Skip to content

Implantation of the Cochlear™ Nucleus® Hybrid S Round Window (S-RW) in Adults

Implantation of the Cochlear™ Nucleus® Hybrid S Round Window (S-RW) in Adults

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02638883
Enrollment
6
Registered
2015-12-23
Start date
2016-02-08
Completion date
2019-06-12
Last updated
2022-09-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Sensorineural Hearing Loss

Keywords

Adults; high frequency SNHL

Brief summary

Evaluate the Cochlear™ Nucleus® S-Round Window (S-RW) implant in newly implanted adults with broader requirements to be considered an eligible candidate.

Detailed description

The Food and Drug Administration recently approved the Cochlear Nucleus Hybrid L24 Implant System (P130016) for individuals aged 18 years and older who present with bilateral residual low frequency hearing sensitivity and severe to profound high frequency sensorineural hearing loss with limited benefit from appropriately fitted bilateral amplification. Additionally, the Nucleus Hybrid S12 Implant has been under evaluation since 2007 (IDE G#070016). The Nucleus Hybrid S-RW is a modification of the current Hybrid S12 implant. The Hybrid S-RW is designed to support implantation via a round window (RW) approach while maintaining the same relative insertion depth as the previous Hybrid S12 when implanted via cochleostomy

Interventions

DEVICEHybrid SRW cochlear implant

Subjects will be implanted with the Hybrid SRW

Sponsors

University of Iowa
CollaboratorOTHER
Cochlear
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Eighteen years of age or older at the time of implantation 2. Sensorineural hearing loss with the following requirements: a pure tone threshold less (better) than or equal to 60 dB HL at 500 Hz,less than (better) or equal to 80 dB HL at 1500 Hz, and high frequency severe to profound (a threshold average of 2000, 3000, & 4000 Hz) of \> 60dB HL. 3. Minimum of 30 days experience with appropriately fit bilateral amplification, fit as described in the Fitting and Use of Hearing Aids section below 4. Aided monosyllabic word score (e.g., CNC Word Test) (mean of two lists) between 20% and 60%, inclusive (i.e., 20% score 60%), in the ear to be implanted 5. Aided monosyllabic word score (e.g., CNC Word Test) (mean of two lists) in the contralateral ear equal to, or better than, the ear to be implanted but not more than 80% 6. Willingness to use bimodal stimulation (i.e., a cochlear implant on one ear and a hearing aid on the contralateral ear) through 12-months post-activation

Exclusion criteria

1. Individuals aged greater than 75 years 2. Duration of severe to profound hearing loss (above 2kHz) greater than 20 years 3. Medical or psychological conditions that contraindicate undergoing surgery as determined by the Investigator 4. Ossification or any other cochlear anomaly that might prevent complete insertion of the electrode array 5. Conductive overlay of 15 dB or greater at two or more frequencies, in the range 500 to 1000 Hz 6. Deafness due to lesions of the acoustic nerve or central auditory pathway 7. Active middle-ear infection or tympanic membrane perforation in the presence of active middle ear disease 8. Unrealistic expectations on the part of the subject, regarding the possible benefits, risks, and limitations that are inherent to the surgical procedure(s) and prosthetic devices as determined by the Investigator 9. Unwillingness or inability of the candidate to comply with all investigational requirements as determined by the Investigator 10. Additional handicaps that would prevent or restrict participation in the audiological evaluations as determined by the Investigator.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
CNC (Consonant-nucleus-consonant) Words12 monthsTwo CNC( consonant-nucleus-consonant) Word lists (Peterson & Lehiste, 1962) were administered in quiet at a level of 60 dBA in the sound-field and scored as a total number of words correct, expressed as a percentage. Possible score are range from 0% to 100 % words correctly repeated. Higher scores mean a better outcome.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Implanted
Subjects will be implanted with the Hybrid SRW cochlear implant. Hybrid SRW cochlear implant: Subjects will be implanted with the Hybrid SRW
6
Total6

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicImplanted
Age at Implant in Years57.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11
Age, Customized6 Participants
Duration of Hearing Loss37.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 25.2
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected— Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
6 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
3 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
3 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 6
other
Total, other adverse events
4 / 6
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 6

Outcome results

Primary

CNC (Consonant-nucleus-consonant) Words

Two CNC( consonant-nucleus-consonant) Word lists (Peterson & Lehiste, 1962) were administered in quiet at a level of 60 dBA in the sound-field and scored as a total number of words correct, expressed as a percentage. Possible score are range from 0% to 100 % words correctly repeated. Higher scores mean a better outcome.

Time frame: 12 months

Population: Only 5 subjects were analysed rather than 6 as one subject used electric mode only by 12 months post activation.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ImplantedCNC (Consonant-nucleus-consonant) Words64.8 percentage of correct words.Standard Deviation 23

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026