Enrollment
38
Registered
2016-01-06
Start date
2016-04-30
Completion date
2017-12-31
Last updated
2019-02-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Total Knee Arthroplasty

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to determine if home-based therapy with monitoring via telemedicine can overcome many barriers to compliance and improve rehabilitation. Patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty will be followed for 10 weeks during their outpatient physical therapy course. Subjects will undergo standard physical therapy or physical therapy paired with InterACTION for 10 weeks.

Interventions

DEVICEInterACTION

InterACTION guided home exercise program paired with standard of care physical therapy

Physical therapy rehabilitation program

Sponsors

James J. Irrgang
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
40 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Between ages 40 to 80 years of age; 2. Have undergone primary unilateral total knee arthroplasty; 3. Being referred for post-operative outpatient physical therapy; 4. Agree to and able to perform pre-defined exercises that they would normally perform in a physical rehabilitation program.

Exclusion criteria

1. Patients with BMI \>40 at the time of surgery; 2. Individuals who are not free of any other co-disability or comorbidity that would specifically impede disallow or otherwise hinder performance of rehabilitation exercises; 3. Individuals who cannot physically receive or understand audio and visual feedback from the joint motion tracking system during or after performance of rehabilitation exercises; 4. Individuals who are discharged post-operatively to a skilled nursing facility instead of to their residence;

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Value Was Evaluated as the Ratio of Change in the Activities of Daily Living Scale Score to the Costs of Rehabilitation.10 weeksThe value was calculated the ratio of the difference between the 10 week and baseline Activities of Daily Living Scale (ADLS) of the Knee Outcome Survey divided by the total charges for the physical therapy treatment sessions. The ADLS is a 14-item measure of symptoms and activity limitations for individuals with a variety of knee impairments. Items are scored from 0 to 4, and the total score is the sum of all the items divided by 70 and multiplied by 100. The ADLS score ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores representing less symptoms and greater levels of activity. Higher ratio of the change in the ADLS score to the costs for rehabilitation represents greater value.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Subjects Satisfied With InterACTION Device10 weeksSubjects in the interACTION group were asked Would you consider using the InterACTION device if you had to do rehabilitation again in the future?
Number of Participants That Complied With Rehabilitation Program10 weeksCompliance with the use of the InterACTION device was measured by reports generated from the device. Subjects in the Standard Physical Therapy Group completed exercise logs that were monitored at each study visit.
Performance Based Outcome Measures10 weeksThe performance based measures included the 6-minute walk test (measured as distance in meters); stair climb test (measured as time in seconds divided by the number of steps); timed up and go test (measured in seconds); and unilateral balance test (measured in seconds). To combine the 4 performance-based outcome measures into a single composite score, the score for each test was converted to a z score (individual's score - overall mean)/overall standard deviation. As such, the z-score represents the number of SD deviations an individual's score is above or below the overall study mean. A z-score of 0 implies the participants score is the same as the mean score. A z-score of 0.1 would indicate that the participant's z score is .1 (10%) of a standard deviation above or below the overall mean. The average of the z scores for each performance-based outcome measure as the unit of analysis.
Range of Motion (Extension)baseline and 10 weeksExtension of both knees was measured with a goniometer and the side-to-side difference was expressed in degrees.
Range of Motion (Flexion)baseline and 10 weeksFlexion of both knees was measured with a goniometer and the side-to-side difference was expressed in degrees.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

A total of 47 subjects were assessed for eligibility for the study. Nine were deemed ineligible and 38 were randomized into one of the 2 study arms. Subjects were recruited and randomized prior to surgery & the baseline assessment was done approximately 2 to 4 weeks after surgery.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Rehabilitation With InterACTION
After total knee arthroplasty, subjects will undergo physical therapy 1 time per week supplemented by home exercise program with InterACTION device. InterACTION: InterACTION guided home exercise program paired with standard of care physical therapy
13
Standard Physical Therapy
After total knee arthroplasty, subjects will undergo standard of care physical therapy 2 times per week with standard home exercise program. Standard of Care Physical Therapy: Physical therapy rehabilitation program
12
Total25

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalStandard Physical TherapyRehabilitation With InterACTION
Age, Continuous65.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.1
65.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.6
65.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.6
Current Smoker1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Education
College graduate
6 Participants2 Participants4 Participants
Education
Graduate degree
7 Participants1 Participants6 Participants
Education
High school grad
5 Participants3 Participants2 Participants
Education
Some college
4 Participants4 Participants0 Participants
Education
Some graduate school
3 Participants2 Participants1 Participants
Education
Some high school
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Employment Status
Regular full time
7 Participants4 Participants3 Participants
Employment Status
Regular part time
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Employment Status
Retired due to health
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Employment Status
Retired not due to health
13 Participants6 Participants7 Participants
Employment Status
Semi-retired
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Employment Status
Temporary retired due to health
2 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
25 Participants12 Participants13 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Marital status
Married
19 Participants8 Participants11 Participants
Marital status
Separated
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Marital status
Single
3 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Marital status
Widowed
2 Participants2 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
3 Participants0 Participants3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
22 Participants12 Participants10 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
11 Participants6 Participants5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
14 Participants6 Participants8 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 130 / 12
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 130 / 12
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 130 / 12

Outcome results

Primary

Value Was Evaluated as the Ratio of Change in the Activities of Daily Living Scale Score to the Costs of Rehabilitation.

The value was calculated the ratio of the difference between the 10 week and baseline Activities of Daily Living Scale (ADLS) of the Knee Outcome Survey divided by the total charges for the physical therapy treatment sessions. The ADLS is a 14-item measure of symptoms and activity limitations for individuals with a variety of knee impairments. Items are scored from 0 to 4, and the total score is the sum of all the items divided by 70 and multiplied by 100. The ADLS score ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores representing less symptoms and greater levels of activity. Higher ratio of the change in the ADLS score to the costs for rehabilitation represents greater value.

Time frame: 10 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Rehabilitation With InterACTIONValue Was Evaluated as the Ratio of Change in the Activities of Daily Living Scale Score to the Costs of Rehabilitation.0.013 ratioStandard Deviation 0.007
Standard Physical TherapyValue Was Evaluated as the Ratio of Change in the Activities of Daily Living Scale Score to the Costs of Rehabilitation.0.018 ratioStandard Deviation 0.009
Secondary

Number of Participants That Complied With Rehabilitation Program

Compliance with the use of the InterACTION device was measured by reports generated from the device. Subjects in the Standard Physical Therapy Group completed exercise logs that were monitored at each study visit.

Time frame: 10 weeks

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Rehabilitation With InterACTIONNumber of Participants That Complied With Rehabilitation ProgramGreater than 90%6 Participants
Rehabilitation With InterACTIONNumber of Participants That Complied With Rehabilitation Program71-90%4 Participants
Rehabilitation With InterACTIONNumber of Participants That Complied With Rehabilitation Program51-70%0 Participants
Rehabilitation With InterACTIONNumber of Participants That Complied With Rehabilitation Program31-50%0 Participants
Rehabilitation With InterACTIONNumber of Participants That Complied With Rehabilitation Program0-30%0 Participants
Rehabilitation With InterACTIONNumber of Participants That Complied With Rehabilitation ProgramMissing Compliance Data0 Participants
Standard Physical TherapyNumber of Participants That Complied With Rehabilitation Program0-30%0 Participants
Standard Physical TherapyNumber of Participants That Complied With Rehabilitation ProgramGreater than 90%5 Participants
Standard Physical TherapyNumber of Participants That Complied With Rehabilitation Program31-50%1 Participants
Standard Physical TherapyNumber of Participants That Complied With Rehabilitation Program71-90%2 Participants
Standard Physical TherapyNumber of Participants That Complied With Rehabilitation ProgramMissing Compliance Data2 Participants
Standard Physical TherapyNumber of Participants That Complied With Rehabilitation Program51-70%0 Participants
Secondary

Number of Subjects Satisfied With InterACTION Device

Subjects in the interACTION group were asked Would you consider using the InterACTION device if you had to do rehabilitation again in the future?

Time frame: 10 weeks

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Rehabilitation With InterACTIONNumber of Subjects Satisfied With InterACTION DeviceYes11 Participants
Rehabilitation With InterACTIONNumber of Subjects Satisfied With InterACTION DeviceNo0 Participants
Secondary

Performance Based Outcome Measures

The performance based measures included the 6-minute walk test (measured as distance in meters); stair climb test (measured as time in seconds divided by the number of steps); timed up and go test (measured in seconds); and unilateral balance test (measured in seconds). To combine the 4 performance-based outcome measures into a single composite score, the score for each test was converted to a z score (individual's score - overall mean)/overall standard deviation. As such, the z-score represents the number of SD deviations an individual's score is above or below the overall study mean. A z-score of 0 implies the participants score is the same as the mean score. A z-score of 0.1 would indicate that the participant's z score is .1 (10%) of a standard deviation above or below the overall mean. The average of the z scores for each performance-based outcome measure as the unit of analysis.

Time frame: 10 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Rehabilitation With InterACTIONPerformance Based Outcome Measures-0.0071 z-scoreStandard Deviation 1.02
Standard Physical TherapyPerformance Based Outcome Measures0.028 z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.64
Secondary

Range of Motion (Extension)

Extension of both knees was measured with a goniometer and the side-to-side difference was expressed in degrees.

Time frame: baseline and 10 weeks

Population: The total number analyzed represents the subjects that did not drop out of the study and completed the 10 weeks follow-up assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Rehabilitation With InterACTIONRange of Motion (Extension)Baseline Active Extension5.3 degreesStandard Deviation 5.6
Rehabilitation With InterACTIONRange of Motion (Extension)10 weeks Active Extension1.6 degreesStandard Deviation 2.5
Standard Physical TherapyRange of Motion (Extension)Baseline Active Extension1.1 degreesStandard Deviation 3.4
Standard Physical TherapyRange of Motion (Extension)10 weeks Active Extension1.7 degreesStandard Deviation 2.5
Secondary

Range of Motion (Flexion)

Flexion of both knees was measured with a goniometer and the side-to-side difference was expressed in degrees.

Time frame: baseline and 10 weeks

Population: The total number analyzed represents the subjects that did not drop out of the study and completed the 10 weeks follow-up assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Rehabilitation With InterACTIONRange of Motion (Flexion)Baseline Active Flexion93.0 degreesStandard Deviation 17.6
Rehabilitation With InterACTIONRange of Motion (Flexion)10 weeks Active Flexion120.8 degreesStandard Deviation 8.6
Standard Physical TherapyRange of Motion (Flexion)Baseline Active Flexion91.5 degreesStandard Deviation 19.3
Standard Physical TherapyRange of Motion (Flexion)10 weeks Active Flexion123.1 degreesStandard Deviation 4.9

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 17, 2026