Skip to content

Stylet Use for McGrath Videolaryngoscope

Comparison of With or Without Use of Stylet for Endotracheal Intubation With McGrath Videolaryngoscope

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02642367
Enrollment
140
Registered
2015-12-30
Start date
2016-01-31
Completion date
2016-05-31
Last updated
2016-11-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Orotracheal Intubation

Brief summary

The routine use of a styletted endotracheal tube during videolaryngoscopy is advocated by some manufacturers, but styletted endotracheal tube can elicit rare but potentially serious complications. We compared the intubation time and success rate whether or not use of stylet for endotracheal intubation with McGrath videolaryngoscope.

Interventions

without use of stylet

DEVICEMcGrath videolaryngoscope with Intubating stylet (Mallinckrodt)

use of stylet

DRUGrocuronium

tracehal intubation was performed 2 min after rocuronium injection with McGrath videolaryngoscope

Sponsors

Ajou University School of Medicine
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
19 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I or II undergoing orotracheal intubation for elective surgery

Exclusion criteria

* cervical spine injury * rapid sequence induction * body mass index\> 35 kg/m2 * airway pathology

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
intubation time2 min after rocuronium injectiontime the blade passed the lips until endtidal CO2 was detected

Countries

South Korea

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026