Skip to content

Consequence of the Learning Curve in Direct Anterior Approach for Total Hip Replacement

Consequence of the Learning Curve in Direct Anterior Approach for Total Hip Replacement

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02645435
Enrollment
69
Registered
2016-01-01
Start date
2015-12-31
Completion date
2015-12-31
Last updated
2016-01-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Arthropathy of Hip, Surgery

Brief summary

Background: Direct anterior approach to the hip (DAA) is being considered as one of the most promising minimally-invasive approaches in total hip arthroplasty (THA). Purpose of this study is to analyse influence of learning curve on clinical and radiographic outcome in direct anterior approach (DAA) for total hip replacement. Methods: The first 30 patients operated with DAA (group B) were compared to 39 patients operated by Hardinge approach (group A). Peri-and postoperative complications, Harris Hip Score (HHS), implant positioning, experienced pain and patient satisfaction were evaluated at a mean follow-up of 32 months.

Detailed description

Direct anterior approach to the hip (DAA) is being considered as one of the most promising minimally-invasive approaches in total hip arthroplasty (THA). Purpose of this study is to analyse influence of learning curve on clinical and radiographic outcome in direct anterior approach (DAA) for total hip replacement. Methods: The first 30 patients operated with DAA (group B) were compared to 39 patients operated by Hardinge approach (group A). Peri-and postoperative complications, Harris Hip Score (HHS), implant positioning, experienced pain and patient satisfaction were evaluated at a mean follow-up of 32 months.

Interventions

PROCEDUREhip replacement

Total hip replacement

Sponsors

Azienda Ospedaliera Bolognini di Seriate Bergamo
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Hip arthritis

Exclusion criteria

* BMI\>35

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Clinical outcome of direct hip approach32 monthsHarry's hip score, a clinical score used in orthopedic surgery to describe outcome of hip function

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
radiological positioning of cup in the replaced hip32 monthsusing standard x-ray of the hip placement of implants is measured in angles between the iliac line and component line for the cup
radiological positioning of the stem in replaced hip32 monthsusing standard x-ray of the hip placement of implants is measured in angles between the axis of implant and femoral axis

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026