Rheumatoid Arthritis
Conditions
Brief summary
The purpose of this study is to determine whether the study drug, BMS-986142, is safe and effective in treating moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis in subjects with an inadequate response to methotrexate or methotrexate and up to 2 tumour necrosis factor (TNF) Inhibitors. Patients who qualify will be randomized to either one of 3 doses of BMS-986142 or placebo in 1:1:1 randomization for 12 weeks. Disease activity and safety will be assessed over the course of the study.
Interventions
BMS986142 specific dose on specific days
Placebo of BMS-986142 specific dose on specific days
Methotrexate specific dose on specific days
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
For more information regarding BMS clinical trial participation, please visit www.BMSStudyConnect.com Inclusion Criteria: * Male and female age 18 and above * Diagnosed with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) by standard criteria at least 16 weeks before screening, have functional ACR class I-III * Have an inadequate response to methotrexate * In addition to an inadequate response to methotrexate have an inadequate response or intolerance to 1 but not more than 2 TNF inhibitors * Have a minimum of 6 swollen and 6 tender joints (from 66/68 joint count) * Have hsCRP of ≥ 0.8 mg/dL (8mg/L) \[by central laboratory values\] or an ESR ≥ 28 mm/hr * Willing to use effective birth control for the entire length of the study
Exclusion criteria
* Diagnosed with juvenile Rheumatoid Arthritis * Have been treated with other biologic treatment than a TNF inhibitor * Active systemic bacterial, viral or fungal infection or evidence of prior or current Hepatitis B or C infection or HIV infection, latent bacterial, viral or fungal infections * Have been treated with Intramuscular or Intra-articular glucocorticosteroids within 4 weeks of randomization * Taking Oral steroids at dose above 10 mg/day of prednisone (or prednisone equivalents) * Have other autoimmune disease other than RA like lupus, multiple sclerosis * Have significant concurrent medical condition at the time of screening or baseline visit
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response at Week 12 | Week 12 | ACR responses are assessed with a composite rating scale of the American College of Rheumatology that includes 7 variables: tender joint count (TJC); swollen joint count (SJC); levels of an acute phase reactant C-reactive Protein levels (CRP); participant's assessment of pain; participant's global assessment of disease activity; physician's global assessment of disease activity; participant's assessment of physical function by health assessment questionnaire disability index (HAQ-DI). ACR20 is defined as achieving at least 20% improvement in both TJC and SJC, and at least 20% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 other assessments of the ACR. Percentage of Participants achieving ACR20 = (number of participants with measure/event of interest)/(number of particpants in the analysis)\*100 |
| Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response at Week 12 | Week 12 | ACR responses are assessed with a composite rating scale of the American College of Rheumatology that includes 7 variables: TJC; SJC; levels of an acute phase reactant (CRP level); participant's assessment of pain; participant's global assessment of disease activity; physician's global assessment of disease activity; participant's assessment of physical function by HAQ--DI. ACR70 is defined as achieving at least 70% improvement in both TJC and SJC, and at least 70% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 other assessments of the ACR. Percentage of Participants achieving ACR70 = (number of participants with measure/event of interest)/(number of particpants in the analysis)\*100 |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 70% Response Over Time From Baseline to Week 12 | Baseline, Day 15, Day 29, Day 57, Day 85 | ACR responses are assessed with a composite rating scale of the American College of Rheumatology that includes 7 variables: TJC; SJC; levels of an acute phase reactant (CRP level); participant's assessment of pain; participant's global assessment of disease activity; physician's global assessment of disease activity; participant's assessment of physical function by HAQ--DI. ACR70 is defined as achieving at least 70% improvement in both TJC and SJC, and at least 70% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 other assessments of the ACR. Percentage of Participants achieving ACR70 = (number of participants with measure/event of interest)/(number of particpants in the analysis)\*100 |
| Percentage of Participants Achieving < 2.6 Response in Disease Activity Score for 28 Joints -C-Reactive Protein (DAS28--CRP) Score at Week 12 | Week 12 | DAS28 is a composite score that includes 4 variables: TJC (based on 28 joints); SJC (based on 28 joints); General health (GH) assessment by the participant assessed from the ACR rheumatoid arthritis (RA) core set questionnaire (participant global assessment) in 100 mm visual analog scale (VAS). Marker of inflammation assessed by the high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) in mg/L. The DAS28 score provides a number indicating the current disease activity of the RA. DAS28 total score ranges from 2-10. A DAS28 score above 5.1 means high disease activity, whereas a DAS28 score below 3.2 indicates low disease activity and a DAS28 score below 2.6 means disease remission. |
| Percentage of Participants Achieving < 2.6 Response in Disease Activity Score for 28 Joints Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (DAS28--ESR) Score at Week 12 | Week 12 | DAS28-ESR is a composite score that includes 4 variables: TJC (based on 28 joints); SJC (based on 28 joints); General health (GH) assessment by the participant assessed from the ACR RA core set questionnaire (participant global assessment) in 100 mm VAS; Marker of inflammation assessed by ESR in mm/hr. The DAS28-ESR score provides a number indicating the current disease activity of the RA. DAS28-ESR total score ranges from 2-10. A DAS28-ESR score above 5.1 means high disease activity, DAS28-ESR score below 3.2 indicates low disease activity and DAS28-ESR score below 2.6 means disease remission. |
| Percentage of Participants Achieving <= 2.8 Response in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Score at Week 12 | Week 12 | CDAI is a composite index constructed to measure clinical remission in RA that does not include a laboratory test, and is a numerical summation of 4 components: TJC (28 joints), SJC (28 joints), Participant's Global Assessment of Disease Activity VAS (in cm), and Physician's Global Assessment of Disease VAS (in cm). Total scores ranges from 0 to 76 with a negative change in CDAI score indicating an improvement in disease activity and a positive change in score indicating a worsening of disease activity. |
| Percentage of Participants Achieving <= 3.3 Response in Simple Disease Activity Index (SDAI) Score at Week 12 | Week 12 | The SDAI is the numerical sum of five outcome parameters: TJC and SJC based on a 28-joint assessment, patient global assessment (PtGA) and physician global assessment (PGA) assessed on a VAS scale ranging from 0 to 10 cm, where higher scores indicate greater affection due to disease activity, and CRP measured in terms of milligram per deciliter (mg/dL). SDAI total score ranges from 0 to 86. SDAI \<= 3.3 indicates disease remission, \> 3.4 to 11 indicates low disease activity, \>11 to 26 indicates moderate disease activity, and \>26 indicates high disease activity. |
| Percentage of Participants Achieving Boolean Remission Criteria at Week 12 | Week 12 | Boolean remission criteria was defined as: tender joint count28 \<= 1; swollen joint count28 \<= 1; physician's global assessment \<= 1; and CRP \<= 1 mg/deciliter. |
| Change From Baseline in DAS28-CRP Score Over Time up to Week 12 | Baseline, Day 85 (Week 12) | DAS28 is a composite score that includes 4 variables: TJC (based on 28 joints); SJC (based on 28 joints); General health (GH) assessment by the participant assessed from the ACR rheumatoid arthritis (RA) core set questionnaire (participant global assessment) in 100 mm visual analog scale (VAS). Marker of inflammation assessed by the high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) in mg/L. The DAS28 score provides a number indicating the current disease activity of the RA. DAS28 total score ranges from 2-10. A DAS28 score above 5.1 means high disease activity, whereas a DAS28 score below 3.2 indicates low disease activity and a DAS28 score below 2.6 means disease remission. |
| Change From Baseline in DAS28-ESR Score Over Time up to Week 12 | Baseline, Week 12 | DAS28-ESR is a composite score that includes 4 variables: TJC (based on 28 joints); SJC (based on 28 joints); General health (GH) assessment by the participant assessed from the ACR RA core set questionnaire (participant global assessment) in 100 mm VAS; Marker of inflammation assessed by ESR in mm/hr. The DAS28-ESR score provides a number indicating the current disease activity of the RA. DAS28-ESR total score ranges from 2-10. A DAS28-ESR score above 5.1 means high disease activity, DAS28-ESR score below 3.2 indicates low disease activity and DAS28-ESR score below 2.6 means disease remission. |
| Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20% Response Over Time From Baseline to Week 12 | Baseline, Day 15, Day 29, Day 57, Day 85 | ACR responses are assessed with a composite rating scale of the American College of Rheumatology that includes 7 variables: tender joint count (TJC); swollen joint count (SJC); levels of an acute phase reactant C-reactive Protein levels (CRP); participant's assessment of pain; participant's global assessment of disease activity; physician's global assessment of disease activity; participant's assessment of physical function by health assessment questionnaire disability index (HAQ-DI). ACR20 is defined as achieving at least 20% improvement in both TJC and SJC, and at least 20% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 other assessments of the ACR. Percentage of Participants achieving ACR20 = (number of participants with measure/event of interest)/(number of particpants in the analysis)\*100 |
| Change From Baseline in SDAI Score Over Time up to Week 12 | Baseline, Week 12 | The SDAI is the numerical sum of five outcome parameters: TJC and SJC based on a 28-joint assessment, PtGA and PGA assessed on a VAS scale ranging from 0 to 10 cm, where higher scores indicate greater affection due to disease activity, and CRP measured in terms of mg/dL. SDAI total score ranges from 0 to 86. SDAI \<= 3.3 indicates disease remission, \> 3.4 to 11 indicates low disease activity, \>11 to 26 indicates moderate disease activity, and \>26 indicates high disease activity. |
| Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), and Serious AEs (SAEs) | Up to 30 days after treatment discontinuation | An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (example, a clinically significant abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a drug, whether or not it is considered related to the drug. An SAE is an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death, initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization, life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying), persistent or significant disability/incapacity, or a congenital anomaly, or a medically important event. |
| Trough Observed Plasma Concentration (Ctrough) of BMS-986142 | Week 4, 8, and 12 | Ctrough was defined as trough observed plasma concentration. |
| Mean Change From Baseline in Rheumatoid Arthritis Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scoring System (RAMRIS) Scores for Synovitis at Week 4 and 12 | Week 4 and Week 12 | Synovitis is assessed in 3 wrist regions (A. the distal radioulnar joint; B. the radiocarpal joint; C. the intercarpal and carpometacarpophalangeal, CMC, joints) and in each MCP joint. For each wrist region, possible score ranges from 0-3, with 0=normal, 1=mild, 2=moderate, and 3=severe damage. The total synovitis score per wrist=the sum of the individual scores for the 3 wrist regions. Minimum score per wrist ranges from 0, indicating no damage, to 9 (score of 3\*3 wrist regions), indicating most severe damage. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement. |
| Mean Change From Baseline in Rheumatoid Arthritis Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scoring System (RAMRIS) Scores for Osteitis at Week 4 and 12 | Week 4, and Week 12 | Osteitis was assessed at a total of 23 anatomic locations: 15 in 1 wrist and 8 in the hand of the same side. Each site is scored in 1.0 increments from 0 to 3, indicating involvement of original articular bone. The total score for the hands/wrists is the sum of the individual scores for each location. Thus the maximum score achievable per hand/wrist is 23 (total number of anatomic locations) \* 3 (maximum per joint)=69. Minimum score=0, indicating normal. Increasing score=greater severity. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement. |
| Mean Change From Baseline in Rheumatoid Arthritis Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scoring System (RAMRIS) Scores for Bone Erosion at Week 4 and 12 | Week 4 and Week 12 | Bone erosion assessed at a total of 23 anatomic locations: 15 in 1 wrist and 8 in the hand of the same side. Each site is scored in 1.0 increments from 0 (no damage) to 10 (severe damage) according to erosion of the original articular bone (each unit=10% loss of articular bone). The total erosion score for the hands/wrists is the sum of the individual scores for each location. Thus the maximum score achievable per hand/wrist is 230. Increasing score=greater severity.A negative change from baseline indicates improvement. |
| Mean Change From Baseline in Rheumatoid Arthritis Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scoring System (RAMRIS) Scores for Cartilage Loss at Week 4 and 12 | Week 4, and Week12 | Cartilage loss was assessed by MRI. Scans of 25 joints were read and scored for each participant by assessors. Scores for each location ranged 0-4 on a 9-point scale, with 0= no cartilage loss and 4= complete cartilage loss. Total score was the sum of the 25 individual scores and ranged 0-100 with 0= no cartilage loss and 100= most severe cartilage loss. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement. |
| Change From Baseline in CDAI Score Over Time up to Week 12 | Baseline, Week 12 | CDAI is a composite index constructed to measure clinical remission in RA that does not include a laboratory test, and is a numerical summation of 4 components: TJC (28 joints), SJC (28 joints), Participant's Global Assessment of Disease Activity VAS (in cm), and Physician's Global Assessment of Disease VAS (in cm). Total scores ranges from 0 to 76 with a negative change in CDAI score indicating an improvement in disease activity and a positive change in score indicating a worsening of disease activity. |
| Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response Over Time From Baseline to Week 12 | Baseline, Day 15, Day 29, Day 57, Day 85 | ACR responses are assessed with a composite rating scale of the American College of Rheumatology that includes 7 variables: TJC; SJC; levels of an acute phase reactant (CRP level); participant's assessment of pain; participant's global assessment of disease activity; physician's global assessment of disease activity; participant's assessment of physical function by HAQ--DI. ACR70 is defined as achieving at least 50% improvement in both TJC and SJC, and at least 50% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 other assessments of the ACR. Percentage of Participants achieving ACR50 = (number of participants with measure/event of interest)/(number of particpants in the analysis)\*100 |
Countries
Argentina, Austria, Brazil, Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Mexico, Netherlands, Poland, Russia, South Africa, South Korea, Spain, Taiwan, United States
Participant flow
Pre-assignment details
Out of 508 participants who signed the informed consent form and were enrolled in the study; 248 participants were randomized, and 247 participants were administered study drug (1 participant did not take any double-blind study medication).
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Placebo Oral dose of matching placebo for BMS-986142 was administered daily for 12 weeks. | 75 |
| BMS 100mg Oral dose of BMS-986142 100mg was administered daily for 12 weeks. | 73 |
| BMS 200mg Oral dose of BMS-986142 200mg was administered daily for 12 weeks. | 73 |
| BMS 350mg Oral dose of BMS-986142 350mg was administered daily for 12 weeks. | 26 |
| Total | 247 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 | FG002 | FG003 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Administrative Reason by Sponsor | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| Overall Study | Adverse Event | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Overall Study | Lack of Efficacy | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Overall Study | Lost to Follow-up | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Overall Study | Other than specified above | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Overall Study | Participant no longer met study criteria | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Overall Study | Poor/Non-Compliance | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 |
| Overall Study | Withdrawal by Subject | 4 | 5 | 3 | 1 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Total | BMS 350mg | BMS 200mg | BMS 100mg | Placebo |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 56.7 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.72 | 52.9 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.16 | 55.2 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.13 | 57.6 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.01 | 58.6 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.61 |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Hispanic or Latino | 84 Participants | 10 Participants | 28 Participants | 24 Participants | 22 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Not Hispanic or Latino | 84 Participants | 8 Participants | 25 Participants | 24 Participants | 27 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 79 Participants | 8 Participants | 20 Participants | 25 Participants | 26 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Asian | 31 Participants | 1 Participants | 8 Participants | 8 Participants | 14 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Black or African American | 21 Participants | 1 Participants | 5 Participants | 9 Participants | 6 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Other | 7 Participants | 0 Participants | 2 Participants | 2 Participants | 3 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized White | 188 Participants | 24 Participants | 58 Participants | 54 Participants | 52 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 214 Participants | 21 Participants | 62 Participants | 67 Participants | 64 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 33 Participants | 5 Participants | 11 Participants | 6 Participants | 11 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk | EG002 affected / at risk | EG003 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 0 / 73 | 0 / 73 | 0 / 26 | 0 / 75 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 12 / 73 | 17 / 73 | 14 / 26 | 11 / 75 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 2 / 73 | 0 / 73 | 0 / 26 | 4 / 75 |
Outcome results
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response at Week 12
ACR responses are assessed with a composite rating scale of the American College of Rheumatology that includes 7 variables: tender joint count (TJC); swollen joint count (SJC); levels of an acute phase reactant C-reactive Protein levels (CRP); participant's assessment of pain; participant's global assessment of disease activity; physician's global assessment of disease activity; participant's assessment of physical function by health assessment questionnaire disability index (HAQ-DI). ACR20 is defined as achieving at least 20% improvement in both TJC and SJC, and at least 20% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 other assessments of the ACR. Percentage of Participants achieving ACR20 = (number of participants with measure/event of interest)/(number of particpants in the analysis)\*100
Time frame: Week 12
Population: Analysis was performed on efficacy population which excluded participants who were randomized to a treatment arm and discontinued based on the interim analysis (IA).
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response at Week 12 | 30.7 Percentage of participants |
| BMS 100mg | Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response at Week 12 | 35.6 Percentage of participants |
| BMS 200mg | Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response at Week 12 | 42.5 Percentage of participants |
| BMS 350mg | Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response at Week 12 | 30.8 Percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response at Week 12
ACR responses are assessed with a composite rating scale of the American College of Rheumatology that includes 7 variables: TJC; SJC; levels of an acute phase reactant (CRP level); participant's assessment of pain; participant's global assessment of disease activity; physician's global assessment of disease activity; participant's assessment of physical function by HAQ--DI. ACR70 is defined as achieving at least 70% improvement in both TJC and SJC, and at least 70% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 other assessments of the ACR. Percentage of Participants achieving ACR70 = (number of participants with measure/event of interest)/(number of particpants in the analysis)\*100
Time frame: Week 12
Population: Analysis was performed on efficacy population which excluded participants who were randomized to a treatment arm and discontinued based on the interim analysis (IA)
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response at Week 12 | 4.0 Percentage of participants |
| BMS 100mg | Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response at Week 12 | 4.1 Percentage of participants |
| BMS 200mg | Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response at Week 12 | 9.6 Percentage of participants |
| BMS 350mg | Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response at Week 12 | 3.8 Percentage of participants |
Change From Baseline in CDAI Score Over Time up to Week 12
CDAI is a composite index constructed to measure clinical remission in RA that does not include a laboratory test, and is a numerical summation of 4 components: TJC (28 joints), SJC (28 joints), Participant's Global Assessment of Disease Activity VAS (in cm), and Physician's Global Assessment of Disease VAS (in cm). Total scores ranges from 0 to 76 with a negative change in CDAI score indicating an improvement in disease activity and a positive change in score indicating a worsening of disease activity.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12
Population: Analysis was performed on efficacy population which excluded participants who were randomized to a treatment arm and discontinued based on the interim analysis (IA). Here 'N' signifies number of participants analyzed who were evaluable for this outcome measure.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in CDAI Score Over Time up to Week 12 | -14.9 Units on a scale | Standard Error 1.591 |
| BMS 100mg | Change From Baseline in CDAI Score Over Time up to Week 12 | -13.6 Units on a scale | Standard Error 2.03 |
| BMS 200mg | Change From Baseline in CDAI Score Over Time up to Week 12 | -16.0 Units on a scale | Standard Error 1.828 |
| BMS 350mg | Change From Baseline in CDAI Score Over Time up to Week 12 | -17.6 Units on a scale | Standard Error 2.519 |
Change From Baseline in DAS28-CRP Score Over Time up to Week 12
DAS28 is a composite score that includes 4 variables: TJC (based on 28 joints); SJC (based on 28 joints); General health (GH) assessment by the participant assessed from the ACR rheumatoid arthritis (RA) core set questionnaire (participant global assessment) in 100 mm visual analog scale (VAS). Marker of inflammation assessed by the high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) in mg/L. The DAS28 score provides a number indicating the current disease activity of the RA. DAS28 total score ranges from 2-10. A DAS28 score above 5.1 means high disease activity, whereas a DAS28 score below 3.2 indicates low disease activity and a DAS28 score below 2.6 means disease remission.
Time frame: Baseline, Day 85 (Week 12)
Population: Analysis was performed on efficacy population which excluded participants who were randomized to a treatment arm and discontinued based on the interim analysis (IA). Here 'N' signifies number of participants analyzed who were evaluable for this outcome measure.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in DAS28-CRP Score Over Time up to Week 12 | -1.1 Units on a scale | Standard Error 0.141 |
| BMS 100mg | Change From Baseline in DAS28-CRP Score Over Time up to Week 12 | -1.1 Units on a scale | Standard Error 0.176 |
| BMS 200mg | Change From Baseline in DAS28-CRP Score Over Time up to Week 12 | -1.4 Units on a scale | Standard Error 0.168 |
| BMS 350mg | Change From Baseline in DAS28-CRP Score Over Time up to Week 12 | -1.4 Units on a scale | Standard Error 0.194 |
Change From Baseline in DAS28-ESR Score Over Time up to Week 12
DAS28-ESR is a composite score that includes 4 variables: TJC (based on 28 joints); SJC (based on 28 joints); General health (GH) assessment by the participant assessed from the ACR RA core set questionnaire (participant global assessment) in 100 mm VAS; Marker of inflammation assessed by ESR in mm/hr. The DAS28-ESR score provides a number indicating the current disease activity of the RA. DAS28-ESR total score ranges from 2-10. A DAS28-ESR score above 5.1 means high disease activity, DAS28-ESR score below 3.2 indicates low disease activity and DAS28-ESR score below 2.6 means disease remission.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12
Population: Analysis was performed on efficacy population which excluded participants who were randomized to a treatment arm and discontinued based on the interim analysis (IA). Here 'N' signifies number of participants analyzed who were evaluable for this outcome measure.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in DAS28-ESR Score Over Time up to Week 12 | -1.1 Units on a scale | Standard Error 0.149 |
| BMS 100mg | Change From Baseline in DAS28-ESR Score Over Time up to Week 12 | -1.1 Units on a scale | Standard Error 0.166 |
| BMS 200mg | Change From Baseline in DAS28-ESR Score Over Time up to Week 12 | -1.4 Units on a scale | Standard Error 0.161 |
| BMS 350mg | Change From Baseline in DAS28-ESR Score Over Time up to Week 12 | -1.5 Units on a scale | Standard Error 0.247 |
Change From Baseline in SDAI Score Over Time up to Week 12
The SDAI is the numerical sum of five outcome parameters: TJC and SJC based on a 28-joint assessment, PtGA and PGA assessed on a VAS scale ranging from 0 to 10 cm, where higher scores indicate greater affection due to disease activity, and CRP measured in terms of mg/dL. SDAI total score ranges from 0 to 86. SDAI \<= 3.3 indicates disease remission, \> 3.4 to 11 indicates low disease activity, \>11 to 26 indicates moderate disease activity, and \>26 indicates high disease activity.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12
Population: Analysis was performed on efficacy population which excluded participants who were randomized to a treatment arm and discontinued based on the interim analysis (IA). Here 'N' signifies number of participants analyzed who were evaluable for this outcome measure.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in SDAI Score Over Time up to Week 12 | -14.8 Units on a scale | Standard Error 1.628 |
| BMS 100mg | Change From Baseline in SDAI Score Over Time up to Week 12 | -13.9 Units on a scale | Standard Error 2.09 |
| BMS 200mg | Change From Baseline in SDAI Score Over Time up to Week 12 | -16.6 Units on a scale | Standard Error 1.954 |
| BMS 350mg | Change From Baseline in SDAI Score Over Time up to Week 12 | -18.9 Units on a scale | Standard Error 3.218 |
Mean Change From Baseline in Rheumatoid Arthritis Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scoring System (RAMRIS) Scores for Bone Erosion at Week 4 and 12
Bone erosion assessed at a total of 23 anatomic locations: 15 in 1 wrist and 8 in the hand of the same side. Each site is scored in 1.0 increments from 0 (no damage) to 10 (severe damage) according to erosion of the original articular bone (each unit=10% loss of articular bone). The total erosion score for the hands/wrists is the sum of the individual scores for each location. Thus the maximum score achievable per hand/wrist is 230. Increasing score=greater severity.A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Time frame: Week 4 and Week 12
Population: Analysis was performed on efficacy population which excluded participants who were randomized to a treatment arm and discontinued based on the interim analysis (IA). Here number analyzed = number of randomized and treated participants with non-missing value at each time point
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Mean Change From Baseline in Rheumatoid Arthritis Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scoring System (RAMRIS) Scores for Bone Erosion at Week 4 and 12 | Week 4 | 0.1 Scores on a scale | Standard Error 0.048 |
| Placebo | Mean Change From Baseline in Rheumatoid Arthritis Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scoring System (RAMRIS) Scores for Bone Erosion at Week 4 and 12 | Week 12 | 0.1 Scores on a scale | Standard Error 0.048 |
| BMS 100mg | Mean Change From Baseline in Rheumatoid Arthritis Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scoring System (RAMRIS) Scores for Bone Erosion at Week 4 and 12 | Week 12 | 0.3 Scores on a scale | Standard Error 0.248 |
| BMS 100mg | Mean Change From Baseline in Rheumatoid Arthritis Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scoring System (RAMRIS) Scores for Bone Erosion at Week 4 and 12 | Week 4 | 0.1 Scores on a scale | Standard Error 0.089 |
| BMS 200mg | Mean Change From Baseline in Rheumatoid Arthritis Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scoring System (RAMRIS) Scores for Bone Erosion at Week 4 and 12 | Week 4 | -0.0 Scores on a scale | Standard Error 0.036 |
| BMS 200mg | Mean Change From Baseline in Rheumatoid Arthritis Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scoring System (RAMRIS) Scores for Bone Erosion at Week 4 and 12 | Week 12 | 0.0 Scores on a scale | Standard Error 0.046 |
| BMS 350mg | Mean Change From Baseline in Rheumatoid Arthritis Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scoring System (RAMRIS) Scores for Bone Erosion at Week 4 and 12 | Week 4 | 0.0 Scores on a scale | Standard Error 0.03 |
| BMS 350mg | Mean Change From Baseline in Rheumatoid Arthritis Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scoring System (RAMRIS) Scores for Bone Erosion at Week 4 and 12 | Week 12 | 0.1 Scores on a scale | Standard Error 0.072 |
Mean Change From Baseline in Rheumatoid Arthritis Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scoring System (RAMRIS) Scores for Cartilage Loss at Week 4 and 12
Cartilage loss was assessed by MRI. Scans of 25 joints were read and scored for each participant by assessors. Scores for each location ranged 0-4 on a 9-point scale, with 0= no cartilage loss and 4= complete cartilage loss. Total score was the sum of the 25 individual scores and ranged 0-100 with 0= no cartilage loss and 100= most severe cartilage loss. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Time frame: Week 4, and Week12
Population: Analysis was performed on efficacy population which excluded participants who were randomized to a treatment arm and discontinued based on the interim analysis (IA). Here number analyzed = number of randomized and treated participants with non-missing value at each time point
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Mean Change From Baseline in Rheumatoid Arthritis Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scoring System (RAMRIS) Scores for Cartilage Loss at Week 4 and 12 | Week 4 | 0.1 Scores on a scale | Standard Error 0.105 |
| Placebo | Mean Change From Baseline in Rheumatoid Arthritis Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scoring System (RAMRIS) Scores for Cartilage Loss at Week 4 and 12 | Week 12 | 0.0 Scores on a scale | Standard Error 0.116 |
| BMS 100mg | Mean Change From Baseline in Rheumatoid Arthritis Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scoring System (RAMRIS) Scores for Cartilage Loss at Week 4 and 12 | Week 12 | 0.3 Scores on a scale | Standard Error 0.139 |
| BMS 100mg | Mean Change From Baseline in Rheumatoid Arthritis Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scoring System (RAMRIS) Scores for Cartilage Loss at Week 4 and 12 | Week 4 | 0.0 Scores on a scale | Standard Error 0.064 |
| BMS 200mg | Mean Change From Baseline in Rheumatoid Arthritis Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scoring System (RAMRIS) Scores for Cartilage Loss at Week 4 and 12 | Week 4 | -0.0 Scores on a scale | Standard Error 0.079 |
| BMS 200mg | Mean Change From Baseline in Rheumatoid Arthritis Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scoring System (RAMRIS) Scores for Cartilage Loss at Week 4 and 12 | Week 12 | 0.0 Scores on a scale | Standard Error 0.111 |
| BMS 350mg | Mean Change From Baseline in Rheumatoid Arthritis Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scoring System (RAMRIS) Scores for Cartilage Loss at Week 4 and 12 | Week 4 | 0.4 Scores on a scale | Standard Error 0.169 |
| BMS 350mg | Mean Change From Baseline in Rheumatoid Arthritis Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scoring System (RAMRIS) Scores for Cartilage Loss at Week 4 and 12 | Week 12 | 0.5 Scores on a scale | Standard Error 0.294 |
Mean Change From Baseline in Rheumatoid Arthritis Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scoring System (RAMRIS) Scores for Osteitis at Week 4 and 12
Osteitis was assessed at a total of 23 anatomic locations: 15 in 1 wrist and 8 in the hand of the same side. Each site is scored in 1.0 increments from 0 to 3, indicating involvement of original articular bone. The total score for the hands/wrists is the sum of the individual scores for each location. Thus the maximum score achievable per hand/wrist is 23 (total number of anatomic locations) \* 3 (maximum per joint)=69. Minimum score=0, indicating normal. Increasing score=greater severity. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Time frame: Week 4, and Week 12
Population: Analysis was performed on efficacy population which excluded participants who were randomized to a treatment arm and discontinued based on the interim analysis (IA). Here number analyzed = number of randomized and treated participants with non-missing value at each time point
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Mean Change From Baseline in Rheumatoid Arthritis Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scoring System (RAMRIS) Scores for Osteitis at Week 4 and 12 | Week 4 | 0.1 Scores on a scale | Standard Error 0.223 |
| Placebo | Mean Change From Baseline in Rheumatoid Arthritis Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scoring System (RAMRIS) Scores for Osteitis at Week 4 and 12 | Week 12 | 0.4 Scores on a scale | Standard Error 0.574 |
| BMS 100mg | Mean Change From Baseline in Rheumatoid Arthritis Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scoring System (RAMRIS) Scores for Osteitis at Week 4 and 12 | Week 12 | 0.5 Scores on a scale | Standard Error 0.451 |
| BMS 100mg | Mean Change From Baseline in Rheumatoid Arthritis Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scoring System (RAMRIS) Scores for Osteitis at Week 4 and 12 | Week 4 | 0.2 Scores on a scale | Standard Error 0.262 |
| BMS 200mg | Mean Change From Baseline in Rheumatoid Arthritis Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scoring System (RAMRIS) Scores for Osteitis at Week 4 and 12 | Week 4 | 0.1 Scores on a scale | Standard Error 0.148 |
| BMS 200mg | Mean Change From Baseline in Rheumatoid Arthritis Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scoring System (RAMRIS) Scores for Osteitis at Week 4 and 12 | Week 12 | 0.0 Scores on a scale | Standard Error 0.257 |
| BMS 350mg | Mean Change From Baseline in Rheumatoid Arthritis Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scoring System (RAMRIS) Scores for Osteitis at Week 4 and 12 | Week 4 | -0.1 Scores on a scale | Standard Error 0.249 |
| BMS 350mg | Mean Change From Baseline in Rheumatoid Arthritis Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scoring System (RAMRIS) Scores for Osteitis at Week 4 and 12 | Week 12 | 0.2 Scores on a scale | Standard Error 0.654 |
Mean Change From Baseline in Rheumatoid Arthritis Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scoring System (RAMRIS) Scores for Synovitis at Week 4 and 12
Synovitis is assessed in 3 wrist regions (A. the distal radioulnar joint; B. the radiocarpal joint; C. the intercarpal and carpometacarpophalangeal, CMC, joints) and in each MCP joint. For each wrist region, possible score ranges from 0-3, with 0=normal, 1=mild, 2=moderate, and 3=severe damage. The total synovitis score per wrist=the sum of the individual scores for the 3 wrist regions. Minimum score per wrist ranges from 0, indicating no damage, to 9 (score of 3\*3 wrist regions), indicating most severe damage. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Time frame: Week 4 and Week 12
Population: Analysis was performed on efficacy population which excluded participants who were randomized to a treatment arm and discontinued based on the interim analysis (IA). Here number analyzed = number of randomized and treated participants with non-missing value at each time point
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Mean Change From Baseline in Rheumatoid Arthritis Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scoring System (RAMRIS) Scores for Synovitis at Week 4 and 12 | Week 12 | 0.7 Scores on a scale | Standard Error 0.467 |
| Placebo | Mean Change From Baseline in Rheumatoid Arthritis Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scoring System (RAMRIS) Scores for Synovitis at Week 4 and 12 | Week 4 | 0.1 Scores on a scale | Standard Error 0.226 |
| BMS 100mg | Mean Change From Baseline in Rheumatoid Arthritis Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scoring System (RAMRIS) Scores for Synovitis at Week 4 and 12 | Week 4 | -0.2 Scores on a scale | Standard Error 0.202 |
| BMS 100mg | Mean Change From Baseline in Rheumatoid Arthritis Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scoring System (RAMRIS) Scores for Synovitis at Week 4 and 12 | Week 12 | -0.0 Scores on a scale | Standard Error 0.315 |
| BMS 200mg | Mean Change From Baseline in Rheumatoid Arthritis Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scoring System (RAMRIS) Scores for Synovitis at Week 4 and 12 | Week 12 | -0.3 Scores on a scale | Standard Error 0.263 |
| BMS 200mg | Mean Change From Baseline in Rheumatoid Arthritis Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scoring System (RAMRIS) Scores for Synovitis at Week 4 and 12 | Week 4 | 0.1 Scores on a scale | Standard Error 0.182 |
| BMS 350mg | Mean Change From Baseline in Rheumatoid Arthritis Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scoring System (RAMRIS) Scores for Synovitis at Week 4 and 12 | Week 12 | 0.9 Scores on a scale | Standard Error 1.163 |
| BMS 350mg | Mean Change From Baseline in Rheumatoid Arthritis Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scoring System (RAMRIS) Scores for Synovitis at Week 4 and 12 | Week 4 | 0.1 Scores on a scale | Standard Error 0.558 |
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), and Serious AEs (SAEs)
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (example, a clinically significant abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a drug, whether or not it is considered related to the drug. An SAE is an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death, initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization, life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying), persistent or significant disability/incapacity, or a congenital anomaly, or a medically important event.
Time frame: Up to 30 days after treatment discontinuation
Population: All treated participants.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), and Serious AEs (SAEs) | AEs | 36 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), and Serious AEs (SAEs) | SAEs | 4 Participants |
| BMS 100mg | Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), and Serious AEs (SAEs) | SAEs | 2 Participants |
| BMS 100mg | Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), and Serious AEs (SAEs) | AEs | 39 Participants |
| BMS 200mg | Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), and Serious AEs (SAEs) | AEs | 39 Participants |
| BMS 200mg | Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), and Serious AEs (SAEs) | SAEs | 0 Participants |
| BMS 350mg | Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), and Serious AEs (SAEs) | AEs | 19 Participants |
| BMS 350mg | Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), and Serious AEs (SAEs) | SAEs | 0 Participants |
Percentage of Participants Achieving < 2.6 Response in Disease Activity Score for 28 Joints -C-Reactive Protein (DAS28--CRP) Score at Week 12
DAS28 is a composite score that includes 4 variables: TJC (based on 28 joints); SJC (based on 28 joints); General health (GH) assessment by the participant assessed from the ACR rheumatoid arthritis (RA) core set questionnaire (participant global assessment) in 100 mm visual analog scale (VAS). Marker of inflammation assessed by the high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) in mg/L. The DAS28 score provides a number indicating the current disease activity of the RA. DAS28 total score ranges from 2-10. A DAS28 score above 5.1 means high disease activity, whereas a DAS28 score below 3.2 indicates low disease activity and a DAS28 score below 2.6 means disease remission.
Time frame: Week 12
Population: Analysis was performed on efficacy population which excluded participants who were randomized to a treatment arm and discontinued based on the interim analysis (IA)
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants Achieving < 2.6 Response in Disease Activity Score for 28 Joints -C-Reactive Protein (DAS28--CRP) Score at Week 12 | 6.7 Percentage of participants |
| BMS 100mg | Percentage of Participants Achieving < 2.6 Response in Disease Activity Score for 28 Joints -C-Reactive Protein (DAS28--CRP) Score at Week 12 | 9.6 Percentage of participants |
| BMS 200mg | Percentage of Participants Achieving < 2.6 Response in Disease Activity Score for 28 Joints -C-Reactive Protein (DAS28--CRP) Score at Week 12 | 11.0 Percentage of participants |
| BMS 350mg | Percentage of Participants Achieving < 2.6 Response in Disease Activity Score for 28 Joints -C-Reactive Protein (DAS28--CRP) Score at Week 12 | 0.0 Percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants Achieving < 2.6 Response in Disease Activity Score for 28 Joints Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (DAS28--ESR) Score at Week 12
DAS28-ESR is a composite score that includes 4 variables: TJC (based on 28 joints); SJC (based on 28 joints); General health (GH) assessment by the participant assessed from the ACR RA core set questionnaire (participant global assessment) in 100 mm VAS; Marker of inflammation assessed by ESR in mm/hr. The DAS28-ESR score provides a number indicating the current disease activity of the RA. DAS28-ESR total score ranges from 2-10. A DAS28-ESR score above 5.1 means high disease activity, DAS28-ESR score below 3.2 indicates low disease activity and DAS28-ESR score below 2.6 means disease remission.
Time frame: Week 12
Population: Analysis was performed on efficacy population which excluded participants who were randomized to a treatment arm and discontinued based on the interim analysis (IA)
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants Achieving < 2.6 Response in Disease Activity Score for 28 Joints Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (DAS28--ESR) Score at Week 12 | 0.0 Percentage of participants |
| BMS 100mg | Percentage of Participants Achieving < 2.6 Response in Disease Activity Score for 28 Joints Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (DAS28--ESR) Score at Week 12 | 6.8 Percentage of participants |
| BMS 200mg | Percentage of Participants Achieving < 2.6 Response in Disease Activity Score for 28 Joints Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (DAS28--ESR) Score at Week 12 | 1.4 Percentage of participants |
| BMS 350mg | Percentage of Participants Achieving < 2.6 Response in Disease Activity Score for 28 Joints Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (DAS28--ESR) Score at Week 12 | 0.0 Percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants Achieving <= 2.8 Response in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Score at Week 12
CDAI is a composite index constructed to measure clinical remission in RA that does not include a laboratory test, and is a numerical summation of 4 components: TJC (28 joints), SJC (28 joints), Participant's Global Assessment of Disease Activity VAS (in cm), and Physician's Global Assessment of Disease VAS (in cm). Total scores ranges from 0 to 76 with a negative change in CDAI score indicating an improvement in disease activity and a positive change in score indicating a worsening of disease activity.
Time frame: Week 12
Population: Analysis was performed on efficacy population which excluded participants who were randomized to a treatment arm and discontinued based on the interim analysis (IA)
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants Achieving <= 2.8 Response in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Score at Week 12 | 0.0 Percentage of participants |
| BMS 100mg | Percentage of Participants Achieving <= 2.8 Response in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Score at Week 12 | 6.8 Percentage of participants |
| BMS 200mg | Percentage of Participants Achieving <= 2.8 Response in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Score at Week 12 | 6.8 Percentage of participants |
| BMS 350mg | Percentage of Participants Achieving <= 2.8 Response in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Score at Week 12 | 0.0 Percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants Achieving <= 3.3 Response in Simple Disease Activity Index (SDAI) Score at Week 12
The SDAI is the numerical sum of five outcome parameters: TJC and SJC based on a 28-joint assessment, patient global assessment (PtGA) and physician global assessment (PGA) assessed on a VAS scale ranging from 0 to 10 cm, where higher scores indicate greater affection due to disease activity, and CRP measured in terms of milligram per deciliter (mg/dL). SDAI total score ranges from 0 to 86. SDAI \<= 3.3 indicates disease remission, \> 3.4 to 11 indicates low disease activity, \>11 to 26 indicates moderate disease activity, and \>26 indicates high disease activity.
Time frame: Week 12
Population: Analysis was performed on efficacy population which excluded participants who were randomized to a treatment arm and discontinued based on the interim analysis (IA)
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants Achieving <= 3.3 Response in Simple Disease Activity Index (SDAI) Score at Week 12 | 0.0 Percentage of participants |
| BMS 100mg | Percentage of Participants Achieving <= 3.3 Response in Simple Disease Activity Index (SDAI) Score at Week 12 | 6.8 Percentage of participants |
| BMS 200mg | Percentage of Participants Achieving <= 3.3 Response in Simple Disease Activity Index (SDAI) Score at Week 12 | 6.8 Percentage of participants |
| BMS 350mg | Percentage of Participants Achieving <= 3.3 Response in Simple Disease Activity Index (SDAI) Score at Week 12 | 0.0 Percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20% Response Over Time From Baseline to Week 12
ACR responses are assessed with a composite rating scale of the American College of Rheumatology that includes 7 variables: tender joint count (TJC); swollen joint count (SJC); levels of an acute phase reactant C-reactive Protein levels (CRP); participant's assessment of pain; participant's global assessment of disease activity; physician's global assessment of disease activity; participant's assessment of physical function by health assessment questionnaire disability index (HAQ-DI). ACR20 is defined as achieving at least 20% improvement in both TJC and SJC, and at least 20% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 other assessments of the ACR. Percentage of Participants achieving ACR20 = (number of participants with measure/event of interest)/(number of particpants in the analysis)\*100
Time frame: Baseline, Day 15, Day 29, Day 57, Day 85
Population: Analysis was performed on efficacy population which excluded participants who were randomized to a treatment arm and discontinued based on the interim analysis (IA)
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20% Response Over Time From Baseline to Week 12 | Baseline (Day 1) | 0.0 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20% Response Over Time From Baseline to Week 12 | Day 57 | 28.0 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20% Response Over Time From Baseline to Week 12 | Day 85 | 30.7 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20% Response Over Time From Baseline to Week 12 | Day 15 | 10.7 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20% Response Over Time From Baseline to Week 12 | Day 29 | 18.7 Percentage of participants |
| BMS 100mg | Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20% Response Over Time From Baseline to Week 12 | Day 57 | 41.1 Percentage of participants |
| BMS 100mg | Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20% Response Over Time From Baseline to Week 12 | Day 15 | 13.7 Percentage of participants |
| BMS 100mg | Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20% Response Over Time From Baseline to Week 12 | Baseline (Day 1) | 0.0 Percentage of participants |
| BMS 100mg | Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20% Response Over Time From Baseline to Week 12 | Day 85 | 35.6 Percentage of participants |
| BMS 100mg | Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20% Response Over Time From Baseline to Week 12 | Day 29 | 23.3 Percentage of participants |
| BMS 200mg | Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20% Response Over Time From Baseline to Week 12 | Day 15 | 24.7 Percentage of participants |
| BMS 200mg | Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20% Response Over Time From Baseline to Week 12 | Baseline (Day 1) | 0.0 Percentage of participants |
| BMS 200mg | Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20% Response Over Time From Baseline to Week 12 | Day 85 | 42.5 Percentage of participants |
| BMS 200mg | Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20% Response Over Time From Baseline to Week 12 | Day 57 | 39.7 Percentage of participants |
| BMS 200mg | Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20% Response Over Time From Baseline to Week 12 | Day 29 | 21.9 Percentage of participants |
| BMS 350mg | Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20% Response Over Time From Baseline to Week 12 | Baseline (Day 1) | 0.0 Percentage of participants |
| BMS 350mg | Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20% Response Over Time From Baseline to Week 12 | Day 85 | 30.8 Percentage of participants |
| BMS 350mg | Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20% Response Over Time From Baseline to Week 12 | Day 57 | 15.4 Percentage of participants |
| BMS 350mg | Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20% Response Over Time From Baseline to Week 12 | Day 15 | 15.4 Percentage of participants |
| BMS 350mg | Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20% Response Over Time From Baseline to Week 12 | Day 29 | 26.9 Percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response Over Time From Baseline to Week 12
ACR responses are assessed with a composite rating scale of the American College of Rheumatology that includes 7 variables: TJC; SJC; levels of an acute phase reactant (CRP level); participant's assessment of pain; participant's global assessment of disease activity; physician's global assessment of disease activity; participant's assessment of physical function by HAQ--DI. ACR70 is defined as achieving at least 50% improvement in both TJC and SJC, and at least 50% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 other assessments of the ACR. Percentage of Participants achieving ACR50 = (number of participants with measure/event of interest)/(number of particpants in the analysis)\*100
Time frame: Baseline, Day 15, Day 29, Day 57, Day 85
Population: Analysis was performed on efficacy population which excluded participants who were randomized to a treatment arm and discontinued based on the interim analysis (IA)
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response Over Time From Baseline to Week 12 | Day 57 | 9.3 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response Over Time From Baseline to Week 12 | Day 15 | 2.7 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response Over Time From Baseline to Week 12 | Day 85 | 9.3 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response Over Time From Baseline to Week 12 | Day 29 | 2.7 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response Over Time From Baseline to Week 12 | Baseline (Day 1) | 0 Percentage of participants |
| BMS 100mg | Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response Over Time From Baseline to Week 12 | Day 29 | 4.1 Percentage of participants |
| BMS 100mg | Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response Over Time From Baseline to Week 12 | Day 57 | 12.3 Percentage of participants |
| BMS 100mg | Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response Over Time From Baseline to Week 12 | Day 85 | 13.7 Percentage of participants |
| BMS 100mg | Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response Over Time From Baseline to Week 12 | Day 15 | 4.1 Percentage of participants |
| BMS 100mg | Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response Over Time From Baseline to Week 12 | Baseline (Day 1) | 0 Percentage of participants |
| BMS 200mg | Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response Over Time From Baseline to Week 12 | Day 29 | 6.8 Percentage of participants |
| BMS 200mg | Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response Over Time From Baseline to Week 12 | Baseline (Day 1) | 0 Percentage of participants |
| BMS 200mg | Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response Over Time From Baseline to Week 12 | Day 15 | 5.5 Percentage of participants |
| BMS 200mg | Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response Over Time From Baseline to Week 12 | Day 57 | 13.7 Percentage of participants |
| BMS 200mg | Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response Over Time From Baseline to Week 12 | Day 85 | 16.4 Percentage of participants |
| BMS 350mg | Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response Over Time From Baseline to Week 12 | Day 57 | 7.7 Percentage of participants |
| BMS 350mg | Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response Over Time From Baseline to Week 12 | Day 15 | 3.8 Percentage of participants |
| BMS 350mg | Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response Over Time From Baseline to Week 12 | Baseline (Day 1) | 0 Percentage of participants |
| BMS 350mg | Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response Over Time From Baseline to Week 12 | Day 29 | 7.7 Percentage of participants |
| BMS 350mg | Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response Over Time From Baseline to Week 12 | Day 85 | 11.5 Percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 70% Response Over Time From Baseline to Week 12
ACR responses are assessed with a composite rating scale of the American College of Rheumatology that includes 7 variables: TJC; SJC; levels of an acute phase reactant (CRP level); participant's assessment of pain; participant's global assessment of disease activity; physician's global assessment of disease activity; participant's assessment of physical function by HAQ--DI. ACR70 is defined as achieving at least 70% improvement in both TJC and SJC, and at least 70% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 other assessments of the ACR. Percentage of Participants achieving ACR70 = (number of participants with measure/event of interest)/(number of particpants in the analysis)\*100
Time frame: Baseline, Day 15, Day 29, Day 57, Day 85
Population: Analysis was performed on efficacy population which excluded participants who were randomized to a treatment arm and discontinued based on the interim analysis (IA)
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 70% Response Over Time From Baseline to Week 12 | Baseline (Day 1) | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 70% Response Over Time From Baseline to Week 12 | Day 15 | 1.3 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 70% Response Over Time From Baseline to Week 12 | Day 57 | 1.3 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 70% Response Over Time From Baseline to Week 12 | Day 85 | 4.0 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 70% Response Over Time From Baseline to Week 12 | Day 29 | 0.0 Percentage of participants |
| BMS 100mg | Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 70% Response Over Time From Baseline to Week 12 | Day 29 | 0.0 Percentage of participants |
| BMS 100mg | Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 70% Response Over Time From Baseline to Week 12 | Day 85 | 4.1 Percentage of participants |
| BMS 100mg | Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 70% Response Over Time From Baseline to Week 12 | Day 15 | 0.0 Percentage of participants |
| BMS 100mg | Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 70% Response Over Time From Baseline to Week 12 | Day 57 | 5.5 Percentage of participants |
| BMS 100mg | Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 70% Response Over Time From Baseline to Week 12 | Baseline (Day 1) | 0 Percentage of participants |
| BMS 200mg | Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 70% Response Over Time From Baseline to Week 12 | Day 29 | 0.0 Percentage of participants |
| BMS 200mg | Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 70% Response Over Time From Baseline to Week 12 | Day 57 | 5.5 Percentage of participants |
| BMS 200mg | Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 70% Response Over Time From Baseline to Week 12 | Day 85 | 9.6 Percentage of participants |
| BMS 200mg | Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 70% Response Over Time From Baseline to Week 12 | Day 15 | 1.4 Percentage of participants |
| BMS 200mg | Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 70% Response Over Time From Baseline to Week 12 | Baseline (Day 1) | 0 Percentage of participants |
| BMS 350mg | Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 70% Response Over Time From Baseline to Week 12 | Baseline (Day 1) | 0 Percentage of participants |
| BMS 350mg | Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 70% Response Over Time From Baseline to Week 12 | Day 29 | 0.0 Percentage of participants |
| BMS 350mg | Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 70% Response Over Time From Baseline to Week 12 | Day 15 | 0.0 Percentage of participants |
| BMS 350mg | Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 70% Response Over Time From Baseline to Week 12 | Day 85 | 3.8 Percentage of participants |
| BMS 350mg | Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 70% Response Over Time From Baseline to Week 12 | Day 57 | 3.8 Percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants Achieving Boolean Remission Criteria at Week 12
Boolean remission criteria was defined as: tender joint count28 \<= 1; swollen joint count28 \<= 1; physician's global assessment \<= 1; and CRP \<= 1 mg/deciliter.
Time frame: Week 12
Population: Analysis was performed on efficacy population which excluded participants who were randomized to a treatment arm and discontinued based on the interim analysis (IA)
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants Achieving Boolean Remission Criteria at Week 12 | 1.3 Percentage of participants |
| BMS 100mg | Percentage of Participants Achieving Boolean Remission Criteria at Week 12 | 4.1 Percentage of participants |
| BMS 200mg | Percentage of Participants Achieving Boolean Remission Criteria at Week 12 | 4.1 Percentage of participants |
| BMS 350mg | Percentage of Participants Achieving Boolean Remission Criteria at Week 12 | 0.0 Percentage of participants |
Trough Observed Plasma Concentration (Ctrough) of BMS-986142
Ctrough was defined as trough observed plasma concentration.
Time frame: Week 4, 8, and 12
Population: Analysis was performed on pharmacokinetic population which included all participants who received BMS-986142 and had any available concentration-time data.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (GEOMETRIC_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Trough Observed Plasma Concentration (Ctrough) of BMS-986142 | Week 8 | 41.2 nanogram/mL | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 95.3 |
| Placebo | Trough Observed Plasma Concentration (Ctrough) of BMS-986142 | Week 12 | 28.4 nanogram/mL | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 123 |
| Placebo | Trough Observed Plasma Concentration (Ctrough) of BMS-986142 | Week 4 | 47.9 nanogram/mL | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 119 |
| BMS 100mg | Trough Observed Plasma Concentration (Ctrough) of BMS-986142 | Week 8 | 92.2 nanogram/mL | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 124.5 |
| BMS 100mg | Trough Observed Plasma Concentration (Ctrough) of BMS-986142 | Week 4 | 111.8 nanogram/mL | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 101.7 |
| BMS 100mg | Trough Observed Plasma Concentration (Ctrough) of BMS-986142 | Week 12 | 75.6 nanogram/mL | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 155.4 |
| BMS 200mg | Trough Observed Plasma Concentration (Ctrough) of BMS-986142 | Week 4 | 195.9 nanogram/mL | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 91.9 |
| BMS 200mg | Trough Observed Plasma Concentration (Ctrough) of BMS-986142 | Week 12 | 169.5 nanogram/mL | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 83.2 |
| BMS 200mg | Trough Observed Plasma Concentration (Ctrough) of BMS-986142 | Week 8 | 283.0 nanogram/mL | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 133.3 |