Skip to content

Comparison of VT Ablation Outcomes Using Remote MAGNETIC Navigation Versus Manual Approach in a Low LVEF Population

A Prospective, Multi-center, Post Market Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing VT Ablation Outcomes Using Remote MAGNETIC Navigation Guided Substrate Mapping and Ablation Versus Manual Approach in a Low LVEF Population

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02637947
Acronym
MAGNETIC-VT
Enrollment
182
Registered
2015-12-22
Start date
2016-01-31
Completion date
2022-02-15
Last updated
2022-09-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Tachycardia, Ventricular

Brief summary

The study purpose is to demonstrate that ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablation using the Niobe™ ES system results in superior outcomes compared to a manual approach in subjects with ischemic scar VT in a low ejection fraction population.

Detailed description

This study is a randomized, single-blind, prospective, multi-center post market evaluation. Subjects will be screened for study eligibility and asked to complete written informed consent prior to any study specific testing assessments. After completing written informed consent, a total of 386 subjects will be randomized on a 1:1 basis to receive VT ablation treatment using either the Niobe ES or standard manual catheter ablation treatment using commercially available products. This will be the largest randomized VT study comparing outcomes from RMN to manually guided catheter ablation procedures. Subjects will be randomized according to a computer-generated randomization scheme. Randomization will be blocked at the study site level and subjects will be blinded to group assignment. Since quality of life measurements will be collected during follow-up, this study is single-blinded in order to mitigate patient bias. Clinical evaluations will not be masked to the treating physician.

Interventions

DEVICEcatheter ablation using magnetic navigation

elimination of cardiac arrhythmias through heating and destroying heart tissue with faulty electrical pathways through the use of Stereotaxis's Niobe ES System with the NaviStar RMT ThermoCool catheter or other magnetically compatible catheters.

DEVICEcatheter ablation using manual navigation

elimination of cardiac arrhythmias through heating and destroying heart tissue with faulty electrical pathways through the use of the NaviStar ThermoCool catheter or other manually navigated catheters.

Sponsors

Stereotaxis
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* subject has had an ICD previously implanted * subject has drug-refractory monomorphic VT * subject is a candidate for ischemic VT RF ablation * subject has had a myocardial infarction * subject has a LVEF less than or equal to 35%

Exclusion criteria

* subject has non-ischemic VT * subject has a history of stroke within 1 month prior to enrollment * subject has had an acute myocardial infarction within 30 days prior to enrollment * subject has unstable angina * subject has undergone cardiac surgery within 60 days prior to enrollment * subject is pregnant or nursing * subject has a limited life expectancy of 1 year or less (Subjects requiring LVAD/IABP intraprocedural support may be enrolled as long as life expectancy is at least 1 year following the ablation procedure.) * subject is unable or unwilling to cooperate with study procedures * subject has a known presence of intracardiac thrombi as determined by echocardiography * subject has a major contraindication to anticoagulation therapy or coagulation disorder * subject has had a previous pericarditis or cardiac tumor * subject has had previous thoracic radiation therapy * any other reason the investigator considers the subject ineligible

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
freedom from any VT in the overall cohort12 months

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
acute success of procedureat end of procedure (immediate)non-inducibility of clinical VT and/or other monomorphic VT using typical stimulation protocol for induction
freedom from VT in large scar subpopulation12 months
major adverse events48 hours post-proceduredeath, cardiac tamponade, stroke, bleeding requiring surgical intervention, progressive heart failure related to VT/VF recurrence
mortality rate12 months

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Total mapping timethrough end of acute procedure, an average of 3 hours
Total ablation timethrough end of acute procedure, an average of 3 hours
Total number of appropriate ICD defibrillator shocks12 months
Total ablation energy deliverythrough end of acute procedure, an average of 3 hoursWatts X seconds / Total scar surface area
Patient quality of life (SF-12)12 monthsMedical Outcomes Study 12-item Short-Form Health Survey
Total mapping points prior to ablationthrough end of acute procedure, an average of 3 hours
Total number of ICD applications of anti-tachycardia pacing12 months
Total procedure time (skin to skin)through end of acute procedure, an average of 3 hours
Total fluoroscopy timethrough end of acute procedure, an average of 3 hours
Total fluoroscopy dosethrough end of acute procedure, an average of 3 hours

Countries

Australia, Belgium, Czechia, Denmark, France, Netherlands, United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 11, 2026