Skip to content

Early Outcomes of Radical Debridement Versus no Debridement Under Different Surgical Procedures

Outcomes of Radical Debridement Versus no Debridement Under Different Surgical Procedures for the Treatment of Thoracic and Lumbar Spinal Tuberculosis

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02638272
Enrollment
74
Registered
2015-12-23
Start date
2009-01-31
Completion date
2015-09-30
Last updated
2015-12-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Spinal Tuberculosis

Brief summary

Whether radical debridement is necessary for the treatment of thoracic and lumbar tuberculosis is still questionable. The objective of this prospective randomized study was to compare the outcomes of radical debridement versus no debridement under different surgical procedures for the treatment of thoracic and lumbar tuberculosis.

Detailed description

Seventy-four thoracic and lumbar tuberculosis patients with a neurological function of grade D and E underwent surgeries from January 2009 to January 2014. All patients were divided into group A and group B by taking the drawing of lots. In group A, radical debridement, bone graft and instrumentation were performed. In group B, isolated posterior instrumentation without debridement were performed in all cases and drainage of iliopsoas abscess via laparoscopy in 2 cases. The operative time, blood loss, visual analogue score (VAS), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), kyphotic angle, Frankel grading, fusion rate and complications were evaluated.

Interventions

PROCEDUREno debridement

It is a spinal surgery performed with isolated posterior instrumentation without debridement.

Sponsors

The Second Hospital of Anhui Medical University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
14 Years to 67 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Frankel grading was grade D and E 2. Severe back pain 3. Abscess combined with high pressure symptoms 4. Larger sequestrum formation or sinus 5. Significant spinal instability.

Exclusion criteria

1. Frankel grading was grade A,B and C 2. Conservative treatment

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The operative time in minutes5 years
blood loss in milliliter5 years
erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) in mm/h5 years
kyphotic angle in degree5 years

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026