Orthodontic Anchorage Procedures, Orthodontic Space Closure
Conditions
Keywords
Miniscrew, Temporary anchorage device (TAD), mini-implants, Miniscrew implant (MSI)
Brief summary
The purpose of this trial is to study and compare two different anchorage techniques. Adolescent patients in need for orthodontic treatment are randomized into Group A and B. Both groups are treated with extractions of the maxillary first premolars and fixed appliance. Anchorage is reinforced by miniscrews in Group A and by molarblock in Group B. The hypotheses are: * that placement of miniscrews does not cause more pain or discomfort than premolar extractions * that molarblock provides increase of anchorage * that miniscrews have a better anchorage capacity than molarblock * that miniscrews are more cost-efficient than conventional anchorage techniques
Detailed description
Participants are recruited from the orthodontic specialist clinic in Gävle, Sweden. After informed consent participants are randomized into Group A and B. The treatment starts with extractions of the maxillary first premolars. Extractions are performed by the participants´ general practitioner. Orthodontic treatment starts after the tooth extractions. All participants get treatment with fixed appliance according to the straight wire concept (3M Victory brackets, .022 slot size, McLaughlin-Bennet-Trevesi prescription). The recommended wire sequence is: .016 Heat Activated Nickel Titanium, .019x.025 Heat Activated Nickel Titanium, .019x.025 Stainless Steel. Treatment time is about two years. The following measurements are taken at: T0 (Before treatment start): Study models, baseline questionnaire, T1 (after tooth extractions, before the orthodontic treatment): Study models, cephalographic x-ray, questionnaire at the evening after tooth extractions, questionnaire one week after tooth extractions. T2 (After miniscrew placement (Group A), Before space closure): Study models, cephalographic x-ray, questionnaire at the evening after miniscrew placement, questionnaire one week after miniscrew placement. T3 (After space closure and miniscrew removal): Study models, cephalographic x-ray, questionnaire after screw removal
Interventions
DRUGTopical anesthesia (buccal and palatal)
Saliva is removed with a sterile swab followed by application of 5% Lidocaine gel (APL, Sweden) on the gingiva.
DRUGLocal anesthesia (buccal and palatal)
Injection of 1,5 ml Xylocaine Dental Adrenaline (Lidocaine hydrochloride 20 mg/ml, adrenaline 12.5 µg/ml, Dentsply Pharmaceutical, Weybridge, Surrey, UK).
PROCEDUREExtraction of the maxillary first premolars
Careful extraction of the maxillary first premolars after mobilization.
DRUGTopical anesthesia (buccal)
Saliva is removed with a sterile swab followed by application of 5% Lidocaine gel (APL, Sweden) on the gingiva.
DRUGLocal anesthesia (buccal)
Injection of 0.3 ml Xylocaine Dental Adrenaline (Lidocaine hydrochloride 20 mg/ml, adrenaline 12.5 µg/ml, Dentsply Pharmaceutical, Weybridge, Surrey, UK).
DEVICEMolarblock
Molarblock is a Stainless steel ligature connecting the maxillary second premolar with the maxillary first and second molar.
DEVICESpider Screw K1 short neck
The Spider Screw K1 (Health Development Company, Sarcedo, Italy) is a self-drilling and self-tapping screw. Short neck screws (SCR-1508 and SCR-1510) with a diameter of 1.5 mm and length 8 or 10 mm are used.
Sponsors
Malmö University
Department of Research and Development, County Council of Gavleborg and Uppsala University
Swedish Dental Associations Scientific Funds
Thuréus Foundation for the Promotion of Dental Science, Uppsala University, Sweden
Region Gävleborg
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
11 Years to 20 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
* Adolescents in need of orthodontic treatment with fixed appliance including extractions of the maxillary first premolars * Need for Anchorage reinforcement * Permanent dentition including the maxillary second molars in occlusion (DS4M2 according to Björk) * Regular dental care in Sweden since the age of three.
Exclusion criteria
* Experience of previous orthodontic treatment * Need for orthognathic surgery * Need for maximum anchorage.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Tooth Position of the Maxillary Molars During Space Closure | Through Space Closure (T2-T3), an average of 9 months | Tooth movement is assessed in millimeters using superimposition of study models and lateral cephalograms. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Experience of Pain and Discomfort | Baseline, the evening after tooth extractions, one week after tooth extractions, the evening after miniscrew placement, one week after miniscrew placement | Experiences of pain and discomfort are examined with validated self-report questionnaires. |
| Change in Tooth Position of the Maxillary Molars During Levelling and Alignment | Through Levelling and Alignment (T1-T2), an average of 9 months | Tooth movement is assessed in millimeters using superimposition of study models and lateral cephalograms. |
| Societal Costs | Through Study Completion, an average of 2 years | Societal costs are the sum of direct and indirect treatment costs. Direct costs are treatment time in the clinic and used material. Indirect costs are travel costs and costs for parents following the participant to the clinic. |
Countries
Sweden
Outcome results
None listed