Skip to content

Efficacy and Safety of Alirocumab Versus Usual Care on Top of Maximally Tolerated Statin Therapy in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes and Mixed Dyslipidemia (ODYSSEY DM-Dyslipidemia)

A Randomized, Open-Label, Parallel Group Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Alirocumab Versus Usual Care in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes and Mixed Dyslipidemia at High Cardiovascular Risk With Non-HDL-C Not Adequately Controlled With Maximally Tolerated Statin Therapy

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02642159
Enrollment
413
Registered
2015-12-30
Start date
2016-03-15
Completion date
2017-05-15
Last updated
2018-05-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Dyslipidemia

Brief summary

Primary Objective: To demonstrate the superiority of alirocumab in comparison with usual care in the reduction of non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C) in participants with type 2 diabetes and mixed dyslipidemia at high cardiovascular risk with non-HDL-C not adequately controlled with maximally tolerated statin therapy. Secondary Objectives: * To demonstrate whether alirocumab is superior in comparison with usual care in its effects on other lipid parameters (ie, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), apolipoprotein B (Apo B), total cholesterol (Total -C), lipoprotein a (Lp\[a\]), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), triglycerides (TGs), triglyceride rich lipoproteins (TGRLs), apolipoprotein A-1 (Apo A-1), apolipoprotein C-III (Apo C-III), lipid subfractions by nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy (ie, LDL-C particle size and LDL, very low-density lipoprotein \[VLDL\], HDL, and intermediate-density lipoprotein \[IDL\] particle number). * To assess changes in glycemic parameters with alirocumab vs. usual care treatment. * To demonstrate the safety and tolerability of alirocumab. * To evaluate treatment acceptance of alirocumab. * To evaluate proprotein convertase subtilisin kexin type 9 (PCSK9) concentrations and antibody development. * To demonstrate the superiority of alirocumab vs. fenofibrate on non-HDL-C and other lipid parameters (subgroup analysis).

Detailed description

The maximum study duration was approximately 9 months per participant, including a 6 month treatment period, a screening period of up to 3 weeks, and an 8 week safety observation period. For the purpose of scientific communication, a first-step analysis (both efficacy and safety) was performed at the Week 24 cut-off date. A second-step analysis was performed once all participants had completed the study to include a final update of the safety analysis.

Interventions

DRUGAlirocumab

Solution for injection, one subcutaneous injection in the abdomen, thigh, or outer area of upper arm with a disposable auto-injector.

Statins at stable dose without other LMT as clinically indicated.

DRUGEzetimibe

Pharmaceutical form: tablet Route of administration: oral

DRUGFenofibrate

Pharmaceutical form: tablet Route of administration: oral

Pharmaceutical form: tablet Route of administration: oral

DRUGOmega-3 fatty acids

Pharmaceutical form: tablet Route of administration: oral

Insulin (injectable or inhaled) or other antihyperglycemic drugs as clinically indicated.

Sponsors

Regeneron Pharmaceuticals
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Sanofi
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Participants with type 2 diabetes and mixed dyslipidemia whose non-HDL-C was not adequately controlled with a stable, maximum dose/regimen of statin that was tolerated by the participant. * 18 years of age or more. * Documented history of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) or at least one additional cardiovascular risk factor. * Non-HDL-C of 100 mg/dL or greater. * Triglycerides greater than or equal to 150 mg/dL and less than 500 mg/dL. * Stable anti-hyperglycemic agents for at least 3 months prior to the screening visit and between screening and randomization (including stable insulin dose defined as no variation more than 30% in daily insulin dose within the preceding 3 months, as judged by the Investigator). * No change in weight of more than 5 kg within the prior 3 months. * On stable dose of medications that are known to influence weight and/or lipids within the last 3 months.

Exclusion criteria

* Use of any lipid modifying therapies other than statins within the last 4 weeks (eg, ezetimibe, fenofibrate, nicotinic acid, omega-3 fatty acids, etc.) or use of over the counter products/nutraceuticals known to impact lipids (eg, red yeast rice) within the last 4 weeks. * Currently drinking more than 2 standard alcoholic drinks per day. * Body Mass Index (BMI) \>45 kg/m² or currently enrolled in a weight loss program and still in active phase of weight loss. * Glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) 9% or greater. The above information was not intended to contain all considerations relevant to a participant's potential participation in a clinical trial.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percent Change From Baseline in Non-HDL-C at Week 24: Overall Intent-to-treat (ITT) AnalysisFrom Baseline to Week 24Adjusted Least-squares (LS) means and standard errors at Week 24 were obtained from a mixed-effect model with repeated measures (MMRM) to account for missing data. All available post-baseline data from Week 8 to Week 24 regardless of status on- or off-treatment were used in the model (ITT analysis).
Percent Change From Baseline in Non-HDL-C at Week 24: ITT- Intent to Prescribe Fenofibrate StratumFrom Baseline to Week 24Adjusted LS means and standard errors at Week 24 from MMRM model including all available post-baseline data from Week 8 to Week 24 regardless of status on- or off-treatment in the intent to prescribe fenofibrate stratum. The usual care here corresponds to fenofibrate.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percent Change From Baseline in Non-HDL-C at Week 12: Overall ITT AnalysisFrom Baseline to Week 24Adjusted LS means and standard errors at Week 12 from MMRM model including all available post-baseline data from Week 8 to Week 24 regardless of status on- or off-treatment.
Percent Change From Baseline in Non-HDL-C at Week 12: ITT- Intent to Prescribe Fenofibrate StratumFrom Baseline to Week 24Adjusted LS means and standard errors at Week 12 from MMRM model including all available post-baseline data from Week 8 to Week 24 regardless of status on- or off-treatment in the intent to prescribe fenofibrate stratum. The usual care here corresponds to fenofibrate.
Percent Change From Baseline in Measured LDL-C at Week 12: Overall ITT AnalysisFrom Baseline to Week 24Measured LDL-C values via beta quantification method. Adjusted LS means and standard errors at Week 12 from MMRM model including available post-baseline data from Week 8 to Week 24 regardless of status on- or off-treatment.
Percent Change From Baseline in Measured LDL-C at Week 12: ITT- Intent to Prescribe Fenofibrate StratumFrom Baseline to Week 24Measured LDL-C values via beta quantification method. Adjusted LS means and standard errors at Week 12 from MMRM model including available post-baseline data from Week 8 to Week 24 regardless of status on- or off-treatment in the intent to prescribe fenofibrate stratum. The usual care here corresponds to fenofibrate.
Percent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein B (Apo-B) at Week 24: Overall ITT AnalysisFrom Baseline to Week 24Adjusted LS means and standard errors at Week 24 from MMRM model including all available post-baseline data from Week 8 to Week 24 regardless of status on- or off-treatment.
Percent Change From Baseline in Apo B at Week 24: ITT- Intent to Prescribe Fenofibrate StratumFrom Baseline to Week 24Adjusted LS means and standard errors at Week 24 from MMRM model including all available post-baseline data from Week 8 to Week 24 regardless of status on- or off-treatment in the intent to prescribe fenofibrate stratum. The usual care here corresponds to fenofibrate.
Percent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol (Total-C) at Week 24 : Overall ITT AnalysisFrom Baseline to Week 24Adjusted LS means and standard errors at Week 24 from MMRM model including all available post-baseline data from Week 8 to Week 24 regardless of status on- or off-treatment.
Percent Change From Baseline in Total-C at Week 24: ITT- Intent to Prescribe Fenofibrate StratumFrom Baseline to Week 24Adjusted LS means and standard errors at Week 24 from MMRM model including all available post-baseline data from Week 8 to Week 24 regardless of status on- or off-treatment in the intent to prescribe fenofibrate stratum. The usual care here corresponds to fenofibrate.
Percent Change From Baseline in Lipoprotein(a) at Week 24 : Overall ITT AnalysisFrom Baseline to Week 24Adjusted means and standard errors at Week 24 were obtained from multiple imputation approach followed by robust regression model for handling of missing data. All available post-baseline data from Week 8 to Week 24 regardless of status on- or off-treatment were included in the imputation model.
Percent Change From Baseline in Measured Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) at Week 24: Overall ITT AnalysisFrom Baseline to Week 24Measured LDL-C values via beta quantification method. Adjusted LS means and standard errors at Week 24 from MMRM model including available post-baseline data from Week 8 to Week 24 regardless of status on- or off-treatment.
Percent Change From Baseline in Fasting Triglycerides at Week 24: Overall ITT AnalysisFrom Baseline to Week 24Adjusted means and standard errors at Week 24 from multiple imputation approach followed by robust regression model including all available post-baseline data from Week 8 to Week 24 regardless of status on- or off-treatment.
Percent Change From Baseline in Fasting Triglycerides at Week 24: ITT- Intent to Prescribe Fenofibrate StratumFrom Baseline to Week 24Adjusted means and standard errors at Week 24 from multiple imputation approach followed by robust regression model including all available post-baseline data from Week 8 to Week 24 regardless of status on- or off-treatment in the intent to prescribe fenofibrate stratum. The usual care here corresponds to fenofibrate.
Percent Change From Baseline in HDL-C at Week 24 : Overall ITT AnalysisFrom Baseline to Week 24Adjusted LS means and standard errors at Week 24 from MMRM model including all available post-baseline data from Week 8 to Week 24 regardless of status on- or off-treatment.
Percent Change From Baseline in HDL-C at Week 24: ITT- Intent to Prescribe Fenofibrate StratumFrom Baseline to Week 24Adjusted LS means and standard errors at Week 24 from MMRM model including all available post-baseline data from Week 8 to Week 24 regardless of status on- or off-treatment in the intent to prescribe fenofibrate stratum. The usual care here corresponds to fenofibrate.
Percent Change From Baseline in LDL-C Particle Number at Week 24: Overall ITT AnalysisFrom Baseline to Week 24LDL-C particle number was calculated from lipid subfractions by nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy. Adjusted LS means and standard errors at Week 24 from MMRM model including all available post-baseline data from Week 8 to Week 24 regardless of status on- or off-treatment.
Percent Change From Baseline in LDL-C Particle Number at Week 24: ITT- Intent to Prescribe Fenofibrate StratumFrom Baseline to Week 24LDL-C particle number was calculated from lipid subfractions by NMR spectroscopy. Adjusted LS means and standard errors at Week 24 from MMRM model including all available post-baseline data from Week 8 to Week 24 regardless of status on- or off-treatment in the intent to prescribe fenofibrate stratum. The usual care here corresponds to fenofibrate.
Absolute Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) at Week 12 and 24 : Overall ITT AnalysisBaseline, Week 12 and 24Absolute change = HbA1c value at specified week minus HbA1c value at baseline.
Absolute Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Week 12 and 24 : Overall ITT AnalysisBaseline, Week 12 and 24Absolute change = FPG value at specified week minus FPG value at baseline.
Absolute Change From Baseline in Number of Glucose-Lowering Treatments at Week 12 and 24 : Overall ITT AnalysisBaseline, Week 12 and 24Glucose lowering treatment was calculated for non-insulin treatments as one for each unique treatment received and for insulin treatment as one in total for all participants who have taken one or more treatments. Absolute change = number of glucose-lowering treatments at specified week minus baseline value.
Percent Change From Baseline in Lipoprotein(a) at Week 24: ITT- Intent to Prescribe Fenofibrate StratumFrom Baseline to Week 24Adjusted means and standard errors at Week 24 from multiple imputation approach followed by robust regression model including all available post-baseline data from Week 8 to Week 24 regardless of status on- or off-treatment in the intent to prescribe fenofibrate stratum. The usual care here corresponds to fenofibrate.
Percent Change From Baseline in Measured LDL-C at Week 24: ITT- Intent to Prescribe Fenofibrate StratumFrom Baseline to Week 24Measured LDL-C values via beta quantification method. Adjusted LS means and standard errors at Week 24 from MMRM model including available post-baseline data from Week 8 to Week 24 regardless of status on- or off-treatment in the intent to prescribe fenofibrate stratum. The usual care here corresponds to fenofibrate.

Countries

Australia, Brazil, Finland, Germany, Israel, Italy, Kuwait, Lebanon, Norway, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey (Türkiye), United Arab Emirates, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

The study was conducted at 119 centers in 15 countries. A total of 864 participants were screened between March 2016 and September 2016, 451 of whom were screen failures. Screen failures were mainly due to inclusion criteria not met.

Pre-assignment details

Randomization was stratified by investigator's choice of usual care therapy, which was pre-specified prior to randomization. Assignment to treatment arms was done centrally using an Interactive Voice/Web Response System in a 2:1 ratio (alirocumab: usual care) after confirmation of selection criteria. 413 participants were randomized.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Alirocumab 75 mg Q2W/Up to 150 mg Q2W
Alirocumab 75 mg SC injection Q2W added to insulin or other antihyperglycemic drugs, stable maximally tolerated dose of statin therapy without other LMT for 24 weeks. Alirocumab dose up-titrated to 150 mg Q2W from Week 12 when non-HDL-C levels \>=100 mg/dL (2.59 mmol/L) at Week 8.
276
Usual Care
Participants on usual care continued on insulin or other antihyperglycemic drugs, stable maximally tolerated dose of statin therapy without additional LMT or with either ezetimibe, fenofibrate, omega-3 fatty acids or nicotinic acid as per Investigator's judgment for 24 weeks.
137
Total413

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event104
Overall StudyOther than specified above103
Overall StudyPoor compliance to study protocol10
Overall StudyRandomized but not treated10
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject91

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalUsual CareAlirocumab 75 mg Q2W/Up to 150 mg Q2W
Age, Continuous63.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.2
64.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.8
62.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.3
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
49 Participants14 Participants35 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
363 Participants123 Participants240 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Intent to Prescribe Treatment
Ezetimibe
156 Participants52 Participants104 Participants
Intent to Prescribe Treatment
Fenofibrate
72 Participants24 Participants48 Participants
Intent to Prescribe Treatment
Nicotinic acid
3 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Intent to Prescribe Treatment
No additional LMT
118 Participants39 Participants79 Participants
Intent to Prescribe Treatment
Omega-3 fatty acids
64 Participants21 Participants43 Participants
Non-HDL-C4.073 mmol/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.221
4.2 mmol/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.2
4.0 mmol/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.2
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian or Alaska Native
4 Participants0 Participants4 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian/Oriental
10 Participants7 Participants3 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black
22 Participants6 Participants16 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
7 Participants1 Participants6 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White/Caucasian
370 Participants123 Participants247 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
197 Participants68 Participants129 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
216 Participants69 Participants147 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
1 / 2750 / 137
other
Total, other adverse events
37 / 27527 / 137
serious
Total, serious adverse events
26 / 27512 / 137

Outcome results

Primary

Percent Change From Baseline in Non-HDL-C at Week 24: ITT- Intent to Prescribe Fenofibrate Stratum

Adjusted LS means and standard errors at Week 24 from MMRM model including all available post-baseline data from Week 8 to Week 24 regardless of status on- or off-treatment in the intent to prescribe fenofibrate stratum. The usual care here corresponds to fenofibrate.

Time frame: From Baseline to Week 24

Population: ITT population. Here, 'Number of participants analyzed' = participants from intent to prescribe fenofibrate stratum who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Alirocumab 75 mg Q2W/Up to 150 mg Q2WPercent Change From Baseline in Non-HDL-C at Week 24: ITT- Intent to Prescribe Fenofibrate Stratum-41.7 Percent changeStandard Error 3.4
Usual CarePercent Change From Baseline in Non-HDL-C at Week 24: ITT- Intent to Prescribe Fenofibrate Stratum-8.5 Percent changeStandard Error 4.8
Comparison: Alirocumab group was compared to usual care group for the intent to prescribe fenofibrate using an appropriate contrast statement.p-value: <0.000197.5% CI: [-46.6, -19.9]Mixed Models Analysis
Primary

Percent Change From Baseline in Non-HDL-C at Week 24: Overall Intent-to-treat (ITT) Analysis

Adjusted Least-squares (LS) means and standard errors at Week 24 were obtained from a mixed-effect model with repeated measures (MMRM) to account for missing data. All available post-baseline data from Week 8 to Week 24 regardless of status on- or off-treatment were used in the model (ITT analysis).

Time frame: From Baseline to Week 24

Population: ITT population: all randomized participants with one baseline and at least one post-baseline non-HDL-C value on- or off-treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Alirocumab 75 mg Q2W/Up to 150 mg Q2WPercent Change From Baseline in Non-HDL-C at Week 24: Overall Intent-to-treat (ITT) Analysis-37.3 Percent changeStandard Error 3
Usual CarePercent Change From Baseline in Non-HDL-C at Week 24: Overall Intent-to-treat (ITT) Analysis-4.7 Percent changeStandard Error 3.3
Comparison: Alirocumab group was compared to usual care group using an appropriate contrast statement.p-value: <0.000197.5% CI: [-38.1, -27]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Absolute Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Week 12 and 24 : Overall ITT Analysis

Absolute change = FPG value at specified week minus FPG value at baseline.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12 and 24

Population: ITT population. Here, 'Number Analyzed' = participants with available data at the specified time points for each arm, respectively.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Alirocumab 75 mg Q2W/Up to 150 mg Q2WAbsolute Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Week 12 and 24 : Overall ITT AnalysisChange at Week 120.45 mmol/LStandard Deviation 2.43
Alirocumab 75 mg Q2W/Up to 150 mg Q2WAbsolute Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Week 12 and 24 : Overall ITT AnalysisChange at Week 240.68 mmol/LStandard Deviation 2.54
Usual CareAbsolute Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Week 12 and 24 : Overall ITT AnalysisChange at Week 120.21 mmol/LStandard Deviation 1.86
Usual CareAbsolute Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Week 12 and 24 : Overall ITT AnalysisChange at Week 240.03 mmol/LStandard Deviation 2.54
Secondary

Absolute Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) at Week 12 and 24 : Overall ITT Analysis

Absolute change = HbA1c value at specified week minus HbA1c value at baseline.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12 and 24

Population: ITT population. Here, 'Number Analyzed' = participants with available data at the specified time points for each arm, respectively.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Alirocumab 75 mg Q2W/Up to 150 mg Q2WAbsolute Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) at Week 12 and 24 : Overall ITT AnalysisChange at Week 120.59 mmol/molStandard Deviation 6.82
Alirocumab 75 mg Q2W/Up to 150 mg Q2WAbsolute Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) at Week 12 and 24 : Overall ITT AnalysisChange at Week 242.84 mmol/molStandard Deviation 8.04
Usual CareAbsolute Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) at Week 12 and 24 : Overall ITT AnalysisChange at Week 120.43 mmol/molStandard Deviation 5.7
Usual CareAbsolute Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) at Week 12 and 24 : Overall ITT AnalysisChange at Week 242.40 mmol/molStandard Deviation 8.19
Secondary

Absolute Change From Baseline in Number of Glucose-Lowering Treatments at Week 12 and 24 : Overall ITT Analysis

Glucose lowering treatment was calculated for non-insulin treatments as one for each unique treatment received and for insulin treatment as one in total for all participants who have taken one or more treatments. Absolute change = number of glucose-lowering treatments at specified week minus baseline value.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12 and 24

Population: ITT population. Here, 'Number Analyzed' = participants with available data at the specified time points for each arm, respectively.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Alirocumab 75 mg Q2W/Up to 150 mg Q2WAbsolute Change From Baseline in Number of Glucose-Lowering Treatments at Week 12 and 24 : Overall ITT AnalysisChange at Week 120.04 Glucose lowering treatmentsStandard Deviation 0.3
Alirocumab 75 mg Q2W/Up to 150 mg Q2WAbsolute Change From Baseline in Number of Glucose-Lowering Treatments at Week 12 and 24 : Overall ITT AnalysisChange at Week 240.07 Glucose lowering treatmentsStandard Deviation 0.37
Usual CareAbsolute Change From Baseline in Number of Glucose-Lowering Treatments at Week 12 and 24 : Overall ITT AnalysisChange at Week 120.04 Glucose lowering treatmentsStandard Deviation 0.19
Usual CareAbsolute Change From Baseline in Number of Glucose-Lowering Treatments at Week 12 and 24 : Overall ITT AnalysisChange at Week 240.04 Glucose lowering treatmentsStandard Deviation 0.23
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in Apo B at Week 24: ITT- Intent to Prescribe Fenofibrate Stratum

Adjusted LS means and standard errors at Week 24 from MMRM model including all available post-baseline data from Week 8 to Week 24 regardless of status on- or off-treatment in the intent to prescribe fenofibrate stratum. The usual care here corresponds to fenofibrate.

Time frame: From Baseline to Week 24

Population: Apo-B ITT population.Here, 'Number of participants analyzed' = participants from intent to prescribe fenofibrate stratum who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Alirocumab 75 mg Q2W/Up to 150 mg Q2WPercent Change From Baseline in Apo B at Week 24: ITT- Intent to Prescribe Fenofibrate Stratum-38.9 Percent changeStandard Error 3.1
Usual CarePercent Change From Baseline in Apo B at Week 24: ITT- Intent to Prescribe Fenofibrate Stratum-3.8 Percent changeStandard Error 4.4
Comparison: Testing according to the hierarchical testing procedure (only performed if the previous endpoint of ITT- intent to prescribe fenofibrate stratum was statistically significant).p-value: <0.000197.5% CI: [-47.4, -22.9]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein B (Apo-B) at Week 24: Overall ITT Analysis

Adjusted LS means and standard errors at Week 24 from MMRM model including all available post-baseline data from Week 8 to Week 24 regardless of status on- or off-treatment.

Time frame: From Baseline to Week 24

Population: Participants of the ITT population with one baseline and at least one post-baseline Apo-B value on-or off-treatment (Apo-B ITT population).

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Alirocumab 75 mg Q2W/Up to 150 mg Q2WPercent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein B (Apo-B) at Week 24: Overall ITT Analysis-33.8 Percent changeStandard Error 2.7
Usual CarePercent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein B (Apo-B) at Week 24: Overall ITT Analysis-1.6 Percent changeStandard Error 3
Comparison: Testing according to the hierarchical testing procedure (only performed if the previous endpoint of overall ITT analysis was statistically significant).p-value: <0.000197.5% CI: [-37.3, -27.2]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in Fasting Triglycerides at Week 24: ITT- Intent to Prescribe Fenofibrate Stratum

Adjusted means and standard errors at Week 24 from multiple imputation approach followed by robust regression model including all available post-baseline data from Week 8 to Week 24 regardless of status on- or off-treatment in the intent to prescribe fenofibrate stratum. The usual care here corresponds to fenofibrate.

Time frame: From Baseline to Week 24

Population: ITT population. Here, 'Number of participants analyzed' = participants from intent to prescribe fenofibrate stratum who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Alirocumab 75 mg Q2W/Up to 150 mg Q2WPercent Change From Baseline in Fasting Triglycerides at Week 24: ITT- Intent to Prescribe Fenofibrate Stratum-15.4 Percent changeStandard Error 4.7
Usual CarePercent Change From Baseline in Fasting Triglycerides at Week 24: ITT- Intent to Prescribe Fenofibrate Stratum-24.4 Percent changeStandard Error 6.6
Comparison: Testing according to the hierarchical testing procedure (only performed if the previous endpoint of ITT- intent to prescribe fenofibrate stratum was statistically significant).p-value: 0.265197.5% CI: [-9.1, 27.1]Regression, Robust
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in Fasting Triglycerides at Week 24: Overall ITT Analysis

Adjusted means and standard errors at Week 24 from multiple imputation approach followed by robust regression model including all available post-baseline data from Week 8 to Week 24 regardless of status on- or off-treatment.

Time frame: From Baseline to Week 24

Population: ITT population.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Alirocumab 75 mg Q2W/Up to 150 mg Q2WPercent Change From Baseline in Fasting Triglycerides at Week 24: Overall ITT Analysis-13.0 Percent changeStandard Error 2
Usual CarePercent Change From Baseline in Fasting Triglycerides at Week 24: Overall ITT Analysis-8.8 Percent changeStandard Error 2.8
Comparison: Testing according to the hierarchical testing procedure (only performed if the previous endpoint of overall ITT analysis was statistically significant).p-value: 0.219197.5% CI: [-11.8, 3.4]Regression, Robust
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in HDL-C at Week 24: ITT- Intent to Prescribe Fenofibrate Stratum

Adjusted LS means and standard errors at Week 24 from MMRM model including all available post-baseline data from Week 8 to Week 24 regardless of status on- or off-treatment in the intent to prescribe fenofibrate stratum. The usual care here corresponds to fenofibrate.

Time frame: From Baseline to Week 24

Population: HDL-C ITT population. Here, 'Number of participants analyzed' = participants from intent to prescribe fenofibrate stratum who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Alirocumab 75 mg Q2W/Up to 150 mg Q2WPercent Change From Baseline in HDL-C at Week 24: ITT- Intent to Prescribe Fenofibrate Stratum13.5 Percent changeStandard Error 2.9
Usual CarePercent Change From Baseline in HDL-C at Week 24: ITT- Intent to Prescribe Fenofibrate Stratum12.3 Percent changeStandard Error 4.1
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in HDL-C at Week 24 : Overall ITT Analysis

Adjusted LS means and standard errors at Week 24 from MMRM model including all available post-baseline data from Week 8 to Week 24 regardless of status on- or off-treatment.

Time frame: From Baseline to Week 24

Population: Participants of the ITT population with one baseline and at least one post-baseline HDL-C value on- or off-treatment (HDL-C ITT population).

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Alirocumab 75 mg Q2W/Up to 150 mg Q2WPercent Change From Baseline in HDL-C at Week 24 : Overall ITT Analysis14.5 Percent changeStandard Error 2.5
Usual CarePercent Change From Baseline in HDL-C at Week 24 : Overall ITT Analysis8.2 Percent changeStandard Error 2.7
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in LDL-C Particle Number at Week 24: ITT- Intent to Prescribe Fenofibrate Stratum

LDL-C particle number was calculated from lipid subfractions by NMR spectroscopy. Adjusted LS means and standard errors at Week 24 from MMRM model including all available post-baseline data from Week 8 to Week 24 regardless of status on- or off-treatment in the intent to prescribe fenofibrate stratum. The usual care here corresponds to fenofibrate.

Time frame: From Baseline to Week 24

Population: LDL-C particle number ITT population. Here, 'Number of participants analyzed' = participants from intent to prescribe fenofibrate stratum who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Alirocumab 75 mg Q2W/Up to 150 mg Q2WPercent Change From Baseline in LDL-C Particle Number at Week 24: ITT- Intent to Prescribe Fenofibrate Stratum-45.4 Percent changeStandard Error 3.5
Usual CarePercent Change From Baseline in LDL-C Particle Number at Week 24: ITT- Intent to Prescribe Fenofibrate Stratum-2.9 Percent changeStandard Error 5
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in LDL-C Particle Number at Week 24: Overall ITT Analysis

LDL-C particle number was calculated from lipid subfractions by nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy. Adjusted LS means and standard errors at Week 24 from MMRM model including all available post-baseline data from Week 8 to Week 24 regardless of status on- or off-treatment.

Time frame: From Baseline to Week 24

Population: Participants of the ITT population with one baseline and at least one post-baseline LDL-C particle number on- or off-treatment (LDL-C particle number ITT population).

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Alirocumab 75 mg Q2W/Up to 150 mg Q2WPercent Change From Baseline in LDL-C Particle Number at Week 24: Overall ITT Analysis-41.6 Percent changeStandard Error 3
Usual CarePercent Change From Baseline in LDL-C Particle Number at Week 24: Overall ITT Analysis-3.9 Percent changeStandard Error 3.4
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in Lipoprotein(a) at Week 24: ITT- Intent to Prescribe Fenofibrate Stratum

Adjusted means and standard errors at Week 24 from multiple imputation approach followed by robust regression model including all available post-baseline data from Week 8 to Week 24 regardless of status on- or off-treatment in the intent to prescribe fenofibrate stratum. The usual care here corresponds to fenofibrate.

Time frame: From Baseline to Week 24

Population: ITT population. Here, 'Number of participants analyzed' = participants from intent to prescribe fenofibrate stratum who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Alirocumab 75 mg Q2W/Up to 150 mg Q2WPercent Change From Baseline in Lipoprotein(a) at Week 24: ITT- Intent to Prescribe Fenofibrate Stratum-18.9 Percent changeStandard Error 4.4
Usual CarePercent Change From Baseline in Lipoprotein(a) at Week 24: ITT- Intent to Prescribe Fenofibrate Stratum3.9 Percent changeStandard Error 6.6
Comparison: Testing according to the hierarchical testing procedure (only performed if the previous endpoint of ITT- intent to prescribe fenofibrate stratum was statistically significant).p-value: 0.00497.5% CI: [-40.6, -5]Regression, Robust
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in Lipoprotein(a) at Week 24 : Overall ITT Analysis

Adjusted means and standard errors at Week 24 were obtained from multiple imputation approach followed by robust regression model for handling of missing data. All available post-baseline data from Week 8 to Week 24 regardless of status on- or off-treatment were included in the imputation model.

Time frame: From Baseline to Week 24

Population: ITT population.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Alirocumab 75 mg Q2W/Up to 150 mg Q2WPercent Change From Baseline in Lipoprotein(a) at Week 24 : Overall ITT Analysis-23.7 Percent changeStandard Error 1.9
Usual CarePercent Change From Baseline in Lipoprotein(a) at Week 24 : Overall ITT Analysis3.7 Percent changeStandard Error 2.6
Comparison: Testing according to the hierarchical testing procedure (only performed if the previous endpoint of overall ITT analysis was statistically significant).p-value: <0.000197.5% CI: [-34.6, -20.1]Regression, Robust
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in Measured LDL-C at Week 12: ITT- Intent to Prescribe Fenofibrate Stratum

Measured LDL-C values via beta quantification method. Adjusted LS means and standard errors at Week 12 from MMRM model including available post-baseline data from Week 8 to Week 24 regardless of status on- or off-treatment in the intent to prescribe fenofibrate stratum. The usual care here corresponds to fenofibrate.

Time frame: From Baseline to Week 24

Population: LDL-C ITT population. Here, 'Number of participants analyzed' = participants from intent to prescribe fenofibrate stratum who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Alirocumab 75 mg Q2W/Up to 150 mg Q2WPercent Change From Baseline in Measured LDL-C at Week 12: ITT- Intent to Prescribe Fenofibrate Stratum-44.3 Percent changeStandard Error 3.6
Usual CarePercent Change From Baseline in Measured LDL-C at Week 12: ITT- Intent to Prescribe Fenofibrate Stratum5.4 Percent changeStandard Error 5.1
Comparison: Testing according to the hierarchical testing procedure (only performed if the previous endpoint of ITT-intent to prescribe fenofibrate stratum was statistically significant).p-value: <0.000197.5% CI: [-63.7, -35.8]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in Measured LDL-C at Week 12: Overall ITT Analysis

Measured LDL-C values via beta quantification method. Adjusted LS means and standard errors at Week 12 from MMRM model including available post-baseline data from Week 8 to Week 24 regardless of status on- or off-treatment.

Time frame: From Baseline to Week 24

Population: LDL-C ITT population.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Alirocumab 75 mg Q2W/Up to 150 mg Q2WPercent Change From Baseline in Measured LDL-C at Week 12: Overall ITT Analysis-41.7 Percent changeStandard Error 3.3
Usual CarePercent Change From Baseline in Measured LDL-C at Week 12: Overall ITT Analysis-7.0 Percent changeStandard Error 3.6
Comparison: Testing according to the hierarchical testing procedure (only performed if the previous endpoint of overall ITT analysis was statistically significant).p-value: <0.000197.5% CI: [-40.8, -28.6]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in Measured LDL-C at Week 24: ITT- Intent to Prescribe Fenofibrate Stratum

Measured LDL-C values via beta quantification method. Adjusted LS means and standard errors at Week 24 from MMRM model including available post-baseline data from Week 8 to Week 24 regardless of status on- or off-treatment in the intent to prescribe fenofibrate stratum. The usual care here corresponds to fenofibrate.

Time frame: From Baseline to Week 24

Population: LDL-C ITT population. Here, 'Number of participants analyzed' = participants from intent to prescribe fenofibrate stratum who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Alirocumab 75 mg Q2W/Up to 150 mg Q2WPercent Change From Baseline in Measured LDL-C at Week 24: ITT- Intent to Prescribe Fenofibrate Stratum-47.0 Percent changeStandard Error 4.2
Usual CarePercent Change From Baseline in Measured LDL-C at Week 24: ITT- Intent to Prescribe Fenofibrate Stratum8.7 Percent changeStandard Error 5.8
Comparison: A separate hierarchical testing procedure was used to control type I error and handle multiple secondary endpoint analyses for ITT-intent to prescribe fenofibrate stratum. Testing was then performed sequentially in the order the endpoints are reported. The hierarchical testing sequence continued only when previous endpoint was statistically significant at 0.025 level.p-value: <0.000197.5% CI: [-71.8, -39.6]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in Measured Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) at Week 24: Overall ITT Analysis

Measured LDL-C values via beta quantification method. Adjusted LS means and standard errors at Week 24 from MMRM model including available post-baseline data from Week 8 to Week 24 regardless of status on- or off-treatment.

Time frame: From Baseline to Week 24

Population: Participants of the ITT population with one baseline and at least one post-baseline LDL-C value on-or off-treatment (LDL-C ITT population).

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Alirocumab 75 mg Q2W/Up to 150 mg Q2WPercent Change From Baseline in Measured Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) at Week 24: Overall ITT Analysis-43.3 Percent changeStandard Error 3.6
Usual CarePercent Change From Baseline in Measured Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) at Week 24: Overall ITT Analysis-0.3 Percent changeStandard Error 4
Comparison: A hierarchical testing procedure was used to control type I error and handle multiple secondary endpoint analyses for overall ITT analysis. Testing was then performed sequentially in the order the endpoints are reported. The hierarchical testing sequence continued only when previous endpoint was statistically significant at 0.025 level.p-value: <0.000197.5% CI: [-49.7, -36.3]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in Non-HDL-C at Week 12: ITT- Intent to Prescribe Fenofibrate Stratum

Adjusted LS means and standard errors at Week 12 from MMRM model including all available post-baseline data from Week 8 to Week 24 regardless of status on- or off-treatment in the intent to prescribe fenofibrate stratum. The usual care here corresponds to fenofibrate.

Time frame: From Baseline to Week 24

Population: ITT population. Here, 'Number of participants analyzed' = participants from intent to prescribe fenofibrate stratum who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Alirocumab 75 mg Q2W/Up to 150 mg Q2WPercent Change From Baseline in Non-HDL-C at Week 12: ITT- Intent to Prescribe Fenofibrate Stratum-34.7 Percent changeStandard Error 3.2
Usual CarePercent Change From Baseline in Non-HDL-C at Week 12: ITT- Intent to Prescribe Fenofibrate Stratum-7.3 Percent changeStandard Error 4.5
Comparison: Testing according to the hierarchical testing procedure (only performed if the previous endpoint of ITT-intent to prescribe fenofibrate stratum was statistically significant).p-value: <0.000197.5% CI: [-40, -14.8]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in Non-HDL-C at Week 12: Overall ITT Analysis

Adjusted LS means and standard errors at Week 12 from MMRM model including all available post-baseline data from Week 8 to Week 24 regardless of status on- or off-treatment.

Time frame: From Baseline to Week 24

Population: ITT population.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Alirocumab 75 mg Q2W/Up to 150 mg Q2WPercent Change From Baseline in Non-HDL-C at Week 12: Overall ITT Analysis-35.5 Percent changeStandard Error 2.9
Usual CarePercent Change From Baseline in Non-HDL-C at Week 12: Overall ITT Analysis-9.4 Percent changeStandard Error 3.2
Comparison: Testing according to the hierarchical testing procedure (only performed if the previous endpoint of overall ITT analysis was statistically significant).p-value: <0.000197.5% CI: [-31.5, -20.7]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in Total-C at Week 24: ITT- Intent to Prescribe Fenofibrate Stratum

Adjusted LS means and standard errors at Week 24 from MMRM model including all available post-baseline data from Week 8 to Week 24 regardless of status on- or off-treatment in the intent to prescribe fenofibrate stratum. The usual care here corresponds to fenofibrate.

Time frame: From Baseline to Week 24

Population: Total-C ITT population. Here, 'Number of participants analyzed' = participants from intent to prescribe fenofibrate stratum who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Alirocumab 75 mg Q2W/Up to 150 mg Q2WPercent Change From Baseline in Total-C at Week 24: ITT- Intent to Prescribe Fenofibrate Stratum-30.9 Percent changeStandard Error 2.6
Usual CarePercent Change From Baseline in Total-C at Week 24: ITT- Intent to Prescribe Fenofibrate Stratum-5.7 Percent changeStandard Error 3.7
Comparison: Testing according to the hierarchical testing procedure (only performed if the previous endpoint of ITT- intent to prescribe fenofibrate stratum was statistically significant).p-value: <0.000197.5% CI: [-35.4, -15.1]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol (Total-C) at Week 24 : Overall ITT Analysis

Adjusted LS means and standard errors at Week 24 from MMRM model including all available post-baseline data from Week 8 to Week 24 regardless of status on- or off-treatment.

Time frame: From Baseline to Week 24

Population: Participants of the ITT population with one baseline and at least one post-baseline Total-C value on- or off-treatment (Total-C ITT population).

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Alirocumab 75 mg Q2W/Up to 150 mg Q2WPercent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol (Total-C) at Week 24 : Overall ITT Analysis-27.4 Percent changeStandard Error 2.3
Usual CarePercent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol (Total-C) at Week 24 : Overall ITT Analysis-2.8 Percent changeStandard Error 2.5
Comparison: Testing according to the hierarchical testing procedure (only performed if the previous endpoint of overall ITT analysis was statistically significant).p-value: <0.000197.5% CI: [-28.8, -20.3]Mixed Models Analysis

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 10, 2026