Skip to content

Stimulation for Colonic Motility

Afferent Stimulation to Evoke Recto-colonic Reflex for Colonic Motility

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02641483
Enrollment
2
Registered
2015-12-29
Start date
2019-01-01
Completion date
2021-12-31
Last updated
2023-09-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Neurogenic Bowel Dysfunction

Brief summary

The investigators are testing the effect of electrical stimulation of the rectum on colonic motility. Most individuals with spinal cord injury develop neurogenic bowel dysfunction, which includes slowed colonic motility, which means that stools take longer than normal to pass through the colon. This slowed movement may result in chronic constipation and difficulty emptying the bowels. Individuals typically (without or without caregiver assistance) insert a gloved finger into the rectum and gently stretch it to improve colonic motility for a brief period to empty the bowels. The investigators hypothesize that electrically stimulating the rectum, instead of mechanically stretching it, will produce the same beneficial effect of improving colonic motility. Therefore, this study will compare the two methods. If electrical stimulation effectively improves colonic motility, then the investigator shall develop the approach as a therapeutic intervention in future studies.

Interventions

Electrical stimulation of the rectum will be applied to activate sensory afferent neurons of the rectum and evoke a recto-colonic reflex to improve colonic motility. This intervention will compared to individuals' usual mechanical intervention of digital rectal stimulation.

Sponsors

VA Office of Research and Development
Lead SponsorFED

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosed neurogenic bowel dysfunction and using digital rectal stimulation * Neurologically stable * Skeletally mature * Suprasacral spinal cord injury, stroke, or multiple sclerosis * At least 6 months post neurological injury or disease diagnosis

Exclusion criteria

* Active sepsis * Open pressure sores on or around pelvis * Significant colon trauma or colostomy * History of autonomic dysreflexia

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Compare Changes in Number of Interventions Used to Complete Bowel Routine, Including Electrical Rectal Stimulation (Treatment) Versus Mechanical Rectal Distension (Control)1 monthTwo interventions will be tested, including the clinical standard of digital rectal stimulation and a novel approach using electrical stimulation of rectal sensory afferents, to determine the effect on colonic pressure. Typically several bouts of digital rectal stimulation are required to achieve complete bowel emptying. We will compare the number of bouts of digital rectal stimulation (control) with electrical rectal stimulation (treatment) required to achieve complete bowel emptying.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Colonic Motility
Study participants will act as their own controls, first providing data using their usual digital rectal stimulation intervention for bowel care, then providing data using electrical stimulation for bowel care. Electrical Rectal Stimulation: Electrical stimulation of the rectum will be applied to activate sensory afferent neurons of the rectum and evoke a recto-colonic reflex to improve colonic motility. This intervention will compared to individuals' usual mechanical intervention of digital rectal stimulation.
2
Total2

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicColonic Motility
Age, Continuous61 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
2 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
2 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
2 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 2
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 2
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 2

Outcome results

Primary

Compare Changes in Number of Interventions Used to Complete Bowel Routine, Including Electrical Rectal Stimulation (Treatment) Versus Mechanical Rectal Distension (Control)

Two interventions will be tested, including the clinical standard of digital rectal stimulation and a novel approach using electrical stimulation of rectal sensory afferents, to determine the effect on colonic pressure. Typically several bouts of digital rectal stimulation are required to achieve complete bowel emptying. We will compare the number of bouts of digital rectal stimulation (control) with electrical rectal stimulation (treatment) required to achieve complete bowel emptying.

Time frame: 1 month

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Colonic MotilityCompare Changes in Number of Interventions Used to Complete Bowel Routine, Including Electrical Rectal Stimulation (Treatment) Versus Mechanical Rectal Distension (Control)Control4 bouts of stimulation
Colonic MotilityCompare Changes in Number of Interventions Used to Complete Bowel Routine, Including Electrical Rectal Stimulation (Treatment) Versus Mechanical Rectal Distension (Control)Intervention1 bouts of stimulation

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026