Skip to content

SPI-2012 vs Pegfilgrastim in the Management of Neutropenia in Participants With Breast Cancer With Docetaxel and Cyclophosphamide (ADVANCE)

RAnDomized Trial of SPI-2012 Versus Pegfilgrastim in the Management of Chemotherapy Induced Neutropenia in Breast CANCEr Patients Receiving Docetaxel and Cyclophosphamide (TC) (ADVANCE)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02643420
Acronym
ADVANCE
Enrollment
406
Registered
2015-12-31
Start date
2016-01-19
Completion date
2018-10-31
Last updated
2022-03-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Breast Cancer, Neutropenia

Keywords

Neutropenia, Breast Cancer, Long-acting Myeloid Growth Factor, Early Stage Breast Cancer, Docetaxel + Cyclophosphamide (TC) chemotherapy

Brief summary

The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of a single dose of SPI-2012 versus pegfilgrastim in participants with early-stage breast cancer receiving docetaxel and cyclophosphamide (TC), as measured by the duration of severe neutropenia (DSN) in Cycle 1.

Detailed description

This was a Phase 3, randomized, open-label, active-controlled, multicenter study to compare the efficacy and safety of SPI-2012 vs pegfilgrastim in participants with breast cancer treated with TC chemotherapy. Each cycle was 21 days. Four cycles were evaluated in this study. On Day 1 of each cycle, participants received TC chemotherapy. On Day 2 of each cycle, participants received study drug (SPI-2012 or pegfilgrastim).

Interventions

Single-use syringes for subcutaneous injection, administered on Day 2 of each cycle

DRUGPegfilgrastim

Single-dose subcutaneous injection administered on Day 2 of each cycle

DRUGDocetaxel

Standard therapy

DRUGCyclophosphamide

Standard therapy

Sponsors

Spectrum Pharmaceuticals, Inc
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Key Inclusion Criteria: * New diagnosis of histologically confirmed early-stage breast cancer (ESBC), defined as operable Stage I to Stage IIIA breast cancer * Candidate for adjuvant or neoadjuvant TC chemotherapy * Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance score ≤ 2 * Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) ≥ 1.5×10\^9/L * Platelet count ≥ 100×10\^9/L * Hemoglobin \> 9 g/dL * Creatinine clearance \> 50 mL/min * Total bilirubin ≤ 1.5 mg/dL * Aspartate Aminotransferase per Serum Glutamic-Oxaloacetic Transaminase (AST/SGOT) and Alanine Aminotransferase per Serum Glutamic-Pyruvic Transaminase (ALT/SGPT) ≤ 2.5× Upper Limit of Normal (ULN). * Alkaline phosphatase ≤ 2.0×ULN Key

Exclusion criteria

* Active concurrent malignancy (except non-melanoma skin cancer or carcinoma in situ of the cervix) or life-threatening disease * Locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer * Known sensitivity to E. coli -derived products or to any products to be administered during dosing * Concurrent adjuvant cancer therapy * Previous exposure to filgrastim, pegfilgrastim, or other G-CSF products in clinical development within 12 months prior to the administration of study drug * Active infection, receiving anti-infectives, or any serious underlying medical condition that would impair ability to receive protocol treatment * Prior bone marrow or stem cell transplant * Use of any investigational drugs, biologics, or devices within 30 days prior to study treatment or plans to use any of these during the course of the study * Radiation therapy within 30 days prior to enrollment * Major surgery within 30 days prior to enrollment

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Duration of Severe Neutropenia (DSN) in Cycle 1Day 1 and Days 4-15 in Cycle 1 (each cycle was 21 days)DSN was defined as the number of days of severe neutropenia (absolute neutrophil count \[ANC\] \<0.5×10\^9/L), after the administration of study drug in Cycle 1.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Depth of Absolute Neutrophil Count (ANC) Nadir in Cycle 1Day 1 and Days 4, 15 in Cycle 1 (each cycle was 21 days)Depth of ANC Nadir was defined as the lowest ANC value after administration of study drug (SPI-2012 or Pegfilgrastim) in Cycle 1.
Number of Participants With Febrile Neutropenia (FN) in Cycle 1Day 1 and Days 4, 15 in Cycle 1 (each cycle was 21 days)FN was defined as an oral temperature \> 38.3 degrees Celsius (C) (101.0 degrees Fahrenheit \[F\]) or two consecutive readings of \>=38.0 degrees C (100.4 degrees F) for 2 hours and ANC \<1.0×10\^9/L.
Duration of Severe Neutropenia in Cycle 2, 3 and 4Days 1, 4, 7, 10, and 15 in cycles 2, 3, and 4 (each cycle was 21 days)DSN was defined as the number of days of severe neutropenia (ANC \<0.5×10\^9 /L) from the first occurrence of an ANC below the threshold in Cycles 2, 3, and 4.
Time to Absolute Neutrophil Count (ANC) Recovery in Cycle 1Day 1 and Days 4, 15 in Cycle 1 (each cycle was 21 days)Time to ANC Recovery was defined as the time from chemotherapy administration until ANC increased to ≥1.5×10\^9/L after the expected nadir within Cycle 1. Time to ANC recovery was assigned as 0 for participants whose ANC value never dropped below 1.5 x10\^9/L.
Number of Participants With Febrile Neutropenia in Cycles 2, 3, and 4Days 1, 4, 7, 10, and 15 of Cycles 2, 3, and 4 (each cycle was 21 days)FN was defined as an oral temperature \> 38.3 degrees C (101.0 degrees Fahrenheit \[F\]) or two consecutive readings of \>=38.0 degrees C (100.4 degrees F) for 2 hours and ANC \<1.0×10\^9/L.
Relative Dose Intensity (RDI) of TC (Docetaxel + Cyclophosphamide) in Cycles 1 to 4Cycles 1 to 4 (each cycle was 21 days)RDI was defined as the percentage of the planned dose that each participant actually received during the study, expressed as the total dose received, divided by the total dose planned and multiplied by 100. The planned dose was defined as the dose that would be given if no doses were missed and/or no dose reductions were made for the number of cycles started. The total planned dose was the sum of planned doses over all cycles.
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)From the first dose of TC (Docetaxel + Cyclophosphamide) until 12 months after the last dose of study treatment (up to approximately 34 months)An adverse event (AE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product or study procedure, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. A TEAE for Treatment Period is defined as adverse event with an onset date on or after the date of study drug administration through the end of treatment. TEAE for follow up is defined as any new onset or ongoing AE at the end of Treatment. SAE is defined as any AE which meets any of the following criteria: results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in a persistent or significant disability/incapacity, results in a congenital anomaly/birth defect, includes important medical events.
Number of Participants With Neutropenic Complications in Cycle 1Day 1 and Days 4, 15 in Cycle 1 (each cycle was 21 days)Neutropenic complications refer to hospitalizations due to neutropenic events and/or the use of anti-infectives due to neutropenia.

Countries

Canada, South Korea, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants were enrolled from 19 Jan 2016 to 31 Oct 2018. A total of 406 participants were randomized in the study.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Arm 1: SPI-2012 and TC
Participants received SPI-2012 13.2 mg/0.6mL (3.6 mg G-CSF) fixed-dose SC injection once per cycle on Day 2 of each cycle up to Cycle 4 (each cycle was 21 days), approximately 24-26 hours after TC chemotherapy administration. TC chemotherapy was administered on Day 1 of each cycle and included Docetaxel 75 mg/m\^2 IV infusion and Cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m\^2 IV infusion per institute's standard of care.
196
Arm 2: Pegfilgrastim and TC
Participants received pegfilgrastim 6 mg SC injection once per cycle on Day 2 of each cycle up to Cycle 4 (each cycle was 21 days), approximately 24-26 hours after TC chemotherapy administration. TC chemotherapy on Day 1 of each cycle included Docetaxel 75 mg/m\^2 IV infusion and Cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m\^2 IV infusion per institute's standard of care.
210
Total406

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyDeath02
Overall StudyInitiation of Non-Protocol Therapy for Breast Cancer612
Overall StudyInvestigator Decision24
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up610
Overall StudyReason not Specified87
Overall StudySponsor decision11
Overall StudyTreatment with Additional Myeloid Growth Factors During Follow-up610
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject2519

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalArm 1: SPI-2012 and TCArm 2: Pegfilgrastim and TC
Age, Continuous59.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.47
59.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.12
59.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.79
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
74 Participants34 Participants40 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
332 Participants162 Participants170 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian or Alaska Native
2 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
18 Participants9 Participants9 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
58 Participants26 Participants32 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
12 Participants4 Participants8 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White or Caucasian
315 Participants156 Participants159 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
404 Participants195 Participants209 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
2 Participants1 Participants1 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 1971 / 2080 / 1971 / 208
other
Total, other adverse events
192 / 197203 / 20892 / 19782 / 208
serious
Total, serious adverse events
36 / 19729 / 2088 / 1972 / 208

Outcome results

Primary

Duration of Severe Neutropenia (DSN) in Cycle 1

DSN was defined as the number of days of severe neutropenia (absolute neutrophil count \[ANC\] \<0.5×10\^9/L), after the administration of study drug in Cycle 1.

Time frame: Day 1 and Days 4-15 in Cycle 1 (each cycle was 21 days)

Population: The ITT population included all participants who were randomized.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Arm 1: SPI-2012 and TCDuration of Severe Neutropenia (DSN) in Cycle 10.20 daysStandard Deviation 0.503
Arm 2: Pegfilgrastim and TCDuration of Severe Neutropenia (DSN) in Cycle 10.35 daysStandard Deviation 0.683
p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-0.266, -0.031]t-statistics
Secondary

Depth of Absolute Neutrophil Count (ANC) Nadir in Cycle 1

Depth of ANC Nadir was defined as the lowest ANC value after administration of study drug (SPI-2012 or Pegfilgrastim) in Cycle 1.

Time frame: Day 1 and Days 4, 15 in Cycle 1 (each cycle was 21 days)

Population: The ITT population included all participants who were randomized. Here, Overall number of participants analyzed signifies participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Arm 1: SPI-2012 and TCDepth of Absolute Neutrophil Count (ANC) Nadir in Cycle 12.56 10^9 ANC/LStandard Deviation 3.086
Arm 2: Pegfilgrastim and TCDepth of Absolute Neutrophil Count (ANC) Nadir in Cycle 12.53 10^9 ANC/LStandard Deviation 3.317
p-value: 0.15595% CI: [0.93, 1.56]Asymptotic normality assumption
Secondary

Duration of Severe Neutropenia in Cycle 2, 3 and 4

DSN was defined as the number of days of severe neutropenia (ANC \<0.5×10\^9 /L) from the first occurrence of an ANC below the threshold in Cycles 2, 3, and 4.

Time frame: Days 1, 4, 7, 10, and 15 in cycles 2, 3, and 4 (each cycle was 21 days)

Population: The ITT population included all participants who were randomized.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Arm 1: SPI-2012 and TCDuration of Severe Neutropenia in Cycle 2, 3 and 4Cycle 20.13 daysStandard Deviation 0.383
Arm 1: SPI-2012 and TCDuration of Severe Neutropenia in Cycle 2, 3 and 4Cycle 30.11 daysStandard Deviation 0.326
Arm 1: SPI-2012 and TCDuration of Severe Neutropenia in Cycle 2, 3 and 4Cycle 40.11 daysStandard Deviation 0.362
Arm 2: Pegfilgrastim and TCDuration of Severe Neutropenia in Cycle 2, 3 and 4Cycle 20.09 daysStandard Deviation 0.374
Arm 2: Pegfilgrastim and TCDuration of Severe Neutropenia in Cycle 2, 3 and 4Cycle 30.08 daysStandard Deviation 0.273
Arm 2: Pegfilgrastim and TCDuration of Severe Neutropenia in Cycle 2, 3 and 4Cycle 40.09 daysStandard Deviation 0.281
Comparison: DSN in Cycle 2p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-0.032, 0.116]t-statistics
Comparison: DSN in Cycle 3p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-0.032, 0.085]t-statistics
Comparison: DSN in Cycle 4p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-0.036, 0.089]t-statistics
Secondary

Number of Participants With Febrile Neutropenia (FN) in Cycle 1

FN was defined as an oral temperature \> 38.3 degrees Celsius (C) (101.0 degrees Fahrenheit \[F\]) or two consecutive readings of \>=38.0 degrees C (100.4 degrees F) for 2 hours and ANC \<1.0×10\^9/L.

Time frame: Day 1 and Days 4, 15 in Cycle 1 (each cycle was 21 days)

Population: The ITT population included all participants who were randomized.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Arm 1: SPI-2012 and TCNumber of Participants With Febrile Neutropenia (FN) in Cycle 14 Participants
Arm 2: Pegfilgrastim and TCNumber of Participants With Febrile Neutropenia (FN) in Cycle 12 Participants
p-value: 0.43595% CI: [-8.6, 10.8]Fisher Exact
Secondary

Number of Participants With Febrile Neutropenia in Cycles 2, 3, and 4

FN was defined as an oral temperature \> 38.3 degrees C (101.0 degrees Fahrenheit \[F\]) or two consecutive readings of \>=38.0 degrees C (100.4 degrees F) for 2 hours and ANC \<1.0×10\^9/L.

Time frame: Days 1, 4, 7, 10, and 15 of Cycles 2, 3, and 4 (each cycle was 21 days)

Population: The ITT population included all participants who were randomized

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Arm 1: SPI-2012 and TCNumber of Participants With Febrile Neutropenia in Cycles 2, 3, and 4Cycle 21 Participants
Arm 1: SPI-2012 and TCNumber of Participants With Febrile Neutropenia in Cycles 2, 3, and 4Cycle 34 Participants
Arm 1: SPI-2012 and TCNumber of Participants With Febrile Neutropenia in Cycles 2, 3, and 4Cycle 42 Participants
Arm 2: Pegfilgrastim and TCNumber of Participants With Febrile Neutropenia in Cycles 2, 3, and 4Cycle 21 Participants
Arm 2: Pegfilgrastim and TCNumber of Participants With Febrile Neutropenia in Cycles 2, 3, and 4Cycle 31 Participants
Arm 2: Pegfilgrastim and TCNumber of Participants With Febrile Neutropenia in Cycles 2, 3, and 4Cycle 40 Participants
Comparison: FN in Cycle 2p-value: 195% CI: [-9.7, 9.8]Fisher Exact
Comparison: FN in Cycle 3p-value: 0.20195% CI: [-8.2, 11.3]Fisher Exact
Comparison: FN in Cycle 4p-value: 0.23295% CI: [-8.7, 10.8]Fisher Exact
Secondary

Number of Participants With Neutropenic Complications in Cycle 1

Neutropenic complications refer to hospitalizations due to neutropenic events and/or the use of anti-infectives due to neutropenia.

Time frame: Day 1 and Days 4, 15 in Cycle 1 (each cycle was 21 days)

Population: The ITT population included all participants who was randomized.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Arm 1: SPI-2012 and TCNumber of Participants With Neutropenic Complications in Cycle 18 Participants
Arm 2: Pegfilgrastim and TCNumber of Participants With Neutropenic Complications in Cycle 18 Participants
p-value: 195% CI: [-9.5, 10]Fisher Exact
Secondary

Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

An adverse event (AE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product or study procedure, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. A TEAE for Treatment Period is defined as adverse event with an onset date on or after the date of study drug administration through the end of treatment. TEAE for follow up is defined as any new onset or ongoing AE at the end of Treatment. SAE is defined as any AE which meets any of the following criteria: results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in a persistent or significant disability/incapacity, results in a congenital anomaly/birth defect, includes important medical events.

Time frame: From the first dose of TC (Docetaxel + Cyclophosphamide) until 12 months after the last dose of study treatment (up to approximately 34 months)

Population: Safety Population included all participants who received at least one dose of any protocol-specified drug (TC, SPI-2012 or pegfilgrastim). One participant was randomized to pegfilgrastim but was given SPI-2012 in Safety Population. Data was summarized and reported separately for Treatment Period and Follow-up Period.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Arm 1: SPI-2012 and TCNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)TEAE192 Participants
Arm 1: SPI-2012 and TCNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)SAE36 Participants
Arm 2: Pegfilgrastim and TCNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)SAE29 Participants
Arm 2: Pegfilgrastim and TCNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)TEAE204 Participants
Arm 1: SPI-2012 and TC - Follow up PeriodNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)TEAE95 Participants
Arm 1: SPI-2012 and TC - Follow up PeriodNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)SAE8 Participants
Arm 2: Pegfilgrastim and TC - Follow up PeriodNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)TEAE83 Participants
Arm 2: Pegfilgrastim and TC - Follow up PeriodNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)SAE2 Participants
Secondary

Relative Dose Intensity (RDI) of TC (Docetaxel + Cyclophosphamide) in Cycles 1 to 4

RDI was defined as the percentage of the planned dose that each participant actually received during the study, expressed as the total dose received, divided by the total dose planned and multiplied by 100. The planned dose was defined as the dose that would be given if no doses were missed and/or no dose reductions were made for the number of cycles started. The total planned dose was the sum of planned doses over all cycles.

Time frame: Cycles 1 to 4 (each cycle was 21 days)

Population: Safety Population included all participants who received at least one dose of any protocol-specified drug (TC, SPI-2012 or pegfilgrastim). One participant was randomized to pegfilgrastim but was given SPI-2012 in Safety Population.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Arm 1: SPI-2012 and TCRelative Dose Intensity (RDI) of TC (Docetaxel + Cyclophosphamide) in Cycles 1 to 4Docetaxel99.1 percentage of planned doseStandard Deviation 5.47
Arm 1: SPI-2012 and TCRelative Dose Intensity (RDI) of TC (Docetaxel + Cyclophosphamide) in Cycles 1 to 4Cyclophosphamide99.3 percentage of planned doseStandard Deviation 3.86
Arm 2: Pegfilgrastim and TCRelative Dose Intensity (RDI) of TC (Docetaxel + Cyclophosphamide) in Cycles 1 to 4Docetaxel98.1 percentage of planned doseStandard Deviation 8.45
Arm 2: Pegfilgrastim and TCRelative Dose Intensity (RDI) of TC (Docetaxel + Cyclophosphamide) in Cycles 1 to 4Cyclophosphamide99.0 percentage of planned doseStandard Deviation 4.33
Secondary

Time to Absolute Neutrophil Count (ANC) Recovery in Cycle 1

Time to ANC Recovery was defined as the time from chemotherapy administration until ANC increased to ≥1.5×10\^9/L after the expected nadir within Cycle 1. Time to ANC recovery was assigned as 0 for participants whose ANC value never dropped below 1.5 x10\^9/L.

Time frame: Day 1 and Days 4, 15 in Cycle 1 (each cycle was 21 days)

Population: The ITT population included all participants who were randomized.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Arm 1: SPI-2012 and TCTime to Absolute Neutrophil Count (ANC) Recovery in Cycle 13.24 daysStandard Deviation 3.565
Arm 2: Pegfilgrastim and TCTime to Absolute Neutrophil Count (ANC) Recovery in Cycle 13.49 daysStandard Deviation 3.589
p-value: 0.68595% CI: [-1.43, 0.94]Negative binomial regression

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 24, 2026