Skip to content

Clinical Study for the Evaluation of the Safety and Initial Performance of the ClearRing System for the Treatment of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia

Clinical Study for the Evaluation of the Safety and Initial Performance of the ClearRing System for the Treatment of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02639442
Enrollment
29
Registered
2015-12-24
Start date
2015-12-31
Completion date
2019-05-31
Last updated
2023-03-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Benign ProstaticHyperplasia (BPH)

Brief summary

The ProArc Medical ClearRing™ system is a prostatic reshaping device that is designed to treat Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (LUTS) due to BPH. During the procedure an implant is delivered into the prostate tissue obstructing the urethra and restricting urine flow. The delivery system uses an electro-cutting blade to perform a circular and superficial incision, in which the implant is placed. Such an implant, with the shape of an open ring, expands the obstructed area, reducing the fluid obstruction through the prostatic urethra.

Detailed description

The proposed study will be conducted on BPH patients, candidates for TURP and will aim to evaluate the ability of the ClearRing™ to improve BPH symptoms while conforming to safety of the procedure. In the proposed study the implants will be inserted by a dedicated delivery system with the aid of resectoscope. Electrical current will be administered by off-the-shelf CE Mark diathermy that passes through the system to cut and pave the ring course. The proper positioning of the implants will be evaluated by cystoscopy or TRUS and following implant positioning the device will be withdrawn. The delivery tool, the implants, resectoscope and the diathermy equipment will be supplied by ProArc Ltd.

Interventions

DEVICEClearRing™

Sponsors

ProArc Medical
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
50 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Male 50 years of age and up to 85 years old. 2. Diagnosed with symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) 3. International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) \>13 4. Peak flow rate ≤ 12 ml/sec (with voided volume ≥ 125ml) 5. Subject is in good general health. 6. Subject understands and has signed the study informed consent form. 7. PSA according to the American Urological Association) AUA) guideline.

Exclusion criteria

1. Subjects who are known to be infected with Hepatitis B, Hepatitis C, or HIV viruses. 2. Subject allergic to nickel or titanium 3. Concomitant participation in another study 4. Diagnosed with Cancer except of BCC or SCC of the skin 5. Any medical condition at the investigator discretion that may interfere with the procedure. 6. Patient with coagulopathy due to medications or congenital 7. Patient is taking steroids 8. Previous prostate surgery 9. Compromised renal function due to obstructive uropathy 10. Urinary Tract Infection (UTI) 11. Intravesical lobe (based on ultrasound and/or cystoscopy and/or medical history) 12. Prostate volume (based on Trans Rectal Ultrasound) \> 80g 13. American Society of Anesthesiologists score (ASA)≥3 14. Known neurogenic bladder 15. Implanted electronic device such as pacemaker/CRT/ICD/DBS. 16. Recent myocardial infarction (less than three months)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The frequency and severity of all treatment-related adverse eventsup to 3 months after procedure day

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Changes in Qmaxchange from baseline until 3 months FU visitmeasured by Uroflowmetry
Changes in Post Void Residualchange from baseline until 3 months FU visitmeasured by Ultra-Sound
Changes in LUTS symptomschange from baseline until 3 months FU visitevaluated by patient's questionnaires (IPSS)

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Duration of Catheter use post procedureuntil 12 months post procedure
Long term safety evaluationuntil 12 months post procedureAE collection

Countries

Israel, Latvia

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026