Skip to content

Study to Evaluate Ospemifene in Patients With Moderate to Severe Vaginal Dryness Due to Menopause

A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Ospemifene in Patients With Moderate to Severe Vaginal Dryness, a Symptom of Vulvo-vaginal Atrophy (VVA) Due to Menopause

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02638337
Enrollment
631
Registered
2015-12-23
Start date
2016-01-26
Completion date
2017-07-05
Last updated
2019-04-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Vaginal Dryness

Keywords

Vulvo-vaginal Atrophy, menopause

Brief summary

The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ospemifene 60 mg once daily (QD) compared with placebo in treatment of vulvo-vaginal atrophy (VVA) due to menopause in women with moderate to severe vaginal dryness as the most bothersome symptom (MBS) of VVA.

Interventions

60 mg tablet

DRUGPlacebo

Tablet identical to the ospemifene tablet without drug

Sponsors

Shionogi
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
40 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Subject is postmenopausal. * Subject has moderate to severe vaginal dryness as the self-reported MBS of VVA.

Exclusion criteria

* Subject has clinically significant abnormal findings in the physical examination. * Subject has a body mass index (BMI) equal to or greater than 38 kg/m\^2 * Subject has uncontrolled hypertension. * Subject has clinically significant abnormal findings in the gynecological examination other than signs of vaginal atrophy. * Subject has uterine/vaginal bleeding of unknown origin. * Subject has a vaginal infection requiring medication (may be treated and be eligible for study).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Parabasal Cells in the Maturation Index of the Vaginal Smear at Week 12Baseline and Week 12Parabasal cells are immature squamous cells in the lining of the vagina. A predominance of parabasal cells indicates absence of estrogenic stimulation and vaginal atrophy. Vaginal smear samples were taken from the middle third of the lateral vaginal wall and were evaluated at a central laboratory by a qualified pathologist. A decrease in parabasal cells indicates improvement in vaginal atrophy. To calculate least squares (LS) means, a mixed-effects model for repeated measures (MMRM) model was used.
Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Superficial Cells in the Maturation Index of the Vaginal Smear at Week 12Baseline and Week 12Superficial cells are mature squamous cells in the lining of the vagina that can decrease in number after menopause resulting in vulvovaginal atrophy. Vaginal smear samples were taken from the middle third of the lateral vaginal wall and were evaluated at a central laboratory by a qualified pathologist. An increase in the number of superficial cells indicates improvement in atrophy. To calculate least squares (LS) means, a mixed-effects model for repeated measures (MMRM) model was used.
Change From Baseline in the Vaginal pH at Week 12Baseline and Week 12The pH scale ranges from 0 to 14. A pH of 7 is neutral, less than 7 is acidic, and greater than 7 is basic. A typical vaginal pH in women of reproductive age is between 3.5 and 4.5, increasing to \> 4.5 after menopause. Vaginal pH was measured by the investigator using a pH indicator strip at the middle third of the vaginal wall. To calculate least squares (LS) means, a mixed-effects model for repeated measures (MMRM) model was used.
Change From Baseline in the Severity of Self-reported Most Bothersome Symptom (MBS) of Vaginal Dryness at Week 12Baseline and Week 12The severity of the most bothersome symptom of vaginal dryness was assessed by the participant through the VVA questionnaire as none = 0, mild = 1, moderate = 2, and severe = 3.
Number of Participants With Adverse EventsFrom the first dose of study drug up to 14 days after the last dose; 14 weeksTreatment-related adverse events (AEs) were defined as AEs that were considered by the investigator to be related to investigational medicinal product, for which causal relationship with the study drug could be reasonably explained. A serious adverse event (SAE) is defined as any AE occurring at any dose that resulted in any of the following outcomes: * Death * Life-threatening condition * Hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization for treatment * Persistent or significant disability/incapacity * Congenital anomaly/birth defect * Other medically important conditions that, based on medical judgment, may jeopardize the participant's health and may require medical intervention to prevent one of the outcomes listed above.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Difficult or Painful UrinationBaseline and Weeks 4, 8, and 12The severity of difficult or painful urination was assessed by the participant through the VVA questionnaire as none = 0, mild = 1, moderate = 2, and severe = 3.
Change From Baseline in Vaginal Pain Associated With Sexual ActivityBaseline and Weeks 4, 8, and 12The severity of vaginal pain associated with sexual activity was assessed by the participant through the VVA questionnaire as none = 0, mild = 1, moderate = 2, and severe = 3.
Change From Baseline in Vaginal Bleeding Associated With Sexual ActivityBaseline and Weeks 4, 8, and 12The severity of vaginal bleeding associated with sexual activity was assessed by the participant through the VVA questionnaire as none = 0, mild = 1, moderate = 2, and severe = 3.
Change From Baseline in Maturation ValueBaseline and Weeks 4, 8, and 12The maturation value is an indicator of the level of maturation attained by the vaginal epithelium. Vaginal smear samples were taken from the middle third of the lateral vaginal wall and were evaluated at the central laboratory by a qualified pathologist. Parabasal cells (P), intermediary cells (I), and superficial cells (S) were counted and results were expressed as the maturation value (MV), whereby superficial cells were assigned a point value of 1.0, intermediate cells were assigned a point value of 0.5, and parabasal cells were assigned a point value of 0. The maturation value (MV) was defined as: (percentage of superficial cells \* 1) + (percentage of intermediate cells \* 0.5) + (percentage of parabasal calls \* 0). Lower MV indicates lower estrogen effect.
Percentage of Participants Who Were Responders at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, and 12A participant was defined as a responder if all the following conditions were met:: * Increase from baseline in maturation value of at least 10 * Decrease from baseline in vaginal pH of at least 0.5 * Improvement from baseline (decrease in severity) of at least 1 point in the most bothersome symptom of vaginal dryness
Change From Baseline in Vaginal Health IndexBaseline and Weeks 4, 8, and 12The investigator performed an evaluation of the vagina, assessing overall elasticity, fluid secretion, pH, condition of epithelial mucosa, and moisture. The severity of each characteristic was assessed using a 5-grade scale from 1 (worst) to 5 (best). The total score was calculated as the sum of the 5 individual scores and ranges from 5 to 25, where higher scores indicate better vaginal health
Change From Baseline in Vulvar Health IndexBaseline and Weeks 4, 8, and 12The investigator performed a visual examination of the vulva, assessing the labia majora, labia minora, clitoris, introitus appearance and elasticity, color, discomfort and pain, and presence of other findings (eg, petechiae, excoriations, ulcers, etc). The severity of each characteristic was assessed on a 4-point scale as 0 = normal, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, and 3 = severe. The total score was calculated by adding the 7 individual scores and ranges from 0 to 21, where lower scores indicate better vulvar health. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Change From Baseline in Vulvovaginal Imaging Total Score at Week 12Baseline and Week 12Vulvovaginal imaging was performed by trained site personnel following a standard procedure. Photographs were assessed by an Independent Panel Review (IPR) in a blinded fashion. Nine parameters (labia majora, labia minora, clitoris, urethra, introitus and elasticity, color, erythema, moisture, and other findings (petechiae, excoriation, ulceration, etc.)) were evaluated on a scale from 0 (normal/none) to 3 (severe). The total score was calculated from the sum of the 9 individual scores and ranged from 0 to 27 with lower values indicating better vulvovaginal health; a negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Change From Baseline in Female Sexual Function Index Total ScoreBaseline and Weeks 4, 8, and 12The Female Sexual Function Index consists of 19 questions organized into 6 domains (desire, arousal, lubrication, orgasm, satisfaction, and pain) answered by the participant on a 5-point scale from 1 to 5. Where relevant, some questions also include an option of 0 if a question is not applicable due to no sexual activity. Each domain score was calculated by adding the scores of each item in the domain and multiplying by a domain factor. The total score was calculated by summing each domain score and ranges from 2 to 36, with higher values indicating better sexual function.
Change From Baseline in Female Sexual Function Index Domain Scores at Week 12Baseline and Week 12The Female Sexual Function Index consists of 19 questions, organized into 6 domains (desire, arousal, lubrication, orgasm, satisfaction, and pain), answered by the participant on a scale from 1 to 5. Where relevant, some questions also include an option of 0 if not applicable due to no sexual activity. Each domain score was calculated by adding the scores of each item in the domain and multiplying by a domain factor. For all domains, higher values indicate better sexual function, according to the following: Desire (2 questions): domain score ranges from 1.2 to 6; Arousal (4 questions): domain score ranges from 0 to 6; Lubrication (4 questions): domain score ranges from 0 to 6; Orgasm (3 questions): domain score ranges from 0 to 6; Satisfaction (3 questions): domain score ranges from 0.8 to 6; Pain (3 questions): domain score ranges from 0 to 6.
Change From Baseline in Urinary Distress Inventory (UDI)-6 Total ScoreBaseline and Weeks 4, 8, and 12The presence or absence of urinary symptoms was assessed using the Urinary Distress Inventory (UDI)-6. The symptoms include frequent urination, urine leakage related to the feeling of urgency, urine leakage related to physical activity, coughing, or sneezing, small amounts of urine leakage, difficulty emptying bladder, and pain and discomfort in the lower abdominal or genital area. If a symptom was present, participants were asked to assess the degree to which they were bothered by it on the following 4-point scale: 1. = present but doesn't bother her at all; 2. = present and bothers her slightly; 3. = present and bothers her moderately; 4. = present and bothers her greatly. The total score was calculated by adding the 6 scores together (Absent = 0), and ranges from 0 to 24, with lower values indicating less urinary distress.
Change From Baseline in Bone Sialoprotein at Week 12Baseline and Week 12Serum bone sialoprotein (BSP) was measured as a marker of bone resorption.
Change From Baseline in Type I Collagen C-Telopeptide (CTX) at Week 12Baseline and Week 12Type I collagen C-telopeptide was measured as a marker of bone resorption.
Change From Baseline in Deoxypyridinoline at Week 12Baseline and Week 12Deoxypyridinoline was measured as a marker of bone resorption.
Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Parabasal Cells in the Maturation Index of the Vaginal Smear at Weeks 4 and 8Baseline and Weeks 4 and 8Parabasal cells are immature squamous cells in the lining of the vagina. A predominance of parabasal cells indicates absence of estrogenic stimulation and vaginal atrophy. Vaginal smear samples were taken from the middle third of the lateral vaginal wall and were evaluated at a central laboratory by a qualified pathologist. A decrease in parabasal cells indicates improvement in vaginal atrophy.
Change From Baseline in Tartrate-Resistant Acid Phosphatase 5b at Week 12Baseline and Week 12Tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase 5b was measured as a marker of bone resorption.
Change From Baseline in Alkaline Phosphatase at Week 12Baseline and Week 12Alkaline phosphatase was measured as a marker of bone formation.
Change From Baseline in Bone-specific Alkaline Phosphatase at Week 12Baseline and Week 12Bone-specific alkaline phosphatase was measured as a marker of bone formation.
Change From Baseline in Osteocalcin at Week 12Baseline and Week 12Osteocalcin was measured as a marker for bone formation.
Change From Baseline in Procollagen 1 N-Terminal Propeptide (P1NP) at Week 12Baseline and Week 12Procollagen 1 N-terminal propeptide was measured as a marker of bone formation.
Mean Days of Lubricant Use Per WeekWeek 1 to Week 12The mean number of days/week that lubricant was used as documented by participants in an electronic daily diary.
Mean Days of Intercourse Per WeekWeek 1 to Week 12The mean number of days/week of intercourse as recorded by participants in an electronic daily diary.
Overall Satisfaction With Treatment at Week 12Week 12Participants were asked to record their overall satisfaction with treatment in an electronic diary according to the following categories: Very satisfied, Moderately satisfied, About equally satisfied and dissatisfied, Moderately dissatisfied, and Very dissatisfied.
Change From Baseline in Estradiol at Week 12Baseline and Week 12
Change From Baseline in Follicle-Stimulating Hormone at Week 12Baseline and Week 12
Change From Baseline in Luteinizing Hormone at Week 12Baseline and Week 12
Change From Baseline in Sex Hormone-Binding Globulin at Week 12Baseline and Week 12
Change From Baseline in Testosterone at Week 12Baseline and Week 12
Change From Baseline in Free Testosterone at Week 12Baseline and Week 12
Change From Baseline in Type I Collagen N-Telopeptide (NTX) at Week 12Baseline and Week 12Type I collagen N-telopeptide was measured as a marker of bone resorption.
Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Superficial Cells in the Maturation Index of the Vaginal Smear at Weeks 4 and 8Baseline and Weeks 4 and 8Superficial cells are mature squamous cells in the lining of the vagina that can decrease in number after menopause resulting in vulvovaginal atrophy. Vaginal smear samples were taken from the middle third of the lateral vaginal wall and were evaluated at a central laboratory by a qualified pathologist. An increase in the number of superficial cells indicates improvement in atrophy.
Change From Baseline in the Vaginal pHBaseline and Weeks 4 and 8The pH scale ranges from 0 to 14. A pH of 7 is neutral, less than 7 is acidic, and greater than 7 is basic. A typical vaginal pH in women of reproductive age is between 3.5 and 4.5, increasing to \> 4.5 after menopause. Vaginal pH was measured by the investigator using a pH indicator strip at the middle third of the vaginal wall.
Change From Baseline in the Severity of Self-reported Most Bothersome Symptom (MBS) of Vaginal Dryness at Weeks 4 and 8Baseline and Weeks 4 and 8The severity of the most bothersome symptom of vaginal dryness was assessed by the participant through the VVA questionnaire as none = 0, mild = 1, moderate = 2, and severe = 3.
Change From Baseline in Vaginal and/or Vulvar Irritation or ItchingBaseline and Weeks 4, 8, and 12The severity of vaginal and/or vulvar irritation or itching was assessed by the participant through the VVA questionnaire as none = 0, mild = 1, moderate = 2, and severe = 3.

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants were randomized at 68 sites in the United States.

Pre-assignment details

After a screening period of up to 4 weeks, participants who met all eligibility criteria were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either ospemifene 60 mg once daily or matching placebo for 12 weeks. Randomization was stratified by severity of most bothersome symptom of vaginal dryness on Day 1 and by the presence or absence of the uterus.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Ospemifene
Participants received one tablet of ospemifene 60 mg orally, once a day for 12 weeks.
313
Placebo
Participants received one tablet of matching placebo, orally, once a day for 12 weeks.
314
Total627

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event610
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up77
Overall StudyOther - Miscellaneous43
Overall StudyProtocol Violation30
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject1316

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicOspemifenePlaceboTotal
Age, Continuous59.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.6
59.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.2
59.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.9
Age, Customized
>= 40 to < 45 years
3 Participants7 Participants10 Participants
Age, Customized
>= 45 to < 55 years
66 Participants58 Participants124 Participants
Age, Customized
>= 55 to < 65 years
171 Participants174 Participants345 Participants
Age, Customized
>= 65 years
73 Participants75 Participants148 Participants
Current Hot Flashes
No
287 Participants286 Participants573 Participants
Current Hot Flashes
Yes
26 Participants28 Participants54 Participants
Duration of Vulvovaginal Atrophy (VVA)8.36 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.92
8.98 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.79
8.67 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.37
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
84 Participants79 Participants163 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
228 Participants234 Participants462 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Mean Severity of Most Bothersome Symptom of Vaginal Dryness2.53 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.5
2.54 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.5
2.54 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.5
Percentage of Parabasal Cells in the Vaginal Squamous Epithelium:25.8 percentage of cells
STANDARD_DEVIATION 33.3
28.3 percentage of cells
STANDARD_DEVIATION 33.1
27.0 percentage of cells
STANDARD_DEVIATION 33.2
Percentage of Superficial Cells in the Vaginal Squamous Epithelium3.0 percentage of cells
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.6
2.8 percentage of cells
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.9
2.9 percentage of cells
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.2
Presence of Uterus
No
185 Participants182 Participants367 Participants
Presence of Uterus
Yes
128 Participants132 Participants260 Participants
Previous Hormone Treatment as Prior Treatment
None
305 Participants307 Participants612 Participants
Previous Hormone Treatment as Prior Treatment
Oral
5 Participants5 Participants10 Participants
Previous Hormone Treatment as Prior Treatment
Other
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Previous Hormone Treatment as Prior Treatment
Transdermal
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Previous Hormone Treatment as Prior Treatment
Vaginal
4 Participants3 Participants7 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants7 Participants7 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
1 Participants3 Participants4 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
38 Participants32 Participants70 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
1 Participants6 Participants7 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
273 Participants266 Participants539 Participants
Severity of Most Bothersome Symptom of Vaginal Dryness
Mild
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Severity of Most Bothersome Symptom of Vaginal Dryness
Moderate
148 Participants143 Participants291 Participants
Severity of Most Bothersome Symptom of Vaginal Dryness
None
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Severity of Most Bothersome Symptom of Vaginal Dryness
Severe
165 Participants171 Participants336 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
313 Participants314 Participants627 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Vaginal pH6.11 pH
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.7
6.14 pH
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.73
6.12 pH
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.71

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 3170 / 310
other
Total, other adverse events
37 / 31742 / 310
serious
Total, serious adverse events
5 / 3173 / 310

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Parabasal Cells in the Maturation Index of the Vaginal Smear at Week 12

Parabasal cells are immature squamous cells in the lining of the vagina. A predominance of parabasal cells indicates absence of estrogenic stimulation and vaginal atrophy. Vaginal smear samples were taken from the middle third of the lateral vaginal wall and were evaluated at a central laboratory by a qualified pathologist. A decrease in parabasal cells indicates improvement in vaginal atrophy. To calculate least squares (LS) means, a mixed-effects model for repeated measures (MMRM) model was used.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

Population: Intent-to-treat population with available baseline data

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
OspemifeneChange From Baseline in the Percentage of Parabasal Cells in the Maturation Index of the Vaginal Smear at Week 12-23.7 percentage of cellsStandard Error 1.4
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Percentage of Parabasal Cells in the Maturation Index of the Vaginal Smear at Week 12-1.9 percentage of cellsStandard Error 1.4
Comparison: For the percentage of parabasal cells a mixed-effects model for repeated measures (MMRM) approach was used, with repeated measurements of the change from baseline as the response variable; treatment, week, treatment by week interaction, and study center as fixed effects; and baseline value modeled as a covariate.p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-25.7, -18]Mixed-effects model repeated measures
Primary

Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Superficial Cells in the Maturation Index of the Vaginal Smear at Week 12

Superficial cells are mature squamous cells in the lining of the vagina that can decrease in number after menopause resulting in vulvovaginal atrophy. Vaginal smear samples were taken from the middle third of the lateral vaginal wall and were evaluated at a central laboratory by a qualified pathologist. An increase in the number of superficial cells indicates improvement in atrophy. To calculate least squares (LS) means, a mixed-effects model for repeated measures (MMRM) model was used.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

Population: Intent-to-treat population with available baseline data

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
OspemifeneChange From Baseline in the Percentage of Superficial Cells in the Maturation Index of the Vaginal Smear at Week 127.8 percentage of cellsStandard Error 0.7
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Percentage of Superficial Cells in the Maturation Index of the Vaginal Smear at Week 120.6 percentage of cellsStandard Error 0.7
p-value: <0.000195% CI: [5.2, 9.1]Mixed-effects model repeated measures
Primary

Change From Baseline in the Severity of Self-reported Most Bothersome Symptom (MBS) of Vaginal Dryness at Week 12

The severity of the most bothersome symptom of vaginal dryness was assessed by the participant through the VVA questionnaire as none = 0, mild = 1, moderate = 2, and severe = 3.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

Population: Intent-to-treat population with available baseline data

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
OspemifeneChange From Baseline in the Severity of Self-reported Most Bothersome Symptom (MBS) of Vaginal Dryness at Week 12-1.29 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.01
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Severity of Self-reported Most Bothersome Symptom (MBS) of Vaginal Dryness at Week 12-0.91 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.96
Comparison: For the MBS of vaginal dryness a generalized estimating equations (GEE) model was used to fit a marginal proportional odds model to the longitudinal ordered categorical data, with repeated measurements of the change from baseline as the response variable; treatment, week, treatment by week interaction, and study center as fixed effects; and baseline severity of dryness modeled as a covariate.p-value: <0.000195% CI: [1.62, 3.06]Generalized estimating equations model
Primary

Change From Baseline in the Vaginal pH at Week 12

The pH scale ranges from 0 to 14. A pH of 7 is neutral, less than 7 is acidic, and greater than 7 is basic. A typical vaginal pH in women of reproductive age is between 3.5 and 4.5, increasing to \> 4.5 after menopause. Vaginal pH was measured by the investigator using a pH indicator strip at the middle third of the vaginal wall. To calculate least squares (LS) means, a mixed-effects model for repeated measures (MMRM) model was used.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

Population: Intent-to-treat population with available baseline data

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
OspemifeneChange From Baseline in the Vaginal pH at Week 12-1.01 pHStandard Error 0.04
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Vaginal pH at Week 12-0.29 pHStandard Error 0.04
p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-0.84, -0.59]Mixed-effects model repeated measures
Primary

Number of Participants With Adverse Events

Treatment-related adverse events (AEs) were defined as AEs that were considered by the investigator to be related to investigational medicinal product, for which causal relationship with the study drug could be reasonably explained. A serious adverse event (SAE) is defined as any AE occurring at any dose that resulted in any of the following outcomes: * Death * Life-threatening condition * Hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization for treatment * Persistent or significant disability/incapacity * Congenital anomaly/birth defect * Other medically important conditions that, based on medical judgment, may jeopardize the participant's health and may require medical intervention to prevent one of the outcomes listed above.

Time frame: From the first dose of study drug up to 14 days after the last dose; 14 weeks

Population: Participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. Four participants randomized to placebo received ospemifene in error and are counted in the ospemifene group for safety assessments. One participant randomized to placebo who enrolled at 2 different sites at the same time was excluded.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
OspemifeneNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsAdverse events leading to withdrawal6 Participants
OspemifeneNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsSerious adverse events5 Participants
OspemifeneNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsTreatment-related adverse events28 Participants
OspemifeneNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsTreatment-related serious adverse events0 Participants
OspemifeneNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsTreatment-related AEs leading to withdrawal5 Participants
OspemifeneNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsAdverse events with outcome of death0 Participants
OspemifeneNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsAny adverse event112 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsAdverse events with outcome of death0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsAny adverse event103 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsTreatment-related adverse events20 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsAdverse events leading to withdrawal10 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsTreatment-related AEs leading to withdrawal3 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsSerious adverse events3 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsTreatment-related serious adverse events0 Participants
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Alkaline Phosphatase at Week 12

Alkaline phosphatase was measured as a marker of bone formation.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

Population: Intent-to-treat population with available data

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
OspemifeneChange From Baseline in Alkaline Phosphatase at Week 12-4.6 units/LStandard Error 0.7
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Alkaline Phosphatase at Week 121.6 units/LStandard Error 0.7
p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-8.1, -4.3]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Bone Sialoprotein at Week 12

Serum bone sialoprotein (BSP) was measured as a marker of bone resorption.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

Population: Intent-to-treat population with available data

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
OspemifeneChange From Baseline in Bone Sialoprotein at Week 12-24964.3 pg/mLStandard Error 3922.5
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Bone Sialoprotein at Week 12-20576.1 pg/mLStandard Error 3871.5
p-value: 0.426395% CI: [-15214.8, 6438.3]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Bone-specific Alkaline Phosphatase at Week 12

Bone-specific alkaline phosphatase was measured as a marker of bone formation.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

Population: Intent-to-treat population with available data

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
OspemifeneChange From Baseline in Bone-specific Alkaline Phosphatase at Week 12-0.50 units/LStandard Error 0.36
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Bone-specific Alkaline Phosphatase at Week 120.84 units/LStandard Error 0.36
p-value: 0.008495% CI: [-2.35, -0.35]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Deoxypyridinoline at Week 12

Deoxypyridinoline was measured as a marker of bone resorption.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

Population: Intent-to-treat population with available data

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
OspemifeneChange From Baseline in Deoxypyridinoline at Week 120.08 µmol/mol creatinineStandard Error 0.16
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Deoxypyridinoline at Week 120.22 µmol/mol creatinineStandard Error 0.16
p-value: 0.515995% CI: [-0.58, 0.29]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Difficult or Painful Urination

The severity of difficult or painful urination was assessed by the participant through the VVA questionnaire as none = 0, mild = 1, moderate = 2, and severe = 3.

Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, and 12

Population: Intent-to-treat population; participants whose baseline values were moderate or severe were included.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
OspemifeneChange From Baseline in Difficult or Painful UrinationWeek 4-1.23 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.01
OspemifeneChange From Baseline in Difficult or Painful UrinationWeek 8-1.42 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.95
OspemifeneChange From Baseline in Difficult or Painful UrinationWeek 12-1.56 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.93
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Difficult or Painful UrinationWeek 4-1.21 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.84
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Difficult or Painful UrinationWeek 8-1.15 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.97
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Difficult or Painful UrinationWeek 12-1.38 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.91
Comparison: Week 4p-value: 0.836995% CI: [0.4, 2.1]Generalized estimating equations model
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.39795% CI: [0.58, 3.95]Generalized estimating equations model
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.539195% CI: [0.54, 3.26]Generalized estimating equations model
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Estradiol at Week 12

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

Population: Intent-to-treat population with available data

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
OspemifeneChange From Baseline in Estradiol at Week 12-2.5 pg/mLStandard Deviation 19.6
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Estradiol at Week 120.5 pg/mLStandard Deviation 10.3
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Female Sexual Function Index Domain Scores at Week 12

The Female Sexual Function Index consists of 19 questions, organized into 6 domains (desire, arousal, lubrication, orgasm, satisfaction, and pain), answered by the participant on a scale from 1 to 5. Where relevant, some questions also include an option of 0 if not applicable due to no sexual activity. Each domain score was calculated by adding the scores of each item in the domain and multiplying by a domain factor. For all domains, higher values indicate better sexual function, according to the following: Desire (2 questions): domain score ranges from 1.2 to 6; Arousal (4 questions): domain score ranges from 0 to 6; Lubrication (4 questions): domain score ranges from 0 to 6; Orgasm (3 questions): domain score ranges from 0 to 6; Satisfaction (3 questions): domain score ranges from 0.8 to 6; Pain (3 questions): domain score ranges from 0 to 6.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

Population: Intent-to-treat population with available baseline and Week 12 data

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
OspemifeneChange From Baseline in Female Sexual Function Index Domain Scores at Week 12Desire0.56 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.07
OspemifeneChange From Baseline in Female Sexual Function Index Domain Scores at Week 12Arousal0.64 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.11
OspemifeneChange From Baseline in Female Sexual Function Index Domain Scores at Week 12Lubrication1.29 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.12
OspemifeneChange From Baseline in Female Sexual Function Index Domain Scores at Week 12Orgasm0.78 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.12
OspemifeneChange From Baseline in Female Sexual Function Index Domain Scores at Week 12Satisfaction0.78 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.09
OspemifeneChange From Baseline in Female Sexual Function Index Domain Scores at Week 12Pain1.47 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.12
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Female Sexual Function Index Domain Scores at Week 12Satisfaction0.62 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.09
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Female Sexual Function Index Domain Scores at Week 12Desire0.39 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.06
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Female Sexual Function Index Domain Scores at Week 12Orgasm0.63 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.11
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Female Sexual Function Index Domain Scores at Week 12Arousal0.44 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.11
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Female Sexual Function Index Domain Scores at Week 12Pain1.01 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.12
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Female Sexual Function Index Domain Scores at Week 12Lubrication0.89 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.12
Comparison: Desirep-value: 0.075295% CI: [-0.02, 0.34]ANCOVA
Comparison: Arousalp-value: 0.186795% CI: [-0.1, 0.49]ANCOVA
Comparison: Lubricationp-value: 0.016195% CI: [0.07, 0.73]ANCOVA
Comparison: Orgasmp-value: 0.3495% CI: [-0.16, 0.48]ANCOVA
Comparison: Satisfactionp-value: 0.219595% CI: [-0.1, 0.41]ANCOVA
Comparison: Painp-value: 0.010395% CI: [0.11, 0.8]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Female Sexual Function Index Total Score

The Female Sexual Function Index consists of 19 questions organized into 6 domains (desire, arousal, lubrication, orgasm, satisfaction, and pain) answered by the participant on a 5-point scale from 1 to 5. Where relevant, some questions also include an option of 0 if a question is not applicable due to no sexual activity. Each domain score was calculated by adding the scores of each item in the domain and multiplying by a domain factor. The total score was calculated by summing each domain score and ranges from 2 to 36, with higher values indicating better sexual function.

Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, and 12

Population: Intent-to-treat population with available data at each time point

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
OspemifeneChange From Baseline in Female Sexual Function Index Total ScoreWeek 44.13 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.43
OspemifeneChange From Baseline in Female Sexual Function Index Total ScoreWeek 84.70 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.49
OspemifeneChange From Baseline in Female Sexual Function Index Total ScoreWeek 125.71 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.55
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Female Sexual Function Index Total ScoreWeek 44.11 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.43
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Female Sexual Function Index Total ScoreWeek 84.51 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.49
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Female Sexual Function Index Total ScoreWeek 124.13 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.54
Comparison: Week 4p-value: 0.974895% CI: [-1.17, 1.2]ANCOVA
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.786595% CI: [-1.18, 1.56]ANCOVA
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.039295% CI: [0.08, 3.09]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Follicle-Stimulating Hormone at Week 12

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

Population: Intent-to-treat population with available data

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
OspemifeneChange From Baseline in Follicle-Stimulating Hormone at Week 12-5.18 IU/LStandard Deviation 12.64
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Follicle-Stimulating Hormone at Week 12-1.96 IU/LStandard Deviation 11.79
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Free Testosterone at Week 12

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

Population: Intent-to-treat population with available data

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
OspemifeneChange From Baseline in Free Testosterone at Week 120.0000 nmol/LStandard Deviation 0.0035
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Free Testosterone at Week 120.0007 nmol/LStandard Deviation 0.0115
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Luteinizing Hormone at Week 12

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

Population: Intent-to-treat population with available data

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
OspemifeneChange From Baseline in Luteinizing Hormone at Week 12-1.58 IU/LStandard Deviation 8.54
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Luteinizing Hormone at Week 12-0.38 IU/LStandard Deviation 7.59
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Maturation Value

The maturation value is an indicator of the level of maturation attained by the vaginal epithelium. Vaginal smear samples were taken from the middle third of the lateral vaginal wall and were evaluated at the central laboratory by a qualified pathologist. Parabasal cells (P), intermediary cells (I), and superficial cells (S) were counted and results were expressed as the maturation value (MV), whereby superficial cells were assigned a point value of 1.0, intermediate cells were assigned a point value of 0.5, and parabasal cells were assigned a point value of 0. The maturation value (MV) was defined as: (percentage of superficial cells \* 1) + (percentage of intermediate cells \* 0.5) + (percentage of parabasal calls \* 0). Lower MV indicates lower estrogen effect.

Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, and 12

Population: Intent-to-treat population with available data at each time point

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
OspemifeneChange From Baseline in Maturation ValueWeek 413.33 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.79
OspemifeneChange From Baseline in Maturation ValueWeek 815.34 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.82
OspemifeneChange From Baseline in Maturation ValueWeek 1216.19 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.87
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Maturation ValueWeek 4-0.65 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.75
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Maturation ValueWeek 80.61 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.78
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Maturation ValueWeek 121.28 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.83
Comparison: Week 4p-value: <0.000195% CI: [11.85, 16.12]ANCOVA
Comparison: Week 8p-value: <0.000195% CI: [12.5, 16.96]ANCOVA
Comparison: Week 12p-value: <0.000195% CI: [12.55, 17.28]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Osteocalcin at Week 12

Osteocalcin was measured as a marker for bone formation.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

Population: Intent-to-treat population with available data

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
OspemifeneChange From Baseline in Osteocalcin at Week 12-1.43 ng/mLStandard Error 0.31
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Osteocalcin at Week 120.62 ng/mLStandard Error 0.31
p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-2.92, -1.19]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Procollagen 1 N-Terminal Propeptide (P1NP) at Week 12

Procollagen 1 N-terminal propeptide was measured as a marker of bone formation.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

Population: Intent-to-treat population with available data

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
OspemifeneChange From Baseline in Procollagen 1 N-Terminal Propeptide (P1NP) at Week 12-3.22 ng/mLStandard Error 0.85
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Procollagen 1 N-Terminal Propeptide (P1NP) at Week 122.04 ng/mLStandard Error 0.86
p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-7.64, -2.89]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Sex Hormone-Binding Globulin at Week 12

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

Population: Intent-to-treat population with available data

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
OspemifeneChange From Baseline in Sex Hormone-Binding Globulin at Week 1230.44 nmol/LStandard Deviation 31.89
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Sex Hormone-Binding Globulin at Week 121.73 nmol/LStandard Deviation 17.61
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Tartrate-Resistant Acid Phosphatase 5b at Week 12

Tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase 5b was measured as a marker of bone resorption.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

Population: Intent-to-treat population with available data

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
OspemifeneChange From Baseline in Tartrate-Resistant Acid Phosphatase 5b at Week 12-0.28 units/LStandard Error 0.04
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Tartrate-Resistant Acid Phosphatase 5b at Week 12-0.06 units/LStandard Error 0.04
p-value: 0.000395% CI: [-0.34, -0.1]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Testosterone at Week 12

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

Population: Intent-to-treat population with available data

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
OspemifeneChange From Baseline in Testosterone at Week 121.1 ng/dLStandard Deviation 9.1
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Testosterone at Week 121.2 ng/dLStandard Deviation 20.2
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Parabasal Cells in the Maturation Index of the Vaginal Smear at Weeks 4 and 8

Parabasal cells are immature squamous cells in the lining of the vagina. A predominance of parabasal cells indicates absence of estrogenic stimulation and vaginal atrophy. Vaginal smear samples were taken from the middle third of the lateral vaginal wall and were evaluated at a central laboratory by a qualified pathologist. A decrease in parabasal cells indicates improvement in vaginal atrophy.

Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 4 and 8

Population: Intent-to-treat population with baseline data

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
OspemifeneChange From Baseline in the Percentage of Parabasal Cells in the Maturation Index of the Vaginal Smear at Weeks 4 and 8Week 4-21.6 percentage of cellsStandard Error 1.3
OspemifeneChange From Baseline in the Percentage of Parabasal Cells in the Maturation Index of the Vaginal Smear at Weeks 4 and 8Week 8-23.7 percentage of cellsStandard Error 1.3
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Percentage of Parabasal Cells in the Maturation Index of the Vaginal Smear at Weeks 4 and 8Week 40.0 percentage of cellsStandard Error 1.3
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Percentage of Parabasal Cells in the Maturation Index of the Vaginal Smear at Weeks 4 and 8Week 8-1.9 percentage of cellsStandard Error 1.3
Comparison: Week 4p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-25.2, -18]Mixed-effects model repeated measures
Comparison: Week 8p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-25.4, -18.1]Mixed-effects model repeated measures
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Superficial Cells in the Maturation Index of the Vaginal Smear at Weeks 4 and 8

Superficial cells are mature squamous cells in the lining of the vagina that can decrease in number after menopause resulting in vulvovaginal atrophy. Vaginal smear samples were taken from the middle third of the lateral vaginal wall and were evaluated at a central laboratory by a qualified pathologist. An increase in the number of superficial cells indicates improvement in atrophy.

Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 4 and 8

Population: Intent-to-treat population with available baseline data

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
OspemifeneChange From Baseline in the Percentage of Superficial Cells in the Maturation Index of the Vaginal Smear at Weeks 4 and 8Week 45.6 percentage of cellsStandard Error 0.6
OspemifeneChange From Baseline in the Percentage of Superficial Cells in the Maturation Index of the Vaginal Smear at Weeks 4 and 8Week 87.1 percentage of cellsStandard Error 0.7
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Percentage of Superficial Cells in the Maturation Index of the Vaginal Smear at Weeks 4 and 8Week 4-0.2 percentage of cellsStandard Error 0.6
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Percentage of Superficial Cells in the Maturation Index of the Vaginal Smear at Weeks 4 and 8Week 8-0.2 percentage of cellsStandard Error 0.6
Comparison: Week 4p-value: <0.000195% CI: [4.2, 7.3]Mixed-effects model repeated measures
Comparison: Week 8p-value: <0.000195% CI: [5.5, 9]Mixed-effects model repeated measures
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Severity of Self-reported Most Bothersome Symptom (MBS) of Vaginal Dryness at Weeks 4 and 8

The severity of the most bothersome symptom of vaginal dryness was assessed by the participant through the VVA questionnaire as none = 0, mild = 1, moderate = 2, and severe = 3.

Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 4 and 8

Population: Intent-to-treat population with available data at baseline

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
OspemifeneChange From Baseline in the Severity of Self-reported Most Bothersome Symptom (MBS) of Vaginal Dryness at Weeks 4 and 8Week 4-0.83 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9
OspemifeneChange From Baseline in the Severity of Self-reported Most Bothersome Symptom (MBS) of Vaginal Dryness at Weeks 4 and 8Week 8-1.14 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.97
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Severity of Self-reported Most Bothersome Symptom (MBS) of Vaginal Dryness at Weeks 4 and 8Week 4-0.62 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.89
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Severity of Self-reported Most Bothersome Symptom (MBS) of Vaginal Dryness at Weeks 4 and 8Week 8-0.84 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.95
Comparison: Week 4p-value: 0.000595% CI: [1.27, 2.36]Generalized estimating equations model
Comparison: Week 8p-value: <0.000195% CI: [1.47, 2.74]Generalized estimating equations model
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Vaginal pH

The pH scale ranges from 0 to 14. A pH of 7 is neutral, less than 7 is acidic, and greater than 7 is basic. A typical vaginal pH in women of reproductive age is between 3.5 and 4.5, increasing to \> 4.5 after menopause. Vaginal pH was measured by the investigator using a pH indicator strip at the middle third of the vaginal wall.

Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 4 and 8

Population: Intent-to-treat population with available baseline data

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
OspemifeneChange From Baseline in the Vaginal pHWeek 4-0.81 pHStandard Error 0.04
OspemifeneChange From Baseline in the Vaginal pHWeek 8-0.95 pHStandard Error 0.04
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Vaginal pHWeek 4-0.24 pHStandard Error 0.04
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Vaginal pHWeek 8-0.32 pHStandard Error 0.04
Comparison: Week 4p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-0.69, -0.46]Mixed-effects model repeated measures
Comparison: Week 8p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-0.75, -0.51]Mixed-effects model repeated measures
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Type I Collagen C-Telopeptide (CTX) at Week 12

Type I collagen C-telopeptide was measured as a marker of bone resorption.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

Population: Intent-to-treat population with available data

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
OspemifeneChange From Baseline in Type I Collagen C-Telopeptide (CTX) at Week 12-0.044 ng/mLStandard Error 0.008
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Type I Collagen C-Telopeptide (CTX) at Week 120.006 ng/mLStandard Error 0.008
p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-0.071, -0.027]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Type I Collagen N-Telopeptide (NTX) at Week 12

Type I collagen N-telopeptide was measured as a marker of bone resorption.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

Population: Intent-to-treat population with available data

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
OspemifeneChange From Baseline in Type I Collagen N-Telopeptide (NTX) at Week 12-0.10 nmol bone collagen equivalents (BCE)/LStandard Error 0.23
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Type I Collagen N-Telopeptide (NTX) at Week 120.65 nmol bone collagen equivalents (BCE)/LStandard Error 0.23
p-value: 0.022795% CI: [-1.39, -0.1]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Urinary Distress Inventory (UDI)-6 Total Score

The presence or absence of urinary symptoms was assessed using the Urinary Distress Inventory (UDI)-6. The symptoms include frequent urination, urine leakage related to the feeling of urgency, urine leakage related to physical activity, coughing, or sneezing, small amounts of urine leakage, difficulty emptying bladder, and pain and discomfort in the lower abdominal or genital area. If a symptom was present, participants were asked to assess the degree to which they were bothered by it on the following 4-point scale: 1. = present but doesn't bother her at all; 2. = present and bothers her slightly; 3. = present and bothers her moderately; 4. = present and bothers her greatly. The total score was calculated by adding the 6 scores together (Absent = 0), and ranges from 0 to 24, with lower values indicating less urinary distress.

Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, and 12

Population: Intent-to-treat population with available data at each time point

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
OspemifeneChange From Baseline in Urinary Distress Inventory (UDI)-6 Total ScoreWeek 4-0.8 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.2
OspemifeneChange From Baseline in Urinary Distress Inventory (UDI)-6 Total ScoreWeek 8-1.0 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.2
OspemifeneChange From Baseline in Urinary Distress Inventory (UDI)-6 Total ScoreWeek 12-1.3 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.2
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Urinary Distress Inventory (UDI)-6 Total ScoreWeek 4-0.9 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.2
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Urinary Distress Inventory (UDI)-6 Total ScoreWeek 8-1.4 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.2
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Urinary Distress Inventory (UDI)-6 Total ScoreWeek 12-1.6 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.2
Comparison: Week 4p-value: 0.72395% CI: [-0.4, 0.6]ANCOVA
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.110495% CI: [-0.1, 0.9]ANCOVA
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.244895% CI: [-0.2, 0.9]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Vaginal and/or Vulvar Irritation or Itching

The severity of vaginal and/or vulvar irritation or itching was assessed by the participant through the VVA questionnaire as none = 0, mild = 1, moderate = 2, and severe = 3.

Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, and 12

Population: Intent-to-treat population; participants whose baseline values were moderate or severe were included

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
OspemifeneChange From Baseline in Vaginal and/or Vulvar Irritation or ItchingWeek 4-0.93 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
OspemifeneChange From Baseline in Vaginal and/or Vulvar Irritation or ItchingWeek 8-1.17 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.01
OspemifeneChange From Baseline in Vaginal and/or Vulvar Irritation or ItchingWeek 12-1.38 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Vaginal and/or Vulvar Irritation or ItchingWeek 4-0.99 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.02
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Vaginal and/or Vulvar Irritation or ItchingWeek 8-1.16 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.04
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Vaginal and/or Vulvar Irritation or ItchingWeek 12-1.40 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.96
Comparison: Week 4p-value: 0.626395% CI: [0.55, 1.43]Generalized estimating equations model
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.786995% CI: [0.66, 1.75]Generalized estimating equations model
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.889495% CI: [0.65, 1.64]Generalized estimating equations model
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Vaginal Bleeding Associated With Sexual Activity

The severity of vaginal bleeding associated with sexual activity was assessed by the participant through the VVA questionnaire as none = 0, mild = 1, moderate = 2, and severe = 3.

Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, and 12

Population: Intent-to-treat population; participants whose baseline values were moderate or severe were included

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
OspemifeneChange From Baseline in Vaginal Bleeding Associated With Sexual ActivityWeek 4-1.17 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.09
OspemifeneChange From Baseline in Vaginal Bleeding Associated With Sexual ActivityWeek 8-1.47 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.92
OspemifeneChange From Baseline in Vaginal Bleeding Associated With Sexual ActivityWeek 12-1.55 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.79
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Vaginal Bleeding Associated With Sexual ActivityWeek 4-1.33 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.14
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Vaginal Bleeding Associated With Sexual ActivityWeek 8-1.58 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.09
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Vaginal Bleeding Associated With Sexual ActivityWeek 12-1.61 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.06
Comparison: Week 4p-value: 0.433695% CI: [0.3, 1.67]Generalized estimating equations model
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.767295% CI: [0.37, 2.08]Generalized estimating equations model
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.710195% CI: [0.39, 1.89]Generalized estimating equations model
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Vaginal Health Index

The investigator performed an evaluation of the vagina, assessing overall elasticity, fluid secretion, pH, condition of epithelial mucosa, and moisture. The severity of each characteristic was assessed using a 5-grade scale from 1 (worst) to 5 (best). The total score was calculated as the sum of the 5 individual scores and ranges from 5 to 25, where higher scores indicate better vaginal health

Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, and 12

Population: Intent-to-treat population with available data at each time point

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
OspemifeneChange From Baseline in Vaginal Health IndexWeek 43.9 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.2
OspemifeneChange From Baseline in Vaginal Health IndexWeek 85.0 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.2
OspemifeneChange From Baseline in Vaginal Health IndexWeek 125.2 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.2
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Vaginal Health IndexWeek 41.5 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.2
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Vaginal Health IndexWeek 82.1 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.2
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Vaginal Health IndexWeek 122.3 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.2
Comparison: Week 4p-value: <0.000195% CI: [2, 3]ANCOVA
Comparison: Week 8p-value: <0.000195% CI: [2.4, 3.4]ANCOVA
Comparison: Week 12p-value: <0.000195% CI: [2.2, 3.4]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Vaginal Pain Associated With Sexual Activity

The severity of vaginal pain associated with sexual activity was assessed by the participant through the VVA questionnaire as none = 0, mild = 1, moderate = 2, and severe = 3.

Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, and 12

Population: Intent-to-treat population; participants whose baseline values were moderate or severe were included

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
OspemifeneChange From Baseline in Vaginal Pain Associated With Sexual ActivityWeek 4-1.24 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.11
OspemifeneChange From Baseline in Vaginal Pain Associated With Sexual ActivityWeek 8-1.41 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.08
OspemifeneChange From Baseline in Vaginal Pain Associated With Sexual ActivityWeek 12-1.55 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.05
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Vaginal Pain Associated With Sexual ActivityWeek 4-0.99 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.11
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Vaginal Pain Associated With Sexual ActivityWeek 8-1.26 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.13
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Vaginal Pain Associated With Sexual ActivityWeek 12-1.21 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.07
Comparison: Week 4p-value: 0.009595% CI: [1.13, 2.4]Generalized estimating equations model
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.054295% CI: [0.99, 2.11]Generalized estimating equations model
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.000495% CI: [1.35, 2.88]Generalized estimating equations model
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Vulvar Health Index

The investigator performed a visual examination of the vulva, assessing the labia majora, labia minora, clitoris, introitus appearance and elasticity, color, discomfort and pain, and presence of other findings (eg, petechiae, excoriations, ulcers, etc). The severity of each characteristic was assessed on a 4-point scale as 0 = normal, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, and 3 = severe. The total score was calculated by adding the 7 individual scores and ranges from 0 to 21, where lower scores indicate better vulvar health. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.

Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, and 12

Population: Intent-to-treat population with available data at each timepoint

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
OspemifeneChange From Baseline in Vulvar Health IndexWeek 4-2.2 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.2
OspemifeneChange From Baseline in Vulvar Health IndexWeek 8-2.8 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.2
OspemifeneChange From Baseline in Vulvar Health Indexweek 12-2.8 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.2
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Vulvar Health IndexWeek 4-1.4 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.2
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Vulvar Health IndexWeek 8-1.7 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.2
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Vulvar Health Indexweek 12-1.6 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.2
Comparison: Week 4p-value: 0.000295% CI: [-1.3, -0.4]ANCOVA
Comparison: Week 8p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-1.5, -0.6]ANCOVA
Comparison: Week 12p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-1.6, -0.7]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Vulvovaginal Imaging Total Score at Week 12

Vulvovaginal imaging was performed by trained site personnel following a standard procedure. Photographs were assessed by an Independent Panel Review (IPR) in a blinded fashion. Nine parameters (labia majora, labia minora, clitoris, urethra, introitus and elasticity, color, erythema, moisture, and other findings (petechiae, excoriation, ulceration, etc.)) were evaluated on a scale from 0 (normal/none) to 3 (severe). The total score was calculated from the sum of the 9 individual scores and ranged from 0 to 27 with lower values indicating better vulvovaginal health; a negative change from baseline indicates improvement.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

Population: Intent-to-treat population; participants who agreed to participate in the optional vaginal imaging, and with available data at both time points were included.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
OspemifeneChange From Baseline in Vulvovaginal Imaging Total Score at Week 12-1.1 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.3
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Vulvovaginal Imaging Total Score at Week 12-0.1 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.3
p-value: 0.011895% CI: [-1.8, -0.2]ANCOVA
Secondary

Mean Days of Intercourse Per Week

The mean number of days/week of intercourse as recorded by participants in an electronic daily diary.

Time frame: Week 1 to Week 12

Population: Intent-to-treat population with available data

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
OspemifeneMean Days of Intercourse Per Week0.9 days/weekStandard Deviation 1
PlaceboMean Days of Intercourse Per Week0.9 days/weekStandard Deviation 1.1
p-value: 0.8772Welch's t-test
Secondary

Mean Days of Lubricant Use Per Week

The mean number of days/week that lubricant was used as documented by participants in an electronic daily diary.

Time frame: Week 1 to Week 12

Population: Intent-to-treat population with available data

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
OspemifeneMean Days of Lubricant Use Per Week0.8 days/weekStandard Deviation 1.3
PlaceboMean Days of Lubricant Use Per Week0.8 days/weekStandard Deviation 1.2
p-value: 0.9575Welch's t-test
Secondary

Overall Satisfaction With Treatment at Week 12

Participants were asked to record their overall satisfaction with treatment in an electronic diary according to the following categories: Very satisfied, Moderately satisfied, About equally satisfied and dissatisfied, Moderately dissatisfied, and Very dissatisfied.

Time frame: Week 12

Population: Intent-to-treat population with available data

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
OspemifeneOverall Satisfaction With Treatment at Week 12Moderately satisfied71 Participants
OspemifeneOverall Satisfaction With Treatment at Week 12Moderately dissatisfied13 Participants
OspemifeneOverall Satisfaction With Treatment at Week 12About equally satisfied and dissatisfied43 Participants
OspemifeneOverall Satisfaction With Treatment at Week 12Very dissatisfied11 Participants
OspemifeneOverall Satisfaction With Treatment at Week 12Very satisfied83 Participants
PlaceboOverall Satisfaction With Treatment at Week 12Very dissatisfied17 Participants
PlaceboOverall Satisfaction With Treatment at Week 12Very satisfied54 Participants
PlaceboOverall Satisfaction With Treatment at Week 12Moderately satisfied52 Participants
PlaceboOverall Satisfaction With Treatment at Week 12About equally satisfied and dissatisfied49 Participants
PlaceboOverall Satisfaction With Treatment at Week 12Moderately dissatisfied26 Participants
p-value: 0.0007Wilcoxon rank-sum test
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Who Were Responders at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12

A participant was defined as a responder if all the following conditions were met:: * Increase from baseline in maturation value of at least 10 * Decrease from baseline in vaginal pH of at least 0.5 * Improvement from baseline (decrease in severity) of at least 1 point in the most bothersome symptom of vaginal dryness

Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, and 12

Population: Intent-to-treat population with available data at each time point

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
OspemifenePercentage of Participants Who Were Responders at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12Week 419.2 percentage of participants
OspemifenePercentage of Participants Who Were Responders at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12Week 827.9 percentage of participants
OspemifenePercentage of Participants Who Were Responders at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12Week 1231.5 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Who Were Responders at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12Week 42.6 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Who Were Responders at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12Week 84.4 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Who Were Responders at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12Week 126.0 percentage of participants
Comparison: Week 4p-value: <0.0001Fisher Exact
Comparison: Week 8p-value: <0.0001Fisher Exact
Comparison: Week 12p-value: <0.0001Fisher Exact

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026