Skip to content

Management of Reflux After Sleeve Using Stretta

Radiofrequency Energy Delivery to the Lower Esophageal Sphincter (Stretta) in Sleeve Gastrectomy Patients With GERD

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02637713
Acronym
MaRSS
Enrollment
5
Registered
2015-12-22
Start date
2016-03-31
Completion date
2019-05-31
Last updated
2024-01-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

GERD, Morbid Obesity

Keywords

GERD, sleeve gastrectomy, reflux, morbidly obese

Brief summary

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a frequently seen entity after sleeve gastrectomy. Management of GERD after sleeve is difficult given limited treatment modalities. Stretta is an endoscopic FDA approved device that improves symptoms of GERD, there is minimal information about its use on patients after sleeve. This registry will attempt to get information regarding the treatment of reflux using Stretta after sleeve gastrectomy.

Detailed description

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a widely prevalent medical disorder in the United States with a spectrum of treatment options ranging from dietary modification, to various pharmacologic treatments, to an array of available surgical and endoscopic procedures. There is a well-described correlation between obesity and symptoms of GERD. The morbidly obese patients undergoing evaluation for bariatric surgery are to characterize any GERD-like symptoms as this will assist in directing surgical therapy. Generally, it is recommended that patients with severe GERD undergo Roux-en-Y gastric bypass(RYGB) rather than a sleeve gastrectomy (SG) as RYGB has proven to be the most effective surgical treatment for GERD in the morbidly obese patient. The number of bariatric procedures performed in the United States has increased significantly in the recent years. Out of all bariatric procedures SG is the most commonly performed in the United States, as it has proven to be a very safe procedure with excellent weight loss. However, the incidence of de novo GERD and the effect of SG on patients with preexisting GERD remain controversial. Although some authors report high incidence of de novo GERD and worsening of previous reflux symptoms, there is also data showing improvement of symptoms post SG. Management of GERD after SG poses an interesting challenge, as traditional invasive procedures like Nissen fundoplication are not available due to an altered gastric anatomy. The alternative is to perform a conversion to RYGB, which represents increased morbidity to patient and significant cost. A large number of endoscopic procedures have been introduced in the past for the management of GERD as an alternative to the surgical anti-reflux procedures with various degrees of success. One of the few non-invasive methods for managing GERD that is still available on the market and widely used is Stretta. Stretta delivers Radio Frequency energy (RFe) to the LES resulting in increased LES pressure. In 2000, the FDA approved the Stretta system for treatment of GERD. Stretta allows an alternative for treatment in patients who are not willing or able to undergo surgery. The Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) published clinical practice guidelines that endorsed Stretta as an appropriate therapy for treatment of GERD in patients \>18, with at least 6 months of symptoms partially or completely responsive to pharmacotherapy and who are unable or unwilling to undergo laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication. There are to date no studies evaluating the use of Stretta in management of patients with GERD symptoms after sleeve gastrectomy. The investigators will study sleeve gastrectomy patients with GERD symptoms and if considered candidates for Stretta all patients will be enrolled in data collection cohort and followed prospectively with symptom questionnaire and quality of life scores for improvement of symptoms.

Interventions

DEVICEStretta

Stretta is an FDA approved device that delivers Radiofrequency energy delivery to the lower esophageal sphincter. It is approved for the management of GRED.

PROCEDURERadiofrequency (RF) Energy to the LES (Stretta Procedure)

The Stretta procedure is performed endoscopically under moderate sedation or general anesthesia which uses radiofrequency (RF) energy applied to the lower esophagus over 14 minutes per FDA approved procedures.

Sponsors

Montefiore Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Symptomatic reflux: (heartburn, chest discomfort, asthma/chronic cough, laryngitis, nocturnal aspiration or regurgitation) 2. On a PPI with GERD-related symptoms 3. On a PPI but like to discontinue them

Exclusion criteria

1. Age \<18 or \> 80 2. History of a severe psychiatric disorder: including suicidal ideation, or admission to a psychiatric institution. 3. Unable or unwilling to consent for an invasive procedure. 4. History of intestinal leak after surgery. 5. History of revisional bariatric surgery 6. Significant sleeve abnormalities such and twist or large fundus 7. Hiatal hernia(\>2cm) 8. Pregnancy 9. Inability to comply with study protocols and procedures 10. Esophageal stricture, Eosinophilic Esophagitis or Achalasia 11. Prior esophageal surgery or therapy for Barrett's Esophagus 12. Grades 3 or 4 esophagitis 13. Gastric or esophageal varices 14. History of obstruction of the small bowel or inflammatory bowel disease 15. Pacemaker or implanted cardiac defibrillator 16. Coagulopathy or use of anticoagulants 17. ASA classification \>3 18. Scleroderma or other connective diseases 19. Use of immunosuppressive medications.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Patients With Improved Symptoms Based on Reflux Symptom Index (RSI) Score6 monthsRSI scores will be used to determine whether patients achieved at least a 50% reduction in symptoms as compared to baseline. Patients will be provided a 9-item questionnaire and asked to rate the score that best applies to their symptoms on a 6 point scale ranging from 0 = No Problem to 5 = Severe Problem.
Number of Patients With Improved Symptoms Based on Reflux Severity Index (RSI) Score12 monthsRSI scores will be used to determine whether patients achieved at least a 50% reduction in symptoms as compared to baseline. Patients will be provided a 9-item questionnaire and asked to rate the score that best applies to their symptoms on a 6 point scale ranging from 0 = No Problem to 5 = Severe Problem.
Number of Patients With Improved Symptoms Based on GERD Health Related Quality of Life (GERD-HRQL) Questionnaire Score6 monthsGERD-HRQL scores will be used to determine whether patients achieved at least a 50% reduction in symptoms as compared to baseline. Patients will be provided a 15-item questionnaire and asked to rate the score that best applies to their symptoms on a 6 point scale ranging from 0 to 5 (overall range from 0-75) with higher scores indicative of worsening symptoms.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Gastric Emptying StudyBaseline (up to 4 hours)A Gastric emptying study will be conducted for all patients at 1, 2, 3, and 4 hours. Patients with severe gastroparesis (\>50% retention at 4 hours) will be excluded from study
Esophageal pH LevelsBaselineAll patients will have pH monitoring conducted at baseline pre-procedurally. The number of patients with abnormal pH levels will be tabulated. Bravo capsule monitoring will be used for evaluation.
EGD AbnormalitiesBaselineAn EGD will be obtained for all patients at baseline. Biopsies of any suspicious lesions and any evidence of esophagitis will be obtained and scored in accordance with Los Angeles classification as either Grade A, Grade B, Grade C, or Grade D lesions with each grade denoting progressively more severe pathophysiology.
Determination of Gastric Dysmotility as a Contributory Factor in GERD Following Sleeve Gastrectomy6 monthsIf gastric dysmotility is determined to have been abnormal at baseline, the gastric emptying study will be repeated at 6 months to evaluate Gastric Dysmotility will be evaluated as a contributory factor in GERD following sleeve gastrectomy.
Use of Anti-reflux MedicationBaselineThe number of patients using anti-reflux medications will be tabulated.
Cessation or Decreased Use of Anti-reflux Medication6 monthsThe number of patients who demonstrate a complete cessation or decrease in use of anti-reflux medications will be tabulated.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Radiofrequency Energy to the Lower Esophageal Sphincter (LES)
All patients that have undergone sleeve gastrectomy as treatment for obesity that have developed severe reflux symptoms will be treated with Stretta (FDA approved device for the management of GERD) and evaluated prospectively for resolution/improvement of reflux symptoms. Stretta: Stretta is an FDA approved device that delivers Radiofrequency energy delivery to the lower esophageal sphincter. It is approved for the management of GRED. Radiofrequency (RF) Energy to the LES (Stretta Procedure): The Stretta procedure is performed endoscopically under moderate sedation or general anesthesia which uses radiofrequency (RF) energy applied to the lower esophagus over 14 minutes per FDA approved procedures.
5
Total5

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyScreen Failure2

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicRadiofrequency Energy to the Lower Esophageal Sphincter (LES)
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African-American
1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic or Latino
2 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White Non-Hispanic
2 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
5 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 3
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 3
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 3

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Patients With Improved Symptoms Based on GERD Health Related Quality of Life (GERD-HRQL) Questionnaire Score

GERD-HRQL scores will be used to determine whether patients achieved at least a 50% reduction in symptoms as compared to baseline. Patients will be provided a 15-item questionnaire and asked to rate the score that best applies to their symptoms on a 6 point scale ranging from 0 to 5 (overall range from 0-75) with higher scores indicative of worsening symptoms.

Time frame: 6 months

Population: Study was terminated early and no 6 month GERD-HRQL data were collected. As such, there were no results to aggregate and report.

Primary

Number of Patients With Improved Symptoms Based on GERD Health Related Quality of Life (GERD-HRQL) Questionnaire Score

GERD-HRQL scores will be used to determine whether patients achieved at least a 50% reduction in symptoms as compared to baseline. Patients will be provided a 15-item questionnaire and asked to rate the score that best applies to their symptoms on a 6 point scale ranging from 0 to 5 (overall range from 0-75) with higher scores indicative of worsening symptoms.

Time frame: 12 months

Population: Study was terminated early and no 12 month GERD-HRQL data were collected. As such, there were no results to aggregate and report.

Primary

Number of Patients With Improved Symptoms Based on GERD Health Related Quality of Life (GERD-HRQL) Questionnaire Score

GERD-HRQL scores will be used to determine whether patients achieved at least a 50% reduction in symptoms as compared to baseline. Patients will be provided a 15-item questionnaire and asked to rate the score that best applies to their symptoms on a 6 point scale ranging from 0 to 5 (overall range from 0-75) with higher scores indicative of worsening symptoms.

Time frame: 24 months

Population: Study was terminated early and no 24 month GERD-HRQL data were collected. As such, there were no results to aggregate and report.

Primary

Number of Patients With Improved Symptoms Based on Reflux Severity Index (RSI) Score

RSI scores will be used to determine whether patients achieved at least a 50% reduction in symptoms as compared to baseline. Patients will be provided a 9-item questionnaire and asked to rate the score that best applies to their symptoms on a 6 point scale ranging from 0 = No Problem to 5 = Severe Problem.

Time frame: 12 months

Population: Study was terminated early and no 12 month RSI data were collected. As such, there were no RSI scores to aggregate and report.

Primary

Number of Patients With Improved Symptoms Based on Reflux Severity Index (RSI) Score

RSI scores will be used to determine whether patients achieved at least a 50% reduction in symptoms as compared to baseline. Patients will be provided a 9-item questionnaire and asked to rate the score that best applies to their symptoms on a 6 point scale ranging from 0 = No Problem to 5 = Severe Problem.

Time frame: 24 months

Population: Study was terminated early and no 24 month RSI data were collected. As such, there were no RSI scores to aggregate and report.

Primary

Number of Patients With Improved Symptoms Based on Reflux Symptom Index (RSI) Score

RSI scores will be used to determine whether patients achieved at least a 50% reduction in symptoms as compared to baseline. Patients will be provided a 9-item questionnaire and asked to rate the score that best applies to their symptoms on a 6 point scale ranging from 0 = No Problem to 5 = Severe Problem.

Time frame: 6 months

Population: Study was terminated early and no 6 month RSI data were collected. As such, there were no RSI scores to aggregate and report.

Secondary

Cessation or Decreased Use of Anti-reflux Medication

The number of patients who demonstrate a complete cessation or decrease in use of anti-reflux medications will be tabulated.

Time frame: 6 months

Population: Study was terminated early and data related to the cessation or decreased use of anti-reflux medications was not collected. As such, there were no related anti-reflux medication data to aggregate and report.

Secondary

Determination of Gastric Dysmotility as a Contributory Factor in GERD Following Sleeve Gastrectomy

If gastric dysmotility is determined to have been abnormal at baseline, the gastric emptying study will be repeated at 12 months to evaluate Gastric Dysmotility will be evaluated as a contributory factor in GERD following sleeve gastrectomy.

Time frame: 12 months

Population: Study was terminated early and data related to gastric dysmotility as a contributing factor to GERD was not collected. As such, there were no 12 month gastric dysmotility results to aggregate and report.

Secondary

Determination of Gastric Dysmotility as a Contributory Factor in GERD Following Sleeve Gastrectomy

If gastric dysmotility is determined to have been abnormal at baseline, the gastric emptying study will be repeated at 6 months to evaluate Gastric Dysmotility will be evaluated as a contributory factor in GERD following sleeve gastrectomy.

Time frame: 6 months

Population: Study was terminated early and data related to gastric dysmotility as a contributing factor to GERD was not collected. As such, there were no 6 month gastric dysmotility results to aggregate and report.

Secondary

EGD Abnormalities

In those patients identified to have abnormal esophageal pathology at baseline, biopsies of any suspicious lesions and any evidence of esophagitis will be obtained and scored in accordance with Los Angeles classification as either Grade A, Grade B, Grade C, or Grade D lesions with each grade denoting progressively more severe pathology. The number of patients demonstrating objective histologic improvement or resolution of esophagitis will be determined.

Time frame: 12 months

Population: Study was terminated early. Biopsies were not obtained at 12 months and, as such, there were no corresponding results to analyze and report.

Secondary

EGD Abnormalities

An EGD will be obtained for all patients at baseline. Biopsies of any suspicious lesions and any evidence of esophagitis will be obtained and scored in accordance with Los Angeles classification as either Grade A, Grade B, Grade C, or Grade D lesions with each grade denoting progressively more severe pathophysiology.

Time frame: Baseline

Population: Biopsies were not obtained at baseline and, as such, there were no corresponding results to analyze and report.

Secondary

EGD Abnormalities

In those patients identified to have abnormal esophageal pathology at baseline, biopsies of any suspicious lesions and any evidence of esophagitis will be obtained and scored in accordance with Los Angeles classification as either Grade A, Grade B, Grade C, or Grade D lesions with each grade denoting progressively more severe pathology. The number of patients demonstrating objective histologic improvement or resolution of esophagitis will be determined.

Time frame: 6 months

Population: Study was terminated early. Biopsies were not obtained at 6 months and, as such, there were no corresponding results to analyze and report.

Secondary

Esophageal pH Levels

If esophageal pH levels at baseline are determined to have been abnormal, the number of patients with symptomatic GERD demonstrating an improvement in esophageal pH exposure following sleeve gastrectomy will be assessed. Bravo capsule monitoring will be used for evaluation.

Time frame: 12 months

Population: Study was terminated early. Esophageal samples were not collected and therefore there was no esophageal pH results to report.

Secondary

Esophageal pH Levels

If esophageal pH levels at baseline are determined to have been abnormal, the number of patients with symptomatic GERD demonstrating an improvement in esophageal pH exposure following sleeve gastrectomy will be assessed. Bravo capsule monitoring will be used for evaluation.

Time frame: 6 months

Population: Study was terminated early. Esophageal samples were not collected and therefore there was no esophageal pH results to report.

Secondary

Esophageal pH Levels

All patients will have pH monitoring conducted at baseline pre-procedurally. The number of patients with abnormal pH levels will be tabulated. Bravo capsule monitoring will be used for evaluation.

Time frame: Baseline

Population: Esophageal samples were not collected and therefore there was no esophageal pH results to report.

Secondary

Gastric Emptying Study

A Gastric emptying study will be conducted for all patients at 1, 2, 3, and 4 hours. Patients with severe gastroparesis (\>50% retention at 4 hours) will be excluded from study

Time frame: Baseline (up to 4 hours)

Population: Study was terminated early and the gastric emptying study was not collected. As such, there were no related gastric emptying data to aggregate and report.

Secondary

Use of Anti-reflux Medication

The number of patients using anti-reflux medications will be tabulated.

Time frame: Baseline

Population: Study was terminated early and data related to the use of anti-reflux medications was not collected. As such, there were no related anti-reflux medication data to aggregate and report.

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026