Skip to content

Comparative Effectiveness of Rehabilitation Interventions for Traumatic Brain Injury

Comparative Effectiveness of Rehabilitation Interventions for Traumatic Brain Injury

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02646176
Acronym
TBI-CER
Enrollment
2130
Registered
2016-01-05
Start date
2008-10-31
Completion date
2012-10-31
Last updated
2021-10-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Brain Injuries

Brief summary

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is increasingly recognized as a significant public health issue, but the most effective rehabilitation methods have yet to be identified. The Institute of Medicine and the Agency for Healthcare Quality and Research sponsored systematic reviews of evidence for comparative effectiveness of rehabilitation interventions for TBI. Both reviews concluded that substantially more research is needed to identify interventions best suited for different individuals. The practice-based evidence (PBE) approach employed to create the data used in the proposed study was a research method recommended to provide greater clarity, along with use of patient-centered outcomes obtained over a longer period of time than used in previous studies. The following specific aims will be addressed in the proposed study: 1. Determine the comparative effectiveness of different therapeutic approaches used in inpatient TBI rehabilitation after statistically adjusting for patient need and ability to benefit from various approaches. Investigators hypothesize: 1.1. Patients who receive a greater proportion of therapy time in Advanced Training (versus Standard of Care) will achieve better outcomes than similar patients who receive a lesser proportion of treatment time in Advanced Training. 1.2. Patients with the greatest initial levels of disability will experience larger effects from Advanced Training therapeutic approaches in comparison to the effects experienced by patients with less disability at admission. 1.3. Patients who receive a greater proportion of therapy in contextualized treatment (versus decontextualized) will achieve better outcomes than similar patients who receive a lesser proportion of time in contextualized treatment. 2. Determine the comparative effectiveness of difference in the delivery of inpatient rehabilitation therapies, after statistically adjusting for patient need and ability to benefit. Investigators hypothesize: 2.1 The level of effort that patients are able to apply in treatment moderates the effectiveness of time in treatment. 2.2 Family involvement in treatment is associated with better outcomes. Data will be drawn from the database established for the TBI Practice-Based Evidence Study (TBI-PBE Study). Data on 2130 persons who received inpatient TBI rehabilitation at any of 10 sites (9 in US, 1 in Canada) were obtained for the study. Detailed longitudinal data were collected prospectively on rehabilitation therapies (with point of care data completed for every clinical encounter), course of recovery, person and injury characteristics and outcomes during and after rehabilitation. Advanced analytic methods (e.g. propensity scores, generalized linear mixed models) will be used to compare the effects of different rehabilitation interventions on outcomes at discharge and during the 9 months following rehabilitation.

Interventions

Inpatient rehabilitation includes activities and interventions provided by occupational, physical, therapeutic recreation and speech therapists, and psychologists.

Sponsors

Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Utah
CollaboratorOTHER
Jennifer Bogner, PhD, ABPP
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
14 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Sustained a TBI, defined as damage to brain tissue caused by external force and evidenced by loss of consciousness, post-traumatic amnesia, skull fracture, or objective neurological findings 2. Diagnosed with an International Classification of Diseases (ICD-9-CM) code consistent with the CDC Guidelines for Surveillance of Central Nervous System Injury 3. Receiving inpatient care on a designated brain injury rehabilitation unit of one of the participating rehabilitation facilities 4. Incurred a TBI severe enough to warrant inpatient rehabilitation regardless of other injuries, with TBI being the predominant reason for rehabilitation admission

Exclusion criteria

1\. None

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Participation9 months post-discharge from inpatient rehabilitationParticipation as measured by the Participation Assessment with Recombined Tools-Objective

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Functional independence-CognitiveUpon completion of inpatient rehabilitation (discharge score), an average of 1 monthFIM-TM Cognitive scales will be used to measure functional independence in the cognitive realm.
Functional independence-MotorUpon completion of inpatient rehabilitation (discharge score), an average of 1 monthFIM-TM Motor scales will be used to measure functional independence in the cognitive realm.
Depressive symptoms3 months post-discharge from inpatient rehabilitationThe Patient Health Questionnaire-9 will be used to measure depressive symptoms.
Life satisfaction3 months post-discharge from inpatient rehabilitationThe Satisfaction with Life Scale will be used to measure life satisfaction
Participation3 months post-dischargeParticipation will be measured using the Participation Assessment with Recombined Tools-Objective

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026