Skip to content

Feasibility Study of the Intravascular Ventricular Assist System (iVAS)

A Clinical Study to Evaluate Ambulatory Counterpulsation for the Treatment of Advanced Heart Failure: A Feasibility Study

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02645539
Enrollment
100
Registered
2016-01-01
Start date
2016-04-30
Completion date
2020-12-31
Last updated
2019-11-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Heart Failure NYHA Class III, Heart Failure NYHA Class IV

Keywords

Heart failure, Bridge-to-transplant, circulatory support, VAD, IABP

Brief summary

The purpose of this feasibility study is to assess the preliminary safety and clinical performance of the intravascular ventricular assist system (iVAS).

Detailed description

This is a single-arm, non-randomized study designed to assess the preliminary safety and clinical performance of the NuPulseCV iVAS. Data obtained from the study will be used to make device modifications, refine the patient population, and inform the design a future clinical trial suitable for assessing longer-term use in heart failure patients.

Interventions

DEVICEintravascular ventricular assist system (iVAS)

A mechanical circulatory support device using the principles of counterpulsation.

Sponsors

NuPulseCV
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Main Inclusion Criteria: 1. At least 18 years of age. 2. If female, are postmenopausal or surgically sterilized, or have a negative pregnancy test within seven (7) days of invasive testing. 3. Advanced heart failure (NYHA Class III or IV) Main

Exclusion criteria

1. Hypotension treated with the following medications: epinephrine, norepinephrine, vasopressin, methylene blue, phenylephrine, or angiotensin II. 2. Receiving more than two inotropes. 3. Subclavian stenosis or stent. 4. Currently receiving circulatory support including ECMO, Impella, TandemLife or equivalents; or any durable VAD. 5. Atrial fibrillation without ventricular pacing. 6. Concomitant, non-cardiac disease process with life expectancy \< 1 year. 7. Significant abnormalities of the aorta, such as aneurysms, coarctation of the aorta, or an extremely tortuous aorta. 8. Severe end-organ dysfunction or failure. 9. Any other condition the heart team believes inappropriate for this study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Survival to transplant or stroke-free survival30 days

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Number of patients demonstrating improvement in Seattle Heart Failure Model Score30 days
Number of patients who deteriorate requiring escalation of treatment30 days
Rate of occurrence of all adverse events30 days
Number of patients demonstrating improvement six minute walk test (6MWT) and two minute step test (2MST)30 days
Rate of occurrence of serious device-related adverse events30 days
Number of patients demonstrating improvement in NYHA Classification30 days
Number of patients demonstrating improvement in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) - quality of life (QOL)30 days
Rate of occurrence of procedure-related adverse events30 days

Countries

United States

Contacts

Primary ContactLori Rhoten
CTT@nupulsecv.com1-800-216-1778

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 18, 2026