Skip to content

Norwegian Cartilage Project - Microfracture

Focal Cartilage Defects in the Knee - A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Arthroscopic Microfracture With Arthroscopic Debridement

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02637505
Enrollment
66
Registered
2015-12-22
Start date
2016-01-31
Completion date
2024-12-31
Last updated
2025-01-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cartilage Injury, Knee Injury

Keywords

Articular cartilage, Focal cartilage injury, Focal cartilage injury in the knee, Knee cartilage, Microfracture, Debridement

Brief summary

114 patients between 18 and 50 years with an isolated focal cartilage defect in the knee will be randomized to either receive arthroscopic microfracture or arthroscopic debridement. Both groups will then undergo a systematic physiotherapy training regime for 6-9 months. The groups will then be compared for results, after 3, 6, 12 and 24 months, by using validated patient reported outcome scores (Lysholm, KOOS, Tegner) and EQ5D as well as clinical examination and radiological findings at 2 years (MRI).

Detailed description

Focal cartilage defects in the knee - A randomized controlled trial comparing arthroscopic microfracture with arthroscopic debridement. Clinical compare the effect of arthroscopic microfracture (MF) with arthroscopic debridement (AD) in patients with symptomatic full thickness knee cartilage injuries less than 2cm2. Focal cartilage injuries in the knee might have devastating effect both in the short term and in the long term. Various surgical treatment options are available, with microfracture the most used technique globally. Meta-analysis and systematic reviews have required well-designed, long-term, multicenter studies to evaluate clinical outcomes of microfracture with the use of a no treatment group as a control group. H0: There is no difference in KOOS QoL after AM or AD 24 months after surgery. H1: There is a difference in KOOS QoL after AM or AD 24 months after surgery. Questionnaires: KOOS, Tegner score, Lysholm score, EQ-5D, VAS. Physical examination: range of motion and hop test. Radiology: x-ray and MRI of the knee. Primary aim: KOOS quality of life (QoL) subscore. Prospective, double-blinded parallel-group multicenter study with 2 treatment arms. Approx. 24 months inclusion and 24 months follow up. In total 4 years. All will be invited to participate in late controls after 5 and 10 years. 6 Norwegian hospitals: Akershus University Hospital, Oslo University Hospital - Ullevaal, Kristiansund Hospital, Aalesund Hospital, Diakonhjemmet Hospital and Haukeland University Hospital. 114 patients Inclusion: age 18-50 years old, single symptomatic cartilage defect on femoral condyle or trochlea. 2 treatment groups with 57 patients in each group. Follow up after 3 months (± 2 weeks), 6 months (± 4 weeks), 12 months (± 6 weeks) and 24 months (± 8 weeks). All will be invited to participate in late controls after 5 and 10 years. If any unforeseen complication outside normal clinical practice occurs, the sponsor representative will be contacted as soon as possible with a parallel message to the local coordinators at the involved hospitals. During each follow up, there will be a case report form (CRF) regarding complications and safety. A 5 mL venous blood sample will be drawn on the day of operation. The blood sample will be centrifuged before serum is pipetted in a sterile tube. The serum will be analyzed at Oslo University Hospital - Rikshospitalet on the cartilage biomarker microRNA-140 (miR-140). If normal distribution, aims will be analyzed using linear mixed models (LMM), and the primary aim will be performed as a post hoc test for the LMM, similar to performing a two-sample t-test. If no normal distribution, analysis will be performed using Mann-Whitney U-test. Detecting a difference of 10 with 80 percent Power, uing a standard deviation of 18, this yields 52 patients in each group. By adding 10% due to loss during follow-up, we therefore plan to include a total of 114 patients. No interim analysis will be done. Monitor from Health Møre and Romsdal HF. The end of this study is 24 months after the last included patient.

Interventions

PROCEDUREArthroscopic microfracture (MF)

Arthroscopy With microfracture procedure

PROCEDUREArthroscopic debridement (AD)

Arthroscopy With debridement procedure

Sponsors

Kristiansund Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Alesund Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Haukeland University Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Diakonhjemmet Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Oslo University Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Haraldsplass Deaconess Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
University Hospital, Akershus
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 50 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Single symptomatic lesion of the trochlea, medial or lateral femoral condyle of the knee less than 2 cm2 * Cartilage lesion ICRS grade 3 or 4 * More than 50 % of the menisci intact * Ligamentous stable knee * Lysholm Score \< 75 * Acceptable range of motion (5-105 degrees)

Exclusion criteria

* Osteoarthritis * Malalignment \> 5 degrees measured clinically, and if uncertainty on HKA radiographs * Systemic arthritis * Previous cartilage surgery except OCD fixation * Obesity BMI \> 30 * Serious drig or alcohol abuse * Inability to answer questionnaires or partake in rehabilitation * Comorbidity that may influence surgery or rehabilitation * Pregnancy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Quality of Life24 months follow upThe KOOS is a validated patient oriented outcome measure validated to use in cartilage Research. It assesses five domains, and the Fifth domain (knee related quality of life) will be the primary endpoint in this study. The primary aim is where the primary aim is the difference in KOOS QoL subscore in the AM group compared to the AD group at 24 months follow up. It is not planned any interim analysis before 24 months follow up.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Tegner Score24 months follow upA validated knee-score to assess the level of physical Activity.
Lysholm Knee Score24 months follow upA condition specific knee score that assesses 8 domains: limp, locking, swelling, pain, stair climbing, use of support, instability and squatting.
EQ5D24 months follow upA generic measure of health status that produces a simple descriptive profile of Health status used in clinical evaluation of Health care.
The Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Other domains24 months follow upThe other four domains of the KOOS score (pain, symptoms, Activity of daily living, sport and recreational function) will act as secondary endpoints
Range of motion24 months follow upClinical evaluation of the joint range of motion
Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) of the cartilage defect24 months follow upA radiographic evaluation (MRI) of the cartilage injury at 2 years, to evaluate which patients have adequate cartilage quality 2 years after surgery. The MRI will be taken with a cartilage specific protocol.
A Hop test24 months follow upClinical evaluation of the knees agility, validated in knee sport medicine Research.
Visual Analog Scale24 months follow upA visual analogue scale for pain, where 0 represents no pain and 10 represents the worst pain imaginable.

Countries

Norway

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 12, 2026