Vaginal Dryness
Conditions
Keywords
Vulvo-vaginal Atrophy, menopause
Brief summary
The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ospemifene 60 mg once daily (QD) compared with placebo in treatment of vulvo-vaginal atrophy (VVA) due to menopause in women with moderate to severe vaginal dryness as the most bothersome symptom (MBS) of VVA.
Interventions
60 mg tablet
Tablet identical to the ospemifene tablet without drug
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Subject is postmenopausal. * Subject has moderate to severe vaginal dryness as the self-reported MBS of VVA.
Exclusion criteria
* Subject has clinically significant abnormal findings in the physical examination. * Subject has a body mass index (BMI) equal to or greater than 38 kg/m\^2 * Subject has uncontrolled hypertension. * Subject has clinically significant abnormal findings in the gynecological examination other than signs of vaginal atrophy. * Subject has uterine/vaginal bleeding of unknown origin. * Subject has a vaginal infection requiring medication (may be treated and be eligible for study).
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Parabasal Cells in the Maturation Index of the Vaginal Smear at Week 12 | Baseline and Week 12 | Parabasal cells are immature squamous cells in the lining of the vagina. A predominance of parabasal cells indicates absence of estrogenic stimulation and vaginal atrophy. Vaginal smear samples were taken from the middle third of the lateral vaginal wall and were evaluated at a central laboratory by a qualified pathologist. A decrease in parabasal cells indicates improvement in vaginal atrophy. To calculate least squares (LS) means, a mixed-effects model for repeated measures (MMRM) model was used. |
| Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Superficial Cells in the Maturation Index of the Vaginal Smear at Week 12 | Baseline and Week 12 | Superficial cells are mature squamous cells in the lining of the vagina that can decrease in number after menopause resulting in vulvovaginal atrophy. Vaginal smear samples were taken from the middle third of the lateral vaginal wall and were evaluated at a central laboratory by a qualified pathologist. An increase in the number of superficial cells indicates improvement in atrophy. To calculate least squares (LS) means, a mixed-effects model for repeated measures (MMRM) model was used. |
| Change From Baseline in the Vaginal pH at Week 12 | Baseline and Week 12 | The pH scale ranges from 0 to 14. A pH of 7 is neutral, less than 7 is acidic, and greater than 7 is basic. A typical vaginal pH in women of reproductive age is between 3.5 and 4.5, increasing to \> 4.5 after menopause. Vaginal pH was measured by the investigator using a pH indicator strip at the middle third of the vaginal wall. To calculate least squares (LS) means, a mixed-effects model for repeated measures (MMRM) model was used. |
| Change From Baseline in the Severity of Self-reported Most Bothersome Symptom (MBS) of Vaginal Dryness at Week 12 | Baseline and Week 12 | The severity of the most bothersome symptom of vaginal dryness was assessed by the participant through the VVA questionnaire as none = 0, mild = 1, moderate = 2, and severe = 3. |
| Number of Participants With Adverse Events | From the first dose of study drug up to 14 days after the last dose; 14 weeks | Treatment-related adverse events (AEs) were defined as AEs that were considered by the investigator to be related to investigational medicinal product, for which causal relationship with the study drug could be reasonably explained. A serious adverse event (SAE) is defined as any AE occurring at any dose that resulted in any of the following outcomes: * Death * Life-threatening condition * Hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization for treatment * Persistent or significant disability/incapacity * Congenital anomaly/birth defect * Other medically important conditions that, based on medical judgment, may jeopardize the participant's health and may require medical intervention to prevent one of the outcomes listed above. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change From Baseline in Difficult or Painful Urination | Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, and 12 | The severity of difficult or painful urination was assessed by the participant through the VVA questionnaire as none = 0, mild = 1, moderate = 2, and severe = 3. |
| Change From Baseline in Vaginal Pain Associated With Sexual Activity | Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, and 12 | The severity of vaginal pain associated with sexual activity was assessed by the participant through the VVA questionnaire as none = 0, mild = 1, moderate = 2, and severe = 3. |
| Change From Baseline in Vaginal Bleeding Associated With Sexual Activity | Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, and 12 | The severity of vaginal bleeding associated with sexual activity was assessed by the participant through the VVA questionnaire as none = 0, mild = 1, moderate = 2, and severe = 3. |
| Change From Baseline in Maturation Value | Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, and 12 | The maturation value is an indicator of the level of maturation attained by the vaginal epithelium. Vaginal smear samples were taken from the middle third of the lateral vaginal wall and were evaluated at the central laboratory by a qualified pathologist. Parabasal cells (P), intermediary cells (I), and superficial cells (S) were counted and results were expressed as the maturation value (MV), whereby superficial cells were assigned a point value of 1.0, intermediate cells were assigned a point value of 0.5, and parabasal cells were assigned a point value of 0. The maturation value (MV) was defined as: (percentage of superficial cells \* 1) + (percentage of intermediate cells \* 0.5) + (percentage of parabasal calls \* 0). Lower MV indicates lower estrogen effect. |
| Percentage of Participants Who Were Responders at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12 | Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, and 12 | A participant was defined as a responder if all the following conditions were met:: * Increase from baseline in maturation value of at least 10 * Decrease from baseline in vaginal pH of at least 0.5 * Improvement from baseline (decrease in severity) of at least 1 point in the most bothersome symptom of vaginal dryness |
| Change From Baseline in Vaginal Health Index | Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, and 12 | The investigator performed an evaluation of the vagina, assessing overall elasticity, fluid secretion, pH, condition of epithelial mucosa, and moisture. The severity of each characteristic was assessed using a 5-grade scale from 1 (worst) to 5 (best). The total score was calculated as the sum of the 5 individual scores and ranges from 5 to 25, where higher scores indicate better vaginal health |
| Change From Baseline in Vulvar Health Index | Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, and 12 | The investigator performed a visual examination of the vulva, assessing the labia majora, labia minora, clitoris, introitus appearance and elasticity, color, discomfort and pain, and presence of other findings (eg, petechiae, excoriations, ulcers, etc). The severity of each characteristic was assessed on a 4-point scale as 0 = normal, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, and 3 = severe. The total score was calculated by adding the 7 individual scores and ranges from 0 to 21, where lower scores indicate better vulvar health. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement. |
| Change From Baseline in Vulvovaginal Imaging Total Score at Week 12 | Baseline and Week 12 | Vulvovaginal imaging was performed by trained site personnel following a standard procedure. Photographs were assessed by an Independent Panel Review (IPR) in a blinded fashion. Nine parameters (labia majora, labia minora, clitoris, urethra, introitus and elasticity, color, erythema, moisture, and other findings (petechiae, excoriation, ulceration, etc.)) were evaluated on a scale from 0 (normal/none) to 3 (severe). The total score was calculated from the sum of the 9 individual scores and ranged from 0 to 27 with lower values indicating better vulvovaginal health; a negative change from baseline indicates improvement. |
| Change From Baseline in Female Sexual Function Index Total Score | Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, and 12 | The Female Sexual Function Index consists of 19 questions organized into 6 domains (desire, arousal, lubrication, orgasm, satisfaction, and pain) answered by the participant on a 5-point scale from 1 to 5. Where relevant, some questions also include an option of 0 if a question is not applicable due to no sexual activity. Each domain score was calculated by adding the scores of each item in the domain and multiplying by a domain factor. The total score was calculated by summing each domain score and ranges from 2 to 36, with higher values indicating better sexual function. |
| Change From Baseline in Female Sexual Function Index Domain Scores at Week 12 | Baseline and Week 12 | The Female Sexual Function Index consists of 19 questions, organized into 6 domains (desire, arousal, lubrication, orgasm, satisfaction, and pain), answered by the participant on a scale from 1 to 5. Where relevant, some questions also include an option of 0 if not applicable due to no sexual activity. Each domain score was calculated by adding the scores of each item in the domain and multiplying by a domain factor. For all domains, higher values indicate better sexual function, according to the following: Desire (2 questions): domain score ranges from 1.2 to 6; Arousal (4 questions): domain score ranges from 0 to 6; Lubrication (4 questions): domain score ranges from 0 to 6; Orgasm (3 questions): domain score ranges from 0 to 6; Satisfaction (3 questions): domain score ranges from 0.8 to 6; Pain (3 questions): domain score ranges from 0 to 6. |
| Change From Baseline in Urinary Distress Inventory (UDI)-6 Total Score | Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, and 12 | The presence or absence of urinary symptoms was assessed using the Urinary Distress Inventory (UDI)-6. The symptoms include frequent urination, urine leakage related to the feeling of urgency, urine leakage related to physical activity, coughing, or sneezing, small amounts of urine leakage, difficulty emptying bladder, and pain and discomfort in the lower abdominal or genital area. If a symptom was present, participants were asked to assess the degree to which they were bothered by it on the following 4-point scale: 1. = present but doesn't bother her at all; 2. = present and bothers her slightly; 3. = present and bothers her moderately; 4. = present and bothers her greatly. The total score was calculated by adding the 6 scores together (Absent = 0), and ranges from 0 to 24, with lower values indicating less urinary distress. |
| Change From Baseline in Bone Sialoprotein at Week 12 | Baseline and Week 12 | Serum bone sialoprotein (BSP) was measured as a marker of bone resorption. |
| Change From Baseline in Type I Collagen C-Telopeptide (CTX) at Week 12 | Baseline and Week 12 | Type I collagen C-telopeptide was measured as a marker of bone resorption. |
| Change From Baseline in Deoxypyridinoline at Week 12 | Baseline and Week 12 | Deoxypyridinoline was measured as a marker of bone resorption. |
| Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Parabasal Cells in the Maturation Index of the Vaginal Smear at Weeks 4 and 8 | Baseline and Weeks 4 and 8 | Parabasal cells are immature squamous cells in the lining of the vagina. A predominance of parabasal cells indicates absence of estrogenic stimulation and vaginal atrophy. Vaginal smear samples were taken from the middle third of the lateral vaginal wall and were evaluated at a central laboratory by a qualified pathologist. A decrease in parabasal cells indicates improvement in vaginal atrophy. |
| Change From Baseline in Tartrate-Resistant Acid Phosphatase 5b at Week 12 | Baseline and Week 12 | Tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase 5b was measured as a marker of bone resorption. |
| Change From Baseline in Alkaline Phosphatase at Week 12 | Baseline and Week 12 | Alkaline phosphatase was measured as a marker of bone formation. |
| Change From Baseline in Bone-specific Alkaline Phosphatase at Week 12 | Baseline and Week 12 | Bone-specific alkaline phosphatase was measured as a marker of bone formation. |
| Change From Baseline in Osteocalcin at Week 12 | Baseline and Week 12 | Osteocalcin was measured as a marker for bone formation. |
| Change From Baseline in Procollagen 1 N-Terminal Propeptide (P1NP) at Week 12 | Baseline and Week 12 | Procollagen 1 N-terminal propeptide was measured as a marker of bone formation. |
| Mean Days of Lubricant Use Per Week | Week 1 to Week 12 | The mean number of days/week that lubricant was used as documented by participants in an electronic daily diary. |
| Mean Days of Intercourse Per Week | Week 1 to Week 12 | The mean number of days/week of intercourse as recorded by participants in an electronic daily diary. |
| Overall Satisfaction With Treatment at Week 12 | Week 12 | Participants were asked to record their overall satisfaction with treatment in an electronic diary according to the following categories: Very satisfied, Moderately satisfied, About equally satisfied and dissatisfied, Moderately dissatisfied, and Very dissatisfied. |
| Change From Baseline in Estradiol at Week 12 | Baseline and Week 12 | — |
| Change From Baseline in Follicle-Stimulating Hormone at Week 12 | Baseline and Week 12 | — |
| Change From Baseline in Luteinizing Hormone at Week 12 | Baseline and Week 12 | — |
| Change From Baseline in Sex Hormone-Binding Globulin at Week 12 | Baseline and Week 12 | — |
| Change From Baseline in Testosterone at Week 12 | Baseline and Week 12 | — |
| Change From Baseline in Free Testosterone at Week 12 | Baseline and Week 12 | — |
| Change From Baseline in Type I Collagen N-Telopeptide (NTX) at Week 12 | Baseline and Week 12 | Type I collagen N-telopeptide was measured as a marker of bone resorption. |
| Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Superficial Cells in the Maturation Index of the Vaginal Smear at Weeks 4 and 8 | Baseline and Weeks 4 and 8 | Superficial cells are mature squamous cells in the lining of the vagina that can decrease in number after menopause resulting in vulvovaginal atrophy. Vaginal smear samples were taken from the middle third of the lateral vaginal wall and were evaluated at a central laboratory by a qualified pathologist. An increase in the number of superficial cells indicates improvement in atrophy. |
| Change From Baseline in the Vaginal pH | Baseline and Weeks 4 and 8 | The pH scale ranges from 0 to 14. A pH of 7 is neutral, less than 7 is acidic, and greater than 7 is basic. A typical vaginal pH in women of reproductive age is between 3.5 and 4.5, increasing to \> 4.5 after menopause. Vaginal pH was measured by the investigator using a pH indicator strip at the middle third of the vaginal wall. |
| Change From Baseline in the Severity of Self-reported Most Bothersome Symptom (MBS) of Vaginal Dryness at Weeks 4 and 8 | Baseline and Weeks 4 and 8 | The severity of the most bothersome symptom of vaginal dryness was assessed by the participant through the VVA questionnaire as none = 0, mild = 1, moderate = 2, and severe = 3. |
| Change From Baseline in Vaginal and/or Vulvar Irritation or Itching | Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, and 12 | The severity of vaginal and/or vulvar irritation or itching was assessed by the participant through the VVA questionnaire as none = 0, mild = 1, moderate = 2, and severe = 3. |
Participant flow
Recruitment details
Participants were randomized at 68 sites in the United States.
Pre-assignment details
After a screening period of up to 4 weeks, participants who met all eligibility criteria were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either ospemifene 60 mg once daily or matching placebo for 12 weeks. Randomization was stratified by severity of most bothersome symptom of vaginal dryness on Day 1 and by the presence or absence of the uterus.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Ospemifene Participants received one tablet of ospemifene 60 mg orally, once a day for 12 weeks. | 313 |
| Placebo Participants received one tablet of matching placebo, orally, once a day for 12 weeks. | 314 |
| Total | 627 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Adverse Event | 6 | 10 |
| Overall Study | Lost to Follow-up | 7 | 7 |
| Overall Study | Other - Miscellaneous | 4 | 3 |
| Overall Study | Protocol Violation | 3 | 0 |
| Overall Study | Withdrawal by Subject | 13 | 16 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Ospemifene | Placebo | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 59.7 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.6 | 59.8 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.2 | 59.7 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.9 |
| Age, Customized >= 40 to < 45 years | 3 Participants | 7 Participants | 10 Participants |
| Age, Customized >= 45 to < 55 years | 66 Participants | 58 Participants | 124 Participants |
| Age, Customized >= 55 to < 65 years | 171 Participants | 174 Participants | 345 Participants |
| Age, Customized >= 65 years | 73 Participants | 75 Participants | 148 Participants |
| Current Hot Flashes No | 287 Participants | 286 Participants | 573 Participants |
| Current Hot Flashes Yes | 26 Participants | 28 Participants | 54 Participants |
| Duration of Vulvovaginal Atrophy (VVA) | 8.36 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.92 | 8.98 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.79 | 8.67 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.37 |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Hispanic or Latino | 84 Participants | 79 Participants | 163 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Not Hispanic or Latino | 228 Participants | 234 Participants | 462 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 1 Participants | 1 Participants | 2 Participants |
| Mean Severity of Most Bothersome Symptom of Vaginal Dryness | 2.53 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.5 | 2.54 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.5 | 2.54 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.5 |
| Percentage of Parabasal Cells in the Vaginal Squamous Epithelium: | 25.8 percentage of cells STANDARD_DEVIATION 33.3 | 28.3 percentage of cells STANDARD_DEVIATION 33.1 | 27.0 percentage of cells STANDARD_DEVIATION 33.2 |
| Percentage of Superficial Cells in the Vaginal Squamous Epithelium | 3.0 percentage of cells STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.6 | 2.8 percentage of cells STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.9 | 2.9 percentage of cells STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.2 |
| Presence of Uterus No | 185 Participants | 182 Participants | 367 Participants |
| Presence of Uterus Yes | 128 Participants | 132 Participants | 260 Participants |
| Previous Hormone Treatment as Prior Treatment None | 305 Participants | 307 Participants | 612 Participants |
| Previous Hormone Treatment as Prior Treatment Oral | 5 Participants | 5 Participants | 10 Participants |
| Previous Hormone Treatment as Prior Treatment Other | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Previous Hormone Treatment as Prior Treatment Transdermal | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Previous Hormone Treatment as Prior Treatment Vaginal | 4 Participants | 3 Participants | 7 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized American Indian or Alaska Native | 0 Participants | 7 Participants | 7 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Asian | 1 Participants | 3 Participants | 4 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Black or African American | 38 Participants | 32 Participants | 70 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Other | 1 Participants | 6 Participants | 7 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized White | 273 Participants | 266 Participants | 539 Participants |
| Severity of Most Bothersome Symptom of Vaginal Dryness Mild | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Severity of Most Bothersome Symptom of Vaginal Dryness Moderate | 148 Participants | 143 Participants | 291 Participants |
| Severity of Most Bothersome Symptom of Vaginal Dryness None | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Severity of Most Bothersome Symptom of Vaginal Dryness Severe | 165 Participants | 171 Participants | 336 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 313 Participants | 314 Participants | 627 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Vaginal pH | 6.11 pH STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.7 | 6.14 pH STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.73 | 6.12 pH STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.71 |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 0 / 317 | 0 / 310 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 37 / 317 | 42 / 310 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 5 / 317 | 3 / 310 |
Outcome results
Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Parabasal Cells in the Maturation Index of the Vaginal Smear at Week 12
Parabasal cells are immature squamous cells in the lining of the vagina. A predominance of parabasal cells indicates absence of estrogenic stimulation and vaginal atrophy. Vaginal smear samples were taken from the middle third of the lateral vaginal wall and were evaluated at a central laboratory by a qualified pathologist. A decrease in parabasal cells indicates improvement in vaginal atrophy. To calculate least squares (LS) means, a mixed-effects model for repeated measures (MMRM) model was used.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
Population: Intent-to-treat population with available baseline data
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ospemifene | Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Parabasal Cells in the Maturation Index of the Vaginal Smear at Week 12 | -23.7 percentage of cells | Standard Error 1.4 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Parabasal Cells in the Maturation Index of the Vaginal Smear at Week 12 | -1.9 percentage of cells | Standard Error 1.4 |
Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Superficial Cells in the Maturation Index of the Vaginal Smear at Week 12
Superficial cells are mature squamous cells in the lining of the vagina that can decrease in number after menopause resulting in vulvovaginal atrophy. Vaginal smear samples were taken from the middle third of the lateral vaginal wall and were evaluated at a central laboratory by a qualified pathologist. An increase in the number of superficial cells indicates improvement in atrophy. To calculate least squares (LS) means, a mixed-effects model for repeated measures (MMRM) model was used.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
Population: Intent-to-treat population with available baseline data
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ospemifene | Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Superficial Cells in the Maturation Index of the Vaginal Smear at Week 12 | 7.8 percentage of cells | Standard Error 0.7 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Superficial Cells in the Maturation Index of the Vaginal Smear at Week 12 | 0.6 percentage of cells | Standard Error 0.7 |
Change From Baseline in the Severity of Self-reported Most Bothersome Symptom (MBS) of Vaginal Dryness at Week 12
The severity of the most bothersome symptom of vaginal dryness was assessed by the participant through the VVA questionnaire as none = 0, mild = 1, moderate = 2, and severe = 3.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
Population: Intent-to-treat population with available baseline data
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ospemifene | Change From Baseline in the Severity of Self-reported Most Bothersome Symptom (MBS) of Vaginal Dryness at Week 12 | -1.29 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.01 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in the Severity of Self-reported Most Bothersome Symptom (MBS) of Vaginal Dryness at Week 12 | -0.91 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.96 |
Change From Baseline in the Vaginal pH at Week 12
The pH scale ranges from 0 to 14. A pH of 7 is neutral, less than 7 is acidic, and greater than 7 is basic. A typical vaginal pH in women of reproductive age is between 3.5 and 4.5, increasing to \> 4.5 after menopause. Vaginal pH was measured by the investigator using a pH indicator strip at the middle third of the vaginal wall. To calculate least squares (LS) means, a mixed-effects model for repeated measures (MMRM) model was used.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
Population: Intent-to-treat population with available baseline data
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ospemifene | Change From Baseline in the Vaginal pH at Week 12 | -1.01 pH | Standard Error 0.04 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in the Vaginal pH at Week 12 | -0.29 pH | Standard Error 0.04 |
Number of Participants With Adverse Events
Treatment-related adverse events (AEs) were defined as AEs that were considered by the investigator to be related to investigational medicinal product, for which causal relationship with the study drug could be reasonably explained. A serious adverse event (SAE) is defined as any AE occurring at any dose that resulted in any of the following outcomes: * Death * Life-threatening condition * Hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization for treatment * Persistent or significant disability/incapacity * Congenital anomaly/birth defect * Other medically important conditions that, based on medical judgment, may jeopardize the participant's health and may require medical intervention to prevent one of the outcomes listed above.
Time frame: From the first dose of study drug up to 14 days after the last dose; 14 weeks
Population: Participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. Four participants randomized to placebo received ospemifene in error and are counted in the ospemifene group for safety assessments. One participant randomized to placebo who enrolled at 2 different sites at the same time was excluded.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ospemifene | Number of Participants With Adverse Events | Adverse events leading to withdrawal | 6 Participants |
| Ospemifene | Number of Participants With Adverse Events | Serious adverse events | 5 Participants |
| Ospemifene | Number of Participants With Adverse Events | Treatment-related adverse events | 28 Participants |
| Ospemifene | Number of Participants With Adverse Events | Treatment-related serious adverse events | 0 Participants |
| Ospemifene | Number of Participants With Adverse Events | Treatment-related AEs leading to withdrawal | 5 Participants |
| Ospemifene | Number of Participants With Adverse Events | Adverse events with outcome of death | 0 Participants |
| Ospemifene | Number of Participants With Adverse Events | Any adverse event | 112 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Adverse Events | Adverse events with outcome of death | 0 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Adverse Events | Any adverse event | 103 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Adverse Events | Treatment-related adverse events | 20 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Adverse Events | Adverse events leading to withdrawal | 10 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Adverse Events | Treatment-related AEs leading to withdrawal | 3 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Adverse Events | Serious adverse events | 3 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Adverse Events | Treatment-related serious adverse events | 0 Participants |
Change From Baseline in Alkaline Phosphatase at Week 12
Alkaline phosphatase was measured as a marker of bone formation.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
Population: Intent-to-treat population with available data
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ospemifene | Change From Baseline in Alkaline Phosphatase at Week 12 | -4.6 units/L | Standard Error 0.7 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Alkaline Phosphatase at Week 12 | 1.6 units/L | Standard Error 0.7 |
Change From Baseline in Bone Sialoprotein at Week 12
Serum bone sialoprotein (BSP) was measured as a marker of bone resorption.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
Population: Intent-to-treat population with available data
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ospemifene | Change From Baseline in Bone Sialoprotein at Week 12 | -24964.3 pg/mL | Standard Error 3922.5 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Bone Sialoprotein at Week 12 | -20576.1 pg/mL | Standard Error 3871.5 |
Change From Baseline in Bone-specific Alkaline Phosphatase at Week 12
Bone-specific alkaline phosphatase was measured as a marker of bone formation.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
Population: Intent-to-treat population with available data
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ospemifene | Change From Baseline in Bone-specific Alkaline Phosphatase at Week 12 | -0.50 units/L | Standard Error 0.36 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Bone-specific Alkaline Phosphatase at Week 12 | 0.84 units/L | Standard Error 0.36 |
Change From Baseline in Deoxypyridinoline at Week 12
Deoxypyridinoline was measured as a marker of bone resorption.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
Population: Intent-to-treat population with available data
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ospemifene | Change From Baseline in Deoxypyridinoline at Week 12 | 0.08 µmol/mol creatinine | Standard Error 0.16 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Deoxypyridinoline at Week 12 | 0.22 µmol/mol creatinine | Standard Error 0.16 |
Change From Baseline in Difficult or Painful Urination
The severity of difficult or painful urination was assessed by the participant through the VVA questionnaire as none = 0, mild = 1, moderate = 2, and severe = 3.
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, and 12
Population: Intent-to-treat population; participants whose baseline values were moderate or severe were included.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ospemifene | Change From Baseline in Difficult or Painful Urination | Week 4 | -1.23 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.01 |
| Ospemifene | Change From Baseline in Difficult or Painful Urination | Week 8 | -1.42 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.95 |
| Ospemifene | Change From Baseline in Difficult or Painful Urination | Week 12 | -1.56 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.93 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Difficult or Painful Urination | Week 4 | -1.21 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.84 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Difficult or Painful Urination | Week 8 | -1.15 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.97 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Difficult or Painful Urination | Week 12 | -1.38 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.91 |
Change From Baseline in Estradiol at Week 12
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
Population: Intent-to-treat population with available data
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ospemifene | Change From Baseline in Estradiol at Week 12 | -2.5 pg/mL | Standard Deviation 19.6 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Estradiol at Week 12 | 0.5 pg/mL | Standard Deviation 10.3 |
Change From Baseline in Female Sexual Function Index Domain Scores at Week 12
The Female Sexual Function Index consists of 19 questions, organized into 6 domains (desire, arousal, lubrication, orgasm, satisfaction, and pain), answered by the participant on a scale from 1 to 5. Where relevant, some questions also include an option of 0 if not applicable due to no sexual activity. Each domain score was calculated by adding the scores of each item in the domain and multiplying by a domain factor. For all domains, higher values indicate better sexual function, according to the following: Desire (2 questions): domain score ranges from 1.2 to 6; Arousal (4 questions): domain score ranges from 0 to 6; Lubrication (4 questions): domain score ranges from 0 to 6; Orgasm (3 questions): domain score ranges from 0 to 6; Satisfaction (3 questions): domain score ranges from 0.8 to 6; Pain (3 questions): domain score ranges from 0 to 6.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
Population: Intent-to-treat population with available baseline and Week 12 data
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ospemifene | Change From Baseline in Female Sexual Function Index Domain Scores at Week 12 | Desire | 0.56 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.07 |
| Ospemifene | Change From Baseline in Female Sexual Function Index Domain Scores at Week 12 | Arousal | 0.64 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.11 |
| Ospemifene | Change From Baseline in Female Sexual Function Index Domain Scores at Week 12 | Lubrication | 1.29 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.12 |
| Ospemifene | Change From Baseline in Female Sexual Function Index Domain Scores at Week 12 | Orgasm | 0.78 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.12 |
| Ospemifene | Change From Baseline in Female Sexual Function Index Domain Scores at Week 12 | Satisfaction | 0.78 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.09 |
| Ospemifene | Change From Baseline in Female Sexual Function Index Domain Scores at Week 12 | Pain | 1.47 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.12 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Female Sexual Function Index Domain Scores at Week 12 | Satisfaction | 0.62 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.09 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Female Sexual Function Index Domain Scores at Week 12 | Desire | 0.39 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.06 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Female Sexual Function Index Domain Scores at Week 12 | Orgasm | 0.63 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.11 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Female Sexual Function Index Domain Scores at Week 12 | Arousal | 0.44 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.11 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Female Sexual Function Index Domain Scores at Week 12 | Pain | 1.01 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.12 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Female Sexual Function Index Domain Scores at Week 12 | Lubrication | 0.89 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.12 |
Change From Baseline in Female Sexual Function Index Total Score
The Female Sexual Function Index consists of 19 questions organized into 6 domains (desire, arousal, lubrication, orgasm, satisfaction, and pain) answered by the participant on a 5-point scale from 1 to 5. Where relevant, some questions also include an option of 0 if a question is not applicable due to no sexual activity. Each domain score was calculated by adding the scores of each item in the domain and multiplying by a domain factor. The total score was calculated by summing each domain score and ranges from 2 to 36, with higher values indicating better sexual function.
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, and 12
Population: Intent-to-treat population with available data at each time point
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ospemifene | Change From Baseline in Female Sexual Function Index Total Score | Week 4 | 4.13 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.43 |
| Ospemifene | Change From Baseline in Female Sexual Function Index Total Score | Week 8 | 4.70 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.49 |
| Ospemifene | Change From Baseline in Female Sexual Function Index Total Score | Week 12 | 5.71 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.55 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Female Sexual Function Index Total Score | Week 4 | 4.11 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.43 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Female Sexual Function Index Total Score | Week 8 | 4.51 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.49 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Female Sexual Function Index Total Score | Week 12 | 4.13 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.54 |
Change From Baseline in Follicle-Stimulating Hormone at Week 12
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
Population: Intent-to-treat population with available data
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ospemifene | Change From Baseline in Follicle-Stimulating Hormone at Week 12 | -5.18 IU/L | Standard Deviation 12.64 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Follicle-Stimulating Hormone at Week 12 | -1.96 IU/L | Standard Deviation 11.79 |
Change From Baseline in Free Testosterone at Week 12
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
Population: Intent-to-treat population with available data
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ospemifene | Change From Baseline in Free Testosterone at Week 12 | 0.0000 nmol/L | Standard Deviation 0.0035 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Free Testosterone at Week 12 | 0.0007 nmol/L | Standard Deviation 0.0115 |
Change From Baseline in Luteinizing Hormone at Week 12
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
Population: Intent-to-treat population with available data
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ospemifene | Change From Baseline in Luteinizing Hormone at Week 12 | -1.58 IU/L | Standard Deviation 8.54 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Luteinizing Hormone at Week 12 | -0.38 IU/L | Standard Deviation 7.59 |
Change From Baseline in Maturation Value
The maturation value is an indicator of the level of maturation attained by the vaginal epithelium. Vaginal smear samples were taken from the middle third of the lateral vaginal wall and were evaluated at the central laboratory by a qualified pathologist. Parabasal cells (P), intermediary cells (I), and superficial cells (S) were counted and results were expressed as the maturation value (MV), whereby superficial cells were assigned a point value of 1.0, intermediate cells were assigned a point value of 0.5, and parabasal cells were assigned a point value of 0. The maturation value (MV) was defined as: (percentage of superficial cells \* 1) + (percentage of intermediate cells \* 0.5) + (percentage of parabasal calls \* 0). Lower MV indicates lower estrogen effect.
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, and 12
Population: Intent-to-treat population with available data at each time point
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ospemifene | Change From Baseline in Maturation Value | Week 4 | 13.33 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.79 |
| Ospemifene | Change From Baseline in Maturation Value | Week 8 | 15.34 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.82 |
| Ospemifene | Change From Baseline in Maturation Value | Week 12 | 16.19 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.87 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Maturation Value | Week 4 | -0.65 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.75 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Maturation Value | Week 8 | 0.61 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.78 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Maturation Value | Week 12 | 1.28 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.83 |
Change From Baseline in Osteocalcin at Week 12
Osteocalcin was measured as a marker for bone formation.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
Population: Intent-to-treat population with available data
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ospemifene | Change From Baseline in Osteocalcin at Week 12 | -1.43 ng/mL | Standard Error 0.31 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Osteocalcin at Week 12 | 0.62 ng/mL | Standard Error 0.31 |
Change From Baseline in Procollagen 1 N-Terminal Propeptide (P1NP) at Week 12
Procollagen 1 N-terminal propeptide was measured as a marker of bone formation.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
Population: Intent-to-treat population with available data
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ospemifene | Change From Baseline in Procollagen 1 N-Terminal Propeptide (P1NP) at Week 12 | -3.22 ng/mL | Standard Error 0.85 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Procollagen 1 N-Terminal Propeptide (P1NP) at Week 12 | 2.04 ng/mL | Standard Error 0.86 |
Change From Baseline in Sex Hormone-Binding Globulin at Week 12
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
Population: Intent-to-treat population with available data
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ospemifene | Change From Baseline in Sex Hormone-Binding Globulin at Week 12 | 30.44 nmol/L | Standard Deviation 31.89 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Sex Hormone-Binding Globulin at Week 12 | 1.73 nmol/L | Standard Deviation 17.61 |
Change From Baseline in Tartrate-Resistant Acid Phosphatase 5b at Week 12
Tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase 5b was measured as a marker of bone resorption.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
Population: Intent-to-treat population with available data
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ospemifene | Change From Baseline in Tartrate-Resistant Acid Phosphatase 5b at Week 12 | -0.28 units/L | Standard Error 0.04 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Tartrate-Resistant Acid Phosphatase 5b at Week 12 | -0.06 units/L | Standard Error 0.04 |
Change From Baseline in Testosterone at Week 12
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
Population: Intent-to-treat population with available data
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ospemifene | Change From Baseline in Testosterone at Week 12 | 1.1 ng/dL | Standard Deviation 9.1 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Testosterone at Week 12 | 1.2 ng/dL | Standard Deviation 20.2 |
Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Parabasal Cells in the Maturation Index of the Vaginal Smear at Weeks 4 and 8
Parabasal cells are immature squamous cells in the lining of the vagina. A predominance of parabasal cells indicates absence of estrogenic stimulation and vaginal atrophy. Vaginal smear samples were taken from the middle third of the lateral vaginal wall and were evaluated at a central laboratory by a qualified pathologist. A decrease in parabasal cells indicates improvement in vaginal atrophy.
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 4 and 8
Population: Intent-to-treat population with baseline data
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ospemifene | Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Parabasal Cells in the Maturation Index of the Vaginal Smear at Weeks 4 and 8 | Week 4 | -21.6 percentage of cells | Standard Error 1.3 |
| Ospemifene | Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Parabasal Cells in the Maturation Index of the Vaginal Smear at Weeks 4 and 8 | Week 8 | -23.7 percentage of cells | Standard Error 1.3 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Parabasal Cells in the Maturation Index of the Vaginal Smear at Weeks 4 and 8 | Week 4 | 0.0 percentage of cells | Standard Error 1.3 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Parabasal Cells in the Maturation Index of the Vaginal Smear at Weeks 4 and 8 | Week 8 | -1.9 percentage of cells | Standard Error 1.3 |
Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Superficial Cells in the Maturation Index of the Vaginal Smear at Weeks 4 and 8
Superficial cells are mature squamous cells in the lining of the vagina that can decrease in number after menopause resulting in vulvovaginal atrophy. Vaginal smear samples were taken from the middle third of the lateral vaginal wall and were evaluated at a central laboratory by a qualified pathologist. An increase in the number of superficial cells indicates improvement in atrophy.
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 4 and 8
Population: Intent-to-treat population with available baseline data
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ospemifene | Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Superficial Cells in the Maturation Index of the Vaginal Smear at Weeks 4 and 8 | Week 4 | 5.6 percentage of cells | Standard Error 0.6 |
| Ospemifene | Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Superficial Cells in the Maturation Index of the Vaginal Smear at Weeks 4 and 8 | Week 8 | 7.1 percentage of cells | Standard Error 0.7 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Superficial Cells in the Maturation Index of the Vaginal Smear at Weeks 4 and 8 | Week 4 | -0.2 percentage of cells | Standard Error 0.6 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Superficial Cells in the Maturation Index of the Vaginal Smear at Weeks 4 and 8 | Week 8 | -0.2 percentage of cells | Standard Error 0.6 |
Change From Baseline in the Severity of Self-reported Most Bothersome Symptom (MBS) of Vaginal Dryness at Weeks 4 and 8
The severity of the most bothersome symptom of vaginal dryness was assessed by the participant through the VVA questionnaire as none = 0, mild = 1, moderate = 2, and severe = 3.
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 4 and 8
Population: Intent-to-treat population with available data at baseline
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ospemifene | Change From Baseline in the Severity of Self-reported Most Bothersome Symptom (MBS) of Vaginal Dryness at Weeks 4 and 8 | Week 4 | -0.83 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.9 |
| Ospemifene | Change From Baseline in the Severity of Self-reported Most Bothersome Symptom (MBS) of Vaginal Dryness at Weeks 4 and 8 | Week 8 | -1.14 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.97 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in the Severity of Self-reported Most Bothersome Symptom (MBS) of Vaginal Dryness at Weeks 4 and 8 | Week 4 | -0.62 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.89 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in the Severity of Self-reported Most Bothersome Symptom (MBS) of Vaginal Dryness at Weeks 4 and 8 | Week 8 | -0.84 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.95 |
Change From Baseline in the Vaginal pH
The pH scale ranges from 0 to 14. A pH of 7 is neutral, less than 7 is acidic, and greater than 7 is basic. A typical vaginal pH in women of reproductive age is between 3.5 and 4.5, increasing to \> 4.5 after menopause. Vaginal pH was measured by the investigator using a pH indicator strip at the middle third of the vaginal wall.
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 4 and 8
Population: Intent-to-treat population with available baseline data
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ospemifene | Change From Baseline in the Vaginal pH | Week 4 | -0.81 pH | Standard Error 0.04 |
| Ospemifene | Change From Baseline in the Vaginal pH | Week 8 | -0.95 pH | Standard Error 0.04 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in the Vaginal pH | Week 4 | -0.24 pH | Standard Error 0.04 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in the Vaginal pH | Week 8 | -0.32 pH | Standard Error 0.04 |
Change From Baseline in Type I Collagen C-Telopeptide (CTX) at Week 12
Type I collagen C-telopeptide was measured as a marker of bone resorption.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
Population: Intent-to-treat population with available data
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ospemifene | Change From Baseline in Type I Collagen C-Telopeptide (CTX) at Week 12 | -0.044 ng/mL | Standard Error 0.008 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Type I Collagen C-Telopeptide (CTX) at Week 12 | 0.006 ng/mL | Standard Error 0.008 |
Change From Baseline in Type I Collagen N-Telopeptide (NTX) at Week 12
Type I collagen N-telopeptide was measured as a marker of bone resorption.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
Population: Intent-to-treat population with available data
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ospemifene | Change From Baseline in Type I Collagen N-Telopeptide (NTX) at Week 12 | -0.10 nmol bone collagen equivalents (BCE)/L | Standard Error 0.23 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Type I Collagen N-Telopeptide (NTX) at Week 12 | 0.65 nmol bone collagen equivalents (BCE)/L | Standard Error 0.23 |
Change From Baseline in Urinary Distress Inventory (UDI)-6 Total Score
The presence or absence of urinary symptoms was assessed using the Urinary Distress Inventory (UDI)-6. The symptoms include frequent urination, urine leakage related to the feeling of urgency, urine leakage related to physical activity, coughing, or sneezing, small amounts of urine leakage, difficulty emptying bladder, and pain and discomfort in the lower abdominal or genital area. If a symptom was present, participants were asked to assess the degree to which they were bothered by it on the following 4-point scale: 1. = present but doesn't bother her at all; 2. = present and bothers her slightly; 3. = present and bothers her moderately; 4. = present and bothers her greatly. The total score was calculated by adding the 6 scores together (Absent = 0), and ranges from 0 to 24, with lower values indicating less urinary distress.
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, and 12
Population: Intent-to-treat population with available data at each time point
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ospemifene | Change From Baseline in Urinary Distress Inventory (UDI)-6 Total Score | Week 4 | -0.8 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.2 |
| Ospemifene | Change From Baseline in Urinary Distress Inventory (UDI)-6 Total Score | Week 8 | -1.0 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.2 |
| Ospemifene | Change From Baseline in Urinary Distress Inventory (UDI)-6 Total Score | Week 12 | -1.3 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.2 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Urinary Distress Inventory (UDI)-6 Total Score | Week 4 | -0.9 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.2 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Urinary Distress Inventory (UDI)-6 Total Score | Week 8 | -1.4 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.2 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Urinary Distress Inventory (UDI)-6 Total Score | Week 12 | -1.6 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.2 |
Change From Baseline in Vaginal and/or Vulvar Irritation or Itching
The severity of vaginal and/or vulvar irritation or itching was assessed by the participant through the VVA questionnaire as none = 0, mild = 1, moderate = 2, and severe = 3.
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, and 12
Population: Intent-to-treat population; participants whose baseline values were moderate or severe were included
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ospemifene | Change From Baseline in Vaginal and/or Vulvar Irritation or Itching | Week 4 | -0.93 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1 |
| Ospemifene | Change From Baseline in Vaginal and/or Vulvar Irritation or Itching | Week 8 | -1.17 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.01 |
| Ospemifene | Change From Baseline in Vaginal and/or Vulvar Irritation or Itching | Week 12 | -1.38 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Vaginal and/or Vulvar Irritation or Itching | Week 4 | -0.99 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.02 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Vaginal and/or Vulvar Irritation or Itching | Week 8 | -1.16 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.04 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Vaginal and/or Vulvar Irritation or Itching | Week 12 | -1.40 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.96 |
Change From Baseline in Vaginal Bleeding Associated With Sexual Activity
The severity of vaginal bleeding associated with sexual activity was assessed by the participant through the VVA questionnaire as none = 0, mild = 1, moderate = 2, and severe = 3.
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, and 12
Population: Intent-to-treat population; participants whose baseline values were moderate or severe were included
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ospemifene | Change From Baseline in Vaginal Bleeding Associated With Sexual Activity | Week 4 | -1.17 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.09 |
| Ospemifene | Change From Baseline in Vaginal Bleeding Associated With Sexual Activity | Week 8 | -1.47 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.92 |
| Ospemifene | Change From Baseline in Vaginal Bleeding Associated With Sexual Activity | Week 12 | -1.55 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.79 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Vaginal Bleeding Associated With Sexual Activity | Week 4 | -1.33 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.14 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Vaginal Bleeding Associated With Sexual Activity | Week 8 | -1.58 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.09 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Vaginal Bleeding Associated With Sexual Activity | Week 12 | -1.61 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.06 |
Change From Baseline in Vaginal Health Index
The investigator performed an evaluation of the vagina, assessing overall elasticity, fluid secretion, pH, condition of epithelial mucosa, and moisture. The severity of each characteristic was assessed using a 5-grade scale from 1 (worst) to 5 (best). The total score was calculated as the sum of the 5 individual scores and ranges from 5 to 25, where higher scores indicate better vaginal health
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, and 12
Population: Intent-to-treat population with available data at each time point
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ospemifene | Change From Baseline in Vaginal Health Index | Week 4 | 3.9 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.2 |
| Ospemifene | Change From Baseline in Vaginal Health Index | Week 8 | 5.0 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.2 |
| Ospemifene | Change From Baseline in Vaginal Health Index | Week 12 | 5.2 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.2 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Vaginal Health Index | Week 4 | 1.5 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.2 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Vaginal Health Index | Week 8 | 2.1 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.2 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Vaginal Health Index | Week 12 | 2.3 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.2 |
Change From Baseline in Vaginal Pain Associated With Sexual Activity
The severity of vaginal pain associated with sexual activity was assessed by the participant through the VVA questionnaire as none = 0, mild = 1, moderate = 2, and severe = 3.
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, and 12
Population: Intent-to-treat population; participants whose baseline values were moderate or severe were included
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ospemifene | Change From Baseline in Vaginal Pain Associated With Sexual Activity | Week 4 | -1.24 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.11 |
| Ospemifene | Change From Baseline in Vaginal Pain Associated With Sexual Activity | Week 8 | -1.41 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.08 |
| Ospemifene | Change From Baseline in Vaginal Pain Associated With Sexual Activity | Week 12 | -1.55 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.05 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Vaginal Pain Associated With Sexual Activity | Week 4 | -0.99 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.11 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Vaginal Pain Associated With Sexual Activity | Week 8 | -1.26 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.13 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Vaginal Pain Associated With Sexual Activity | Week 12 | -1.21 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.07 |
Change From Baseline in Vulvar Health Index
The investigator performed a visual examination of the vulva, assessing the labia majora, labia minora, clitoris, introitus appearance and elasticity, color, discomfort and pain, and presence of other findings (eg, petechiae, excoriations, ulcers, etc). The severity of each characteristic was assessed on a 4-point scale as 0 = normal, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, and 3 = severe. The total score was calculated by adding the 7 individual scores and ranges from 0 to 21, where lower scores indicate better vulvar health. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, and 12
Population: Intent-to-treat population with available data at each timepoint
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ospemifene | Change From Baseline in Vulvar Health Index | Week 4 | -2.2 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.2 |
| Ospemifene | Change From Baseline in Vulvar Health Index | Week 8 | -2.8 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.2 |
| Ospemifene | Change From Baseline in Vulvar Health Index | week 12 | -2.8 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.2 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Vulvar Health Index | Week 4 | -1.4 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.2 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Vulvar Health Index | Week 8 | -1.7 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.2 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Vulvar Health Index | week 12 | -1.6 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.2 |
Change From Baseline in Vulvovaginal Imaging Total Score at Week 12
Vulvovaginal imaging was performed by trained site personnel following a standard procedure. Photographs were assessed by an Independent Panel Review (IPR) in a blinded fashion. Nine parameters (labia majora, labia minora, clitoris, urethra, introitus and elasticity, color, erythema, moisture, and other findings (petechiae, excoriation, ulceration, etc.)) were evaluated on a scale from 0 (normal/none) to 3 (severe). The total score was calculated from the sum of the 9 individual scores and ranged from 0 to 27 with lower values indicating better vulvovaginal health; a negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
Population: Intent-to-treat population; participants who agreed to participate in the optional vaginal imaging, and with available data at both time points were included.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ospemifene | Change From Baseline in Vulvovaginal Imaging Total Score at Week 12 | -1.1 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.3 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Vulvovaginal Imaging Total Score at Week 12 | -0.1 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.3 |
Mean Days of Intercourse Per Week
The mean number of days/week of intercourse as recorded by participants in an electronic daily diary.
Time frame: Week 1 to Week 12
Population: Intent-to-treat population with available data
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ospemifene | Mean Days of Intercourse Per Week | 0.9 days/week | Standard Deviation 1 |
| Placebo | Mean Days of Intercourse Per Week | 0.9 days/week | Standard Deviation 1.1 |
Mean Days of Lubricant Use Per Week
The mean number of days/week that lubricant was used as documented by participants in an electronic daily diary.
Time frame: Week 1 to Week 12
Population: Intent-to-treat population with available data
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ospemifene | Mean Days of Lubricant Use Per Week | 0.8 days/week | Standard Deviation 1.3 |
| Placebo | Mean Days of Lubricant Use Per Week | 0.8 days/week | Standard Deviation 1.2 |
Overall Satisfaction With Treatment at Week 12
Participants were asked to record their overall satisfaction with treatment in an electronic diary according to the following categories: Very satisfied, Moderately satisfied, About equally satisfied and dissatisfied, Moderately dissatisfied, and Very dissatisfied.
Time frame: Week 12
Population: Intent-to-treat population with available data
| Arm | Measure | Category | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ospemifene | Overall Satisfaction With Treatment at Week 12 | Moderately satisfied | 71 Participants |
| Ospemifene | Overall Satisfaction With Treatment at Week 12 | Moderately dissatisfied | 13 Participants |
| Ospemifene | Overall Satisfaction With Treatment at Week 12 | About equally satisfied and dissatisfied | 43 Participants |
| Ospemifene | Overall Satisfaction With Treatment at Week 12 | Very dissatisfied | 11 Participants |
| Ospemifene | Overall Satisfaction With Treatment at Week 12 | Very satisfied | 83 Participants |
| Placebo | Overall Satisfaction With Treatment at Week 12 | Very dissatisfied | 17 Participants |
| Placebo | Overall Satisfaction With Treatment at Week 12 | Very satisfied | 54 Participants |
| Placebo | Overall Satisfaction With Treatment at Week 12 | Moderately satisfied | 52 Participants |
| Placebo | Overall Satisfaction With Treatment at Week 12 | About equally satisfied and dissatisfied | 49 Participants |
| Placebo | Overall Satisfaction With Treatment at Week 12 | Moderately dissatisfied | 26 Participants |
Percentage of Participants Who Were Responders at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12
A participant was defined as a responder if all the following conditions were met:: * Increase from baseline in maturation value of at least 10 * Decrease from baseline in vaginal pH of at least 0.5 * Improvement from baseline (decrease in severity) of at least 1 point in the most bothersome symptom of vaginal dryness
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, and 12
Population: Intent-to-treat population with available data at each time point
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ospemifene | Percentage of Participants Who Were Responders at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12 | Week 4 | 19.2 percentage of participants |
| Ospemifene | Percentage of Participants Who Were Responders at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12 | Week 8 | 27.9 percentage of participants |
| Ospemifene | Percentage of Participants Who Were Responders at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12 | Week 12 | 31.5 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants Who Were Responders at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12 | Week 4 | 2.6 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants Who Were Responders at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12 | Week 8 | 4.4 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants Who Were Responders at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12 | Week 12 | 6.0 percentage of participants |